Competitive Comparison



Similar documents
Competitive Comparison Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor-based Platforms vs. AMD Opteron*

Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5100 Series

Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor

Leading Virtualization Performance and Energy Efficiency in a Multi-processor Server

Intel Xeon Processor 5400 Series

7 Real Benefits of a Virtual Infrastructure

Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5400 Series. Boost Performance and Energy Efficiency with new 45nm multi-core Intel Xeon processors

Innovativste XEON Prozessortechnik für Cisco UCS

Summary. Key results at a glance:

Performance Comparison of Fujitsu PRIMERGY and PRIMEPOWER Servers

Business white paper. HP Process Automation. Version 7.0. Server performance

WHITE PAPER FUJITSU PRIMERGY SERVERS PERFORMANCE REPORT PRIMERGY BX620 S6

Re-Hosting Mainframe Applications on Intel Xeon Processor-based Servers

Making the Move to Quad-Core and Beyond

Oracle Database Reliability, Performance and scalability on Intel Xeon platforms Mitch Shults, Intel Corporation October 2011

Figure 1A: Dell server and accessories Figure 1B: HP server and accessories Figure 1C: IBM server and accessories

Intel Xeon Processor 3400 Series-based Platforms

Power Comparison of Dell PowerEdge 2950 using Intel X5355 and E5345 Quad Core Xeon Processors

Comparing Multi-Core Processors for Server Virtualization

Comparative performance test Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.1 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 AS on Intel-based servers

Legal Notices Introduction... 3

Itanium 2 Platform and Technologies. Alexander Grudinski Business Solution Specialist Intel Corporation

A Quantum Leap in Enterprise Computing

HP ProLiant BL460c achieves #1 performance spot on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications running Microsoft, Oracle

How System Settings Impact PCIe SSD Performance

Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series. An Intelligent Approach to IT Challenges

DDR3 memory technology

HP ProLiant DL585 G5 earns #1 virtualization performance record on VMmark Benchmark

The Engine for Digital Transformation in the Data Center

The Foundation for Better Business Intelligence

HP ProLiant BL460c takes #1 performance on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications running Linux, Oracle

Intel Xeon Processor 5600 Series

Intel Itanium Architecture

LS DYNA Performance Benchmarks and Profiling. January 2009

HP ProLiant Gen8 vs Gen9 Server Blades on Data Warehouse Workloads

Oracle Database Scalability in VMware ESX VMware ESX 3.5

Performance brief for IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0 with VMware ESX 4.0 on HP ProLiant DL380 G6 server

HP ProLiant BL660c Gen9 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 technical brief

You re not alone if you re feeling pressure

Scaling in a Hypervisor Environment

IBM System x family brochure

Maximize Performance and Scalability of RADIOSS* Structural Analysis Software on Intel Xeon Processor E7 v2 Family-Based Platforms

HP ProLiant BL685c takes #1 Windows performance on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications

Re-Hosting Mainframe Applications on Intel Xeon Processor-Based Servers

Virtualization Performance on SGI UV 2000 using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3 KVM

Leading Virtualization 2.0

Red Hat Enterprise Linux: The Clear Leader for Enterprise Web Applications

Intel Xeon Processor E Product Family

CUTTING-EDGE SOLUTIONS FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW. Dell PowerEdge M-Series Blade Servers

Configuring and using DDR3 memory with HP ProLiant Gen8 Servers

Performance Evaluation of VMXNET3 Virtual Network Device VMware vsphere 4 build

Highly Scalable Server for Many Possible Uses. MAXDATA PLATINUM Server 3200 I

Accelerating Data Compression with Intel Multi-Core Processors

CONFIGURING DDR2 MEMORY ON DELL PLATFORMS BASED ON THE INTEL E7520 AND E7525 CHIP SETS

AMD PhenomII. Architecture for Multimedia System Prof. Cristina Silvano. Group Member: Nazanin Vahabi Kosar Tayebani

Measuring Cache and Memory Latency and CPU to Memory Bandwidth

System Requirements Table of contents

Table Of Contents. Page 2 of 26. *Other brands and names may be claimed as property of others.

WHITE PAPER FUJITSU PRIMERGY SERVERS PERFORMANCE REPORT PRIMERGY RX200 S6

How To Configure Your Computer With A Microsoft X86 V3.2 (X86) And X86 (Xo) (Xos) (Powerbook) (For Microsoft) (Microsoft) And Zilog (X

Server Migration from UNIX/RISC to Red Hat Enterprise Linux on Intel Xeon Processors:

Virtualization Technologies and Blackboard: The Future of Blackboard Software on Multi-Core Technologies

Modernizing Servers and Software

How To Compare Two Servers For A Test On A Poweredge R710 And Poweredge G5P (Poweredge) (Power Edge) (Dell) Poweredge Poweredge And Powerpowerpoweredge (Powerpower) G5I (

Primergy Blade Server

Virtuoso and Database Scalability

Improve Power saving and efficiency in virtualized environment of datacenter by right choice of memory. Whitepaper

Power Efficiency Comparison: Cisco UCS 5108 Blade Server Chassis and Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure

RED HAT ENTERPRISE VIRTUALIZATION PERFORMANCE: SPECVIRT BENCHMARK

OpenPower: IBM s Strategy for Best of Breed 64-bit Linux

Sun Microsystems Special Promotions for Education and Research January 9, 2007

Evaluating Intel Virtualization Technology FlexMigration with Multi-generation Intel Multi-core and Intel Dual-core Xeon Processors.

What is in Your Workstation?

Building the Energy-Smart Datacenter

Intel Core i3-2310m Processor (3M Cache, 2.10 GHz)

Enabling Technologies for Distributed and Cloud Computing

High Performance SQL Server with Storage Center 6.4 All Flash Array

Comparing the performance of the Landmark Nexus reservoir simulator on HP servers

Intel 965 Express Chipset Family Memory Technology and Configuration Guide

HP ProLiant DL580 Gen8 and HP LE PCIe Workload WHITE PAPER Accelerator 90TB Microsoft SQL Server Data Warehouse Fast Track Reference Architecture

AMD and SAP. Linux Alliance Overview. Key Customer Benefits

Cisco is a registered trademark or trademark of Cisco Systems, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and certain other countries.

HP ProLiant DL380 G5 takes #1 2P performance spot on Siebel CRM Release 8.0 Benchmark Industry Applications running Windows

FUJITSU Enterprise Product & Solution Facts

Cisco Prime Home 5.0 Minimum System Requirements (Standalone and High Availability)

ECLIPSE Performance Benchmarks and Profiling. January 2009

System Configuration and Order-information Guide ECONEL 100 S2. March 2009

Enabling VMware Enhanced VMotion Compatibility on HP ProLiant servers

Kingston Technology. Server Architecture and Kingston Memory Solutions. May Ingram Micro. Mike Mohney Senior Technology Manager, TRG

PCI Express* Ethernet Networking

Performance Analysis of Web based Applications on Single and Multi Core Servers

Transcription:

Competitive Guide Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor-based Systems Business Enterprise Competitive Comparison Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor-based Platforms vs. AMD Opteron* Quad-Core Reality Through Practical Innovation Offering the industry's first standard high-volume quad-core server microprocessor, Intel unveils a powerful, new technology within its proven Intel Xeon processor family of products. The Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor 5300 Δ series provides breakthrough performance and energy-efficiency for the ultimate in powerful, dense and reliable general-purpose servers. Key platform features include: Better Performance Better Performance per Watt at the System Level Proven and Reliable Solution Better for Virtualization Lower power 64-bit quad-core processors + based on Intel Core microarchitecture improve performance per watt, delivering up to 50% more performance over previous generations within the same power envelope Intel Virtualization Technology, which provides hardware-assisted virtualization, and the broadest industry virtualization software support combine to help optimize data center effectiveness and consolidate more applications on fewer servers New dual independent point-to-point bus and faster front side bus speed driving up to 3x bandwidth improvements versus single-core Intel Xeon processors with DDR2-400 memory Fully buffered DDR2 DIMM memory (FB-DIMM) for more throughput, higher capacity and improved reliability Platform supports both dual-core and quad-core processors using the same socket for both processors, assuring investment protection and a smooth path for upgrading existing dual-core servers

Extending Innovation Your existing servers with Dual-Core Intel Xeon processors 5100 Δ series are socket compatible with Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor 5300 series. They can be added to your existing infrastructure seamlessly and without disruption. Your existing legacy software will also run on quad-core processors with no code changes or revisions, providing even greater investment protection. And with most software, you'll instantly experience the outstanding performance gains quad-core delivers. Built on Experience Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors are built on the proven and advanced Intel Core microarchitecture. By using an already proven dual-core technology as a base for design, Intel is able to deliver a proven and reliable solution for quad-core technology reducing implementation risk and manufacturing costs through a dual-die implementation on high-volume 65nm process technology. Breakthrough Performance: Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor-based Platforms vs. Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor-based Platforms Breakthrough Performance for Servers φ (Higher is better.) SPECint*_rate_base2000 Integer Throughput 1.57 2.55 SPECfp*_rate_base2000 Floating Point Throughput 0.95 1.18 SPECjbb*2005 E-Commerce Application 1.62 2.61 TPC-C* Database 1.21 1.72 SAP-SD* Enterprise Resource Planning 1.23 1.72 SPECWeb*2005 Web Server 1.17 1.61 Lotus Domino* 7.0 Mail Server 1.39 2.18 SunGard Adaptiv* Financial Services 1.20 2.09 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5300 Series Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5100 Series AMD Opteron* 2XX/22XX Series For more information on published performance results, please go to www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon.

Breakthrough Performance for Workstations (Higher is better.) SPECapc* for 3ds max* 8 Rendering DCC-Rendering 1.37 1.90 Cinebench* 9.5 x CPU Rendering CB Score DCC-Rendering 1.28 1.70 Monte Carlo Profit Simulator Excel* 2003 Financial Services 1.42 1.95 POV-Ray* 3.7 x64 Rendering PPS DCC-Rendering 1.14 1.94 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Breakthrough Performance for High Performance Computing (Higher is better.) Linpack Dense Floating Point 2.39 4.0 Fluent* Fluid Dynamics 1.27 1.75 LS-Dyna* Crash Simulation 1.29 1.06 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5300 Series Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5100 Series AMD Opteron* 2XX/22XX Series For more information on published performance results, please go to www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon.

Comparing the Architectures Key Architecture Advantages Intel Core Microarchitecture Dual Independent Point-to-Point Bus Intel Smart Cache 4 instructions per cycle vs. 3 instruction per cycle for AMD Opteron* 2000 series processor Up to 3x system bandwidth increase vs. previous generation, resulting in higher performance 8 MB shared cache, up to 4 MB fully accessible by each core, lowering memory latency and increasing performance Fully Buffered DIMMs Increases memory capacity and throughput Simultaneously read and write helps reduce latency at peak load Allows for maximum capacity at full bandwidth Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor Dual-Core AMD Opteron* 2000 Series Processor Fully Buffered DDR2 DDR2 Intel 6321 (ESB2 I/O) Intel 5000 Series Chipset PCI Express* PCI-X* or PCI Express* Bridge I/O Hub Advantages 4X cache and up to 4 MB accessible to each core (fewer cache misses) Wider bus solely for data (higher data bandwidth) Full speed memory at full capacity Limitations Smaller cache and only 1 MB accessible to each core Sacrifice memory capacity for bandwidth Requires both processors for max memory BW and capacity Shared link for Data and Address (lower data bandwidth)

Quad-Core Intel Xeon Opteron* processor (5300 Δ series) (Socket 1207) System Bus Format Bi-direction, discrete (separate address and data bus) Uni-directional, encoded packet (shared address and data bus) System Bus Width 64 bits 16 bits (each direction) System Bus Peak Bandwidth 21 GB/s 8 GB/s Cache Size/Accessible per Core 8 MB (Intel Smart Cache)/ Full 4 MB accessible per core 2x1M discrete/only 1M accessible per core Memory Fully Buffered DDR2-667 DDR2-400 DDR2-533 DDR2-667 Peak Memory Bandwidth 21 GB/s 12.8 GB/s + 17 GB/s + 21 GB/s + Maximum Memory 64 GB 64 GB 64 GB 64 GB ++ + With two processors installed. ++ Limited to certain OEM configurations. Value of Fully Buffered DDR2 Why FB-DIMM? Fully Buffered DIMM (FB-DIMM) is the next evolution in memory technology for servers and workstations that value both capacity and bandwidth. With older memory technologies, as the signaling rates are increased, the number of DIMMs supported per channel decreases. Therefore, there was a trade-off between overall memory capacity and bandwidth. FB-DIMM offers the no-compromise solution by providing maximum capacity at the highest bandwidth. What is FB-DIMM? Previous memory technologies used a shared parallel interface with all DIMMs on the same bus. FB-DIMM is based on a highspeed point-to-point interface that uses a buffer, referred to as the AMB (Advanced Memory Buffer), to decouple the memory interface from the DRAM components. Decoupling allows the memory bus to run at full speed no matter how many DIMMs are installed, and allows simultaneous reads and writes while still using industry standard commodity DDR2 DRAMs to keep down costs. Reliability Built In FB-DIMM technology offers better RAS (reliability, availability, serviceability) by complementing Intel s existing enhanced data ECC protection (error-correcting code) with enhanced CRC (Cyclic Redundancy Checking). Enhanced CRC checks the transfer of all addresses, commands, and data and automatically retries when an error is detected, allowing for uninterrupted operation in case of transient errors. Finally, there is an AMB pass-through mode whereby if part of the AMB fails, it switches into repeater mode. That DIMM is effectively turned off, but the memory requests are passed in both directions. For more information on the new Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor, go to www.intel.com/quadcoreserver.

Leading Energy Efficiency Why Does System Power Matter? IT managers are faced with the challenge of a growing need for higher compute density and constant pressure to lower overall spending. The cost of electricity is the second highest data center cost, only second to labor. Lowering the power (watts) of each system helps increase compute density within a rack or a fixed footprint and also helps reduce operational cost associated with powering both the servers directly and the associated cooling. How is Intel Driving New Levels of Power Efficiency? Intel has a comprehensive approach to improving power efficiency resulting in better optimized data centers and lower overall cost. First, Intel has already incorporated strained silicon into its 65nm processor technology to improve transistor performance and decrease power. Intel is shifting to the Intel Core microarchitecture, further reducing the power consumed by the processor. Three power levels for the Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor 5300 series are being offered: 50, 80, and 120 watts. Intel will manufacture increased numbers of 50 and 80 watt versions to help meet demand and technology needs, as well as to deliver new levels of energy-efficiency in our quad-core offering. These processors, designed to meet the increasingly challenging compute and data needs of your business infrastructure, deliver as much as 150% better performance than AMD. Additionally, the Intel power toolkit helps IT managers fit more servers within each rack. Finally, demand-based switching with Enhanced Intel SpeedStep technology helps lower utility costs. Intel Virtualization Technology Intel continues to deliver advanced platform features, adding even more value and capabilities to your servers. Intel Virtulization Technology is a set of hardware enhancements to Intel server and client platforms that can improve traditional software-based virtualization solutions. Servers based on Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors are ideal for infrastructure virtualization on dense 2-way form factors, and with up to 50% more performance over previous-generation Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor-based servers, more applications can be consolidated on smaller and more power-efficient systems. More Performance In A Stable Power Infrastructure Performance (Business Operations per Second) (Higher is better.) System Power (Measured System Watts) (Lower is better.) 200,000 400 335 150,000 1.5X Performance Increase 153,500 300 323 322 100,000 4X Performance Increase 102,313 200 Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor E5345 Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160 Single-Core Intel Xeon Processor 50,000 33,114 100 3.60 GHz 3.00 GHz 2.33 GHz 3.60 GHz 3.00 GHz 2.33 GHz SPECjbb 2005 Configuration Details: Data Source: Intel internal measurement - November 2006. System power was measured during the steady-state of window of the performance run. Intel Xeon processor 3.60 GHz-based platform details: Intel preproduction Server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processors 3.60 GHz with 2 MB L2 Cache and 800 MHz system bus and 8 GB (8x1024 MB) DDR2-400 memory, Microsoft Windows* Server x32 Enterprise Edition. Windows 2003* Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit* 5.0 JVM. Run with 1 JVM instance. Dual-Core Intel Xeon processor 5160 based platform details: Intel preproduction Server platform with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory; Windows 2003* Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit* 5.0 P26.4.0. Run with two jvm instances. Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5345 based platform details: Intel preproduction Server platform with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors E5345, 2.33 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory, Windows 2003* Enterprise Edition. BEA JRockit* 5.0 P26.4.0. Run with two jvm instances.

Different Approaches to Energy Efficiency Intel Xeon processor-based platforms New platform: a balanced approach Intel Core microarchitecture 65nm process technology Intel Virtualization Technology AMD Opteron*-based platforms Performance gains tied to increases in frequency No new efficient microarchitecture One generation behind on process technology No hardware-level virtualization technology 1. SPECint_rate_base2000 Configuration Details: Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 2220SE platformbased details: Tyan Thunder K9QE (S4985)* Server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 2220SE, 2.80 GHz with 2x1 MB L2 cache, 8x512 MB, DDR2-667 memory. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9* SP3 (64-bit), SPEC binaries built with PathScale EKOPath* Compiler Suite, Release 2.3. Referenced as published at 78.3. details: Dell PowerEdge 2950* Server platform with two Dual- Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) DDR2 FB-DIMM memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003. SPEC binaries built with Intel C/C++ Compiler 9.1. Referenced as published at 123. details: Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY RX300 S3* Server platform with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) DDR2-RAM memory, Microsoft Windows 2003* Enterprise Edition. SPEC binaries built with Intel C/C++ Compiler 9.1. Measured at 200. 2. SPECfp_rate_base2000 Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 2220SE-based platform details: Tyan Thunder K9QE (S4985)* Server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 2220SE, 2.80 GHz with 2x1 MB L2 cache, 4 GB (8x512 MB) DDR2-667 memory. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9* SP3 (64- bit), SPEC binaries built with PathScale EKOPath* Compiler Suite, Release 2.3. Referenced as published at 87.9. details: Dell PowerEdge 2950* Server platform with two Dual- Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) FB-DIMM memory, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4* Advanced Server Update 3 EM64T. SPEC binaries built with Intel C/C++ Compiler 9.0. Referenced as published at 83.4. details: Fujitsu Siemens Computers PRIMERGY RX300 S3* Server platform with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) DDR2 memory, 64-bit SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10*. SPEC binaries built with Intel C/C++ Compiler 9.1. Measured at 104. 3. SPECjbb 2005 Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 2220SE-based platform details: Tyan Computer Corporation Thunder K9QE (S4985)* Server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 2220SE, 2.80 GHz with 2x1 MB L2 Cache, 8 GB (8x1024 MB) DDR2-667 memory. Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition SP1 (64-bit) IBM Corporation IBM J9 VM*. Referenced as published at 80617 bops and 40,309 bops/jvm. details: Dell PowerEdge 2950* Server platform with two Dual- Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 16 GB (4x4 GB) DDR2-667 FB-DIMM memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition + SP1, BEA JRockit* 5.0 P27.1.0. Measured at 130,589 bops and bops/jvm. details: Dell PowerEdge 2950* Server platform with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 16 GB (8x2 GB) 667MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition + SP1, BEA JRockit* 5.0 P27.1.0. Measured at 210,065 bops and 105,033 bops/jvm. 4. TPC-C Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 2220-based platform details: HP ProLiant DL385 G2* server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 2220SE 2.80 GHz, (2 processors/4 cores/4 threads), 32 GB (8x4 GB) DDR2 memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition, Database Software Microsoft SQL Server* 2005 Enterprise x64 Edition. Referenced as published at 139,693 tpmc; $2.28/tpmC. details: HP ProLiant ML370 G5* Server platform with two Dual- Core Intel Xeon processors 5160, (2 processors/4 cores/4 threads), 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 64 GB (16x4 GB) FBDIMM memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition, Database Software Microsoft SQL Server* 2005 Enterprise x64 Edition. Referenced as published at 169,360 tpmc; $2.93/tpmC. details: HP ProLiant ML370 G5* platform with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, (2 processors / 8 cores / 8 threads), 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 64 GB (16x4 GB) FBDIMM memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise x64 Edition, Database Software Microsoft SQL Server* 2005 Enterprise x64 Edition. Referenced as published at 240,737 tpmc; $1.85/tpmC. 5. SAP-SD 2-Tier Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 2218-based platform details: HP ProLiant BL25p G2* Server with two Dual- Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 2218 2.6 GHz, 1 MB L2 cache per core, 16 GB main memory, Microsoft Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise Edition. SQL Server* 2005 database. SAP ECC Release 5.0. Referenced as published at 1047 SD users. details: IBM System x3650* server platform with two Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 24 GB FBDIMM memory. Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, DB2 UDB 8.2.2 database. SAP ECC Release 5.0. Result published at 1285 users. details: HP ProLiant BL480c* platform with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 32 GB 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory, Windows Server* 2003 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server* 2005 database, SAP ECC Release 6.0. Results published at 1,806 users. 6. SPECWeb 2005 Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 285-based platform details: HP ProLiant DL145 G2* Server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 285, 2.6 GHz with 2x1 MB L2 Cache, 16 GB (8x2 GB) PC3200 memory. 64-Bit RHEL 4 U2 (2.6.9-22 ELsmp x86_64). 64-bit Accoria Rock Web Server*1.3.3 HTTPS software, and Apache Tomcat* 5.5.9. Referenced as published at 11,293. details: HP ProLiant DL380 G5* Server platform with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 32 GB FB-DIMM memory, Windows Server* 2003 SP1, Rock Web Server v1.4.0. Referenced as published at 13,257. details: Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY TX300 S3* Server platform with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 32 GB (8x4 GB) DDRII-RAM PC2-5300F memory, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4* ES U4, Rock Web Server v1.4.0. Results submitted at 18,160. 7. Lotus Domino 7.0 Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 285-based platform details: HP Proliant DL385* Server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 285, 2.60 GHz, 8 GB memory. Windows Server* 2003 OS. 17,000 concurrent, active users; Transactions per minute throughput value of 13927 Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5160-based platform details: Intel Server Pre-Production platform with two Dual- Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 16 GB (8x2 GB) FB-DIMM memory, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9.0* SP3. 22,000 concurrent, active users; Transactions per minute throughput value of 19,297. details: Intel Server Pre-Production platform with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon Processor X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 32 GB 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9.0* SP3. 22,000 concurrent, active users; Transactions per minute throughput value of 30,379. 8. SunGard Adaptiv Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 2220SE-based platform details: Server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 2220SE, 2.80 GHz, 8 GB PC3200 memory. Microsoft Windows Server* x32 Enterprise Edition. SunGard Adaptiv* Credit Risk 64-bit version workload. details: Intel preproduction Server platform with two Dual- Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory; Microsoft Windows Server* x32 Enterprise Edition. SunGard Adaptiv* Credit Risk 64-bit version workload. details: Intel preproduction Server platform with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 2x4 MB L2 Cache, 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory, Microsoft Windows Server* x32 Enterprise Edition. SunGard Adaptiv* Credit Risk 64-bit version workload. 9. SPECapc for 3ds max 8 Rendering Workstation Benchmarks Performance Disclaimers best published or measured results. SPECapc 3ds max* 8 Rendering Score Performance comparison of 2x Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355 (Intel internal reference workstation using X5000 chipset) scoring compared to 2x AMD Opteron* processors 285 (Sun Ultra* 40) as of Nov. 7, 2006. Actual performance may vary. Source: HP continued on next page

continued from previous page 10. Cinebench 9.5 x CPU Rendering CB Score Workstation Benchmarks Performance Disclaimers best published or measured results. Cinebench* 9.5 x-cpu CB score Performance comparison of 2x Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355 (HP xw8400 workstation using Intel X5000 chipset) scoring compared to 2x AMD Opteron* processors 285 (Sun Ultra* 40) as of Nov. 7, 2006. Actual performance may vary. Source: HP. 11. Monte Carlo Profit Simulator Excel 2003 Workstation Benchmarks Performance Disclaimers best published or measured results. Monte Carlo Profit Simulator using Microsoft Excel* 2003 completion time sales and cost comparison simulating profits using the longest time to complete on four simultaneous copies. Performance comparison of 2x Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355 (HP xw8400 workstation using X5000 chipset) scoring compared to 2x AMD Opteron* processors 285 (Sun Ultra* 40) as of Nov. 7, 2006. Actual performance may vary. Source: HP. 12. POV-Ray 3.7 x64 Rendering PPS Workstation Benchmarks Performance Disclaimers best published or measured results. POV-Ray* 3.7B15 x64 Rendering PPS score built-in benchmark performance comparison of 2x Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355 (Intel internal reference workstation using X5000 chipset) scoring compared to 2x AMD Opteron* processors 285 (Sun Ultra* 40) as of Nov. 7, 2006. Actual performance may vary. See http://www.haveland.com/ index.htm?povbench/index.php for more information. Source: Intel internal testing. 13. Linpack Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 280-based platform details: IBM eserver e326m* server platform with two Dual-Core AMD Opteron* processors Model 280, 2.40 GHz. details: Verari Systems RM1220* Server with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 16 GB (8x2 GB) 667MHz FB-DIMM memory; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4*, Update 2, EM64T, Intel Linpack 3.0.1. details: Verari Systems RM2220* Server with two Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 8 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4*, Update 4, EM64T, Intel Linpack 3.0.1. 14. Fluent Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 275-based platform details: IBM LS20* platform with two 2.2 GHz L2 Cache 2x1024 KB. details: Intel preproduction customer reference board with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4*, Update 2, EM64T, Fluent 6.2.16*. details: IBM System x3650* server platform with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 8 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 12 GB (12x1 GB) FB-DIMM memory; Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4*, Nahant update 4, EM64T, Fluent 6.3*. 15. LS-Dyna Dual-Core AMD Opteron* Processor Model 285-based platform details: HP DL145* platform with two 2.6 GHz L2 Cache 2x1024 KB. details: Intel preproduction customer reference board with two Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processors 5160, 3.00 GHz with 4 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 8 GB (8x1 GB) 667 MHz FB-DIMM memory; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4*, Update 2, EM64T, LS-DYNA mpp970.5434a*. details: IBM System x3650* server platform with two Quad- Core Intel Xeon Processors X5355, 2.66 GHz with 8 MB L2 Cache, dual 1333 MHz system bus, 12 GB (12x1 GB) FB-DIMM memory; Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4*, Nahant update 4, EM64T, LS-DYNA mpp970s*. Disclaimers: φ Relative performance for each benchmark is calculated by taking the actual benchmark result for the first platform tested and assigning it a value of 1.0 as a baseline. Relative performance for the remaining platforms tested was calculated by dividing the actual benchmark result for the baseline platform into each of the specific benchmark results of each of the other platforms and assigning them a relative performance number that correlates with the performance improvements reported. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, reference http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/benchmark_limitations.htm or call (U.S.) 1-800-628-8686 or 1-916-356-3104. Δ Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. + 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel 64 architecture. Processors will not operate (including 32-bit operation) without an Intel 64 architecture-enabled BIOS. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information. Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with an enabled Intel processor, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and, for some uses, certain platform software enabled for it. Functionality, performance or other benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations and may require a BIOS update. Software applications may not be compatible with all operating systems. Please check with your application vendor. Compatibility and upgradeability to Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor 5300 series is determined by the manufacturer. Please check with your OEM to determine compatibility and upgradeability. Measured SPECint_rate for Clovertown 2.66/1333 vs published AMD Opteron 2220 SE (2.8 GHz, socket F) Copyright 2006 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, Intel logo, Intel. Leap ahead., Intel. Leap ahead. logo, Xeon, Intel SpeedStep, Intel Core, and the Intel Inside logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Printed in USA 1106/HLW/OCG/XX/PDF Please Recycle 315886-001US