ENGINEERING REPORT Sewage Treatment System



Similar documents
WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

COURSE # 343 UNIT # 1: ADVANTEX WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. What you will learn in this lesson. Introduction to the listing

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

Example Calculations Evaluation for Fine Bubble Aeration System. Red Valve Company, Inc. 700 NORTH BELL AVENUE CARNEGIE, PA

Overview of Best Available Technologies for Onsite Septic Systems and Management Considerations Presentation to NAHB

TREATMENT OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW

Lance DeClue, REHS Environmental Health Specialist II County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

Glossary of Wastewater Terms

THE NEW NSF 350 AND 350-1

Case Study of an Advanced On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Connected to a Single-Family Residence

Operation and Maintenance of Onsite Waster Systems in Maryland. A growing challenge for the industry and regulators

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

A Guide to Specifying Reed Beds and Constructed Wetland Systems

Natural and Advanced Treatment Systems for Wastewater Management at Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site in Developing Countries

COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

Guidance on applying for approval of installation of a commercial onsite wastewater system

Georgia Department of Public Health. Georgia Onsite Sewage Management Systems. Background and Use of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Georgia

E nv i ro n m e nta l. Biotec 5-7. Sustainable, Reliable, Affordable

Practice Tests Answer Keys

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

ADVANCED LAGOON TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

Minnesota. BMI Project No. M

An Algae Based Treatment System Provides A Truly Sustainable Treatment Solution For Small & Seasonal Wastewater Treatment Plants

SEPTIC TANKS FOR THE COLLECTION & SETTLEMENT OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE

1.85 WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 20, 2005

Alberta Environment Standards for Advanced Waste Systems

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

SMALL COMMUNITY TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION WHILE IN OPERATION USING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Floating Treatment Wetland Technology: Nutrient Removal from Wastewater

Small Wastewater Treatment Systems

Nutrient removal from wastewater by wetland systems

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Unit 1. Physical, chemical and biological Characteristics of Wastewater

Advanced Wastewater Treatment Process

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

Alberta Onsite Wastewater Management Association Installer Training Program

STORMWATER MONITORING: POLLUTANTS, SOURCES, AND SOLUTIONS

Saudi Aramco Project Development

CONTENT COPY OF ORIGINAL

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

TALLINN WATER TREATMENT AND SEWERAGE Tuuli Myllymaa

Onsite Wastewater Concepts, Materials, Regulations & The Application Process Part I

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Treatment Plant of Sakhnin City in Israel by Using Advanced Technologies

Membrane Bioreactor Performance Compared to Conventional Wastewater Treatment

MODELING WASTEWATER AERATION SYSTEMS TO DISCOVER ENERGY SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES By Steven A. Bolles Process Energy Services, LLC

City of Charlottetown Wastewater Treatment Expansion & Upgrading

THE MARSHALL STREET ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (CLEARWATER, FLORIDA) CONVERSION TO 4-STAGE BARDENPHO TO IMPROVE BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN REMOVAL

Oasis Clearwater ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERS

PERC-RITE DRIP DISPERSAL DESIGN GUIDE FOR SEPTIC TANK OR ADVANCED TREATMENT EFFLUENT MAINE

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Northport/Leelanau Township Wastewater Treatment Facility

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. SKT: bah. Public Notice Beginning Date: April 9, Public Notice Ending Date: May 9, 2014

Treatment and longevity in Norwegian soil treatment units

Alternative Options to Large Scales of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facilities Management in Thailand

Public Health (Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal) Regulations 2014

INTRODUCTION. AEROBIC TREATMENT UNITS (ATUs)

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Location of the system. Percolation tests for drainage fields. Cesspool sizing. Suggested Information notices

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT AND UTILITY PLAN NEW WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY TOWN OF MEAD FOR A FOR THE

FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT WA CITY OF POMEROY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Wastewater Treatment in Kathmandu, Nepal

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Report prepared by: Kelly Hagan and Mark Anderson Grand River Conservation Authority 400 Clyde Road Cambridge ON N1R 5W6

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

LIMNOLOGY, WATER QUALITY

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

City of Lakeland s Wetlands Treatment System An Overview

DOMESTIC WASTEWATER SYSTEMS

Canada-wide Strategy for the Management of Municipal Wastewater Effluent

SECTION 6 EXISTING WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

DANISH GUIDELINES FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SYSTEMS Hans Brix

Guidelines for Remodeling and Additions with Respect to On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems

Permeable Pavement Treatment Capacity

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Page 1 Chapter 285- On-Site Sewage Facilities

APPLICATION OF NATURAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS FOR WASTEWATER POLLUTION CONTROL IN THE EXPANSION AREA OF CALI, COLOMBIA

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Holistic Aeration and Chemical Optimization Saves Big Money from 1 MGD to 600 MGD. Trevor Ghylin, PE PhD

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELING TOOLS AT A WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SITE IN NAM DINH, VIETNAM

St. John s Harbour Clean-Up Phase 2. Project Description

( ) ABC Formula/Conversion Table for Wastewater Treatment, Industrial, Collection and Laboratory Exams. Alkalinity, as mg CaCO 3 /L =

aquateam Aquateam - Norwegian Water Technology Centre A/S Report no: Project no: O Project manager: Dr. Bjørn Rusten.

Planning, Designing, Monitoring and Inspection of Wastewater Treatment Systems of Industries

STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION

Improving on-site domestic wastewater treatment systems - West Coast Lagoons Project

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. IL TTL. Public Notice Beginning Date: June 15, Public Notice Ending Date: July 16, 2012

On-site Treatmentt for Domestic Wastewater in Thailand Suwanna. K. Boontanon Mahidol Univ. 2

Septic System Owner s Manual

City of East Lansing CSO Control Facility Evaluation Demonstrative Approach to Meet WQS

BIODISC HIGH PERFORMANCE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT FOR DOMESTIC APPLICATIONS

Transcription:

CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 7A Barbados Avenue, Kingston 5, Jamaica, Tele: (876) 754-2154/5 Fax: (876) 754-2156 E-mail: mail@fcsconsultants.com GORE FLORENCE HALL DEVELOPMENT FCS # 0827/76/C ENGINEERING REPORT Sewage Treatment System Prepared for: GORE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED 2C BRAEMAR KINGSTON 10 NOVEMBER 2008

Overview This engineering report describes the sewerage treatment designs for the 866 two bedroom house development at Florence Hall Trelawny. Sewerage Treatment Design Design References The sewage treatment design was prepared with reference to the developers manual Volume 3 Section 4 Minimum Requirements for Waste Water Treatment Systems and Excreta Management in Jamaica provided by the Ministry of Health& Environment Environmental Health Unit; and EPA Technology Assessment: Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment - EPA/832-R-93-008. Design Criteria The basic criteria used in the design is that influent to the treatment plant is typical of medium strength domestic sewage. The treatment plant effluent will meet NEPA 2004 standards for direct discharge. Table 1: Sewage Treatment Plant Wastewater Characteristics Parameter Units Influent Effluent COD mg/l 500 100 BOD mg/l 250 20 TSS mg/l 220 20 TKN mg/l 40 10 P mg/l 8 4 FC MPN/100ml 10 7-10 8 200 Sewage Treatment Plant Components The sewage treatment plant consists of the following components: 1. Grit removal chamber 2. Septic tank 3. Distribution box 4. Reed beds with Bulrush (Scirpus) 5. Chlorination chamber 1

The size of each component is shown in the table below. Table 2: Sewage Treatment Plant Components Florence Hall Sewage Treatment Plant Septic Tank, Reed Bed and Chlorination Chamber Qty Unit 1 Headworks including screen and grit removal structure 2 Hydraulic retention time for Septic Tanks 1.5 Days 3 Septic Tank capacity 1,447.98 m 3 /d 4 Number of septic tank trains 6 No. 5 Capacity of each tank 245 m 3 /d 6 Dimensions of each Tank, Depth 3 m 7 Width 5 m 8 Length 16.6 m 9 Volume of each tank 249 m 3 10 Total septic volume 1,494 m 3 11 Effluent from septic tank flows into a distribution box that spreads flow into three reed beds 12 Reed bed loading 90 L/m 2 13 Reed bed size 10,725.75 m 2 14 Reed bed depth 0.7 m 15 Voids in bed 0.5 16 Number of reed bed trains 3 17 Area of each bed 3,575.25 m 2 18 Length 120 m 19 Width 30 m 20 L/W 5 # 21 Total Reed bed area 10,800 m 2 22 Reed bed setback 20 m 23 Contact Chlorine chamber HRT 25 min 24 Volume required 25.14 m 3 25 D 0.9 m 26 W 2 m 27 L 14 m 28 Discharge into wetland 2

Biochemical Processes Florence Hall Engineering Report Sewage Treatment The septic tanks will have a hydraulic retention time of 1.5 days; during which the COD and BOD will be reduced to 300 and 150 mg/l respectively. The septic tanks will also remove the majority of the TSS and fecal coli form by about 1 log. Table 3: Reed Bed Waste Water Influent Parameter Units Influent Effluent COD mg/l 300 <100 BOD mg/l 150 20 TSS mg/l 100 20 TKN mg/l 40 10 P mg/l 8 4 FC MPN/100ml 1.9x10 6 1.9x10 4 The reed bed is designed to have a minimum hydraulic retention time of 5.8 days. A hydraulic retention time of 2.8 days is required to reduce the oxygen demand to NEPA standards. The BOD removal follows the 1 st order plug flow reaction L t =Le -kt where L t is the concentration of BOD at any time. The reaction constant k T = k 20 Ө (T-20) where k 20 = Rate Constant at 20 o C k 20 = = 1.104 Ө = 1.06 The average temperature for this site is 27 degrees Celsius. COD removal is at the same rate as BOD removal and COD is generally twice the BOD concentration. 3

The TSS will be removed within the first few metres of the reed bed (EPA/832- R-93-008). The nitrogen entering wetland systems can be measured as organic nitrogen and ammonia (expressed as TKN), or as nitrate, or a combination of both nitrogen measurements. The organic N entering a reed bed is typically associated with particulate matter such as organic wastewater solids. Decomposition and mineralization processes in the wetland will convert a significant part of this organic N to ammonia (EPA/832-R-93-008). Nitrogen removal by wetland plants ranges from 0.2 to 2.25 g/m 2 /day. In order to achieve required total nitrogen concentration of 10 mg/l; an additional 3 days of retention time is necessary for reduction by plant uptake. Phosphorous removal by wetland plants ranges from 0.05 to 0.5 g/m 2 /day. Using an average of 0.25/m 2 /day, the phosphorous will be below acceptable levels within the 5.8 days of retention. Phosphorous reduction will occur via plant uptake and sedimentation of PO4. Fecal coliform levels are expected to have a 2 log reduction in 5.8 days. Chlorination for 25 minutes in a contact chamber will reduce FC to acceptable levels. Discharge from the chlorination chamber will be to a wetland north of the North Coast Highway. Constructions details are included in the enclosed drawings. Prepared By Ivan Foreman, PEng. Director 4

APPENDIX

Project: Project No. Proposed residential development 0827/76/C WETLAND DESIGN Input Data: Design Flow Rate,Q: 252549 GPD ( 33760.84 ) ft. 3 ( 955.644 ) m 3 Req'd BOD 5 Removal (%): 85 Depth of Wetland, d: 3 ft Type of soil in wetland: Medium Gravel Gradation of particles: 35mm - 75mm Porosity of gravel/stones, n: 40 % Slope of bottom of wetland: 0.4 % Calculate Temperature Dependent Rate Constant Enter Avg. Temperature of location: 27 o K T = Rate Constant at Temperature T = K 20 Ө (T-20) where K 20 = Rate Constant at 20 o C = 1.104 Ө = 1.06 K T = 1.104 = 1.66 x (1.06) 7 Calculate Area of Reed Bed required for BOD removal A = Q [ln(c o /C e ) K T dn where C o = Influent BOD 5 (150mg/l) C e = Effluent BOD 5 (<20mg/l) so C o /C e = Ratio of Influent: Effluent = 150 (100 - % Reduction) = 6.67 Area = [ 33760.84 x ln ( 6.67 ) ] [ 1.66 x 3 x 0.4 ] = 32152.64 sq. ft 6

Calculate Hydraulic Retention Time Required for BOD Removal From the equation : C e /C o = e (KTt) Hydraulic retention time, t = [ln(c e /C o )] K T = 2.77 days Calculate Area of Reed Bed required for Nitrogen removal Nitrogen Removal Obtained in First 2.77 days = 29 % Additional % Nitrogen Removal Req'd: 31 % Specify Plant Type: Bulrush (Scirpus) Oxygen available = depth x available oxygen per unit vol. for specified plant = 0.91 m x 7.5 gm/m 3 /d = 6.86 gm/m 2 /d Assume 5mg/L of oxygen to react with 1mg of Ammonia to form Nitrate Assume 100mg/L BOD influent and apply % reduction above Therefore, Use NH influent as 15 mg/l Oxygen Required = 5 x Q x (Nitrogen to be removed) = 5 x 955.644 m 3 /d x 4.65 mg/l = 22219 gm/d Area Required = Oxygen required/oxygen Available = 3240 m 2 ( 34860.505 ) sq.ft Calculate Total Area and Retention time TOTAL AREA REQUIRED = 32152.64 + #### = 67013.1 sq.ft Using a 2:1 Length to Width ratio, Dimensions are: Length = 366.10 ft Width = 183.05 ft Depth = 3 ft = 111.59 m = 55.79 m = 0.91 m Total HRT = 2.77 + 3.00 = 5.8 days References: - EPA Technology Assessment: Subsurface Flow - Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment - EPA/832-R-93-008 7