School of Forest Resources and conservation



Similar documents
TREES: FOREST TREE INSECT CONTROL

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF OHIO. Dual MAGNUM. EPA Reg EPA SLN No. OH

FWRC. Cooperators: Delta Wildlife, Inc. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Integrated Weed Management in Portland Parks

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

PASTURE AND HAY INSECT MANAGEMENT

Propagation and Care of Leyland Cypress as Christmas Trees

Simazine 4L Herbicide

Wildfire Damage Assessment for the 2011 Southeast Complex Fires

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

for Sweet Corn Joe Masabni UKREC Princeton, KY Joe Masabni

Strawberry Production Basics: Matted Row

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

Hand-held and Backpack Sprayers for Applying Pesticides

HERBICIDES FOR CONTROL OF BROADLEAF WEEDS AND GRASSES

WEED MANAGEMENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Managing Black Walnut

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Are My. Pine Trees. Ready To Thin?

Comparison of Weed Management Strategies with Roundup Ready Corn. J. A. Ferrell and W. W. Witt

Forest Regeneration Methods: Natural Regeneration, Direct Seeding and Planting 1

Tree and forest restoration following wildfire

SUGGESTIONS WEED CONTROL

1 SEEDLING QUALITY. Seedling quality

STUDY GUIDE Category 6 Right-of-Way Pest Control

Waterwise Landscaping: Designing a Drought-tolerant (and deer-resistant) Landscape and Garden

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

Key Growth Stages. Kent McKay, NCREC. Minot, ND

Nematode Management in Okra 1

TREE STRUCTURE AND BIOLOGY

Organic Gardening Certificate Program Quiz Week 3 Answer Key

Developing a Prescribed Fire Burn Plan: ELEMENTS & CONSIDERATIONS

NORTH COUNTY TRANSFER CENTER METRO Contract Numbers 01756/ % - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SECTION NEW PLANTING MAINTENANCE

Phenology. Phenology and Growth of Grapevines. Vine Performance

Maintaining Cactus and Succulents

for Tomato Joe Masabni UKREC Princeton, KY Joe Masabni

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY

SOIL TEST NOTES. NOTE 17: Managing Lead Contaminated Soils

How Much Does Acid Rain Hinder the Growth Height of Brassica rapa Plants Without Other Environmental Stressors?

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Plants, like all other living organisms have basic needs: a source of nutrition (food),

Use this diagram of a food web to answer questions 1 through 5.

Invasive Species Jeopardy

This material is based on work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Extension Service & the U.S. EPA

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

College of Agriculture, P.O. Box Tucson, Arizona

CALCULATING AVAILABLE FORAGE

Direct sowing versus planting

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Landscape Fertilizers: Selection, Handling, Application and Storage...

4- ""X,4. f'~.'.' ..';:,'.,- ~':;:..j..~ ', ' " .~.::~:~~. ~ ~ ...,',", ~. :!.;~.j:~~.,.., ~.,7-c' ':';...;~.:. c...-::.'.. .:4'.'-;' ' ':;\ :.,.

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

Our American Trees by Robert C. Birkby

4.0 Discuss some effects of disturbances on the forest.

Cooperative Extension Service The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Athens

Corn and Soybean Production Calendar

Culture in field conditions - Challenges A South American point of view Roberto Campos Pura Natura, Argentina

ACTIVE INGREDIENTS. Methylated seed oils, surfactants and emulsifiers. All ingredients are exempt from tolerance as specified in 40 CFR (c).

In this lesson, students will identify a local plant community and make a variety of

Virginia Gardener

Can You Make Money With Sheep? David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison

WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY LAWN?

Pest Management Plan. March CEPF Grant Border Rural Committee. Integrated Conservation in Northern Keiskammahoek

PEST MANAGEMENT (CSP Enhancements) January 2006 Enhancement Activity Task Sheet

Project on the Eradication of the Weed Wedelia trilobata from Niue. Pest Management in the Pacific Programme

Abstract. Introduction

Evaporative Cooling System for Aquacultural Production 1

Guidelines for. Urban Tree Canopy

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

Protecting Your Forest Asset

Identification and Prevention of Frost or Freeze Damage By Linda Reddick, Kingman Area Master Gardener

Fayette County Appraisal District

By Gerald Urquhart, Walter Chomentowski, David Skole, and Chris Barber

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

Amazing World Under Our Feet

Crop residue management (CRM), a cultural practice that

Objectives. Raster Data Discrete Classes. Spatial Information in Natural Resources FANR Review the raster data model

WEED MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR PEACH ORCHARDS

COMPOST A USER'S GUIDE TO. The Beauty of Your Lawn & Garden Blossoms from the Soil

Transcription:

School of Forest Resources and conservation Daniel B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Forestry, Wildlife, Water and Soil Resources, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Natural Resource Recreation and Tourism A Guide to Using Imazapyr for Chemical Site Preparation in Southern Pine Plantation Establishment By: David Dickens Forest Productivity Professor, The University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Pat Minogue Assistant Professor of Silviculture, University of Florida, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, and David Moorhead Silviculture Professor, The University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources 3 August 2012 Introduction Some form of site preparation is needed to establish southern pine plantations. This is the case whether the site was a harvested forest, a pasture site, or a former cropland site. Southern pines are shade intolerant, therefore requiring direct sunlight - a free-to-grow environment. Like all plants, they have three major requirements for growth: water, sunlight, and nutrients. Site preparation should optimize all three of these requirements. In most cases, competition control is the most important objective in preparing a site for planting southern pine seedlings. On soils that are somewhat poorly to very poorly drained (many Atlantic and Gulf Flatwoods soils), mechanical bedding is often needed to improve soil aeration, fostering adequate seedling survival and early growth. Some site preparation activities can also enhance the planting of a site by reducing or moving logging debris. Types of site preparation include: mechanical (chopping, shearing, piling, disking, bedding, 3-in-1 plowing, subsoiling, and ripping), chemical (using soil, foliar, or soil and foliar active herbicides) or combinations of mechanical and chemical treatments. The use of herbicides for forest site preparation has become common in the last 30 years. This paper addresses appropriate imazapyr site preparation rates for different application timings to optimize planted pine seedling growth and survival, while avoiding seedling injury caused by residual herbicide. The active ingredient, imazapyr, is a foliar and soil active herbicide (absorbed by foliage, stems, and roots) with relatively broad spectrum control of many tree, shrub, vine, broadleaf, and grass weeds. Imazapyr is typically applied as a broadcast spray over unwanted vegetation prior to planting (Photo 1). Following absorption into plants, imazapyr moves within the xylem (upward), phloem (primarily downward), or from cell to cell throughout the plant very quickly, accumulating in regions of new growth. Imazapyr works to prevent the synthesis of three amino acids produced by plants, which are required for protein synthesis and plant sustenance. Imazapyr has an acute lethal dose to 50% of a test (rat) population (LD 50 ) > 5000 mg/kg, classed by the US Environmental Protection Agency as "practically nontoxic". Imazapyr's low toxicity to humans is due in part to its mode of action. It works on amino acid synthesis pathways that are specific to plants and not found in humans or animals. Since the patent for imazapyr expired in 2002, other herbicide manufacturers have been able to produce and sell the herbicide, greatly reducing the price per gallon. Common imazapyr forestry herbicides contain either 2 or 4 pounds acid equivalent (ae) imazapyr per gallon. Because of the broad spectrum of vegetation controlled, low LD 50 for humans, and the reduced prices for this product, imazapyr is widely used for forest site preparation.

Factors that determine imazapyr site preparation application rate per acre and timing include: whether using the 2 or 4 lb ae imazapyr per gallon product (Table 1 and 2), planned pine seedlings planting month (Table 1 and 2), surface (0-8 ) soil texture (% sand, silt, or clay), percent soil organic matter, soil drainage class, and site rainfall amount between herbicide application and planting. 2 versus 4 lb acid equivalent (ae) imazapyr per gallon formulations: Current products labeled for forestry use containing 2 lb ae imazapyr/gallon are primarily used for site preparation and other non-selective treatments. These contain surfactants to improve leaf wetting and herbicide uptake by foliage and stems (Chopper Gen2, Polaris SP, Rotary ). Current forestry products containing 4 lb ae imazapyr/gallon do not contain surfactant, because they are used for selective applications, "over-the-top" of pines (Arsenal AC, Polaris AC Complete, Imazapyr 4 L). For selective herbicide use over pines, the amount of surfactant should be tailored to the specific pine species and age to ensure pine tolerance to the herbicide. Surfactants improve herbicide uptake by both weeds and pine crop trees. At least two site preparation timing studies done in the last 20 years using Chopper (0.75 lb ae/acre) have shown superior growth rates for loblolly pine two to four years post planting when the product was applied in June and seedlings were planted in mid-december to early January. Imazapyr applications made later in the year (September - ) and earlier (February-April) resulted in less loblolly pine growth. Reduced loblolly pine growth rates observed for early imazapyr treatments (pre-june) are thought to be due to less effective hardwood control, particularly for recent harvests where hardwood resprouts have not developed to an adequate size to absorb an effective dose from the foliage and roots. Another reason may be reduced herbaceous vegetation control in the first growing season after planting, as the residual herbicide degrades with time. Reduced growth rates observed for pines planted following the later (September - ) imazapyr site preparation treatments may be due to negative effects from residual soil active imazapyr. On sandy sites in particular, planted pines sometimes show phytotoxic symptoms such as fasciculation (multiple buds) in the apical leader, yellowing, and stunting following late imazapyr applications using Chopper at /acre (0.75 lb ae/acre) or more (Photos 1 and 2). Photos 3 and 4 show good slash pine survival and growth when imazapyr is applied four months prior to planting using Polaris SP at the /acre (0.75 lb ae/acre). Photos 5 through 8 illustrate cases where loblolly pine seedlings were planted within 3 months of a 40 or /acre Chopper (2 lb ae/gallon) application and first year survival is poor. Recommendations Imazapyr is sometimes used alone for site preparation at a rate of 0.75 lb ae/acre or more. Normally lesser amounts are used in combination with other herbicides, in particular glyphosate or triclopyr (as described on the Arsenal AC label). These herbicide combinations broaden the spectrum of weeds controlled and generally improve fuels to support broadcast site prep burning, which is typically done six weeks or more after herbicide treatment. Labeled Arsenal AC rates for site preparation range from 0.75-1.25 lb ae/acre (24-/acre product) for loblolly pine and longleaf pine, and from 0.62-1.0 lb ae/acre (20-32 oz/acre product) for slash pine. Tolerance to imazapyr is greatest for loblolly pine, whereas longleaf and slash have similar tolerance, and are more prone to imazapyr injury than loblolly. Since the Chopper Gen2 product contains half the concentration of imazapyr compared to Arsenal, the recommended product rates are doubled. Other generic products follow these same recommendations, but in all cases the labeled rates

may be excessive. Therefore in many cases, on many sites, a lesser imazapyr application rate than the labeled amount can be used with acceptable competition control results. Based on the two previously mentioned studies and field observations throughout the southeast during the nearly three decades since imazapyr was introduced, the rate of imazapyr applied should be adjusted for the particular pine species to be planted and the time interval between herbicide application and planting (Tables 1and 2). Table 1. Suggested highest imazapyr product rate using formulations containing 2 lb acid equivalent imazapyr per gallon * to optimize growth and to minimize planted loblolly, longleaf, or slash pine seedling phytotoxicity. Rates less than imazapyr product should contain appropriate tank mix combinations with glyphosate, triclopyr, sulfometuron methyl or other compatible herbicides labeled for this use, following all herbicide product label directions. Planting Date Herbicide Site Prep Treatment Date** May - June July - August September Herbicide product rates per acre* Loblolly Pine 56 oz 64 oz 60 oz 56 oz Longleaf and Slash Pine 36 oz 36 oz 36 oz ()*** (32 oz) *** 36 oz *Imazapyr product formulations containing 2 lb acid equivalent imazapyr per gallon such as: trade names (manufacturer): Chopper, Chopper Gen2 (BASF Specialty Products), Polaris SP (NuFarm), and Rotary 2SL (Alligare LLC). **Do not plant within 60 days of a /acre or greater (2 lbs ae/gallon) imazapyr herbicide application. *** Do not plant within 45 days of a 32 or 36 oz/ac imazapyr rate when rainfall amounts for the area are lower than normal, soil moisture is not adequate for planting, and competing vegetation is less than 1 foot tall. If the site has a sandy, loamy sand, or sandy loam surface soil texture, is moderately well, well to excessively well drained, and has an organic matter content < 2%, then the time interval between application and planting may be increased by one month (Tables 1 and 2). Another option is to reduce the herbicide product rate applied by 2 oz for 4 lb ae/gal imazapyr products and by 4 oz for 2 lb ae/gal product formulations.

Table 2. Suggested highest imazapyr product rate using formulations containing 4 lb acid equivalent imazapyr per gallon * to optimize growth and minimize planted loblolly, longleaf or slash pine seedling phytotoxicity. Rates less than imazapyr product should contain appropriate tank mix combinations with glyphosate, triclopyr, sulfometuron methyl or other compatible herbicides labeled for this use, following all herbicide product label directions. Planting Date Herbicide Site Prep Treatment Date** May - June July August September Herbicide product rates per acre* 28 oz 32 oz 30 oz 28 oz Longleaf and Slash Pine 18 oz 18 oz 18 oz ()*** (16 oz) *** 18 oz *Imazapyr product formulations containing 4 lb acid equivalent imazapyr per gallon: trade names (manufacturer): Arsenal AC (BASF Specialty Products), Polaris AC Complete (NuFarm), and Imazapyr 4SL (Alligare LLC). **Do not plant within 60 days of a /acre or greater (4 lbs ae/gallon) imazapyr herbicide application. ***Do not plant within 45 days of a 16 or 18 oz/ac imazapyr rate when rainfall amounts for the area are lower than normal, soil moisture is not adequate for planting, and competing vegetation is less than 1 foot tall. Photo 1 and 2. Stunted loblolly pine growth following site preparation using /acre Chopper (0.75 lb ae/acre imazapyr) + surfactant, applied in late August of the previous year.

Photo 3 and 4. Left and right photos: Slash pine planted 23-24 December 2010 following site preparation using /acre Polaris SP (imazapyr @ 0.75 lb ae/acre) and 3 qts/acre Accord (glyphosate) in late August 2010, burned early 2010, and 2 oz/acre Spyder (sulfometuron methyl) applied late April 2011 (left photo taken 30 August and right photo taken 17 2011). This stand had approximately 85% survival and good growth in a hot and dry (12 below normal rainfall) first growing season. Photo 5 and 6. Left photo: poor loblolly pine survival (<40%) following site preparation using /acre Chopper (imazapyr) + 16 oz/acre Garlon 4 (triclopyr) + 4 oz/ac Oust Extra (sulfometuron methyl + metsulfuron methyl) applied late August 2010. The seedlings were planted in early December 2010. Right photo: the same site as photo 5, but at the edge where little herbicide appears to be sprayed, showing good survival (80%) and seedling appearance.

Photo 7 and 8. Left photo: poor loblolly pine survival (<50%) following site preparation using Chopper/acre (imazapyr) applied late August 2010. Seedlings were planted early December 2010. The right photo: the same site as photo 7, but at the edge where little or no herbicide appears to be sprayed and good survival (80-95%) and seedling appearance were observed. Athens, Georgia 30602-2152 Phone: 706.542.6819 fax: 706.542.5073 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Institution In compliance with federal law, including the provisions of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the University of Georgia does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its administration of educational policies, programs, or activities; its admissions policies; scholarship and loan programs; athletic or other University-administered programs; or employment. In addition, the University does not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation consistent with the University non-discrimination policy. Inquiries or complaints should be directed to the director of the Equal Opportunity Office, Peabody Hall, 290 South Jackson Street, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Telephone 706-542-7912 (V/TDD).Fax 706-542-2822.