1 Sarching for lpton-flavor-violating dcay at supr charm-tau factory arxiv:160.01181v [hp-ph] 18 Fb 016 Zhou Hao a, Zhang Rn-You a, Han Liang a, Ma Wn-Gan a, Guo Li b, and Chn Chong a a Dpartmnt of Modrn Physics, Univrsity of Scinc and Tchnology of China, Hfi, Anhui 3006, P.R.China b Dpartmnt of Physics, Chongqing Univrsity, Chongqing, 401331, P.R. China Abstract W invstigat th possibility of sarching th lpton-flavor-violating (LFV) rar dcay at th Supr Charm-Tau Factory (CTF). By comparing th kinmatic distributions of th LFV signal and th standard modl (SM) background, w dvlop an optimizd vnt slction critria which can thortically liminat th background vnts. It is concludd that nw σ uppr limit of about 1 10 9 on Br( ) can b obtaind at th CTF, which is far byond th capability of Supr-B factory in sarching lpton rar dcay. Within th framwork of th scalar lptoquark modl, a joint constraint on λ 1 λ and M LQ can b drivd from th uppr bound on Br( ). With 1000 fb 1 data xpctd at th CTF, w gt λ 1 λ < 4.5 10 (M LQ = 600 GV) and M LQ > 570 GV (λ 1 λ = 4 10 ) at 95% confidnc lvl (C.L.). PACS: 13.35.Dx, 14.60.Fg, 11.30.Fs, 14.80.Sv
I. Introduction Th standard modl (SM) [1, ] of lmntary particl physics provids a rmarkably succssful dscription of strong, wak and lctromagntic intractions at th nrgy scal up to O(10 ) GV. It implis strict lpton numbr consrvation as th consqunc of th gaug invarianc and th absnc of right-handd nutrinos. Howvr, a numbr of concptional and xprimntal difficultis, such as th hirarchy problm, dark mattr and nutrino oscillations, driv physicists to considr nw mchanisms byond. Many xtnsions of th SM, such as th suprsymmtric modls, lft-right symmtric modls, littl Higgs modl with T parity and lptoquark modls, could bring in lpton-flavor-violating (LFV) trms in natural ways, and introduc non-zro nutrino masss and rar dcays of chargd lpton. As th havist lpton, lpton has mor LFV dcay mods compard to th lpton. Th branching ratios of th lpton LFV dcays ar prdictd at th lvl of 10 10 10 7 [3 6]. Thrfor, sarching for LFV dcays and improving limits on th branching ratio bcoms incrasingly important of currnt and futur xprimnts. All th LFV dcays of lpton, such as l, lll ( ) and lh, whr l,l = or and h is a hadronic systm, ar snsitiv to nw physics byond th SM. Among ths mods, th radiativ dcays and ar prdictd to hav th largst probability clos to currnt xprimntal uppr limits in a wid varity of nw physics scnarios. So far th most stringnt limits ar Br( ) < 3.3 10 8 and Br( ) < 4.4 10 8 at 90% confidnc lvl (C.L.), with (963±7) 10 6 dcays of data collctd by thbfactoris [7]. Toachiv mor snsitivity in probing LFV dcay, high intnsiv lctron-positron bam facilitis ar dsird. On main projct is th wll-stablishd upgrad of B factory, i.., Supr-B factory, running at nrgis from opn charm thrshold to abov Υ(5S) rsonanc with intndd accumulatd luminosity of 75 ab 1. Th Supr-B factory would provid grat opportunity in sarching rar dcay, whr a 90% C.L. uppr limit on Br( ) is xpctd as.4 10 9 [8]. Anothr proposal, so-calld th Supr Charm-Tau factory (CTF), is an + collidr dsignd to work in th nrgy rgion from to 5 GV with instant luminosity of 10 35 cm s 1 [9]. Compard to th Supr-B factory, lptons can b copiously producd in pairs at th CTF with cntr-
3 of-mass (c.m.s) nrgis E + not far abov th m thrshold, and th radiativ background + + is not significant. In this papr, w invstigat th potntial of sarching th LFV dcay at th CTF and dmonstrat its bttr chanc than th Supr-B factory. Th papr is organizd as follows: Th LFV signal and dominant background at th CTF ar discussd. Thn a stratgy of xprimntal vnt slction to improv signal significanc is dvlopd, and an xpctd uppr limit on Br( ) is prsntd. Finally, constraints on th lptoquark modl paramtrs ar givn as an xampl of intrprtation of nw physics. II. LFV signal and background at th CTF At th CTF, th cross sction for + + incrass significantly as th incrmnt of th colliding nrgy from th thrshold of -pair production ( 3.55 GV) to th thrshold of D mson production ( 3.74 GV). W st th CTF c.m.s nrgy as 3.7 GV, in ordr to gt lpton pair producd copiously. Th signal undr discussion is that on lpton follows LFV dcay into a muon and a photon, whil th othr follows SM dcay into a muon and two nutrinos, i.., + + + ( + ν ν ) + ( ) and + + + ( + ) + ( ν ν ). Th Fynman diagram for th signal procss + + + ν ν is dpictd in Fig.1. Du to th fact that Γ m O(10 1 )issufficintlysmall, thnarrowwidthapproximationisadoptdwhncalculating th LFV dcay, and th muon and photon ar assumd isotropic in th rst fram of th lpton. Th SM dcay + + ν ν is not factorizd, so that th spin corrlation can b rstord. Consquntly, th cross sction of th signal procss + + + ν ν can b givn as σ( + + + ν ν ) = σ( + + + ν ν ) Br( ). (.1) Givn th dficincy of dtctor rsolution, no rquirmnt on missing transvrs nrgy /E T raisd by scaping nutrinos is imposd. Thus, th dtctabl LFV signal at th CTF is comprisd of two muons and an isolatd photon in final stat as + +X, whr X dnots all th undtctd nutrinos and on hard muon is from LFV dcay and th othr soft on
4 /Z ν W ν Figur 1: Th Fynman diagram for th signal procss + + + ν ν. from th standard lptonic dcay. Accordingly, th background to th LFV signal mainly coms from th + + procss, which is dpictd in Fig. as th lading ordr (LO) contribution. (a) Z (b) (c) Z (d) () Z (f) (g) Z (h) Figur : Th LO Fynman diagrams for th background procss + +. Considring th gomtric accptanc of th dtctor and to avoid th soft divrgnc inducd by low nrgy infrard radiation, a st of kinmatic cuts on final particls is imposd as baslin, E > 0.5 GV, η < 5, η < 3, R(,) > 0.3, (.) whr E is photon nrgy, η and η ar th psudorapiditis of photon and muon, and R(,) = (η η ) +(φ φ ) is th sparation on th psudorapidity-azimuthal-angl plan btwn muon and photon. Aftr applying th baslin cuts, th cross sctions of th LFV
5 signal and th SM background at th s = 3.7 GV CTF ar obtaind as σ S = σ( + + + ν ν )+σ( + + + ν ν ) = 817.6 pb Br( ), σ B = σ( + + ) = 968.5 pb, (.3) whr in numrical calculation, th SM input paramtrs ar takn as m = 0.511 MV, m = 105.7 MV, m = 1.777 GV, Γ =.67 10 1 GV, M W = 80.385 GV, M Z = 91.1876 GV and α w = α(0) = 1/137.036. III. Rsults and discussion By following Eq.(.3), on can gt that th vnt numbr of background is about 8 ordr of magnitud largr than that of th LFV signal, N S N B = σ S σ B Br( ) < 4.4 10 8, (3.1) if only baslin cuts ar takn. Howvr, by xploring th distinction btwn th LFV signal and background kinmatic distributions, an optimizd vnt slction algorithm can b dvlopd to supprss th SM background and nhanc th snsitivity of sarching LFV dcay at th CTF. First, for an vnt of + +X final stat, th lading muon 1 can b dfind as +, M + m < M m 1 =, (3.), M m < M + m whr M ± is th invariant mass of ± systm. Th invariant mass distributions of th 1 systm ar dpictd in Fig.3, for th LFV signal and th SM background rspctivly aftr applying baslin cuts. Th lading muons in signal procsss ar prdominatly from th lpton LFV radiativ dcay, and th signal is manifstd as a striking pak around m in th 1 mass spctrum. Thrfor, a stringnt mass window can b imposd to ffctivly supprss th continuous spctrum of th SM background. Sinc th lpton dcay width is ngligibl, th sprad of signal mass pak is dominatd by dtctor rsolution. Compard with th BESIII, th CTF puts forward a highr rquirmnt on dtctor prformanc,.g., th nrgy rsolution
6 of lctromagntic calorimtr for photon at th CTF is about 1.5% at E = 1 GV [9], whras th corrsponding rsolution of th BESIII is about.5% [10]. Th momntum rsolutions of th track systm for both th CTF and th BESIII ar about 0.5%. Accordingly, a consrvativ mass window cut1 on 1 systm can b chosn as M 1 m < 0.1 GV. (3.3) ) -1 ( GV 10 8 6 1 signal background 1/σ dσ/dm 4 0 0 0.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 4 M 1 ( GV ) Figur 3: 1 invariant mass distributions for th LFV signal and th SM background aftr applying baslin cuts. Th scond muon othr than th lading on is dnotd as. Aftr applying succssiv baslin cuts and cut1, th trailing momntum spctrum of th LFV signal would b wll sparatd from that of th SM background, as shown in Fig.4. For th LFV signal, th trailing muon is from th branch of standard 3-body lptonic dcay, whos momntum distribution is irrlvant to th 1 invariant mass window imposd around m. But th trailing muon momntum distribution for th SM background obviously dpnds on th 1 invariant mass window and will ovrlap that for th LFV signal as th mass window incrass to about 0.3 GV. Basd on th sparation, a cut on th trailing muon momntum can b dfind to liminat th SM contamination, p < 1.1 GV. (3.4) Basd on th abov discussion, an optimizd vnt slction critria can b proposd:
7 ) -1 ( GV 10 8 6 signal background 1/σ dσ/dp 4 0 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8 p ( GV ) Figur 4: Th trailing muon momntum spctra of th LFV signal and th SM background aftr applying succssiv baslin cuts and cut1. Cut1 ( 1 invariant mass cut): M 1 m < 0.1 GV; Cut ( momntum cut): p < 1.1 GV. This two-stp cut stratgy could thortically rmov all th background vnts and sav 98.9% of signal, i.., th cross sction for th LFV signal aftr th abov kinmatic cuts applid is σ S = 808.6 pb Br( ). (3.5) Th significanc of signal ovr background can b dfind corrspondingly as S = N S NS +N B. (3.6) Taking that N B = 0 aftr th final vnt slction, th significanc can thn b writtn as S = N S = σ S L = 8.99 10 Br( ) L, (3.7) whr L is th accumulatd luminosity in unit of fb 1, and it s rasonabl to prsum an annual intgratd luminosity of about 1 ab 1 at th CTF. If th LFV signal is not dtctd with crtain accumulatd luminosity at th CTF, a nw uppr bound on Br( ) can b st at a C.L. of σ, as shown in Fig.5. Th σ uppr limits on Br( ) for som typical valus of th intgratd luminosity ar also givn in Tabl1.
8 W can s that th dirct sarch for th LFV dcay at th CTF would giv much mor stringnt limit on Br( ) than th currnt xprimntal limit drivd at th B factory. For xampl, with on yar data ( 1000 fb 1 ) takn at th CTF, a nw σ uppr bound Br( ) < 4.9 10 9 can b obtaind, which is about on ordr of magnitud smallr than th currnt xprimntal uppr bound of 4.4 10 8 ; with two yar run, th CTF could surpass th proposd Supr-B factory in th snsitivity of sarching LFV dcay. 50 10-9 currnt xp. uppr limit 40 Br( ) 30 0 10 S< 0 0 1000 000 3000 4000 5000-1 Luminosity ( fb ) Figur 5: σ uppr bound on th branching ratio for as a function of th intgratd luminosity at th CTF. L [fb 1 σ uppr bound on ] L [fb 1 σ uppr bound on ] Br( ) Br( ) 300 1.65 10 8 1500 3.30 10 9 600 8.5 10 9 3000 1.65 10 9 1000 4.95 10 9 5000 9.90 10 10 Tabl 1: σ uppr bounds on th branching ratio for at diffrnt luminositis. IV. Constraints on nw physics Nw uppr bound on Br( ) xpctd at th CTF would constrain nw physics byond th SM. Among all th xtnsions of th SM, th lptoquark (LQ) modl is a promising on to intrprt LFV dcays and has bn xtnsivly studid. In addition to th spin and gaug quantum numbrs, th lptoquarks carry both lpton numbr and baryon numbr, and th spin- 0 and spin-1 particls ar calld scalar and vctor lptoquarks rspctivly. Th rnormalizabl
9 andsu(3) C SU() L U(1) Y invariantintractionsbtwnscalarlptoquarksandsmfrmions ar givn by th following Lagrangian [11]: L LQ = [ ] [ λ L 0qL ci l L +λ R 0 u c R R S + λ L 0, 0d c 1 R RS + 0, 4 3 3 λ R 1 q L i R +λ L 1(u R l L ) T] S 1, 7 6 + λ L 1(d R l L ) T S 1 +λ L 1q, 1 L ci l L S +h.c., (4.1) 1, 1 6 3 whr q L and l L dnot th lft-handd SU() L doublt quarks and lptons of th SM, and u R, d R and R ar th right-handd SU() L singlt quarks and chargd lptons rspctivly. W us S j, Y to dnot scalar lptoquark, whr th subscript j can valu 0 and 1/ indicating SU() L singlt and doublt rspctivly, and Y stands for hyprcharg. Color and gnration indics hav bn supprssd. i (i = 1,,3) ar thr Pauli matrics. In invstigating th rar dcay, w also rquir th intractions btwn th scalar lptoquarks and photon. Th photon intractions aris from th following SU() L U(1) Y invariant kinmatic trms of th scalar lptoquarks: L kintic = (D S) (D S). (4.) Th SU() L U(1) Y covariant drivativ D is givn by D = ig i=1,,3 W i T i ig Y B, (4.3) whr W i (i = 1,,3) and B ar th SU() L and U(1) Y gaug filds, rspctivly, and T i (i = 1,,3) ar th gnrator matrics for th SU() L rprsntation occupid by th scalar lptoquarks. From Eq.(4.) w obtain th photon intraction for a scalar lptoquark as ] L LQ, = iq LQ [( S )S S ( S) A, (4.4) whr A is th photon fild and Q LQ rprsnts th lctric charg of th scalar lptoquark S. For simplicity, w assum that all th LFV couplings xcpt λ L 1 (i = 1,j =,3), whr,ij i and j ar quark and lpton flavor indics, ar zro. Thrfor, only -u-lq and -u-lq couplings ar non-zro, and th lpton can dcay into + via quark-lptoquark involvd loops at th LO, as shown in Fig.6.
10 LQ u (a) u u LQ (b) LQ LQ (c) u LQ u (d) Figur 6: Th lowst ordr Fynman diagrams for th LFV dcay procss in th scalar lptoquark modl. Th LO dcay width for th LFV dcay procss is givn by Γ( ) = 1 1 8π p,cm m M, (4.5) whr M is th amplitud for th Fynman diagrams in Fig.6 and p,cm is th thrmomntum of in th rst fram of th initial lpton. Th summation is takn ovr th spins spin of th initial and final stat particls and th factor 1 ariss from th spin avrag of th initial stat. W comput M by using th rlatd Fynman ruls obtaind from Eqs.(4.1) and (4.4), and adopt Passarino-Vltman rduction mthod to convrt on-loop amplitud to scalar intgrals. Th loop divrgnc is naturally cancld for ths four diagrams with no ncssary to introduc any countrtrm. Th LFV dcay branching ratio for can thus b xprssd as Br( ) = 9α w(λ 1 λ ) (m m ] ) [( F 104π 4 Γ m 3 1 + F )(m +m ) 4R(F 1 F)m m, (4.6) whr λ 1 = λ L 1,1 and λ = λ L 1,13, dnoting th -u-lq and -u-lq coupling strngths, rspc- tivly. Th form factors F 1, ar givn in Appndix. Undr th simplicity assumption, thr ar only thr paramtrs of scalar lptoquark dtrmining th LFV dcay, namly th couplings λ 1, and th scalar lptoquark mass M LQ. As shown in Eq.(4.6), th LFV dcay branching ratio is proportional to (λ 1 λ ) but is much complicatdly rlatd to M LQ. Th dpndnc of Br( ) as functions of λ 1 λ and th lptoquark mass M LQ is prsntd in Fig.7. According to th dpndnc, a joint constraint on λ 1 λ and M LQ can b drivd from th uppr bound on Br( ) xpctd at th CTF, as shown in Fig.8. On can stimat from th plot th uppr bound on λ 1 λ and th lowr bound on M LQ for givn M LQ and λ 1 λ,
11-9 50 10 (a) currnt xp. uppr limit Br( ) 40 30 0 M LQ =600 GV M LQ =1000 GV M LQ =1500 GV 10 0 0 0.1 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 λ 1 λ -9 10 50 (b) currnt xp. uppr limit Br( ) 40 30 0 λ 1 λ =0.05 λ 1 λ =0.15 λ 1 λ =0.3 10 0 00 400 600 800 1000 100 1400 M LQ ( GV ) Figur 7: Th branching ratio for as functions of (a) λ 1 λ and (b) M LQ.
1 rspctivly. For xampl, with 1000 fb 1 data xpctd at th CTF, on can gt λ 1 λ < 4.5 10, (M LQ = 600 GV, 95% C.L.), M LQ > 570 GV, (λ 1 λ = 4 10, 95% C.L.). (4.7) 1 currnt xp. bound -1 L = 1000 fb λ 1 λ 10-1 - 10 00 400 600 800 1000 100 1400 M LQ ( GV ) Figur 8: Th joint constraint on λ 1 λ and M LQ with 1000 fb 1 intgratd luminosity at 95% C.L.. Bsids th abov spcifid lptoquark intrprtation, th LFV dcay can b xprssd in a modl-indpndnt formalism. An ffctiv vrtx -- can b introducd in a form of i m σ ν p ν (σ L P L +σ R P R ), whr σ ν = i [, ν ], P L,R = (1 5 )/ and p ν is th momntum of th photon [1]. Thn th branching ratio for can b simply xprssd in trms of th form factors σ L and σ R as Br( ) = (m m ) 3( σ L + σ R ) 16πΓ m 5. (4.8) Similarly, a joint uppr bound on σ L and σ R can b dducd from th uppr bound on Br( ). As shown in Fig.9, a mor stringnt uppr bound of σ L + σ R < 5.7 10 10, much smallr than th currnt xprimntal limit, could b drivd, if th LFV dcay is not dtctd with 1000 fb 1 intgratd luminosity xpctd at th CTF. V. Summary In this papr, w invstigat th potntial of sarching LFV dcay at th CTF. With a cntr-of-mass 3.7 GV of lctron-positron collision, lptons can b copiously producd in
13 σ R 10 1.8 1.6 1.4 1. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4-9 0. 0 0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1. 1.4 1.6 1.8 10 σ L currnt xp. bound -1 L = 1000 fb Figur 9: Th joint uppr bound on σ L and σ R with 1000 fb 1 intgratd luminosity at 95% C.L.. -9 pairs at th CTF. Th LFV signal procsss + + + ν () ν () ar faturd by dtctabl final stat of 1 +X, namly on hard lading 1 along with a hard photon from radiativ LFV dcay and on soft trailing from th standard lptonic dcay, and laving th missing transvrs nrgy from scaping nutrinos unmasurd. W propos a twostp vnt slction stratgy that imposs an invariant mass window on th 1 systm around m and thn follows a succss momntum sparation cut on. This critria can significantly supprss th dominant + + SM background. It can b prdictd with a coupl yars of CTF running, nw snsitivitis on Br( ), which could surpass currnt xprimntal uppr bound and thos xpctd at th Supr-B factory, can b achivd. Th nw uppr limit on Br( ) xpctd at th CTF would crtainly constrain paramtr spac of nw physics byond th SM, ithr in spcific thoris as lptoquark or in modl-indpndnt ffctiv formalism. VI. Acknowldgmnts This work was supportd in part by th National Natural Scinc Foundation of China (Grants. No.1175190, No.11375008, No.11375171).
14 VII. Appndix Th form factors F 1 and F ar xprssd as whr [ ( ) ( ) F 1 = Q u C (1) 00 +m C (1) 1 +C (1) 11 +C(1) 1 +m C (1) +C (1) +C(1) 1 m uc (1) 0 1 Q LQ C () 00 m ( ) m B (1) m 0 +B (1) 1 + ( F = Q u m m C (1) 0 +C (1) 1 +C (1) ) m m m m B (1) i = B i (m,m LQ,m u) B () i = B i (m,m LQ,m u) m m m C (1) {j,jk} = C {j,jk} (m,0,m,m LQ,m u,m u) ( ) B () 0 +B () 1 ( B (1) 0 +B (1) 1 B () 0 B () 1 ] ), (7.1) C () {j,jk} = C {j,jk} (m,m,0,m LQ,m u,m LQ), (7.) and M LQ is th mass of scalar lptoquark. Th dfinitions of on-loop - and 3-point functions B i (i = 0,1) and C {j,jk} (j,k = 0,1,) ar givn in Rf. [13]. Not addd Aftr submitting this papr w found anothr calculation of this LFV signal at th HIEPA [14]. Rfrncs [1] S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys., 579 (1961). [] S. Winbrg, Phys. Rv. Ltt. 19, 164 (1967). [3] G. Cvtic, C. Dib, C. S. Kim, and J. D. Kim, Phys. Rv. D 66, 034008 (00). [4] T. Fukuyama, T. Kikuchi, and N. Okada, Phys. Rv. D 68, 03301 (003). [5] A. Brignol and A. Rossi, Phys. Ltt. B 566, 17 (003). [6] M. Blank, A. J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Rcksigl, and C. Tarantino, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41, 657 (010).
15 [7] B. Aubrt, t al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rv. Ltt. 104, 0180 (010). [8] B. O Lary, t al. (SuprB Collaboration), arxiv:1008.1541. [9] A. E. Bondar t al.(charm-tau Factory Collaboration), Phys. Atom. Nucl. 76, 107 (013). [10] M. Ablikim, t al. (BESIII Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Mthods Phys. Rs. Sct. A 614, 345 (010). [11] S. Davidson, D. Baily, and B. A. Campbll, Z. Phys. C 61, 613 (1994). [1] L. Lavoura, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 191 (003). [13] T. Hahn and M. Pérz-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999). [14] Yu-Bo Li, Chng-Ping Shn, and Chang-Zhng Yuan, Sci. Bull. 61, 307 (016).