Results of the Spring, 2011 Administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement at New Mexico Highlands University



Similar documents
ABET - Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Mapped to NSSE Survey Questions

The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) Business Accreditation (BA) Standards

Focusing on LMU s Undergraduate Learning Outcomes: Creative and Critical Thinking

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - St. Petersburg College (2013 Administration) 2013 Means Report - Main Survey

[Weighted] 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions [ACTCOLL] CLQUEST

In what level of qualification are you enrolled? Where has your study been mainly based in the current academic year?

High-Impact Practices and Experiences from the Wabash National Study

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - University of Cincinnati Clermont College (2015 Administration) 2015 Means Report - Main Survey

The Disengaged Commuter Student: Fact or Fiction? are less committed to academic pursuits compared with their counterparts who go away to

The Degree Qualifications Profile Mapped to NSSE Survey Questions

Michigan Technological University College Portrait. The Huskies Community. Carnegie Classification of Institutional Characteristics

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - Savannah Technical College (2015 Administration) 2015 Frequency Distributions - Main Survey

Suggested Strategies for Student Engagement

NSSE S BENCHMARKS ONE SIZE FITS ALL?

AACSB Business Mapped to NSSE 2015 Survey Items

AACSB Accounting Mapped to NSSE 2015 Survey Items

2012 Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE)

Simmons College Adaptation of the CLASSE for Students

Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (WASC) ACCREDITATION TOOLKIT

College Entrance Exams - A Daydream Project

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - El Paso Community College (2015 Administration) 2015 Frequency Distributions - Main Survey

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - Orange County Community College (2015 Administration) 2015 Frequency Distributions - Main Survey

Community College Survey of Student Engagement - East Georgia State College (2015 Administration) 2015 Frequency Distributions - Main Survey

The University of Southern Mississippi College Portrait The University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, MS

Miami University Graduation Survey Certificate and Associate s Degree Recipients

Miami University Graduation Survey Graduate Degree Recipients

Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Undergraduate Program. Assessment Measures

Miami University Graduation Survey College of Professional Studies and Applied Sciences Bachelor s Degree Recipients

Independent Colleges and Student Engagement:

Perceived Stress among Engineering Students

California State University, Los Angeles College Portrait. The Cal State LA Community. Carnegie Classification of Institutional Characteristics

Living in the Red Hawks Community

Required for Review: Ask and answer an assessment-focused question

Community College Survey of Student Engagement

The Broncho Community. Carnegie Classification of Institutional Characteristics

Double Degree Program of Master of Public Administration Program Description for. Sun Yat-sen University and Northern Illinois University

University of North Dakota Department of Electrical Engineering Graduate Program Assessment Plan

National Research and Trends on Senior Capstone Experiences

Planning and Implementing Ubiquitous Computing at Wake Forest University

STUDENT SATISFACTION REPORT (STUDENT OPINION SURVEY) SPRING

Program Assessment Report. Unit Psychology Program name: Clinical Psychology MA Completed by David Grilly May 2007

Double Degree Program of Master of Public Administration Program Description for. Renmin University of China and Northern Illinois University

915 Volunteer Blvd General Inquiries: Academic Advising Staff

MASTERS SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT REPORT

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAM OUTCOMES FALL 2011 TO SPRING 2012

Self-Reported Gains in Academic & Life Skills (part 1) Source: UCUES Core 2008 (Seniors only)

Graduate Handbook of the Mathematics Department. North Dakota State University May 5, 2015

California State University, Stanislaus Business Administration (MBA) ASSESSMENT REPORT and PLAN

Proposal for Dual Degree Program Master of Education in Higher Education (M.Ed.) / Master of Public Policy and Administration (MPPA)

MASTER S OPTION GENERAL GUIDELINES Option 4: Comprehensive Examination

New Mexico Highlands University School of Business Outcomes Assessment For BBA Programs

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAM OUTCOMES FALL 2010 TO SPRING 2011

University of South Carolina School of Library & Information Science. A Checklist of Certification Requirements for School Librarian Candidates

ASSESSMENT PLAN UNDERGRADUATE MAJOR IN POLITICAL SCIENCE. Mission Statement

Master of Arts Program in Teaching English as a Foreign Language

A Survey Among Members Of The Association Of American Colleges And Universities. Conducted By Hart Research Associates. April 2009

School of Agriculture Assessment Results for

Self-Reported Gains in Academic & Life Skills (part 1) Source: UCUES Core 2010 (Seniors only)

Chapter 11 Job Responsibilities Four-Year Institutions. Tables

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, COUNSELING, AND POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION STUDENT OUTCOMES, COMPETENCIES, AND METHODS OF ASSESSMENT

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR: Academic Year August 15, Department s/program s Goal(s) in Support of Institutional Mission:

Assessment Plan PhD in English & Comparative Literature, University of Cincinnati

Preschool to 3rd Grade (P-3) Early Childhood Education Teacher Preparation Program

Ph.D. PROGRAM IN HIGHER EDUCATION School of Education Indiana University

Colorado State University s Systems Engineering degree programs.

Graduate Student Handbook of the Mathematics Department

Miami University Graduation Survey Certificate and Associate s Degree Recipients

Important Steps to a Career in Higher Education (MA/MS or or PhD)

Institutional Research Reports

YSU Program Student Learning Assessment Report Due Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) DEGREE PROGRAMS IN EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION with an emphasis in HIGHER EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION

Assignment of Semester Credit Hours Revised March 2, 2016

Western Carolina University Marketing B.S B.A Business Assessment Plan for

Key components of a successful remedial/developmental education program include an effective organizational structure, mandatory assessment and

Assessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Why is it important to use multiple methods? What are direct and indirect methods of assessment?

GRADUATE SCHOOL IN RELIGIOUS STUDIES (OR RELATED HUMANITIES/SOCIAL SCIENCE FIELD) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Using campus survey results to make good decisions in challenging times: The first year experience of veteran and active duty students at UC

The Wisconsin Experience for UW Madison Bachelor s Degree Recipients: Annual Update

The Undergraduate Core Curriculum (General Education) Outcomes and Assessment. Newcomb-Tulane College

Family and Consumer Sciences Education (FCSE) Master of Science

Fall Term Syllabus MASTER SYLLABUS. Course Domain and Boundaries

How To Prepare For Graduate School

Department of History

MASTER OF ARTS (M.A.) DEGREE PROGRAMS IN EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND STUDENT PERSONNEL SERVICES

College of Social Sciences and Humanities

MASTER OF EDUCATION (M.Ed.) PROGRAMS

Master's Degree, Student Affairs Concentration

Anadolu University (TR)

Computer Science Department s Student Outcomes Assessment Plan

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PROGRAM DETAILS

Tutoring Services at CSUSM. Presented by the Centers for Learning and Academic Support Services (CLASS)

PSYCHOLOGY. Master of Science in Applied Psychology

2009 MASTER PLAN/PROGRESS REPORT

CATL Scholar Application Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning. Enhancing Academic Challenge in the Human Service Internship

FINAL REPORT RESEARCH GRADE 7 TO 12 PROGRAMS. Frontier College would like to thank the Ontario Ministry of Education for their support.

Program Outcomes and Assessment. Learning Outcomes

2012 MASTER PLAN/PROGRESS REPORT

2009 MASTER PLAN/PROGRESS REPORT

LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICY

Engaging Students in Learning

Transcription:

Results of the Spring, 2011 Administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement at New Mexico Highlands University Prepared by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Research The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is administered to freshmen and senior students in the spring semester to assess their experiences with their undergraduate institution. It is administered by the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. In 2011, 751 institutions from the United States and Canada participated in the survey. As a part of Highlands participation in the Voluntary System of Accountability, we must administer a survey of student engagement at least once every three years. The NSSE was first administered at Highlands in the spring of 2009 and administered for a second time in the spring of 2011. This report summarizes the results from the spring, 2011 administration of the survey. More information about the NSSE can be found here: http://nsse.iub.edu/. More information about the Voluntary System of Accountability can be found here: http://www.voluntarysystem.org/. We can compare Highlands performance to three different comparison groups: 1) all Southwest public institutions; 2) all institutions sharing our Carnegie classification (Masters- Large Programs); or 3) a self- selected group of comparison institutions. 400 freshmen and 477 seniors were invited to take the survey online. The overall response rate was 21% (13% of the freshmen and 29% of the seniors). While this response rate is disappointing, it is not significantly different from the response rates of our selected peer group, and is almost exactly the same as our response rate in 2009 (see table below). Response Rate a Our C Highlands Southwest Public Carnegie Class G FY SR FY SR FY SR FY Overall 21% 18% 27% By class 13% 29% 15% 20% 24% 29% 13% NSSE sample size b 400 477 62,774 79,47 0 223,23 9 241,44 2 4,718 Sampling Error c Overall 6.3% 0.6% 0.2% 1 By class 12.7% 7.1% 0.9% 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% 3.7% Number of respondents b 52 136 9,271 16,10 0 53,033 71,029 608 Total population 400 477 65,536 86,14 1 225,01 4 246,49 6 4,917 The NSSE groups it s items into five general categories: Level of Academic Challenge, Active and Collaborative Learning, Student- Faculty Interaction, Enriching Educational Experiences, and Supportive

Campus Environment. Examples of the items that made up each of these categories are included at the end of this report. The tables below, (provided by the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research), compare Highlands performance in each of the five categories to the performance of the three comparison groups. As can be seen, in not a single category did Highlands students score significantly lower than any of the comparison groups and, in a few cases, Highlands students scored significantly higher than the comparison groups. While this is good, in represents a decrease in our performance from the 2009 administration when our freshmen students scored significantly higher than the comparison groups in several cases. Level of Academic Challenge 2011 First-Year 49.6 51.1 -.11 53.4 -.29 52.0 -.16 Senior 57.6 55.7.13 57.5.01 56.6.07 Level of Academic Challenge 2009 First-Year 54.5 50.6 *.28 53.1.11 53.7.06 Senior 57.9 56.1.12 56.9.07 57.0.06. Active and Collaborative Learning 2011

First-Year 47.6 41.5 *.35 43.1.27 44.2.19 Senior 54.4 50.7 *.20 52.0.13 51.2 *.17 Active and Collaborative Learning 2009 First-Year 52.9 43.5 ***.53 43.3 ***.57 43.2 ***.59 Senior 56.5 52.5 *.22 51.5 ***.28 51.0 ***.31 Highland s Student- Faculty Interaction 2011 Southwest Public Carnegie Class Our Comparison First-Year 38.6 33.0 *.29 34.4.23 36.0.13 Senior 43.4 40.0.16 41.6.09 42.7.03 Student- Faculty Interaction 2009 First-Year 46.8 36.2 ***.55 35.2 ***.63 34.6 ***.66 Senior 43.8 41.8.10 41.7.10 42.0.09

Enriching Educational Experiences 2011 First-Year 26.1 27.7 -.11 26.5 -.03 26.0.01 Senior 36.9 36.8.01 38.3 -.08 35.4.09 Enriching Educational Experiences 2009 First-Year 29.9 26.7.23 27.0.22 28.0.14 Senior 37.8 36.3.09 38.5 -.04 40.8 -.16 Supportive Campus Environment 2011 First-Year 58.5 61.8 -.17 62.9 -.23 63.5 -.23 Senior 61.3 59.0.11 59.6.09 59.3.10 Supportive Campus Environment 2009

First-Year 63.6 61.9.08 61.6.10 61.6.11 Senior 60.2 60.1.00 58.8.07 58.2.10 Box and whisker charts (available in this Excel sheet), show that Highlands students demonstrate a great deal of variance in their responses to the NSSE, suggesting that individual student experiences at NMHU vary a great deal. Comparison of 2009 and 2011 Results As can be seen in the tables above, and summarized in the table below, the scores for freshmen students in 2011 were quite lower than in 2009. 2009 2011 Level of Academic Challenge 54.5 49.6 Active and Collaborative Learning 52.9 47.6 Student Faculty Interaction 46.8 38.6 Enriching Educational Experiences 29.9 26.1 Supportive Campus Environment 63.6 58.5 This difference is difficult to explain. Because of the small numbers involved (75 in 2009 and 52 in 2011) the sampling error is quite large. We may not be able to collect reliable results from our freshmen until we can increase our response rate. Examples of items in each of the five general areas:

Level of Academic Challenge Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or labwork, etc. related to academic program) Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book- length packs course readings Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more; number of written papers or reports of between 5 and 19 pages; and number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages Coursework emphasizes: Analysis of the basic elements of an idea, experience or theory Coursework emphasizes: Synthesis and organizing of ideas, information, or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships Coursework emphasizes: Making of judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods Coursework emphasizes: Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Working harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor s standards or expectations Campus environment emphasizes: Spending significant amount of time studying and on academic work Active and Collaborative Learning Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions Made a class presentation Worked with other students on projects during class Worked with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments Tutored or taught other students (paid or voluntary) Participated in a community- based project (e.g., service learning) as part of a regular course Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (students, family members, co- workers, etc.) Student- Faculty Interaction Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor Talked about career plans with a faculty member or advisor Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student- life activities, etc.) Received prompt written or oral feedback from faculty on your academic performance Worked on a research project with a faculty member outside of course or program requirements Enriching Educational Experiences

Participating in co- curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, social fraternity or sorority, etc.) Practicum, internship, field experience, co- op experience, or clinical assignment Community service or volunteer work Foreign language coursework / Study abroad Independent study or self- designed major Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) Serious conversations with students of different religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values Using electronic medium (e.g., listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Campus environment encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together Supportive Campus Environment Campus environment provides the support you need to help you succeed academically Campus environment helps you cope with your non- academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Campus environment provides the support you need to thrive socially Quality of relationships with other students Quality of relationships with faculty members Quality of relationships with administrative personnel and offices