LA-UR- Title: Author(s): Submitted to: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.



Similar documents
Appendix A. An Overview of Monte Carlo N-Particle Software

How To Solve The Mcdn

Visualization of Output Data from Particle Transport Codes

Calculation of Source-detector Solid Angle, Using Monte Carlo Method, for Radioactive Sources with Various Geometries and Cylindrical Detector

Monte Carlo Simulation for Solid Angle Calculations in Alpha Particle Spectrometry

Dynamic Load Balancing of Parallel Monte Carlo Transport Calculations

Introduction to the Monte Carlo method

Statistical Impact of Slip Simulator Training at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Simulation of detector calibration using MCNP

CHAPTER 9: IMPORTANCE SAMPLING IN MCNP

Lecture 2 Macroscopic Interactions Neutron Interactions and Applications Spring 2010

NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY

2 Absorbing Solar Energy

Load Balancing Of Parallel Monte Carlo Transport Calculations

LA-UR Title: Author(s): Intended for: MCNP6 class at Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University, March 3-7, Issued:

SPACE SOLAR POWER FOR POWERING A SPACE ELEVATOR. Bryan E. Laubscher, ISR-4 Mervyn J. Kellum, ISR-4

How To Use A Proton For Radiation Therapy

MATH 121 FINAL EXAM FALL December 6, 2010

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF THE FULL MULTIPLICITY DISTRIBUTIONS MEASURED WITH A PASSIVE COUNTER

Manual for simulation of EB processing. Software ModeRTL

GCSE Revision Notes Mathematics. Volume and Cylinders

SURFACE TENSION. Definition

Joint Application of Perl Scripts and MCNPX in Solving the Dynamic-Geometry Related Problems in Proton Beam Radiotherapy

CALCULATION METHODS OF X-RAY SPECTRA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Monte Carlo simulation of a scanning whole body counter and the effect of BOMAB phantom size on the calibration.

Atomic and Nuclear Physics Laboratory (Physics 4780)

AP* Atomic Structure & Periodicity Free Response Questions KEY page 1

HW6 Solutions Notice numbers may change randomly in your assignments and you may have to recalculate solutions for your specific case.

JCAT Project: Monte Carlo Internal Charging Tool(MCICT) status report. Fan Lei (RadMod) & David Rodgers (ESA)

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USEFULNESS OF THE ISOCS MATHEMATICAL EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION FOR LARGE RECTANGULAR 3 x5 x16 NAI DETECTORS

Instructors Guide: Atoms and Their Isotopes

Computer Simulations of Edge Effects in a Small-Area Mesa N-P Junction Diode

Jorge E. Fernández Laboratory of Montecuccolino (DIENCA), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, via dei Colli, 16, Bologna, Italy

TLD ALBEDO DOSIMETER PERFORMANCE ON A Hp(10) NEUTRON DOSE IAEA INTERCOMPARISON

Modern Physics Laboratory e/m with Teltron Deflection Tube

Geometrical importance sampling in Geant4: from design to verification

Center of Gravity. We touched on this briefly in chapter 7! x 2

Solar Energy. Outline. Solar radiation. What is light?-- Electromagnetic Radiation. Light - Electromagnetic wave spectrum. Electromagnetic Radiation

Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds from the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump. Siva Darbha. Office of Science, SULI Program. University of Toronto

CHEM 1411 Chapter 5 Homework Answers

Name period AP chemistry Unit 2 worksheet Practice problems

Nuclear Criticality Safety Division TRAINING MODULE CSG-TM-016 COG SOFTWARE

Chapter 22: The Electric Field. Read Chapter 22 Do Ch. 22 Questions 3, 5, 7, 9 Do Ch. 22 Problems 5, 19, 24

REACTION RATES DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 Reactor Theory (Neutron Characteristics) REACTION RATES

Transport Test Problems for Hybrid Methods Development

MONTE CARLO MODELING OF A VARIAN 2100C 18 MV MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON BEAM AND SUBSEQUENT DOSE DELIVERY USING MCNP5

HW7 Solutions Notice numbers may change randomly in your assignments and you may have to recalculate solutions for your specific case.

CBA Volume: Student Sheet 1

Simplified procedure for evaluating the coverage area of a multifeed shaped antenna Application to the planning of a broadcasting satellite system

13- What is the maximum number of electrons that can occupy the subshell 3d? a) 1 b) 3 c) 5 d) 2

DISCLAIMER. This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States

6.772/SMA Compound Semiconductors Lecture 18 - Light Emitting Diodes - Outline

Chapter NP-5. Nuclear Physics. Nuclear Reactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2.0 NEUTRON INTERACTIONS

90 degrees Bremsstrahlung Source Term Produced in Thick Targets by 50 MeV to 10 GeV Electrons

Volume I: Overview and Theory. X-5 Monte Carlo Team. April 24, 2003 (Revised 10/3/05)

ACCELERATORS AND MEDICAL PHYSICS 2

Automatic and Objective Measurement of Residual Stress and Cord in Glass

PHYSICAL QUANTITIES AND UNITS

CENTER OF GRAVITY, CENTER OF MASS AND CENTROID OF A BODY

Neutrons as a multifunctional tool for geophysicists

Gamma Ray Detection at RIA

Radiation Strip Thickness Measurement Systems

Part I: Principal Energy Levels and Sublevels

Lab 4: Magnetic Force on Electrons

Molecular Dynamics Study of Void Growth and Dislocations in dynamic Fracture of FCC and BCC Metals

Objectives. PAM1014 Introduction to Radiation Physics. Constituents of Atoms. Atoms. Atoms. Atoms. Basic Atomic Theory

SEMICONDUCTOR I: Doping, semiconductor statistics (REF: Sze, McKelvey, and Kittel)

Topic 3. Evidence for the Big Bang

MASS DEFECT AND BINDING ENERGY

Chapter 6. Current and Resistance

Summer Holidays Questions

Chapter 3.8 & 6 Solutions

FACTORS AFFECTING THE RESPONSE OF THE BUBBLE DETECTOR BD-100 AND A COMPARISON OF ITS RESPONSE TO CR-39*

Foundations for Improvements to Passive Detection Systems - Final Report

CHAPTER 8, GEOMETRY. 4. A circular cylinder has a circumference of 33 in. Use 22 as the approximate value of π and find the radius of this cylinder.

Current Engineering and Design Activities at Los Alamos National Laboratory Supporting Commercial U.S. Production of 99Mo without the Use of HEU

Cross section, Flux, Luminosity, Scattering Rates

Damping Wigglers in PETRA III

Principles of dosimetry The ionization chamber

Nuclear Science and Technology Division (94) Multigroup Cross Section and Cross Section Covariance Data Visualization with Javapeño

11. Describing Angular or Circular Motion

CHAPTER 24 GAUSS S LAW

Spectrophotometry and the Beer-Lambert Law: An Important Analytical Technique in Chemistry

EQUATION OF STATE. e (E µ)/kt ± 1 h 3 dp,

Chapter 6 Notes. Chemical Composition

Radiation Hard Sensor Materials for the CMS Tracker Upgrade The CMS HPK Campaign

Element of same atomic number, but different atomic mass o Example: Hydrogen

DEVELOPMENT OF A DYNAMIC SIMULATION MODE IN SERPENT 2 MONTE CARLO CODE

Lecture on Solid Angle

MULTIPLE INTEGRALS. h 2 (y) are continuous functions on [c, d] and let f(x, y) be a function defined on R. Then

FLUID COMPOSITION ANALYSIS BY MULTIPLE GAMMA-RAY BEAM AND MODALITY MEASUREMENTS

[2] At the time of purchase of a Strontium-90 source, the activity is Bq.

Transcription:

LA-UR- Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Title: Author(s): Submitted to: Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer, is operated by the University of California for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. Los Alamos National Laboratory requests that the publisher identify this article as work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher s right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness. Form 836 (8/00)

Medical Physics SDEF Sources By Tim Goorley, X-5 LA-UR-05-7964

Abstract While it is important to accurately represent the appropriate geometry for Medical Physics simulations, it is just as important to accurately represent the radiation source. The following slides give several examples of photon and neutron sources encountered in Medical Physics applications. These examples show how to construct the SDEF card in MCNP to simulate various radiation sources.

SDEF Sources Co-60 Photon Source (Exercises 1-3) Epithermal Neutron Beam (Exercises 4-5)

Co-60 Photon Source Photon Energies: 1.173 MeV, 1.332 MeV Both energies equally probable Isotropic Exercise 1: Point Source at origin Exercise 2: Source Sphere (equally prob)

Solutions Simple input deck for Co-60 point or sphere source 100 1-1.0-10 imp:p=1 200 0 10 imp:p=0 10 so 5.0 $ Sphere at origin, 5 cm radius c sdef erg=d1 cel=100 par=2 $ What would this line do? [Point Source @ origin] c sdef erg=d1 cel=100 par=2 rad=2.0 $ What would this line do? [Thin Shell Src] sdef erg=d1 cell=100 par=2 rad=d2 $ This is a homogeneous sphere source si1 L 1.173 1.332 $ Discrete Co-60 Energies, in MeV sp1 D 1.0 1.0 $ Equiprobable si2 H 0 2.0 $ Radial Bin Distribution from 0.0 cm to 2.0 cm sp2-21 2 $ Power law sampling to 2 nd power, for spherical sources mode p $ Photon Source nps 50 m1 1001 2 8016 1 $ Water, note molecular formula is atom fraction print

Co-60 Seed Source Exercise 3: 2 hemispheres rad = 1.0 cm 1 cylinder rad = 1.0 cm, length = 1.0 cm Hint: Use Cell Acceptance

Solutions Exercise 3 SDEF ERG=D1 RAD=D2 CEL = 100 What would the following lines do? SDEF ERG=D1 CEL=100 SDEF ERG=D1 RAD=2.0

Exercise 3 Input Deck Simple input deck for Co-60 Seed source 100 1-1.0-10:-20:-30 imp:p=1 200 0 10 20 30-40 imp:p=1 300 0 40 imp:p=0 10 s -0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 20 s 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 30 rcc -0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 40 so 5.0 c sdef erg=d1 cel=100 par=2 c sdef erg=d1 cel=100 par=2 rad=2.0 sdef erg=d1 cell=100 par=2 rad=d2 si1 L 1.173 1.332 sp1 D 1.0 1.0 si2 H 0 2.0 sp2-21 2 mode p nps 50 m1 1001 2 8016 1 print $ What would this line do? $ What would this line do?

Exercise 3 Plotting These Vised Source plotting pictures show the difference between SP2 21 2.0 (left correct) and SP2 21 1.0 (right not homogeneous) Do you see a difference? Different colors for different energies

Neutron Beam Monoenergetic Epithermal N s 5.0 KeV Beam 5.0 cm radius Travels from x to +x [monodirectional] Starts at x= -5.0 Pass through a 1 cm rad ball of water at origin Exercise 4: Monodirectional beam

Neutron Beam Ex 4 soln Exercise 4 SDEF POS= -5.0 0.0 0.0 VEC=1 0 0 $ What if no vec card? AXS=1 0 0 $ What if no axs card? DIR=1.0 $ What if no dir card? RAD=D3 ERG=0.005 PAR=1 SI3 H 0.0 5.0 SP3-21 1

Exercise 4 Plotting These Vised Source plotting pictures show the difference between SP2 21 2.0 (left not correct) and SP2 21 1.0 (right correct) Do you see a difference?

Exercise 4 Input Deck This is a simple monodir neutron beam problem C Little geometry is needed 100 1 1.0-10 imp:n=1 101 0 10-20 imp:n=1 $ What if imp:n=0? 102 0 20 imp:n=0 10 so 1.0 20 so 20.0 mode n p m1 1001 2 8016 1 sdef pos -5.0 0.0 0.0 axs 1 0 0 $ What happens if no axs? C If no axs, source becomes a spherical source vec 1 0 0 $ What happens if no vec? C If no vec, no reference direction for particle direction dir 1.0 $ What happens if no dir? [isotropic source] erg=0.005 rad=d4 par 1 ext=0.0 $ A disk source is a degenerate cylinder source si4 H 0.0 5.0 sp4-21 1 $ Power Law, power=1 for disk sources print nps 50

Exercise 5 Add beam divergence of 5 Think about difference between: Y A B 5 5 X Both are possible in MCNP (Do Both!)

Neutron Beam Ex 5 soln A Exercise 5 SDEF POS= -5.0 0.0 0.0 VEC=100 8.74 0.0 AXS=1 0 0 DIR=1 PAR=1 RAD=D3 ERG=0.005 Exercise 5 SDEF POS= -5.0 0.0 0.0 VEC=100 8.74 0.0 AXS=100 8.74 0.0 DIR=1 PAR=1 RAD=D3 ERG=0.005 The difference between these two is the cross section of the beam. The one on the right has a circular cross section, the one on the left has an elliptical cross section

Beam Cross Section AXS & VEC different AXS & VEC same Which did you intend?

Neutron Beam Ex 5 soln B Exercise 5 SDEF POS= -5.0 0.0 0.0 VEC=1 0 0 AXS=1 0 0 DIR=0.9962 $ = cos(5 deg*pi/180) PAR=1 RAD=D3 ERG=0.005