Exhibit memory of previously-learned materials by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers. Key Words



Similar documents
Bloom s Taxonomy. List the main characteristics of one of the main characters in a WANTED poster.

Cognitive Domain (Bloom)

Alignment of Taxonomies

Higher order questions encourages higher order thinking Based on Bloom s Taxonomy

Core Competencies for Public Health Practice Lessons Learned (USA)

Writing learning objectives

Resources for Writing Program Learning Outcomes

AANN CNE CE Applications Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Writing Goals and Objectives If you re not sure where you are going, you re liable to end up some place else. ~ Robert Mager, 1997

Mortgage Broker Qualifying Standards (MBQS)

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Webb s Depth of Knowledge Guide

Writing Learning Objectives

5. Formally register for INS299 for the number of semester hours indicated on your contract.

Writing Student Learning Outcomes for an Academic Program

Guide to Transferable Skills

6 Week Strategic Onboarding Program:

TIPS FOR WRITING LEARNING OBJECTIVES

HSU Division of Enrollment Management and Student Affairs. Assessment Workbook

MOUNTAIN VIEW COLLEGE CORE CURRICULUM EVALUATION COMMITTEE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES COURSE LEVEL VICTOR J. SOTO INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER PREPARED BY

The Learning Skills Pyramid

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready (SCCCR) Probability and Statistics

Industrial Engineering Definition of Tuning

Accountable Talk Toolkit

TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (Excerpts from Linn and Miller Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 9 th ed)

Activity 1: Using base ten blocks to model operations on decimals

GRADE 11 English Language Arts Standards Pacing Guide. 1 st Nine Weeks

Revised Bloom s Taxonomy

Comprehension Questions for Leveled Text

Instructional Design What Is It and Why Should I Care?

A New Lens for Examining Cognitive Rigor in Standards, Curriculum, & Assessments. for the transition to Common Core State Standards?

Dr. Ryan McLawhon Texas A&M University

Three domains of learning

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE MAJOR A PRIMER FOR DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT LIAISONS

Writing Educational Goals and Objectives

CREATING LEARNING OUTCOMES

Developing Objectives and Relating them to Assessment

Model Assignment Issued July 2013 Level 4 Diploma in Business and Administration

Quickwrite Questions: How did you learn the skill of note taking? How did this skill contribute to your success?

Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)

Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas Norman L. Webb March 28, Reading (based on Wixson, 1999)

Characteristics of Binomial Distributions

Writing Instructional Objectives

Using the PRECEDE- PROCEED Planning Model PRECEDE-PROCEED P R E C E D E. Model for health promotion programming Best known among health scientists

Writing Measurable Learning Outcomes

Writing Quality Learning Objectives

HIGH SCHOOL MASS MEDIA AND MEDIA LITERACY STANDARDS

PSYCHOLOGY CURRICULUM VITAE

The National Arts Education Standards: Curriculum Standards <

Grade 6 English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors

Preproduction STUDENTS

Writing Learning Objectives

WISCONSIN MBA RÉSUMÉ GUIDE

What Have I Learned In This Class?

Developing & Measuring Student Learning Outcomes in Academic Advising

Elements of a Novel and Narrative Writing Grade 10

6 The Literature Review

Curriculum Development. Workbook

Second Language Acquisition Stages Stephen Krashen (1986) Silent and Receptive Stage

Instructional Design Principles in the Development of LearnFlex

GRADE 9 READING LITERATURE...2

2012 VISUAL ART STANDARDS GRADES K-1-2

Utilizing Bloom's Taxonomy in Your Classroom

behind the scenes curriculum mapping: primary The following curriculum mapping is relevant for all 10 episodes of THE LION KING - Behind The Scenes

IB Command Terms Categorized by Skill Level (For an explanation of this document visit

How To Write The English Language Learner Can Do Booklet

Case for Learning Design

CHAPTER 5 : COURSE AND UNIT DESIGN AND QUALITY

Case Writing Guide. Figure 1: The Case Writing Process Adopted from Leenders & Erskine (1989)

Sample. Session 4: Case Analysis & Planning. Identify potential legal and non-legal options for achieving client goals

Teaching and Educational Development Institute. Bloom s taxonomy of educational objectives

Given below are three important steps for your successful job search.

Virginia English Standards of Learning Grade 8

In Defense of Kantian Moral Theory Nader Shoaibi University of California, Berkeley

SAMPLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Brought to you by the NVCC-Annandale Reading and Writing Center

WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW

UNIT PLAN: The Catcher in the Rye. Written by AnnMarie Dull, tenth grade English teacher at the High School for Environmental Studies, New York, NY

This document has been produced to support the development of effective questioning and dialogue between teacher and pupils.

LEVEL A! (Reading Comprehension Questions)

Critical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean?

The Open Group Certified Architect (Open CA) Program

TeenResumeGuide. Mayor s Youth Council of Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino bostonyouthzone.com/myc

Module Five Critical Thinking

Big6 Science Fair Project Organizer

LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES WRITING WINNING COVER LETTERS AND RESUME WORKSHOP 2003

Units of Study 9th Grade

MS Health Care Administration ( )

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready (SCCCR) Algebra 1

Charting the Text. What is it? When should I use it? How do I use it? Why should I use it?

Tracking Performance Accomplishments and Writing Self Assessments

Transcription:

The Six Levels of Questioning Level 1 Knowledge Exhibit memory of previously-learned materials by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts, and answers. who what why when where which omit choose find how define label show spell list match name relate tell recall select What is? Who was? How is? Where is? How did happen? When did happen? Why did? When did? How would you show? Who were the main? Which one? How would you describe? Can you recall? Can you select? Can you list the three? NOTE: Discussion Directors should not use questions from this level of questioning. These kinds of questions don t make for good discussion because they typically have only one or two correct answers.

Level 2 Comprehension Demonstrate understand of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions, and stating main ideas. compare contrast demonstrate interpret explain extend illustrate infer outline relate rephrase translate summarize show classify What is the main idea of? What facts or ideas show? Can you explain what is happening? What does mean? How would you classify the type of? How would you compare? How would you contrast? Put in your own words How would you rephrase the meaning of? What statements support? What can you say about? Which is the best answer? How would you summarize? NOTE: Discussion Directors should not use questions from this level of questioning. These kinds of questions don t make for good discussion because they typically have only one or two correct answers.

Level 3 Application Solve problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques, and rules in a different way. apply build choose construct develop interview make use of organize plan select solve utilize model identify experiment How would you use? What examples can you find to? What would happen if? What parts would you choose to change? How would you solve using what you ve learned? How would you organize to show? How would you show your understanding of? What approach would you use to? How would you apply what you learned to? What other way would you plan to? What facts would you select to show? What questions would you ask in an interview with?

Level 4 Analysis Examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations. analyze categorize classify compare contrast discover dissect divide examine inspect simplify survey take part in test for distinguish list distinction theme relationships function motive inference assumption conclusion Why do you think? What are the parts or features of? How is related to? What motive is there? Can you list the parts? What inference can you make? What conclusions can you draw? How would you classify? How would you categorize? What evidence can you find? What is the relationship between? Can you make a distinction between? What is the function of? What ideas justify?

Level 5 Synthesis Compile information together in a different way by combining elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions. build choose combine compile compose construct create design develop estimate formulate imagine invent make up originate plan predict propose solve solution suppose discuss modify change original improve adapt minimize maximize delete theorize elaborate test happen change What change would you make to solve? How would you improve? What would happen if? Can you elaborate on the reason? Can you propose an alternative? Can you invent? How would you adapt to create a different? How would you change or modify the plot? What could be done to minimize or maximize? What way would you design? What could be combined to improve? Suppose you could. What would you do? How would you test? Can you formulate a theory for? Can you think or an original way for the? Can you predict the outcome if?

Level 6 Evaluation Present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas, or quality of work based on a set of criteria. award choose conclude criticize decide defend determine dispute evaluate judge justify measure compare mark rate recommend rule on select agree appraise prioritize opinion interpret explain support importance criteria prove disprove assess influence perceive value deduct Do you agree with the actions? Why or why not? What is your opinion of? Who would you prove or disprove? What is the value of? Would it be better if? Why did the character choose? What would you recommend? How would you rate? What would you cite to defend the actions? How would you evaluate? What choice would you have made? What would you select? How would you prioritize? What judgment would you make about? How would you justify? Why is it better?