NWEA EXTERNAL FAQ. MAP Science for use with Next Generation Science Standards



Similar documents
APPENDIX I Engineering Design in the NGSS Key Definitions

High School Item Cluster Prototype

Rover Races Middle School NGSS, Common Core, and 21 st Century Skills Alignment Document

NGSS/CCSS-M Sample Classroom Assessments Tasks

Top 4 MAP elearning Needs: Solved!

The Next Generation Science Standards. Executive Summary

A study of the effectiveness of National Geographic Science

H.S. Solar Energy: Solar Powered Cars

THE CHALLENGES OF PREPARING TEACHERS TO TEACH SCIENCE

Maple Lake Public School District # Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction and Student Achievement

Equity for all Students Economic Development

Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas Norman L. Webb March 28, Reading (based on Wixson, 1999)

Appendix: The Teacher-Friendly Guides TM, Virtual Fieldwork, and the NGSS s Three-Dimensional Science

a. What is the period of validity for an educator s license? Less than 5 years 5 years X 3 Greater than 5 years

Writing Learning Objectives that Engage Future Engineers: Hands-on & Minds-on Learning Activities

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Accelerated Model Course Pathways

Appendix K. Model Course Mapping in Middle and High School for the Next Generation Science Standards

a. What is the period of validity for an educator s license? Less than 5 years 5 years X 1 Greater than 5 years

NGSS Evidence Statements Executive Summary of the Front Matter

a. What is the period of validity for an educator s license? Less than 5 years 5 years X 3 Greater than 5 years

Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric

To ensure students achieve success, educators must take an

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

Subordinating Ideas Using Phrases It All Started with Sputnik

NWEA. and the Common Core. Presenter: Laura Riley NWEA

Measures of Academic Progress MAP. Glossary of Terms

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

I. Teacher Preparation. A. Elementary School Licensure Requirements. 1. Licensure Grade Levels Early Elementary Elementary Education 2

a. What is the period of validity for an educator s license? Less than 5 years 5 years X 1 Greater than 5 years

Sample Science Model Course Pathway Options (developed by Michigan Science Standards Review Committee)

Copyright 2013 CTB/McGraw-Hill LLC. 1

Unit 1: Introduction to Environmental Science

April 2013 NGSS Release Page 1 of 6

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Indicator 5.1 Brief Description of learning or data management systems that support the effective use of student assessment results.

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

BOARD OF EDUCATION R2464.DR Page 1 of 8 Gifted & Talented Students (K-8)

Standards for Engineering, Technology, and the Applications of Science

Utah State Office of Education Elementary STEM Endorsement Course Framework Nature of Science and Engineering

Nwea 8th Grade Test Download or Read Online ebook nwea 8th grade test in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

Materials Needed: Choose one of the following methods depending on how familiar your students are with the internet and how to use it.

Curriculum Blueprint

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Middle School CS in Science Standards Crosswalk

Presented to District of Columbia Public Schools June 2007

Appendix A: Annotated Table of Activities & Tools

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Supporting the Implementation of NGSS through Research: Curriculum Materials

CONNECTING LESSONS NGSS STANDARD

Bachelor of Bachelor of Computer Science

a. What is the period of validity for an educator s license? Less than 5 years X (4 years) 1 5 years Greater than 5 years

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Oglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric

Rigorous curriculum, instruction, and assessment include the following attributes:

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Student Learning Objective (SLO) Template

Georgia Department of Education

Classroom Teacher Evaluation Pilot. Overview and Progress Report

How To Learn To Teach With A Language Skill

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

Principal Practice Observation Tool

date by June Key initiatives included: Paraprofessionals and Academic specialists

Rubrics for AP Histories. + Historical Thinking Skills

Core Goal: Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

A CONTENT STANDARD IS NOT MET UNLESS APPLICABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF SCIENCE ARE ALSO ADDRESSED AT THE SAME TIME.

This morning I watched Sesame Street. During

Teacher Guidebook

Moving Standards into Practice

Assessment Policy. 1 Introduction. 2 Background

Proficient 2 (80-89%)

Nevis Public School District #308. District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, Learning together... Achieving quality together.

ASSESSING MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENTIFIC

Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success

Fair dismissal district means any common or union high school district or education service district.

Please use the guidance provided in addition to this template to develop components of the SLO and populate each component in the space below.

HECAT: Chapter 5 curriculum fundamentals

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES As Measures of Educator Effectiveness. A Guide For Principals

Massachusetts District-Determined Measures. The Arts

COMPARISON OF SEO SCHOLARS AND

Next Generation Science Standards

Preparing STEM-Centric Elementary Teachers. Elissa Hozore Liz Neal Division of Educator Effectiveness Maryland State Department of Education

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Mississippi Department of Education Highly Qualified Teacher Criteria The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

Sharing Designs of Sustainable Communities on Mars

Art & Music Five Year Plan. Program Review, Research & Recommendations Chris McCullough, Supervisor Fine & Applied Arts June, 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MATHEMATICS & SCIENCE EDUCATION EXPERT PANEL. Exemplary. Promising Science

South Washington County Schools World s Best Workforce Summary Report

How does ethnicity and culture shape or influence a person s identity and how might we change the characteristics that do not make us happy?

Indiana Content Standards for Educators

NSTA Position Statement: Early Childhood Science Education

New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)

One Stop Shop For Teachers

To date, more than 45 states and the District of Columbia have adopted the CCSS.

N.J.A.C. 6A:9, PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS

SCHOLASTIC READING INVENTORY (SRI) - Testing Window: Aug. 28 th Sept. 28 th, 2012

ACTIVITY 6: Series and Parallel Wiring

Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA)

A CONTENT STANDARD IS NOT MET UNLESS APPLICABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF SCIENCE ARE ALSO ADDRESSED AT THE SAME TIME.

Barbie Bungee Jump. High School Physics

Transcription:

Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) Science for use with Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)* assessments are available for the 2016 17 school year. These new assessments measure student growth toward understanding of the multidimensional NGSS performance expectations. 1. What are the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)? 2. What is the purpose of MAP Science for use with NGSS assessments? 3. How are the items in MAP Science for NGSS aligned to the dimensions of NGSS? 4. How do multidimensional items compare to single dimensional items? 5. How are the MAP Science for use with NGSS blueprints different from older MAP for Science blueprints? 6. Is MAP Science for use with NGSS for grades 6 8 useful for high school students? 7. How will the Learning Continuum reports reflect multidimensional standards? 8. How does the new assessment affect the growth and status norms? 9. What does engineering design look like in the assessments? 10. How does NWEA ensure MAP Science for use with NGSS item pools provide a wide range of content complexity and cognitive rigor? 11. Is the current MAP for Science still available?

1. What are the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)? Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States was developed in 2012 13 by a state-led collaboration among 26 lead states, Achieve, and science education experts. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) were guided by a new research document titled A Framework for K-12 Science Education (2012 National Research Council) that described the dimensions needed for student understanding of science and engineering. These dimensions are: Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs). Previous science standards were guided by research from 20 years ago and were not multidimensional. They had process or inquiry skills separated from content and themes. In addition, previous standards were intended to guide the entire curriculum, whereas the NGSS are intended to guide assessment. 2. What is the purpose of MAP Science for use with NGSS assessments? MAP Science for use with NGSS assessments are designed to be growth measures as students build their understanding of the multidimensional NGSS performance expectations. The assessments do not provide a summative or diagnostic measure of a student s proficiency in the NGSS performance expectations or dimensions. The results of the MAP Science for use with NGSS assessments (for grades 3 5 and 6 8) can be used as growth measures of general student understanding of the NGSS. The assessments provide an overall score, as well as scores in the individual disciplinary areas of the assessments. Taking these interim, adaptive assessments allows students to gauge their growth throughout the school year and from year to year. 3. How are the items in MAP Science for NGSS aligned to the dimensions of NGSS? All existing science items were rated for their alignment to the three dimensions of a particular jurisdiction s adoption of the NGSS: Disciplinary Core Idea Components (DCIC), Science and Engineering Practices (SEP), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCC). These dimensions are outlines in A Framework for K 12 Science Education (2012 NRC). The NWEA rubric used to rate the items has 18 levels of alignment. The item pools include the highest-rated existing items; as more NGSS items are calibrated, the overall pool item ratings will increase. This process included writing multidimensional Learning Statements beforehand and aligning items to the NGSS performance expectations.

4. How do multidimensional items compare to single dimensional items? The MAP Science for use with NGSS assessments include multidimensional items that align to the NGSS dimensions. Some items assess all dimensions of appropriate performance expectations, and others assess different combinations of the dimensions. All items provide measures of growth toward a student s understanding of the DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs of the NGSS. Over time, more and more of the items in the assessment pools will be three-dimensional, such as the sample item below, which is aligned to the Life Sciences DCI of Information Processing, the SEP of Developing and Using Models, and the CCC of Cause and Effect.

5. How are the MAP Science for use with NGSS blueprints different from older MAP for Science blueprints? Like previous MAP for Science assessment blueprints, the new MAP for use with NGSS assessment blueprints have three goals: life sciences, physical sciences, and earth and space sciences. One difference is that each goal now includes the discipline of engineering design. In addition, the subgoals are the same as the DCIs of the NGSS. However, the number of items in the assessments will be the same as in previous MAP for Science assessments. MAP for use with NGSS assessments are fine growth measures for all elementary and middle school students in classrooms implementing the NGSS. The assessments have items that provide evidence of growth toward understanding the NGSS PEs for an appropriate range of grades. The assessment for grades 6 8 includes items aligned to the NGSS middle school PEs, plus items aligned to grades 3 5 and high school PEs to form a content progression. Similarly, the blueprint for the assessment for grades 3 5 includes lower- and upper-grade PEs. In this way, the assessments can adapt down and up to establish a student s zone of proximal development. 6. Is MAP Science for use with NGSS for grades 6 8 useful for high school students? You may have already used MAP for Science assessments for your high school students. The new MAP Science for use with NGSS for grades 6 8 may also be useful for some high school students. However, the 6 8 blueprint includes only the 9 12 NGSS PEs that form a content progression from the 6 8 PEs; there is no new content. Therefore, only 26 of the 71 high school NGSS PEs are in the 6 8 blueprint. Also, the 6 8 MAP Science for use with NGSS includes all the science disciplines, whereas in high school, students are usually in discipline-specific courses. In the future, NWEA is planning to publish NGSS-aligned high school assessments. 7. How will the Learning Continuum reports reflect multidimensional standards? The 2016 17 MAP for use with NGSS Learning Continuum reports will be populated with the new multidimensional NWEA Learning Statements. These statements give teachers information about how students are performing in the dimensions of the NGSS. A Learning Statement often has many items associated with it, and these items have a range of RITs. In the reports, the Learning Statements appear for the RIT range of their items. For example, below is a sample report for the Physical Sciences goal and Waves topic in typical middle school RIT bands:

8. How does the new assessment affect the growth and status norms? All the items in the NGSS pools have been calibrated on the existing General Science Scale. Therefore, the 2015 norms can be used in a similar manner as in previous MAP for Science assessments. The NWEA research team regularly studies the norms and publishes updates. In the coming years, we will evaluate how norms are affected by the NGSS.

9. What does engineering design look like in the assessments? Items measuring student understanding of engineering design are included in the goals and subgoals of the life sciences, physical sciences, and earth and space sciences. The sample item below is aligned to both the NGSS performance expectation MS-PS4-2 and MS-ETS1-4, and will be reported in the Physical Sciences goal under the Waves subgoal. Aligned NGSS PEs: MS-PS4-2 Develop and use a model to describe that waves are reflected, absorbed, or transmitted through various materials. ** MS-ETS1-4 Develop a model to generate data for iterative testing and modification of a proposed object, tool, or process such that an optimal design can be achieved. ** NWEA Learning Statement: Develops design solutions involving the reflection, transmission, or absorption of light, using models Item RIT: 213 Item DOK: 2 DCI: Electromagnetic Radiation Developing Possible Solutions Optimizing the Design Solution Electromagnetic Radiation Developing Possible Solutions SEP: Developing and Using Models Developing and Using Models CCC: Structure and Function Structure and Function ** NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

10. How does NWEA ensure MAP Science for use with NGSS item pools provide a wide range of content complexity and cognitive rigor? In order to measure students learning and growth in science, the pool of science items must span a full range of cognitive levels and skills. MAP Science for use with NGSS items vary by the number of dimensions assessed, by the item types used including selected response and technologically enhanced items, and by content complexity. To meet the goal of a wide range of content complexity, science content specialists evaluate all items using Webb s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) in addition to Bloom s Taxonomy. Science content specialists receive ongoing training on DOK, including trainings with Norm Webb himself. The item pool has items at DOK levels 1, 2, and 3. DOK 1 items involve the recall of information. DOK 2 items involve a higher level of thinking than DOK 1 items, including some decision-making around how to approach the item. DOK 3 items require strategic thinking and demand the use of reasoning, planning, and/or evidence to solve and justify responses to problems with typically more than one possible answer. Examples of cognitive engagement in MAP Science for use with NGSS assessments include: Representing scientific relationships using words or diagrams (DOK 1) Describing examples and non-examples of scientific concepts (DOK 1 or 2) Interpreting data from graphical displays (DOK 2) Designing investigations around scientific questions (DOK 2 or 3) Evaluating models of engineering solutions (DOK 2 or 3) Justifying conclusions based on experimental data with reasoning and evidence (DOK 3) Because MAP assessments are adaptive, the overall distribution of DOK for any given test event will vary based on individual student achievement and other factors. 11. Is the current MAP for Science still available? Yes, you can continue using your 2015 16 MAP for Science assessments. Northwest Evaluation Association 2016. MAP and Measures of Academic Progress are registered trademarks and NWEA is a trademark of Northwest Evaluation Association in the US and other countries. The names of other companies and their products mentioned in this brochure are the trademarks of their respective owners. *Next Generation Science Standards is a registered trademark of Achieve. Neither Achieve nor the lead states and partners that developed the Next Generation Science Standards were involved in the production of this product, and do not endorse it.