Analysis of statistics 215 January 216
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Table of Contents Overview of the Court s statistics in 215... 4 A. Number of new applications... 4 B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications... 4 C. Processing of applications... 4 1. Pre-allocation... 4 2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions... 4 3. applications... 5 4. Judgments... 5 5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)... 5 D. Priority policy... 5 General in... 6 Number of applications allocated to a judicial... 7 Processing of applications... 9 Country-specific in... 14 Albania... 14 Andorra... 15 Armenia... 16 Austria... 17 Azerbaijan... 18 Belgium... 19 Bosnia and Herzegovina... 2 Bulgaria... 21 Croatia... 22 Cyprus... 23 Czech Republic... 24 Denmark... 25 Estonia... 26 Finland... 27 France... 28 Georgia... 29 Germany... 3 Greece... 31 Hungary... 32 Iceland... 33 Ireland... 34 Italy... 35 Latvia... 36 Liechtenstein... 37 Lithuania... 38 Luxembourg... 39 Malta... 4 2/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Republic of Moldova... 41 Monaco... 42 Montenegro... 43 Netherlands... 44 Norway... 45 Poland... 46 Portugal... 47 Romania... 48 Russian Federation... 49 San Marino... 5 Serbia... 51 Slovakia... 52 Slovenia... 53 Spain... 54 Sweden... 55 Switzerland... 56 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia... 57 Turkey... 58 Ukraine... 59 United Kingdom... 6 3/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Overview of the Court s statistics in 215 The Court s statistics for 215 disclose like last year a lower number of incoming cases allocated to a judicial. This is partly the result of a new approach to Rule 47 of the Rules of Court, which determines what applicants are required to do for their application to be allocated for judicial decision. However, there is also an indication of a falling off in demand with a lower number of cases coming into the system and in particular a lower number of applications allocated to the Single Judge. This has helped the Court to reduce the stock of pending cases since the number of applications disposed of exceeds the volume of incoming cases. The backlog of inadmissible cases has been eliminated which explains the decrease in the number of applications decided by the Single judge. As the Court focuses on other categories of cases, productivity will tend to remain more stable, with fluctuations depending on when large groups of cases are processed and adjudicated. This change of focus is reflected in the increase in the number of applications in those other categories (I to V) which were communicated or decided by judgment or decision. 9,999 more such applications were processed in 215 than in 214. A. Number of new applications In 215 4,65 applications were allocated to a judicial, an overall decrease of 28% compared with 214 (56,2). 27,5 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (a decrease of 4% in relation to 214). 13,6 were identified as probable Chamber or cases (a decrease of 19%). It is the second year in a row that the number of allocated cases has decreased (- 15% in 214). B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications 45,576 applications were disposed of judicially, a decrease of 47% in relation to 214 (86,68). The number of cases disposed of exceeded those allocated by more than 4,9 (i.e. a monthly surplus of around 4). As a result, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court decreased over the year, by 7% from 69,9 to 64,85. C. Processing of applications 1. Pre-allocation As at 31 December 215 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 1,, a decrease of 48% in relation to the same date the previous year (19,5). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 215 was 32,4, an increase of 29%. 45% of these files were disposed of under Rule 47. 2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions In 215 43,135 applications were declared inadmissible or of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a or a Chamber, a 48% decrease compared with 214 (83,68). The Single-Judge decided 36,314 cases in 215, a decrease of 54% compared with 214 (78,664). The number of applications by a Chamber or a, in a decision or a judgment, following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration, increased by 111% in 215 (4,628 compared to 2,198 in 214). Friendly settlements (1,658) decreased by 2% (1,696 in 214) and unilateral declarations were multiplied by almost six (2,97 compared to 52 in 214). The remainder of the applications were either declared inadmissible by a Chamber or a or by these s on other grounds. 4/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 3. applications Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the respondent. In 215 15,965 applications were communicated (an increase of 12% compared to 214 when 7,895 applications were communicated). 4. Judgments Judgments were delivered in respect of 2,441 applications (compared with 2,388 in 214 an increase of 2%). A significant proportion of these applications were joined with the result that the number of judgments actually delivered was 823, a decrease of 8%. 177 judgments (in respect of 1,589 applications) were adopted by a three-judge. These judgments accounted for 65% of the applications decided by a judgment (59% in 214). 5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,458) decreased by 25% compared with 214 (1,939). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 161 cases (a decrease of 25% compared with 216 in 214) and dismissed them in 63 cases (19% less than the 782 in 214). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. 39% of the requests granted are linked to the conflict in Ukraine. D. Priority policy 1 The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases, namely the cases falling within the top three categories ( priority applications ). At 31 December 215 there were 11,49 applications in these categories. The number of priority applications dealt with at different stages of the procedure in 215 increased by 1% compared to 214. 37% more priority applications were communicated to the respondent s in comparison with 214. The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or of the list of cases by a Chamber or decreased by 35%. The number of priority applications following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration decreased from 326 in 214 to 32 in 215. The number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment increased by 11% in 215. 1 An explanation of the Court s priority policy can be found on the Court s internet site http://www.echr.coe.int/documents/priority_policy_eng.pdf 5/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 General in Table 1 General statistical in 1. [round figures (5)] Applications allocated 215 214 +/- 465 562-28% 2. Interim procedural events Applications communicated to respondent 215 214 +/- 15965 7895 12% 3. Applications decided By decision or judgment - by judgment delivered - by decision (inadmissible or ) 215 214 +/- 45576 8668-47% 2441 2388 2% 43135 8368-48% 4. Pending applications [round figures (5)] Applications pending before a judicial - Chamber and Grand Chamber - - Single-Judge 31/12/215 1/1/215 +/- 6485 699-7% 272 2965-8% 345 325 8% 315 82-62% 5. Pre-judicial applications [round figures (5)] Applications at a pre-judicial stage 31/12/215 1/1/215 +/- 1 195-48% 215 214 +/- Applications disposed of administratively 324 251 29% 6/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Number of applications allocated to a judicial 2 Chart 1 per year 7 6 5 4 3 325 282 272 415 392 353 496 57 642 649 658 611 562 46 2 1 15 138 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 13965 1193 973 794 665 568 5 385 294 159 198 1516 1281 999 699 6485 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 2 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 22 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage. 7/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Chart 3 High case-count States (more than 1,5 applications pending before a judicial ) Poland 17 2,6% Georgia 215 3,3% Slovenia 165 2,5% Azerbaijan 15 2,3% remaining 37 States 165 16,4% Ukraine 1385 21,4% Romania 355 5,5% Hungary 46 7,1% Italy 755 11,6% Turkey 845 13,% Russia 92 14,2% Total number of pending applications: 64,85 Chart 4 The Court s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial 3 2213 34,% Pending action 313 4,6% 554,9% 3147 4,9% 64,85 3617 55,7% 3 The Pending action category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying the pilot procedure. 8/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Chart 5 The Court s total caseload by priority category Cat. IV 1964 3,2% Cat. V 358 47,1% Cat. III 1345 16,% Cat. II 318,5% Cat. I 827 1,3% Cat. VI-VII 3232 5,% 64,85 Processing of applications Chart 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications 12 1 8 6 4 2 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 Applications judgment delivered 757 934 889 736 816 128 1719 1734 188 2393 267 1511 1678 3661 2388 2441 Applications communicated 1463 1573 1686 1717 2447 2956 3232 3456 4416 623 6674 536 5236 7931 7895 15965 Applications inadmissible 6779 8992 17865 17272 235 27612 2816 2759 3163 3367 38575 5677 8621 89739 8368 43135 or 9/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Chart 7 Number of judgments since 2 18 16 156 153 1543 1625 1499 14 12 115 1157 193 1 888 844 916 891 823 8 695 73 718 6 4 2 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 Chart 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed from 212 to 215 25 2392 2 1563 1742 15 133 1 921 771 546 517 151 623 68 691 communicated decision judgment 5 212 213 214 215 1/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population State Applications allocated to a judicial Population (1) Allocated/population (1) 212 213 214 215 1.1.212 1.1.213 1.1.214 1.1.215 212 213 214 215 Albania 111 16 82 147 3195 2899 2896 2893,35,37,28,51 Andorra 6 2 5 6 85 76 76 76,71,26,66,79 Armenia 238 196 156 122 3274 327 317 317,73,65,52,4 Austria 377 437 315 263 8443 8452 857 8585,45,52,37,31 Azerbaijan 342 324 42 268 9235 9356 9477 9593,37,35,42,28 Belgium 268 27 159 22 1141 11162 1124 11258,24,24,14,18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 43 87 667 98 3829 3829 3831 3825 1,12 2,27 1,74 2,37 Bulgaria 1274 129 928 131 7327 7285 7246 722 1,74 1,66 1,28 1,43 Croatia 195 184 196 812 4398 4262 4247 4225 4,33 4,32 2,58 1,92 Cyprus 78 144 55 32 862 866 858 847,9 1,66,64,38 Czech Republic 547 481 37 34 155 1516 1512 1538,52,46,35,32 Denmark 13 84 66 45 5581 563 5617 566,18,15,12,8 Estonia 31 237 187 19 134 132 1316 1313 2,25 1,8 1,42 1,45 Finland 314 315 185 177 541 5427 5451 5472,58,58,34,32 France 1344 1536 1142 188 65398 65579 65835 66352,21,23,17,16 Georgia 367 157 12 8 4498 4498 449 449,82,35,23,18 Germany 1492 1525 126 789 81844 8524 8767 81174,18,19,13,1 Greece 722 728 585 457 11291 1163 1927 1812,64,66,54,42 Hungary 735 991 243 4235 9958 999 9877 9849,74 1, 2,43 4,3 Iceland 1 9 28 1 32 322 326 329,31,28,86,3 Ireland 55 62 33 18 4583 4591 465 4626,12,14,7,4 Italy 3246 318 549 1935 6821 59685 6783 6796,53,53,9,32 Latvia 286 322 298 246 242 224 21 1986 1,4 1,59 1,49 1,24 Liechtenstein 16 7 12 13 36 37 37 37 4,44 1,89 3,24 3,51 Lithuania 373 428 387 377 38 2972 2943 2921 1,24 1,44 1,31 1,29 Luxemburg 31 38 23 22 525 537 55 563,59,71,42,39 Malta 26 5 39 24 416 421 425 429,63 1,19,92,56 Republic of Moldova 934 1354 111 111 356 3559 3559 3555 2,62 3,8 3,9 2,84 Monaco 5 1 4 9 36 36 36 36 1,39 2,78 1,11 2,5 Montenegro 18 289 158 129 618 623 622 622 2,91 4,64 2,54 2,7 Netherlands 675 778 674 496 1673 1678 16829 1691,4,46,4,29 Norway 11 148 141 73 4986 551 518 5166,2,29,28,14 Poland 471 3968 2747 2182 38538 38533 3818 386 1,6 1,3,72,57 Portugal 217 267 252 233 1542 1487 1427 1375,21,25,24,22 Romania 6768 5413 4425 466 21356 22 19947 19861 3,17 2,7 2,22 2,32 Russia 1746 12328 8913 69 14356 14357 143667 146267,75,86,62,41 San Marino 1 4 5 4 32 34 34 33,31 1,18 1,47 1,21 Serbia 4894 558 2786 1236 7241 7182 7147 7112 6,76 7,4 3,9 1,74 Slovak Republic 531 464 324 353 544 5411 5416 5421,98,86,6,65 Slovenia 422 496 352 212 255 259 261 263 2,5 2,41 1,71 1,3 Spain 694 781 642 553 46196 46728 46512 4644,15,17,14,12 Sweden 546 362 272 213 9483 9556 9645 9747,58,38,28,22 Switzerland 326 442 34 318 7955 839 814 8237,41,55,37,39 "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" 35 535 382 362 26 262 266 269 1,7 2,59 1,85 1,75 Turkey 8986 355 1584 228 74724 75627 76668 77696 1,2,46,21,28 Ukraine 7791 13132 14181 61 45453 45373 45246 45246 1,71 2,89 3,13 1,33 United Kingdom 172 98 72 575 6299 6395 64351 64767,27,14,11,9 Total 64937 6579 5628 4629 822271 82814 82332 828488,79,8,68,49 SOURCES 214 and 215: Internet sites of the Eurostat service ( Population and social conditions ) or from the United Nations Statistics Division. The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 828 million inhabitants on 1 January 215. The average number of applications allocated per 1, inhabitants was.49 in 215. 11/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Table 3 The Court s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial State Single Judge or Chamber or - awaiting first examination Pending action TOTAL Albania 8 171 228 1 48 Andorra 1 2 1 4 Armenia 54 825 92 7 978 Austria 36 37 61 1 135 Azerbaijan 7 1228 279 8 1522 Belgium 15 282 43 8 348 Bosnia and Herzegovina 73 291 52 42 4 84 Bulgaria 8 531 168 15 794 Croatia 38 244 214 1 56 Cyprus 8 32 17 2 59 Czech Republic 29 58 56 9 152 Denmark 2 17 1 1 3 Estonia 28 3 12 1 71 Finland 6 1 6 1 14 France 85 135 157 11 388 Georgia 16 1991 147 2154 Germany 71 93 42 6 212 Greece 18 666 178 3 892 Hungary 94 3981 471 71 4617 Iceland 13 6 19 Ireland 3 2 5 Italy 22 5614 1697 2 34 7567 Latvia 28 63 63 5 159 Liechtenstein 2 1 2 1 6 Lithuania 8 199 68 16 363 Luxembourg 1 1 5 7 Malta 2 24 21 7 54 Republic of Moldova 69 83 339 1 11 1223 Monaco 1 2 3 Montenegro 39 53 76 3 171 Netherlands 5 171 46 6 273 Norway 12 43 6 1 62 Poland 261 585 821 14 1681 Portugal 4 21 13 9 326 Romania 311 1128 1884 165 48 3536 Russia 732 4742 3121 547 65 927 San Marino 5 1 6 Serbia 114 363 29 451 5 1142 Slovakia 35 11 34 9 188 Slovenia 3 172 38 149 5 1654 Spain 23 8 53 3 87 Sweden 16 7 14 6 43 Switzerland 2 61 42 7 13 "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" 12 173 67 12 264 Turkey 199 6656 1526 65 8446 Ukraine 28 416 9439 25 13832 United Kingdom 26 125 95 1 256 ALL STATES 3147 3617 2213 313 554 64834 12/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements from 213 to 215 State Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement 213 214 215 213 214 215 Albania 1 14 Andorra Armenia Austria 1 8 2 Azerbaijan 3 11 6 11 23 19 Belgium 3 1 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1 176 5 Bulgaria 4 3 5 19 9 4 Croatia 3 3 9 31 36 36 Cyprus Czech Republic 2 1 12 1 5 Denmark 1 Estonia 1 1 Finland 1 1 3 1 France 2 9 3 2 4 1 Georgia 3 14 14 11 15 12 Germany 2 3 2 3 2 Greece 24 55 54 128 Hungary 3 1 73 31 61 Iceland Ireland 1 3 Italy 44 27 1853 4 9 9 Latvia 2 1 4 Liechtenstein Lithuania 1 1 Luxembourg Malta 2 Republic of Moldova 21 6 4 8 9 1 Monaco Montenegro 19 1 1 Netherlands 1 1 1 2 4 2 Norway Poland 41 26 33 93 83 113 Portugal 5 6 7 4 39 31 Romania 38 64 116 29 51 168 Russia 12 161 194 39 78 43 San Marino Serbia 9 52 9 679 116 291 Slovakia 4 3 4 23 9 2 Slovenia 1 1 1 1 Spain 1 1 Sweden 2 Switzerland The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia' 48 38 5 55 69 19 Turkey 27 2 18 86 84 139 Ukraine 23 63 658 28 36 52 United Kingdom 4 3 5 12 1 Grand Total 49 52 297 1481 1696 1658 13/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Country-specific in Albania Chart 9 1 % 8 2% 171 42% 228 56% 48 Graph 1 16 147 14 129 12 16 99 1 8 7 82 79 6 48 38 4 21 22 2 9 213 214 215 14/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Andorra Chart 11 1 25% 1 25% 2 5% 4 Graph 12 6 6 6 6 5 5 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 213 214 215 15/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Armenia Chart 13 92 9% 7,7% 54 6% 825 84% 978 Graph 14 196 195 2 178 18 16 156 14 12 1 122 8 6 56 4 2 19 16 25 2 4 213 214 215 9 16/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Austria Chart 15 61 45% 1 1% 36 27% 135 37 27% Graph 16 7 6 611 5 4 437 315 387 3 263 241 2 1 27 33 22 18 7 7 213 214 215 17/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Azerbaijan Chart 17 279 18,3% 8,5% 7,5% 1228 8,7% 1 522 Graph 18 45 42 4 35 3 25 324 284 245 268 2 15 115 117 123 16 1 5 13 11 3 213 214 215 18/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Belgium Chart 19 43 13% 8 2% 15 4% 282 81% 348 Graph 2 3 25 27 253 22 198 2 159 145 15 1 5 37 22 9 26 19 19 213 214 215 19/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Bosnia and Herzegovina Chart 21 4 % 73 9% 291 35% Pending action 42 5% 52 6% 84 Graph 22 1185 12 119 1 87 98 79 8 667 6 4 213 2 52 26 11 4 213 214 215 1 2/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Bulgaria Chart 23 168 21% 15 2% 8 1% 531 67% 794 Graph 24 3 25 2552 2381 2 15 1 129 928 131 1176 5 44 77 12 26 21 37 213 214 215 21/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Croatia Chart 25 214 42% 1 2% 38 8% 244 48% 56 Graph 26 25 2 184 247 15 1491 196 1 812 832 5 142 115 144 24 33 25 213 214 215 22/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Cyprus Chart 27 17 29% 2 3% 8 14% 32 54% 59 Graph 28 18 163 155 16 14 12 1 144 8 6 55 32 4 24 2 2 3 1 3 213 214 215 7 23/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Czech Republic Chart 29 56 37% 9 6% 29 19% 58 38% 152 Graph 3 9 827 8 7 735 6 5 4 3 481 37 34 43 2 1 36 11 12 13 213 214 215 45 4 24/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Denmark Chart 31 1 33% 1 3% 2 7% 17 57% 3 Graph 32 88 9 84 8 7 66 6 6 5 45 48 4 3 2 1 6 5 2 213 214 215 25/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Estonia Chart 33 12 16,9% 1 1,4% 28 39,4% 3 42,3% 71 Graph 34 6 533 5 451 4 3 2 237 187 19 181 1 9 6 9 7 4 5 213 214 215 26/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Finland Chart 35 1 7,1% 6 42,9% 6 42,9% 14 1 7,1% Graph 36 35 315 3 3 272 256 25 2 185 177 15 1 5 21 8 12 6 7 3 213 214 215 27/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 France Chart 37 157 4% 11 3% 85 22% 388 135 35% Graph 38 25 2391 2 15 1536 1142 1273 188 1156 1 5 74 89 13 36 24 33 213 214 215 28/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Georgia Chart 39 147 7% 16 1% 1991 92% 2154 Graph 4 579 6 5 4 3 2 1 273 197 157 12 8 47 38 28 3 4 2 213 214 215 29/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Germany Chart 41 42 2% 6 3% 71 33% 93 44% 212 Graph 42 35 3 333 25 2 1525 15 126 1182 91 1 789 5 24 25 23 7 13 12 213 214 215 3/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Greece Chart 43 178 2% 3 3% 18 2% 666 75% 892 Graph 44 8 7 6 728 585 554 67 5 472 457 4 3 188 268 2 118 126 94 1 43 213 214 215 31/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Hungary Chart 45 471 1% 71 1,5% 94 2% 4617 3981 86% Graph 46 45 4235 4 35 3 25 243 226 2 15 991 148 1363 1 5 478 21 124 42 6 88 213 214 215 32/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Iceland Chart 47 6 32% 19 13 68% Graph 48 3 28 25 2 17 15 1 9 11 1 11 5 4 2 1 1 213 214 215 33/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Ireland Chart 49 2 4% 3 6% 5 Graph 5 7 62 63 6 51 5 4 33 3 2 18 16 1 2 2 1 213 214 215 34/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Italy Chart 51 1697 22% Pending action 2,3% 34 1% 22 3% 5614 74% 7567 Graph 52 1 9625 9 8 7 6 549 5 4438 4 3 318 2872 1763 1935 1848 2 1 62 78 145 25 213 214 215 35/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Latvia Chart 53 63 4% 5 3% 28 17% 63 4% 159 Graph 54 5 484 45 4 322 46 35 3 38 298 246 25 2 15 1 5 19 27 19 21 1 7 213 214 215 36/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Liechtenstein Chart 55 1 17% 2 33% 2 33% 1 17% 6 Graph 56 16 16 14 14 12 13 12 1 8 7 8 6 4 2 3 1 1 1 2 213 214 215 37/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Lithuania Chart 57 68 19% 16 4% 8 22% 363 199 55% Graph 58 45 428 416 387 4 356 377 35 3 25 278 2 15 1 5 15 12 26 5 1 21 213 214 215 38/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Luxembourg Chart 59 5 72% 1 14% 1 14% 7 Graph 6 4 38 35 31 3 26 24 25 23 22 2 15 1 5 2 3 2 213 214 215 2 1 39/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Malta Chart 61 7 13% 2 4% 21 39% 54 24 44% Graph 62 5 5 45 4 39 35 3 32 24 3 25 2 15 1 5 12 9 1 15 16 8 7 213 214 215 4/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Republic of Moldova Chart 63 339 28% Pending action 1 % 11 1% 69 5% 83 66% 1223 Graph 64 35 3143 3 25 2 1354 1341 15 111 111 926 1 5 85 73 121 19 25 2 213 214 215 41/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Monaco Chart 65 1 33% 2 67% 3 Graph 66 1 1 1 9 9 8 8 7 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 213 214 215 1 42/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Montenegro Chart 67 76 44% 3 2% 39 23% 171 53 31% Graph 68 5 446 452 45 4 342 35 3 25 289 2 15 158 129 1 5 47 29 15 3 1 7 213 214 215 43/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Netherlands Chart 69 46 17% 6 2,2% 5 18% 273 171 63% Graph 7 1389 14 12 1 8 778 674 796 552 6 496 4 2 42 1 25 3 19 213 214 215 44/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Norway Chart 71 6 1% 1 2% 12 19% 43 69% 62 Graph 72 158 16 148 141 14 115 12 1 8 73 78 6 4 2 17 1 2 4 4 1 213 214 215 45/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Poland Chart 73 821 48,8% 14,8% 261 15,5% 585 34,8% 1681 Graph 74 6 5388 5 4 3968 3 2 2747 2568 2182 2254 1 76 154 193 23 28 31 213 214 215 46/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Portugal Chart 75 13 32% 9 3% 4 1% 21 64% 326 Graph 76 3 25 267 236 252 233 186 2 169 15 1 91 91 5 26 13 22 2 213 214 215 47/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Romania Chart 77 Pending action 165 5% 48 1,4% 311 9% 1128 32% 1884 53% 3536 Graph 78 8 7697 796 7 6 5 5413 4425 466 418 4 3 2 869 88 1 384 166 127 26 213 214 215 48/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Russian Federation Chart 79 Pending action 547 5,9% 65,7% 732 8% 3121 34% 4742 51% 927 Graph 8 25 23845 2 15574 15 12328 1 8913 69 6553 5 699 111 1331 257 218 16 213 214 215 49/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 San Marino Chart 81 1 17% 6 5 83% Graph 82 6 6 5 5 4 4 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 213 214 215 5/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Serbia Chart 83 Pending action 451 39,5% 5 % 114 1% 363 32% 29 18% 1142 Graph 84 12 11427 1 8 6 558 4 3685 2786 2491 2 1421 1236 418 193 63 18 121 213 214 215 51/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Slovakia Chart 85 34 18% 9 5% 35 19% 188 11 58% Graph 86 684 7 6 5 464 4 324 354 353 344 3 2 1 56 28 29 16 14 15 213 214 215 52/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Slovenia Chart 87 5 % 3 2% 172 11% 38 2% Pending action 149 85,2% 1654 Graph 88 896 9 8 7 6 5 496 411 4 3 352 212 248 2 1 48 25 56 3 16 15 213 214 215 53/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Spain Chart 89 3 4% 23 26% 53 61% 87 8 9% Graph 9 12 1 129 781 79 8 642 553 668 6 4 2 42 14 35 13 25 213 214 215 4 54/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Sweden Chart 91 6 14% 16 37% 14 33% 43 7 16% Graph 92 4 362 365 35 311 3 272 25 213 211 2 15 1 5 1 16 8 4 4 6 213 214 215 55/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Switzerland Chart 93 42 32% 7 5,4% 2 16% 13 61 47% Graph 94 1197 12 1 8 6 4 442 43 34 318 321 2 24 9 19 13 19 11 213 214 215 56/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Chart 95 67 25% 12 4,5% 12 5% 173 65% 264 Graph 96 9 85 8 7 6 5 4 3 535 492 382 362 328 2 1 126 73 38 9 1 12 213 214 215 57/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Turkey Chart 97 1526 18% 65 1% 199 2% 6656 79% 8446 Graph 98 1 911 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 355 58 1584 2784 36 228 2 214 19 115 158 213 214 215 58/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 Ukraine Chart 99 9439 68% 25 % 28 2% 416 3% 13832 Graph 1 16 14181 14 13132 12732 12 1 8 6 849 61 5712 8828 4 2934 2281 2 738 173 81 213 214 215 59/6
ECHR Analysis of Statistics 215 United Kingdom Chart 11 1 4% 26 1% 95 37% 256 125 49% Graph 12 197 2 18 16 1633 14 12 1 98 72 171 128 8 6 575 533 4 2 38 35 19 27 213 214 215 6/6