Risk & Capital Management under Basel III



Similar documents
Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Basel III: The Net Stable Funding Ratio. Issued for comment by 11 April 2014

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Net Stable Funding Ratio disclosure standards

Information on Capital Structure, Liquidity and Leverage Ratios as per Basel III Framework. as at March 31, 2015 PUBLIC

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III framework for liquidity - Frequently asked questions

Regulatory Practice Letter November 2014 RPL 14-20

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: the net stable funding ratio

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Net Stable Funding Ratio

Prudential Standard APS 210 Liquidity

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Net Stable Funding Ratio disclosure standards. Issued for comment by 6 March 2015

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools

Information on Capital Structure, Liquidity Coverage and Leverage Ratios as per Basel-III Framework as at March 31, 2016

Basel 3: A new perspective on portfolio risk management. Tamar JOULIA-PARIS October 2011

The challenge of liquidity and collateral management in the new regulatory landscape

18,343 18,308 3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves)

Press release Press enquiries:

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring. February 2013 BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS

Basel III: Liquidity Rules

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently Asked Questions on Basel III s January 2013 Liquidity Coverage Ratio framework

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked. monitoring

U.S. regulatory capital: Basel III liquidity coverage ratio final rule

Bank Capital Adequacy under Basel III

REMARKS ON THE BASEL CAPITAL FRAMEWORK AND TRADE FINANCE, 27 FEBRUARY 2014 SESSION 4. Mr. Andrew CORNFORD Research Fellow Financial Markets Center

Securitization Perspectives: Final U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio. September 10, 2014

Liquidity Coverage Ratio: A Quick Reference. February 2015

Prudential Standard APS 210 Liquidity

MINIMUM LIQUID ASSETS ( MLA ) AND LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO ( LCR )

Glossary & Definitions

Regulatory Capital Disclosures

FS Regulatory Brief. Basel III liquidity regime More practical but not yet workable. January Key LCR changes

Basel III Pillar 3 and Leverage Ratio disclosures of ALTERNA BANK

Definition of Capital

Consultation Paper: Implementation of Basel III capital adequacy requirements in New Zealand

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Basel III Pillar 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISK DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014

NATIONAL BANK OF ROMANIA

TD Bank Financial Group Q4/08 Guide to Basel II

Liquidity Stress Testing

U.S. Basel III: Guide for Community Banks

Prof Kevin Davis Melbourne Centre for Financial Studies. Managing Liquidity Risks. Session 5.1. Training Program ~ 8 12 December 2008 SHANGHAI, CHINA

TD Bank Financial Group Q1/08 Guide to Basel II

ICAAP Report Q2 2015

US Bank Regulators Propose Net Stable Funding Ratio Rule to Enhance Financial System Resiliency

MORGAN STANLEY ASIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED. Interim Financial Disclosure Statements

Standard Chartered Bank (Thai) PCL & its Financial Business Group Pillar 3 Disclosures 30 June 2015

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure

GE Capital Finance Australia APS 330: Public Disclosure of Prudential Information December 2013 (AUD $ million)

Bank of Queensland Limited

BASEL III PILLAR 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2015

Impact assessment of the new liquidity rules on Luxembourg banks

Figures 4. Tables 4. Abbreviations 5. 1 Introduction 6. 2 Definition of capital and capital buffers New definition of capital 14

The $500 Million Question. Proactive Planning for Consolidated Capital Requirements. By: Lowell W. Harrison and Derek W. McGee

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

CRD IV CRR / Basel III monitoring exercise

First Quarter Report January 31, 2015

DNB Liquidity Pillar 2 Supervision. Seminar Das neue SREP Konzept der Aufsicht Clemens Bonner (c.bonner@dnb.nl)

NOVEMBER 2010 (REVISED)

Impact of Basel III Liquidity Requirements on the Payments Industry

MORGAN STANLEY Financial Supplement - 4Q 2015 Table of Contents

Economic Commentaries

Comments on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s Consultative Document: Supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures

Quarterly Financial Supplement - 1Q 2016

Market Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring

Client Update Basel Committee Adopts Net Stable Funding Ratio: How Much Liquidity Is Enough?

Basel III: The Net Stable Funding Ratio

FR Y-14 Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions

Rogers Bank Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures

Basel III Liquidity Standards: The Implications for Credit Union Investments

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems

Basel III: Issues and implications. kpmg.com

MODULE 1. Guidance to completing the Standardised Approach to Credit Risk module of BSL/2

Note: The agencies revised this guide on July 18, 2013, to correct an error on page 8, Table 4, Comparison of Risk Weights of the Current Rule with

Main differences between the financial consolidation method and the regulatory consolidation method, considering regulatory adjustments

FOREX Bank AB. Annual information about capital adequacy and risk management 1

Disclosure 17 OffV (Credit Risk Mitigation Techniques)

Basel II. Tamer Bakiciol Nicolas Cojocaru-Durand Dongxu Lu

CANADIAN TIRE BANK. BASEL PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES December 31, 2014 (unaudited)

DG FISMA CONSULTATION PAPER ON FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSFR IN THE EU

Transcription:

www.pwc.com Risk & Capital Management under Basel III London, 15 Draft

Agenda Basel III changes to capital rules - Definition of capital - Minimum capital ratios - Leverage ratio - Buffer requirements - Systemically important financial institutions Basel III the liquidity proposals - Liquidity coverage ratio - Net stable funding ratio Slide 2

The new elements Areas Capital Ratios and Targets Capital definition Main Basel III Components Countercyclical Buffers Leverage Ratio Minimum Capital Standards Systemic Risk RWA requirements Counterparty Credit Risk Trading Book and Securitization (Basel II.5 ) Liquidity Standards Liquidity Coverage Ratio Net Stable Funding Ratio Slide 3

The proposals in summary Tightening the capital requirements Raising the quality, consistency and transparency of the capital base through stricter rules on eligibility of instruments to be included in capital and introduction of a new core Tier 1 ratio, Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Enhancing risk coverage through strengthening counterparty credit risk capital requirements arising from derivatives, repurchase transactions and securities financing Supplementing risk-based capital requirements with a non-risk-based leverage ratio Reducing pro-cyclicality and promoting countercyclical capital buffers Introducing a global liquidity standard comprising a stressed liquidity coverage ratio and a longer-term structural liquidity ratio Addressing systemic risk and interconnectedness, with more specific proposals promised Slide 4

Changes to the capital adequacy framework Focus on Common Equity Core Tier 1 ratio as the key ratio Harmonised regulatory adjustments (deductions) to be made from Common Equity Tier 1 Greater detail of public disclosures Slide 5

Capital Definition Total regulatory capital will consist of the following elements: Tier 1 Capital Tier 2 Capital Total regulatory capital Common Equity Tier 1 Additional Tier 1 Capital Tier 3 Capital Tier 3 capital will be eliminated Slide 6

Capital Base Common Equity Tier 1 Tier 1 capital Additional Tier 1 capital Tier 2 capital Common shares that meet the criteria for classification as common shares for regulatory purposes Stock surplus (share premium) resulting from the issue of instruments included Common Equity Tier 1 Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income and other disclosed reserves Common shares issued by consolidated subsidiaries and held by third parties (i.e. minority interest) that meet the criteria for inclusion in Common Equity Tier 1 capital Regulatory adjustments applied in the calculation of Common Equity Tier 1 Instruments that meet the criteria for inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital (and are not included in Common Equity Tier 1) Stock surplus (share premium) resulting from the issue of instruments included in Additional Tier 1 capital Instruments issued by consolidated subsidiaries and held by third parties that meet the criteria for inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital and are not included in Common Equity Tier 1 Regulatory adjustments applied in the calculation of Additional Tier 1 Capital Instruments that meet the criteria for inclusion in Tier 2 capital (and are not included in Tier 1 Capital) Stock surplus (share premium) resulting from the issue of instruments included in Additional Tier 2 capital Instruments issued by consolidated subsidiaries and held by third parties that meet the criteria for inclusion in Tier 2 capital and are not included in Tier 1 capital Certain loan loss provisions Regulatory adjustments applied in the calculation of Tier 2 capital Slide 7

Capital Adjustments Deductions from Core Equity Tier 1 (general rule) Goodwill and intangibles (not new in EU) Deferred tax assets (limited recognition if due to timing differences) Shortfall of provisions over expected loss Defined benefit pension assets Investments in Core Equity Tier 1 instruments of banking, financial and insurance entities Other deductions Investments in other Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments of banking, financial and insurance entities Risk weighting of former deductions (1250%) Certain securitization exposures Non-payment/delivery on non-dvp and non-pvp transactions Significant investments in commercial entities Slide 8

Contingent capital In addition to the full criteria published in December 2010, all Additional Tier1 and Tier 2 capital instruments must have the following feature: They can be either converted to ordinary equity or written down, at the discretion of the relevant authority, at the earlier of, a) a decision by the authority that the firm requires this to remain viable, or b) the decision to make an injection of public sector funds to ensure the viability of the firm. Unless national law already allows this. All new instruments issued after 1 Jan 2013 must have the above feature to qualify Existing instruments which qualify under the old rules still qualify after that date BUT will be given a haircut, increasing by 10% p.a. after 1 Jan 2013 Slide 9

Capital Buffers Create buffers in good times that can absorb shocks in periods of stress In addition to the minimum capital requirements for Common Equity Tier 1, Tier1 and Total Capital, two types of buffers are introduced: Capital Conservation Buffer: Should be available to absorb banking sector losses conditional on a plausible severe stressed financial and economic environment Countercyclical Buffer: Extends capital conservation range during periods of excess credit growth or other indicators deemed appropriate by supervisors for their national contexts. Slide 10

Capital Conservation Buffer 2.5%- points added to the minimum ratios To be built up in good times and available in period of stress Inclusion in target capital ratios by end of transition period (2018) Restriction on distributions (dividends, share buy-backs and bonuses) if the full buffer requirement is not met Slide 11

Countercyclical Capital Buffer Up to 2.5%-points added to the minimum ratios Declared by any country which is experiencing overheated credit markets preannouncement of decision by up to 12 months Can be relaxed when the market cools down again takes effect immediately with announcement Restriction on distributions (dividends, share buy-backs and bonuses) if the buffer requirement is not met Slide 12

Countercyclical Capital Buffer Calculated as weighted average of buffers deployed across all jurisdictions where a firm has credit exposure Firm 60% assets in Country A 40% assets in Country B 2% 1% Countercyclical Capital Buffer (60% * 2%) + (40% * 1%) = 1.6% Slide 13

Capital Ratios (by 1/1/2018) Target Capital Ratios Common Equity (after deductions) Tier 1 capital Total capital Minimum 4.5% 6% 8% Capital conservation buffer 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% Minimum plus conservation buffer 7% 8.5% 10.5% Countercyclical capital buffer 0% - 2.5% 0% - 2.5% 0% - 2.5% Upper end of minimum capital 9.5% 11% 13% Slide 14

Capital Ratios Transitional arrangements From 1 January: 2011 2012 Min Common Equity Ratio 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% 2.5% Capital conservation buffer Min common equity + cap conservation buffer 3.5% Phase in of deductions from Common Equity 4.0% 4.5% 5.125% 5.75% 6.375% 7.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 100% Minimum Tier 1 4.0% 4.0% 4.5% 5.5% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% Minimum Total Capital 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% Min Total Capital + Capital Conservation buffer 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.625% 9.25% 9.875% 10.5% Capital instruments that no longer qualify as Tier 1 or Tier 2 Phased out over 10 year period starting 2013 Shading indicates transition periods Slide 15

Leverage Ratio Tier 1 Capital 3% Exposure A simple, non-risk based, backstop measure To be calculated as an average over the quarter Supervisory monitoring to start on 1 January 2011 Ratio to be tested during a parallel run period from 1 January 2013 to 1 January 2017 Final adjustments in first half of 2017 with a view to migrating to a Pillar I treatment in January 2018 Banks will be required to disclose beginning in January 2015 Slide 16

Leverage Ratio Capital measure (numerator) Tier 1 (i.e. Common Equity Tier 1 and Additional Tier 1) Exposure measure (denominator) On balance sheet exposures excluding derivatives, net of specific provisions and valuation adjustments No netting of collateral or other credit risk mitigants No netting of loans and deposits Securities Financing Transactions and repos can be netted under Basel II rules Derivatives converted to a loan equivalent value per Basel II rules (MTM plus add-on) Other off balance sheet items converted at 100% CCF, (except cancellable lines of credit, at 10%) Slide 17

Systemic Risk and Interconnectedness Policy options designed to reduce risks related to the failure of systematically relevant, cross-border institutions (SIFIs) Approaches to address systematically important financial institutions could include any of the following and/or combinations: Capital Surcharges The Swiss Finish Liquidity Surcharges Ban on business (eg. Volcker Rule in the US) In parallel, work-in-progress on Recovery and Resolution Regimes. Slide 18

The Basel III liquidity package Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) (introduced 2015) Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) (introduced 2018) Monitoring tools Observation period for LCR and NSFR starts in 2011 Slide 19

Liquidity Coverage Ratio 30-day liquidity coverage ratio designed to ensure short-term resilience to liquidity disruptions Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets Liquidity Coverage Ratio = Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days = Outflows Min [inflows; 75% of outflows Slide 20

LCR Stress Scenario Conditions The scenario for this standard entails a combined idiosyncratic (institution specific) and market-wide shock that would result in: The run off of a proportion of retail deposits A partial loss of unsecured wholesale funding capacity A partial loss of secured, short-term financing with certain collateral and counterparties Contractual outflows that would arise from a downgrade in the bank s public credit rating by up to and including 3 notches, including collateral posting requirements Increase in market volatilities that impact the quality of collateral or potential future exposure of derivative positions Unscheduled draws on committed but unused credit and liquidity facilities The potential need to buy back debt or honour non-contractual obligations in the interest of mitigating reputational risk The stress scenario incorporates many of the shocks experienced during the crisis Slide 21

LCR = Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days High Quality Liquid Assets Asset Characteristics Fundamental Market-Related Low credit/market risk Active/sizeable market Ease/certainty of valuation Committed market makers Low correlation with risky assets Low market concentration Listed on recognized exchange Flight to quality Ideally be eligible at central banks for intraday or overnight liquidity facilities BUT eligibility in itself does not constitute basis for such categorization Slide 22

LCR = Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days Level 1 vs. Level 2 Assets Cash Central Bank Reserves Level 1 Assets Sovereign and Supra-national bonds assigned 0% risk-weight under Basel II Standardized Approach Sovereign/Central Bank bonds not assigned a 0% risk weight: Issued in domestic currency of the home sovereign or the sovereign in the country the risk is taken; or Matching the currency of liquidity risk Sovereign and Supra-national bonds assigned 20% risk-weight under Basel II Standardised Approach Level 2 Assets Corporate and Covered Bonds rated AA- by a recognised ECAI (or internally rated with a corresponding PD) A minimum 15% haircut For all assets, maximum price decline (haircut increase) over 30-day period in relevant period of stress not to exceed 10% Slide 23

LCR = Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days Restrictions on Level 1 and Level 2 Assets Level 1 Assets Level 1 Assets can be included without limit in the ratio Level 2 Assets Can only comprise up to 40% of the total of high quality liquid assets Maximum of 2/3 adjusted Level 1 assets that would exist after an unwind of all secured funding transactions Slide 24

LCR = Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days Calculation of Cash Outflows Retail Deposits Run-off factor Term deposits >30 days with penalty 0% Stable (Demand & term deposits <30days) 5% Less Stable (Demand & term deposits <30 days) 10% Unsecured Wholesale Funding Run-off factor Portion of corporate deposits with operational relationships covered by deposit insurance 5% Stable small business customers 5% Less Stable small business customers 10% Deposits needed for operational purposes of legal entities 25% Non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks and PSEs 75% Other legal entity customers 100% Slide 25

LCR = Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days Calculation of Cash Outflows Secured Funding Run-off factor Transactions backed by L1 Assets with any counterparty 0% Transactions backed by L2 assets with any counterparty days) 15% Transactions backed by assets not qualifying as highly liquid with domestic sovereigns, domestic central banks or domestic public sector entities as counterparty 25% All other secured funding transactions 100% Other items (Undrawn commitments, liabilities related to derivative transactions, ABCP, SIVs, etc) are included as well Slide 26

LCR = Stock of High Quality Liquid Assets 100% Net Cash Outflows over the next 30 calendar days Calculation of Cash Inflows Items Weighting Factor Deposits held at centralized institution of a network of co-op banks Operational deposits held at other financial institutions Credit or liquidity facilities 0% Reverse repos and securities borrowing with L1 assets as collateral Reverse repos and securities borrowing with L2 assets as collateral 15% Amounts receivable from retail counterparties Amounts receivable from non-financial wholesale counterparties (transactions not otherwise listed) 50% Reverse repos and securities borrowing with all other assets as collateral Amounts receivable from financial institutions from transactions not otherwise listed 100% Net derivative receivables Slide 27

Net Stable Funding Ratio To promote more medium and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks NSFR = Available amount of stable funding Required amount of stable funding > 100% To establish a minimum acceptable amount of stable funding based on the liquidity characteristics of an institution s assets and activities over a one year horizon To ensure that long-term assets are funded with at least a minimum amount of stable liabilities. Slide 28

NSFR= Available amount of stable funding Required amount of stable funding 100% Available Stable Funding Portion of non-maturity deposits and/or term deposits with maturities of less than one year that would be expected to stay with the institution for an extended period in an idiosyncratic stress event includes stable and less stable retail and SME deposits ASF Factors 0% 50% Portion of wholesale funding with maturities of less than a year that is expected to stay with the institution for an extended period in an idiosyncratic stress event wholesale funding by non-financial corporates, sovereigns and PSEs with maturity <1yr (50%) All other liabilities 80% 90% 100% Capital Preferred stock with maturity of equal to or greater than one year Liabilities with effective maturities of one year or greater Slide 29

NSFR= Available amount of stable funding Required amount of stable funding 100% Required Stable Funding Components of Required Stable Funding RSF Factor Cash and unencumbered assets with maturity less than one year 0% Claims on sovereigns, central banks, multilaterals with 0% risk-weight under Basel II Standardized Approach 5% Corporate or covered bonds rated AA-or better; Claims on sovereigns, central banks, multilaterals with 20% RW under Basel II Standardized Approach with maturities over one year 20% Gold, equities and other corporate and covered bonds rated A+ to A- with maturities over one year ; other loans to non-financial corporate clients, sovereigns, central banks, PSEs with maturities less than one-year 50% Residential mortgages 65% Other retail and SME loans with maturities less than one year 85% All other assets 100% Off Balance Sheet Items (Undrawn amount of committed credit and liquidity facilities ) Other contingent obligations 5% National supervisions to specify RSF factors based on national circumstances Slide 30