Risk-Estimate Distances



Similar documents
Product sheet 8 p - Carl-Gustaf - eng - v. 3 sep 14

APPENDIX R- Aerial Use of DU During the Gulf War

Presentation of the BOFORS 3P and System Concept. BOFORS 40/57 mm 3P. - Remotely Controlled Turret System. - Bushmaster IV integration

Article from Schweizer Soldat. LASSO: simple but ingenious

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS OFFICER CANDIDATES SCHOOL TRAINING COMMAND 2189 ELROD AVENUE QUANTICO, VA

STATEMENT OF WORK AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS STATEMENT OF WORK

Marine Rifle Squad U.S. Marine Corps

APPENDIX L. TARGETING, SYMBOLOGY, AND SCHEDULING

The Swedish Squad Support Weapon Program

Joint Theater Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline

Projectile Motion 1:Horizontally Launched Projectiles

Abrams Tank Systems. Lessons Learned Operation Iraqi Freedom 2003

Variable Damage Effects in Naval Wargames

Torpedo: A Historical Review. Admiralty Trilogy Seminar! Presented by:! Clash of Arms Games

120mm Mid Range Munition (MRM) ARDEC S&T Effort

AIRCRAFT LOADING AND UNLOADING PROCEDURES

Ship Security Bridge Vulnerability Study To determine the effects of weapons fired at the bridge of tankers and to recommend effective ship hardening

AMAS Mine/ERW Clearance Marking System. Third Edition April 2011

STATEMENT BY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Military Reliability Modeling William P. Fox, Steven B. Horton

TOW WEAPON SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Any Warfighter Anywhere All the Time

Measurement of Charge-to-Mass (e/m) Ratio for the Electron

Product Manager Guided Precision. Munitions and Mortar Systems (PM

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS OFFICER CANDIDATES SCHOOL TRAINING COMMAND 2189 ELROD AVENUE QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

MACHINE GUN EMPLOYMENT B3N4478 STUDENT HANDOUT

Marine Corps Tank Employment MCWP 3-12 (CD) Appendix F. Scout and TOW Platoons

Despicable Me Minions vs Evil Minions

Section 4: The Basics of Satellite Orbits

Version 1.3 Last Updated June 20 th 2014

Command & Colors: Ancients. Game Design by. Richard Borg. 3rd Edition GMT Games, LLC

3.10 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY

PEO MS OVERVIEW Tactical Missile Conference 2009

The Army Universal Task List

UDENRIGSMINISTERIET, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF DENMARK TECHNICAL MODERNISATION PLAN OF THE POLISH ARMED FORCES

1.3. DOT PRODUCT If θ is the angle (between 0 and π) between two non-zero vectors u and v,

ARMA 3 (Alpha) Field Guide

Security Issues with the Military Use of Cellular Technology Brad Long, Director of Engineering, IFONE, Inc.

RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION AFTER BEFORE

Mr. Patrick Carley. Ground Combatant Systems Lethality, Visual Augmentation, Weapons, Ammunition UNCLASSIFIED

Fast Play Napoleonic Wargame Rules 1.1 by Jon Linney

Curragh History Archives

Performance. 13. Climbing Flight

This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online ( and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at

The future of range instrumentation.

circular motion & gravitation physics 111N

Common Battle Drills for all Infantry Units

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF ENHANCED AIR INSERTION OF THE BCT, SUCH AS BY VERTICAL ENVELOPMENT?

Physical Security and Stockpile Management (PSSM)

The Nuclear Weapons Debate

Zeltbahn tents and shelters

Department of the Army Pamphlet Safety. Range Safety. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 16 April 2014 UNCLASSIFIED

WELCOME TO PAYDAY 2 CRIME.NET

BUILDING DESIGN FOR HOMELAND SECURITY. Unit I Building Design for Homeland Security

I. Introduction. II. The Parties

DEFENCE FORCE REMUNERATION TRIBUNAL

Readings this week. 1 Parametric Equations Supplement. 2 Section Sections Professor Christopher Hoffman Math 124

Mission Assurance and Systems Engineering

Export Controls: What are they? Why do we care?

TGF. The Grunt Factor. Rules. By Dansk Figurspilsforening

PACIFIC FLEET. Paul Sincock Ph.D. (Design & Programming) Nils Dücker (Art)

Technical Training School Locations

Department of Defense MANUAL

RA The Air Launched Weapon Release Certificate

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles:

CLASS U - MILITARY SCIENCE

EN AVANT! EN MASSE! Game Control Rules August 2008

Reasons for U.S. Involvement in War

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs): An Introduction 1 Adrian Wilkinson, James Bevan, and Ian Biddle

COMBAT ORDERS FOUNDATIONS B2B2377 STUDENT HANDOUT

Attachment 3: 1977 Department of Defense 3-Digit Enlisted Occupational Classification System

THE DYSTOPIAN WARS RULES ERRATA PAGE Last updated on June 17 th 2011

Prepared for tomorrow s challenges with your global full service partner

New Inspection Systems Based on the Registration of the Backscattered X-rays

Lab 8: Ballistic Pendulum

Theme: The Growing Role of Private Security Companies in Protecting the Homeland.

The Acid Digestion Process (ADP) for Disposal of Sea Dumped Munitions

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

IAI/Malat Solutions for the Maritime Arena

Motion of Charges in Combined Electric and Magnetic Fields; Measurement of the Ratio of the Electron Charge to the Electron Mass

New England Defense Contracting Trends

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Joint Targeting Cycle and Collateral Damage Estimation Methodology (CDM)

TECHNICAL MANUAL PROCEDURES FOR THE DESTRUCTION LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT ENEMY USE

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL

WarBirds Quickstart Guide

The Direct Attack on Direct Attack (Paperback)

CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS

What is the difference between sensation and. Perception:

The Export Control Lists of the European Union

December Under fire. Israel s artillery policies scrutinised

3500 Pts - Space Marines - Vulkan Apoc 3,500

Transcription:

Appendix F Risk-Estimate Distances Risk-estimate distances allow commanders to estimate the risk in terms of percent of friendly casualties that may result from an air attack against the enemy. Risk-estimate distances are based on fragmentation patterns. Risk-estimate distances are for combat use and are not minimum safe distances for peacetime training. See the FMFM 5-2 series of Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manuals (JMEMs) and appropriate Service or command guidance for peacetime restrictions. Computations All attacks are parallel to the FLOT. Distances are computed from the intended impact point of the center of a stick of bombs or a pod of rockets. Deflection distance (from the aiming point toward friendly troops) is built into the risk-estimate distance. The deflection distance equals the distance from the aircraft centerline to the farthest outboard station plus the lateral distance that a weapon travels because of rack-ejection velocity. Relationships Between Weapon Impact and Point of Intersection For all determinations in table F-1 (p. F-4), the position of a prone man was assumed to be on a line perpendicular to the line of flight (or line of weapon impacts) at the midpoint of the line (stick) of weapons. For all sticks of weapons, a weapon was assumed to impact at the point of intersection of these two lines. Thus, for the

F - 2 MCWP 3-23.1 weapons evaluated, the following relationships between weapon impact and the point of intersection were assumed: GP bombs. The center bomb of the stick impacts at the point of the intersection. Rockets. The center rocket impacts at the point of intersection for an odd number of rockets (e.g., four of seven). The midpoint between the impacts of the center two rockets for an even number of rockets (e.g., rockets two and three of four) is at the point of intersection. Cluster weapons. The center of the pattern created by the middle CBU is located at the point of intersection. Guns.The middle round of a single strafe impacts at the point of intersection. Maverick. Single-weapon delivery impacting at point of intersection. Weapon Reliability and Delivery Parameters A weapon reliability of 1.0 was used for all weapons evaluated and shown in table F-1. Delivery parameters and considerations for specific weapons are in MCRP 5-6.3.7, Risk Estimates for Friendly Troops (C). Casualty Criterion The casualty criterion is the 5-minute assault criterion for a prone soldier in winter clothing and helmet. Physical incapacitation means

Close Air Support F - 3 that a soldier is physically unable to function in an assault within a 5-minute period after an attack. A probability of incapacitation (PI) value of less than 0.1% can be interpreted as being less than or equal to one chance in one thousand. Warning: Risk-estimate distances do not represent the maximum fragmentation envelopes of the weapons listed. Troops in Contact Unless the ground commander determines otherwise, the terminal controller should regard friendlies within 1 kilometer of targets as a troops in contact situation and should advise the ground commander accordingly. However, friendlies outside of 1 kilometer may still be subject to weapon effects. Terminal controllers and aircrews must carefully weigh the choice of ordnance and delivery profile in relation to the risk of fratricide. The ground commander must accept responsibility for the risk to friendly forces when targets are inside the 0.1% PI distance. When ground commanders pass their initials to terminal controllers, they accept the risk inherent in ordnance delivery inside the 0.1% PI distance. Ordnance delivery inside 0.1% PI distances will be considered as danger close. Warning: Risk-estimate distances are for combat use and are not minimum safe distances for peacetime training. See JMEMS and appropriate Service

F - 4 MCWP 3-23.1 or command guidance for peacetime restrictions. Item Description Risk-Estimate Distance (meters) 10% PI 0.1% PI Mk-82 LD 500-lb bomb 250 425 Mk-82 HD 500-lb bomb (retarded) 100 375 Mk-82 LGB 500-lb bomb (guided bomb unit (GBU)-12) 250 1 425 1 Mk-83 HD 1,000-lb bomb 275 475 Mk-83 LD 1,000-lb bomb 275 475 Mk-83 LGB 1,000-lb bomb (GBU-16) 275 1 475 1 Mk-84 HD/LD 2,000-lb bomb 325 500 Mk-84 LGB 2,000-lb bomb (GBU- 10/24) 225 1 500 1 Mk-20 2 Rockeye 150 225 Mk-77 500 lb napalm 100 150 CBU-55/77 2 Fuel-air explosive (FAE) 1 1 CBU-58/71 2,3 CBU (all types) 350 525 CBU-87 2 CBU (all types) 175 275 CBU-89/78 3 CBU (all types) 175 275 2.75" foldingfin aircraft rocket (FFAR) Rocket with various warheads 5" ZUNI Rocket with various warheads 160 200 150 200 SUU-11 7.62-mm minigun 1 1 GAU-12 25-mm gun 100 150 Figure F-1. Risk-Estimate Distance.

Close Air Support F - 5 or command guidance for peacetime restrictions. Item M-4, M-12, SUU-23, M-61 Description Risk-Estimate Distance (meters) 10% PI 0.1% PI 20-mm Gatling gun 100 150 GPU-5A, GAU-8 30-mm Gatling gun 100 150 AGM-65 5 Mk-1/Mk-21 Mk-5/Mk-23 AC-130 Maverick (TV-, IIR-, laser- guided) Walleye II (1,000-lb TVguided bomb) Walleye II (2,400-lb TVguided bomb) 105-mm cannon 40-/25-/20-mm gun 25 100 275 500 1 1 80 4 35 200 4 125 1 Risk-estimate distances are to be determined. For LGBs, the values shown are for weapons that do not guide and that follow a ballistic trajectory similar to general-purpose bombs. This does not apply to GBU-24 bombs, because GBU-24s do not follow a ballistic trajectory. 2 Not recommended for use near troops in contact. 3 CBU-71/CBU-84 bombs contain time-delay fuzes that detonate at random times after impact. CBU-89 bombs are antitank and antipersonnel mines and are not recommended for use near troops in contact. 4 AC-130 estimates are based on worst-case scenarios. The 105-mm round described is the M-1 high-explosive (HE) round with the M-732 proximity fuze. Other fuzing would result in smaller distances. These figures are accurate throughout the firing orbit. The use of no-fire headings has no benefits for reducing risk-estimate distances and should not be used in contingency situations. 5 The data listed applies only to AGM-65 A, B, C, and D models. AGM-65 E and G models contain a larger warhead, and risk-estimate distances are not currently available. Figure F-1. Risk-Estimate Distance (continued).