Physical Assessment & Clinical Judgment Rubric The following criteria will be used to grade your individual assignment. The grade you receive will account for 20% of your final grade. Keep in mind that the score requirement described under each point on the scale defines the minimum performance that must be demonstrated to achieve that score. Lesser will be awarded if the elements of each not met or only partially met. 100-90 Points = A 89-80 Points = B 79-70 Points = C 69-60 Points = D Below 60 = F Criteria Outstanding Exceptionally Good Good Basic Weak Data Collection Case Study 1, 3, and 4 25 23 21 19 17 -Develops a prioritized health history and physical assessment based on evaluation of client s current condition through analysis of multiple data sets. addressed in a comprehensive and thorough manner. components of addressed comprehensively, one component needed While both addressed adequately more detail is needed. Although the components are present the content is superficial and not well developed. Did not address one or more components or was off topic. - Provides a justification for rationale for selected assessments. -Supports decisions with current scholarly references.
Maximum : 25 Program outcome #3 Evaluates data to inform decision making in response to complex situations. Analysis and Synthesis Case Study 1, 3 and 4 25 23 21 19 17 Performs a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of health data to determine two priority interventions for care of each client which are client s current condition/needs. - Support your decision current scholarly references. Maximum : 25 Program outcome # 4 Applies evidence from varied sources to impact quality client outcomes. systemically and methodically analyzed, relevant to each client s current condition and needs and supported by references. components of systematically and methodically analyzed, relevant to each client s current condition and needs, and supported by references information for one client needed systematically and methodically analyzed, relevant to each client s current condition and needs, and supported by references information for two of the clients needed more detail. Although all components are present, the content is not well analyzed, or supported for each of the client s current condition needs, or supported by references. Did not address one or more components or was off topic.
Evaluates Interventions Case study 1, 3 and 4 20 18 16 14 12 4. Evaluates interventions - Parameters that could be used to the measurable and relevant to the intervention. Maximum : 20 Parameters used to measurable and Either one of the parameters used to interventions is not measurable or one of the parameters is not Two of the parameters used to effectiveness the not measurable, or two of the parameters are not Interventions selected are appropriate however 1 or more may not address major findings and the parameters do not address the The parameters used to not measurable and not Program outcome #3 Evaluates data to inform decision making in response to complex situations. Nursing Care plan Case Study 2 20 18 16 14 12 Develops 1 priority nursing plan care plan relevant to the client s current condition: One NANDA 1 Nursing diagnoses One outcome with criteria of how you plan to evaluate the the outcome. addressed in a comprehensive and thorough manner. components of addressed and well developed, one component needed addressed and adequately developed, two components needed more detail nursing care plan are addressed and adequately developed, three components needed more detail Did not develop a nursing care plan appropriate for the client situation.
Two priority nursing interventions which are related to the Nursing Diagnosis and outcome. Explain how you plan to effectiveness of the Incorporates appropriate NIC and NOC data. Utilizes current scholarly references to support decisions. Maximum : 20 Program Outcome #1 Uses a holistic approach to design care with clients experiencing variable and complex health care needs. Scholarly Writing Case study 1, 2, 3, and 4 10 8 6 4 2 The case study analysis reflects an understanding of the components of physical assessment and clinical judgment. Conforms to APA standards for headings, citations and The case study analysis exemplary and meets all four criterion. While the case study analysis is well done and components, one component of the criterion had limitations. While the case study analysis is good and components, two criterion had limitations. Although the case study is acceptable and components, three of the components of the criterion had limitations. The case study analysis did not contain one or more of the required criterion.
reference page. Is organized and within page limitation. Grammar, punctuation, word choice and spelling are correct.