Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30 March 2011



Similar documents
ORTEC Radioactivity and its Measurements in Foodstuffs Where Does Radioactivity in Food Come From? Natural Radioactivity: Industrial Radioactivity:

Fukushima Accident: Radioactive Releases and Potential Dose Consequences

The objective of this chapter is to provide criteria with which to assess the safety of

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: National Response to I-131 from Japan Nuclear Power Plant March 27, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Assessment of environmental radiation monitoring data in Hungary following the Fukushima accident

1. In the general symbol cleus, which of the three letters. 2. What is the mass number of an alpha particle?

medical diagnostics caesium-137 naturally occurring radio nuclides in the food radon in indoor air potassium in the body

Inter-Agency Committee on Response to Nuclear Accidents

Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/51/EURATOM

Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources

RADIATION MONITORING NETWORK OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC

The Role of the United States Food Safety and Inspection Service After the Chemobyl Accident

EPA Radionuclides Rule and the RadNet Program

Legislation in Ukraine about the Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident

SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BIOSPHERE MODEL TO ESTIMATE RADIOLOGICAL DOSE IN THE GOLDSIM ENVIRONMENT

IAEA Safety Standards

Exposures from the Events at the NPPs in Fukushima following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group Environment

A Review of Emerging Gamma Detector Technologies for Airborne. Radiation Monitoring

National Emergency Plan for Nuclear Accidents. December 2005

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CATTENOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

RADON AND HEALTH. INFORMATION SHEET October What is radon and where does it come from?

Radiation and the Universe Higher Exam revision questions and answers

Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment. A10.1 Introduction...

Radiological Protection Principles concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials

Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response

RADON Although radon is agas, its decay products are not, and they occur either as unattached

Radiation and Environmental Protection at the CNSC

Guidance on Radioactive Materials in Sewage Sludge and Ash at Publicly Owned Treatment Works

The Chernobyl Forum: Second revised version

Chapter VI Agricultural and environmental impacts

All aspects on radon. Case 3. Background. Christoffer Baltgren,

CROM An Introduction. Juan Carlos Mora Radiation Protection for the Public and the Environment CIEMAT

Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life

Chapter 17: Radioactivity and Nuclear Chemistry

Derived Intervention Levels for Tritium Based on Food and Drug Administration Methodology Using ICRP 56 Dose Coefficients (U)

6. PROGRAMS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Activities Concerning Environment Protection

CONCENTRATION OF U-238, U-235, RA-226, TH-232 AND K- 40 FOR SOME GRANITE SAMPLES IN EASTERN DESERT OF EGYPT.

Position paper on the implications of deep sea disposal of radioctive waste

The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Basics of Nuclear Physics and Fission

NORM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES & PRINCIPLES

Investigation into Terrestrial Radioactive Contamination at Thule and Assessment of Radiation Doses

22.1 Nuclear Reactions

Radiological monitoring in Belgium. Experts permanently monitor the radioactivity in our environment

For convenience, we may consider an atom in two parts: the nucleus and the electrons.

Industrial tracers - Finding leaks and blockages

Studies of Radioactive Contaminations and Heavy Metal Contents in Vegetables and Fruit from Lublin, Poland

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

This material is based on work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Extension Service & the U.S. EPA

What you should do if there is a NUCLEAR EMERGENCY at the Devonport Site

A radiation weighting factor is an estimate of the effectiveness per unit dose of the given radiation relative a to low-let standard.

Activities at temporary job site utilizing U.S. NRC Radioactive Material License # Amendment (,

Nuclear Emergency Response Program

Antoine Henri Becquerel was born in Paris on December 15, 1852

FUNDAMENTALS OF A STATE S NUCLEAR SECURITY REGIME: OBJECTIVE AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS

Objectives 404 CHAPTER 9 RADIATION

Backgrounder Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/

Design Guide for Nuclear Substance Laboratories and Nuclear Medicine Rooms GD-52

COMPENDIUM OF EPA-APPROVED ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR MEASURING RADIONUCLIDES IN DRINKING WATER

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

Chapter 15 Radiation in the Environment 1

[2] At the time of purchase of a Strontium-90 source, the activity is Bq.

Radiometric Dating. Dating Methods for Igneous Rocks

Worldwide marine radioactivity studies (WOMARS)

ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL DATA RELATING TO THE 2000 WILDFIRE AT HANFORD

Leaflet 14. Accident and Incident Investigation and Reporting

CALCULATING THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND BIOCAPACITY

Thyroid Cancer Finding It and Treating It Using Radioiodine

Assessment of Dose to the Nursing Infant from Radionuclides in Breast Milk

Radon from building materials

Proficiency testing schemes on determination of radioactivity in food and environmental samples organized by the NAEA, Poland

Case study from Ukraine

Q1 What types of radiation are there? A1 There are two main types of radiation:

Minnesota Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Emergency Worker Handbook

what to do in the event of a nuclear alert?

Thyroid Screening for Radioiodine

IAEA-TECDOC-1344 Categorization of radioactive sources

Role and tasks of Arpa Piemonte in controlling and monitoring of ionizing and non ionizing radiation. G.. d Amored

Questionnaire for NORM service providers

The effects of radiation on the body can be divided into Stochastic (random) effects and deterministic or Non-stochastic effects.

SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

RADIATION MONITORING UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS

Is Food from Japan Safe to eat?

Significant incidents in nuclear fuel cycle

Radon: The Second Leading Cause of Lung Cancer? Deh, deh, deh, dehhhhh..

PERSONNEL MONITORING AND DOSIMETRY POLICIES

Introduction. Chapter 15 Radiation Protection. Regulatory bodies. Dose Equivalent. Regulatory bodies. Main Principles of Radiation Protection

Ecosystems and Food Webs

Ionizing Radiation and Breast Cancer Risk

PRESS NOTE. Scientific Meet on Radiation & Health safety

Guidelines for Reporting Radiological Incidents to the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland

REAC/TS Radiation Accident Registry: Update of Accidents in the United States. Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Nuclear Physics. Nuclear Physics comprises the study of:

Chemistry 1000 Lecture 2: Nuclear reactions and radiation. Marc R. Roussel

Phased International Cooperation with North Korea s Civil Nuclear Programs

Alarm Response Guidelines for Radiation Portal Monitoring Systems

Transcription:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30 March 2011 This document is intended to provide basic background information and not to give a complete overview. It will be updated as appropriate. 1. Introduction Radioactive isotopes of elements (radionuclides) are naturally present in the environment, and that includes our bodies and our food and water. We are exposed to radiation (also known as background radiation) from these radionuclides on a daily basis. Radiation comes from space (i.e., cosmic rays) as well as from naturally-occurring radioactive materials (radionuclides) found in the soil, water and air. Radioactivity can be detected in food and water and the concentration of naturally-occurring radionuclides varies depending on several factors such as local geology, climate and agricultural practices. People can also be exposed to radiation from man-made activities, including medical diagnostic intervention. Radioactivity can contaminate food after it has been discharged into the environment from industries that concentrate natural radionuclides and from civil or military nuclear operations. Whether, man-made or natural in origin, radioactive material passes through the food chain in the same way as non-radioactive material. The degree of harm to human health depends on the type of radionuclides and the length of time people are exposed to it. The amount of radiation people are exposed to varies from place to place and among individuals. In the event of releases of radioactivity following an emergency at a nuclear power plant, land, rivers, sea and structures in the vicinity of the power plant can become contaminated with a mixture of radionuclides generated inside the reactor, also known as nuclear fission products. Individuals can therefore become exposed to radiation from these fission products. 2. Radionuclides in food Background levels of radionuclides in foods vary and are dependent on several factors, including the type of food and the geographic region where the food has been produced. The common radionuclides in food are potassium-40 ( 40 K), radium-226 ( 226 Ra) and uranium 238 ( 238 U) and their associated progeny. In general, 40 K is the most commonly occurring natural radioisotope. In milk, for example, levels of 40 K measure around 50 Bq/L, and for meat, bananas and other potassium rich products, levels may measure at several hundreds Bq/kg. Other natural radioisotopes exist in much lower concentrations, and originate from the decay of uranium and thorium. When large amounts of radioisotopes are discharged into the environment, they can affect foods by either falling onto the surface of foods like fruits and vegetables or animal feed as deposits from the air or through contaminated rainwater/snow. Radioactivity in water can also accumulate in rivers and the sea, depositing on fish and seafood. Once in the environment, radioactive material can also become incorporated into food as it is taken up by plants, seafood or ingested by animals. Although many different kinds of radionuclides can be discharged following a major nuclear emergency, some are very short-lived and others do not readily transfer into food. Radionuclides generated in nuclear installations and that could be significant for the food chain include; radioactive hydrogen ( 3 H), carbon ( 14 C), technetium ( 99 Tc), sulphur ( 35 S), cobalt ( 60 Co) strontium ( 89 Sr and 90 Sr), ruthenium ( 103 Ru and 106 Ru), iodine ( 131 I and 129 I), uranium ( 235 U) plutonium ( 238 Pu, 239 Pu and 240 Pu), caesium ( 134 Cs and 137 Cs), cerium ( 103 Ce), iridium ( 192 Ir), and americium ( 241 Am). 1

The radionuclides of most concern for possible transfer to foods have been considered when setting the Codex Guideline levels described below. Of immediate concern is iodine-131, it is distributed over a wide area, found in water and on crops and is rapidly transferred from contaminated feed into milk. However, iodine-131 has a relatively short half-live and will decay within a few weeks. In contrast, radioactive caesium which can also be detected early on, is longer-lived (Cs-134 has a half life of about 2 years and Cs-137 has a half life of about 30 years) and can remain in the environment for a long-time. Radioactive caesium is also relatively rapidly transferred from feed to milk. Uptake of caesium into food is also of longterm concern. Other radioisotopes that could be of long-term concern if released, are strontium and plutonium. Strontium-90 has a half life of about 29 years and plutonium has a much longer half life than that (Pu-238: 88 years, Pu-239: 24100 years, Pu-240: 6564 years). However, both strontium and plutonium are relatively immobile in the environment and are of concern more locally, thus it is unlikely to cause a problem in international food trade in the immediate and medium-term. Commodities of concern Open-air vegetables and plants can be affected by the atmospheric release of radionuclides, resulting in radioactive contamination. Thus, radionuclides tend to be detected from leafy vegetables especially the ones with large leafy parts in the early phase after a nuclear accident. Milk is also associated with the early-phase contamination due to the rapid transfer of radioactive iodine and "relatively" rapid transfer of radioactive caesium from contaminated feed into milk. Over time, radioactivity can also build up within food, as radionuclides are transferred through soil into crops or animals, or into rivers, lakes and the sea where fish and other seafood could take up the radionuclides. Foods collected from the wild, such as mushrooms, berries and game meat, may continue to be a radiological problem for a long time. Fish and aquatic microflora may bioconcentrate certain radionuclides, but due to the high dilution of radionuclides in water, contamination tends to be confined relatively locally. 3. Health effects The main health concern for consumers in the long term due to high radiation exposure is development of cancer. Cancer types and target organs depend on the radionuclides. IAEA estimates that on average, our radiation exposure due to all natural sources amounts to about 2.4 msv a year - though this figure can vary, depending on the geographical location by several hundred percent. In Canada, the average dose due to naturally occurring background radiation is about 2 msv per year, of which about one-half comes from the inhalation of naturallyoccurring radon and its short-lived decay products. About 0.7 msv per year, nationally-averaged, arises from cosmic and terrestrial gamma radiation. The portion of the background dose resulting from ingestion of natural radionuclides in food is about 0.25-0.4 msv per year. Consuming contaminated food will increase the amount of radioactivity inside a person and therefore increase their exposure to radiation, thereby possibly increasing the health risks associated with radiation exposure. The exact health effects will depend on which radionuclides have been ingested and the amount being ingested. Examples for exposure from contaminated foods: - Adult eating 200g spinach contaminated with 1000Bq/kg of Cs-137 resulting in 0.0026 msv additional exposure [0.2 (kg) 1000 (Bq/kg) 1.3 10-5 (msv/bq)] - One-year old child consuming 0.5 L milk contaminated with 100 Bq/L of I-131 resulting in 0.009 msv additional exposure [0.5 (L) 100 (Bq/L) 1.8 10-4 (msv/bq)] 2

Radioactive iodine (I-131) in food is of immediate concern due to its rapid transfer to milk from contaminated feed and its accumulation in the thyroid gland. I-131has a relatively short half-life (8 days) and will therefore naturally decay over a short time frame. If radioactive iodine is breathed in or swallowed, it will concentrate in the thyroid gland and increase the risk of thyroid cancer. The uptake of radioactive iodine into the thyroid gland can be decreased or prevented by ingestion of non-radioactive iodine, by taking potassium iodide pills. Once the thyroid is saturated with iodine, no further iodine can be incorporated. Iodized table salt should not be used as an alternative to potassium iodide pills as it does not contain sufficient iodine to saturate the thyroid, and high salt intake may have adverse health effects. Radioactive caesium (Cs-134 and Cs-137), in contrast to radioactive iodine, has a long half-life (Cs-134: 2 years, Cs-137: 30 years). Radioactive caesium can stay in the environment for many years and could continue to present a longer term problem for food, and food production, and a threat to human health. If caesium-137 enters the body, it is distributed fairly uniformly throughout the body's soft tissues, resulting in exposure of those tissues. Compared to some other radionuclides, caesium-137 remains in the body for a relatively short time. Like all radionuclides, exposure to radiation from caesium-137 results in an increased risk of cancer. Other radionuclides could be of concern, depending on the nature of the nuclear accident and release of specific isotopes. 4. International standards and guidance The Codex Guideline Levels The Codex Alimentarius Commission (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme) has developed the guideline levels for certain radionuclides in food following a nuclear emergency (General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (GSCTFF), CODEX STAN 193-1995, page 33-37). The Guideline Levels have been first developed in 1988 and then revised in 2006 to increase the number of radionuclides covered. These Guideline Levels are applied to foods destined for human consumption and traded internationally, which have been contaminated following a nuclear or radiological emergency. If radionuclide levels in food do not exceed the corresponding guidelines levels, the food should be considered as safe for human consumption as far as generic radiological protection of food consumers is concerned. The following text is from the GSCTFF and provides the proper context: Scope: The Guideline Levels apply to radionuclides contained in foods destined for human consumption and traded internationally, which have been contaminated following a nuclear or radiological emergency 1. These guideline levels apply to food after reconstitution or as prepared for consumption, i.e., not to dried or concentrated foods, and are based on an intervention exemption level of 1 msv in a year. Application: As far as generic radiological protection of food consumers is concerned, when radionuclide levels in food do not exceed the corresponding Guideline Levels, the food should be considered as safe for human consumption. When the Guideline Levels are exceeded, national governments shall decide whether and under what circumstances the food should be distributed within their territory or jurisdiction. National governments may wish to adopt different values for internal use within their own territories where the assumptions concerning food distribution that have been made to derive the Guideline Levels may not apply, e.g., in the case of wide-spread radioactive contamination. For foods that are consumed in small quantities, such as spices, that represent a small percentage of total diet and hence a small addition to the total dose, the Guideline Levels may be increased by a factor of 10. Radionuclides: The Guideline Levels do not include all radionuclides. Radionuclides included are those important for uptake into the food chain; are usually contained in nuclear installations or used as a radiation source in large enough quantities to be significant potential contributors to levels in foods, and; could be accidentally released into the environment from typical installations or might be employed in malevolent actions. Radionuclides of natural origin are generally excluded from consideration in this document. 1 For the purposes of this document, the term emergency includes both accidents and malevolent actions. 3

General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CODEX STAN 193, page 33-37) is available in English at: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/17/cxs_193e.pdf Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture The Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture provides advice on immediate actions to prevent and mitigate the radioactive contamination of agricultural foodstuffs when a nuclear emergency occurs in or affect your area. You will find the advice, counter measures, glossary and other relevant information at: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/emergency/index.html 5. Analytical methods and Laboratories Routine monitoring of the food supply is undertaken by several national authorities. For example the US FDA has published a method for the determination of Gamma-Ray Emitting Radionuclides in Foods by High-Purity Germanium Spectrometry http://www.fda.gov/downloads/scienceresearch/fieldscience/ucm248262.doc After a nuclear accident monitoring the agricultural, forestry and fisheries environment and restriction of the movement and export of possibly contaminated products is an important factor. However, an implementation of such monitoring can be complex, expensive and technically demanding and require certain training and quality assurance of laboratory performance in advance. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) has established and coordinates a world-wide network of the analytical laboratories called "ALMERA network (Analytical Laboratories for the Measurement of Environmental Radioactivity)". Those laboratories in the ALMERA network would be expected to provide reliable and timely analysis of environmental samples including food in the event of an accidental or intentional release of radioactivity. ALMERA currently (April 2010) consists of 122 laboratories representing 77 countries. The website of ALMERA Network: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/naml/page.php?page=2244 A full listing of the current ALMERA member laboratories can be found in the ALMERA Newsletter: http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/newsletter.asp?id=146 Generic procedures for monitoring in a nuclear or radiological emergency (IAEA, 1999): http://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/te_1092_web.pdf (File size: 28MB) Programmes and systems for source and environmental radiation monitoring (IAEA Safety Reports Series No.64, 2010): http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/pub1427_web.pdf 6. Useful links and references Links FAO Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department (Joint division for nuclear techniques) http://www.fao.org/ag/portal/age-index/en/ http://www.fao.org/crisis/japan/en/ WHO http://www.who.int/hac/crises/jpn/en/index.html Canada 4

Canadian Guidelines for the Restriction of Radioactively Contaminated Food and Water Following a Nuclear Emergency (Health Canada, 2000) : http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewhsemt/pubs/contaminants/emergency-urgence/index-eng.php European Commission Maximum level of radioactive contamination in foodstuffs: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/food_safety/contamination_environmental_factors/l211 09_en.htm USA Accidental Radioactive Contamination of Human Food and Animal Feeds: Recommendations for State and Local Agencies" (FDA, 1998): http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/uc M094513.pdf Supporting Document for Guidance Levels for Radionuclides in Domestic and Imported Foods (FDA, 2004): http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/foodcontaminantsadulteration/chemicalcontaminants/r adionuclides/ucm078341 References Radioactive fallout in soils, crops and food (FAO, 1989) http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0228e/t0228e00.htm Application of the Commission's Recommendations to the Protection of People Living in Longterm Contaminated Areas after a Nuclear accident or a Radiation Emergency (ICPR Publication 111, 2008) Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency (IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-2, 2011): http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/pub1467_web.pdf Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments (IAEA Technical Reports Series No.472, 2010): http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/trs472_web.pdf Measurement of Radionuclides in Food and the Environment A Guidebook, Technical Reports Series No. 295 (IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 295, 1989), Hard copy only. Quantification of Radionuclide Transfer in terrestrial and Freshwater Environments for Radiological Assessments (IAEA TECDOC Series No.1616, 2009). http://wwwpub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/te_1616_web.pdf 5