Decoding Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Management and Physician Opportunities Together

Similar documents
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Using Data to Understand the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary Measure

Hospital Value-based Purchasing Specifications 2016 Updated August 2015

Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview. Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012

Overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Awareness Brief. FY 2018 Value Based Purchasing Program Domain Weighting

5/19/2016 MIPS AND MACRA: MAKING SENSE OF THE NEW REGULATIONS AND PAYMENT SYSTEMS. No Disclosures AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS

HCAHPS and Value-Based Purchasing Methods and Measurement. Deb Stargardt, Improvement Services Darrel Shanbour, Consulting Services

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing. April 6, :00-3:45 pm

Value Based Care and Healthcare Reform

Value Based Payment Models: What are they and strategies for success

National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Mount Sinai Care: A Medicare Shared Savings Program Primer. Brett Bernstein, MD, AGAF, FASGE Medical Director, Provider Partners of Mount Sinai IPA

FY 2016 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Issues May 21, 2015

Navigating CMS Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals Why It Matters and What You Need to Know. Dr. Paul Mulhausen, CMO

Fiscal Year 2016 proposed Inpatient and Long-term Care Hospital policy and payment changes (CMS-1632-P)

Presented by Kathleen S. Wyka, AAS, CRT, THE AFFORDABLE CA ACT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE RESPIRATORY C PROFESSION

Evidence Based Practice to. Value Based Purchasing. Barb Rogness BSN MS Building Bridges May 2013

in LOVE with LIFE CaroMont Health s Path to Accountable Care: A Pathway to Health

Leadership Summit for Hospital and Post-Acute Long Term Care Providers May 12, 2015

Telligen Quality Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organization. We See Where the Health Care Reform Bus is Taking Us How Do We Get On?

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Acute Care Hospital Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Quality Improvement Program Measures

Pay-for-Performance (P4P) and the Shifting Reimbursement Paradigm

MACRA & APMs: More than Acronyms June 2, 2016

Home Care s Pivotal Role in Patient Transitions from Acute to Post Acute Care Settings:

CMS Quality Measurement and Value Based Purchasing Programs Kate Goodrich, MD MHS Director, Quality Measurement and Health Assessment Group, CMS

Value-Based Payment and Health System Transformation

ASSESSMENT OF THE HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM:

Adding Value to. Provider Compensation. June 13, Healthcare Strategy Group OHA Presentation Adding Value to. Physician Compensation

HCAHPS, Value-Based Purchasing and A Culture of Always

THE EVOLUTION OF CMS PAYMENT MODELS

Using Root Cause Analysis to Determine Why Readmissions are High. Presentation Objectives. Background Information 11/30/2011

Integrating Post-Acute Providers with Health System Strategies

CMS Listening Session: Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

How To Reduce Hospital Readmission

CMS QCDR (Qualified Clinical Data Registry) and Other Ways PPRNet Can Help with Value-Based Payment

PIONEER ACO A REVIEW OF THE GRAND EXPERIMENT. Norris Vivatrat, MD Associate Medical Director Monarch HealthCare

Value Based Purchasing: New Tools for Hospitals

PL and Amendments: Impact on Post-Acute Care for Health Care Systems

Narrow network health plans: New approaches to regulating adequacy and transparency. Michael S. Adelberg

Home Health Value Based Purchasing 2016 and Beyond

National Trends in Medicare Alternative Payment Models. James Michel Senior Director, Medicare Reimbursement & Policy AHCA

Key Information. QP or Partial QP Determination

From the Ground Up: The implementation of a Transition Care Program (TOC) and its impact in COPD 30-day readmissions

A MACRA Overview. A web discussion with guests Ivy Baer, Gayle Lee, and Tanvi Mehta of AAMC

2014: Volume 4, Number 1. A publication of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Information Products & Data Analytics

Performance Measurement in CMS Programs Kate Goodrich, MD MHS Director, Quality Measurement and Health Assessment Group, CMS

Medicare s Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, a New Era in Medicare Reimbursement by Daniel J. Hettich

Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program

CMS Office of Public Affairs MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM

Learning Objectives 4/19/2016. The Five-Star Ratings Have Changed IMPROVING YOUR CMS FIVE-STAR QUALITY RATING KAY HASHAGEN, PT, MBA, RAC-CT

June 25, Dear Acting Administrator Tavenner,

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

1. Executive Summary Problem/Opportunity: Evidence: Baseline Data: Intervention: Results:

Medicare Physician Reporting: Beyond PQRS. Mary Patton Wheatley Senior Specialist, AAMC August 17, 2011

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES & 42 CFR CFR

Patient Experience/ Satisfaction What s at Stake? Customer Service at UAMS

Improving Hospital Performance

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Moving Towards Bundled Payment

Updates from CMS: Value-Based Purchasing, ACOs, and Other Initiatives The Seventh National Pay for Performance Summit March 19, 2012

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

Overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program

Accelerating Innovation in Health Care Payment and Delivery: The CMS Innovation Center

MIPS. ACR Issues Analysis of Proposed MACRA MIPS Rule

Transcription:

Decoding Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Management and Physician Opportunities Together Dale N. Schumacher THE TRANSFORMATION TO CONSUMER-DRIVEN HEALTHCARE

Decoding Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Management and Physician Opportunities Together Dale N. Schumacher, MD, MPH, MEd Dale.Schumacher@Rockburn.org 2

This presentation is based in part on an article published in the June 2015 issue of hfm: Decoding Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary, The CMS Efficiency Measure, by Dale N. Schumacher, MD, Len Felgner, Eric D. Dobkin, MD, Fern E. Nerhood, Margaret Paroski, MD, copyright 2015, The Healthcare Financial Management Association. 3

I. Introduction 4

I. Introduction It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. VBP: 1,375/3088 (45%) hospitals received no payment reduction or received an incentive (31/76=41%) MSPB: 1,255/3078 (41%) hospitals received 0 points for their Efficiency Domain in VBP (27/76=36%) HAC: 724/2576 (22%) hospitals received 1% payment reductions (11/85=13%) RRP: 2,638/3478 (76%) hospitals received payment reductions (72/91=80%) 5

Glossary - TMI MSPB Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary The only Efficiency measure MSPB Amount An average $ claims per episode for a hospital. Adjusted for regional differences, efficiency, and more. National average =$19,578. Standardized Claims X US National Ave. Predicted Claims Renormalized Spending Per Episode MSPB Measure A hospital's MSPB ratio: MSPB Amt. US National Median MSPB Amt. The national MSPB measure = 0.98 A close approximation of MSPB measure is: Standardized Claims Predicted Amt. Renormalized (Claims) Predicted Payment Amt. The amount generated by regression model that is price standardized, case mix adjusted, and removes regional wage variation. Predicted Amt. Renormalized The predicted payment amt. excluding extreme low cost values and outliers MSPB Achievement Threshold: 0.98, Median MSPB ratio across all hospitals MSPB Benchmark: 0.83, Mean of the lowest (best) decile MSPB ratios across all hospitals 6

Why Together Today? Hospitals received 2014 MSPB data in June 2015. - 3 data files: Index, Episode, Risk - Hospital Specific Report 2-year lag time: CY2015 impacts FFY2017 MSPB measure In FFY2017, VBP can impact 2% of Medicare payments to hospitals Key Questions for Management and Physicians How are MSPB and other value oriented programs impacting my hospital financially? What should we do about it? Are they a priority? Who should be on the team to improve our efficiencies and MSPB performance? 7

II. VBP, The Context Surrounding MSPB 8

VBP FY 2016 - The context surrounding MSPB The Affordable Care Act of 2010 mandated MSPB ¼ of 1.75% FY 2016 Value-Based Purchasing Domain Weighting (Payment adjustment effective for discharges from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016) Patient Experience of Care, 25% Clinical Process of Care, 10% MSPB Efficiency, 25% Outcome, 40% 9

VBP FY 2017 The context surrounding MSPB The Affordable Care Act of 2010 mandated MSPB ¼ of 2% FY 2017 Value-Based Purchasing Domain Weighting (Payment adjustment effective for discharges from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017) Clinical Process of Care, 5% Patient Experience of Care, 25% MSPB Efficiency, 25% Clinical Care Outcome 25% AMI, HF, PN 30 day Mortality Safety 20% PSI 90, CLABSI, CAUTI, SSI, C. difficile, MRSA 10

Turning MSPB Measure into Efficiency Measure under VBP 4 MSPB measure scores are compared: Hospital A For Your Hospital 1. Hospital Baseline Score (MSPB Measure from the past time period) 2. Hospital Performance Score (MSPB Measure from the most recent time period) For The Nation 3. Achievement Threshold: 50 th percentile MSPB measure nationally (during baseline period) 4. Benchmark: average MSPB measure of the best performing 10% of hospitals nationally (during baseline period) 11

National Distribution of MSPB Measures MSPB Benchmark: 0.83 MSPB Achievement Threshold: 0.98 From CMS Hospital Specific Report 12

MSPB Scores 0.83 0.98 Achievement Points CMS compares how a hospital performed compared to national scores. 1. Achievement Points Compares your hospital (current scores) to CMS national scores (baseline period). Worse than the 50% achievement threshold = 0 points Above the benchmark = 10 points Between the threshold and the benchmark = 1 to 10 points Hospital A NOTE: For MSPB, lower scores are better 0 Points 1-10 Points 10 Points MSPB Achievement Threshold: 0.98 MSPB Benchmark: 0.83 Timeline Baseline Period 1 year time gap Performance Period From CMS Hospital Specific Report 13

MSPB Scores Improvement Points CMS compares how a hospital performed one period to the next. 1. Improvement Points Compares your hospital (current scores) to itself (baseline scores). Worse than baseline period = 0 points Between the threshold and the benchmark = 0 to 9 points Hospital A Hospital A 0 Points NOTE: For MSPB, lower scores are better 0-9 Points Baseline period score Current score MSPB Benchmark: 0.83 Timeline Baseline Period 1 year time gap Performance Period 14 From CMS Hospital Specific Report

III. MSPB Individual Beneficiary & the Measure 15

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary An Episode 1 Patient Summary: Patient admitted with syncope, discharged, then re-hospitalized. There was also a skilled nursing (SNF) admission. Age 85-90. 2 Risk Adjustment Based On 90 Days Before Episode Ambulatory coding complete? Hierarchical Condition Categories and age establish patient complexity and usually add $ to the predicted payment amount. Efficient care prior to admission? 3The Episode Index hospital owns the total spend Episode Begins 3 Days Before Index Admission Claims paid for these 3 days are assigned to this episode. 4 Admission Date Index Admission Correct MS-DRG? Discharge planning prevents readmission? Discharge Date 30 Days After Discharge Efficient post-discharge management? Combined Part B Claims Paid Over Whole Episode: Up to 5 providers reported in order of claims paid amount (highest to lowest $) although only the combined $ amount is given. 1) Ambulance Company 3) Dr. Miller 5) Dr. Williams 2) Dr. Jones 4) Dr. Smith Total $6,500 5 Financial Scoreboard (All Applied to Index Hospital) Payment Inpatient (Part A) $13,000 SNF (Part A) $9,000 Physicians & Transport (Part B) $6,500 Other $200 TOTAL Claims Paid $28,700 Episode Ends Part B Claims paid consistent with patient s needs? Compared to national, standardized, claims paid model, there is $17,000 gap Predicted Payment Amount $11,700 MSPB Rate 2.45 16

MSPB: Detailed CMS Statistics A. Number of Eligible Admissions B. Average Spending per Episode C. MSPB Amount (Ave. Risk Adjusted) D. US National Median MSPB E. MSPB Measure Performance Rate (C/D) Your Hospital (example data) State U.S. 700 150,000 3,510,945 $19,500 $18,000 $19,598 $19,800 $18,500 $19,253 $19,584 $19,584 $19,584 1.01 0.94 0.98 From Table 3 of a simulated CMS Hospital Specific Report17

IV. MSPB Data Decoding and Uses at Your Hospital (Love your data) 18

MSPB: MDC Focus See table Page 5 Decoding MSPB Article A. MDC B. MDC Description C. MSPB Measure (Approx.) =G/H D. # of Episodes E. Total Standardized Spending F. Sum of Predicted Amount Renormalized G. Hospital Average (Standardized) Spending per Episode H. Predicted Spending per Episode 3 4 5 Circulatory System 1.01 100 $1,986,000 $1,960,000 $19,860 $19,600 6 19

MDC Opportunity MSPB 30-Day Care Pathways 1 MDC-X, XXX Qualifying Episodes, MSPB Measure=X.XX Look at high-volume MDC with MSPB Measure>1.00 Which SNFs are most/least efficient? Which combinations are the most/least efficient? 3 We are the only inpatient provider XXX Episodes, MSPB=X.XX 2 4 5 Our Hospital higher than different X Episodes, MSPB=X.XX Some leakage out Was there an inpatient event in 30 days after discharge that was not at our own hospital? NO YES Does the yes/no rate vary among our hospitals? Episodes with additional inpatient event at a different facility XX Episodes, MSPB=X.XX 6 Was our rehab facility used? Inpatient Rehab highest X Episodes, MSPB=X.XX Other Hospital highest X Episodes, MSPB=X.XX 7 Leakage out! Are there trends in case type or attending physician? Leakage in! Key MDC Major Diagnostic Category MSPB Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary SNF Skilled Nursing Facility 8 From Other Inpatient Facility - Readmission counted as part of another hospital s episode 20

MSPB: Physician Profiles MS-DRG 470 Operating Physician (PB1) = Dr. A., n=28, MSPB = 1.08 Operating Physicians (PB1) = All Others, n=56, MSPB 1.21 100% 100% 80% 11% 90% 80% 27% 57% 70% 63% 60% 40% 20% 43% 96% 89% No Yes 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 38% 75% 73% No Yes 10% 25% 0% 4% 0% Rehab SNF HH Rehab SNF HH 21

Additional MSPB Opportunities Hospital Compare Public Reporting Hospital Compare Public Reporting Stars 2016 MSPB (SPP Spending Per Patient) Payment 30 day (MSPB-1) AMI, HF, PN, THA/TKA, Kidney UTI, Spine Fusions, Cellulitis, GI Hemorrhage No MSPB in 75 measures 2013-2014 MSPB Trends Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CCJR) Public Use Files (PUF) Physician Payments 90 days not 30, but MSPB useful Example to Follow Value Modifier includes MSPB 22

Medicare Payments by County PUF 2013 Using Claims Paid (MSPB Methodology) County Total $ 1 E & M 2 HCC 3 Readmission Rate 4 Tuscaloosa 10,106 1,050 0.99 18.3 Jefferson 9,906 911 0.98 17.5 Etowah 11,195 991 1.01 17.9 Franklin (Ohio) 9,537 992 1.06 19.8 1 Standardized and risk adjusted per capita 2 Evaluation and Management Standardized 3 Hierarchical Condition Categories 4 All Cause Medicare 23

Making MSPB Interoperable with HAC & QualityAdvisor 1 HAC File 2 MSPB File 3 Quality Advisor HIC HIC MRN DVT/PE PDGNS_CD PSI Trigger Diagnoses or Procedures Std_Pmt_ All_Clm Pred_Amt Renormal MSPB Measure (Approx.) 1820 41519 $ 44,659 $ 26,757 1.67 41071 45342 $ 49,257 $ 28,182 1.75 389 41519 $ 84,115 $ 56,233 1.50 72252 41519 $ 74,037 $ 61,742 1.20 1983 45342 $ 47,538 $ 35,229 1.35 1536 41511 $ 68,780 $ 53,887 1.28 24

V. MSPB Working with Physicians 25

V. MSPB Working with Physicians Education Necessary but insufficient Data Necessary but insufficient Part B might be an exception Comparative Performance Necessary Incentives Can help MSPB and Value Modifier. MACRA (Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act 2015), Initiates Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) with MSPB like measures. Performance 2017, Payment 2019. Resource use 30% 2021. 26

What Cost Measures Will Be Used to Calculate the 2018 Physician Value Modifier? Total per capita costs measure (Parts A & B) Total per capita costs for beneficiaries 4 chronic conditions (COPD, HF, CAD, and DM) Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) measure (3 days before and 30 days after an inpatient hospitalization) 27

Physician Involvement MSPB The MSPB data from 2012, 2013, and 2014 provide multiple opportunities to work with physicians, particularly: Validating Part B claims for specific physicians in specific case mix groups. Studying patients who leak out of the system (MSPB 30 Day Care Pathways - Panels 5, 6 and 7). Comparing use of home health and SNF for comparable patients. Are there SNF patients that should be Rehab? Understanding the impact of HACs on MSPB results. Physician involvement is highly dependent on existing institutional cultures, roles, responsibilities, and experiences with bundled or episode care. Understanding the impact MSPB will have on the physicians 2016 VM. 28

VI. MSPB In Context A Multi-Year Resource & Process Improvement Opportunity 29

QUALITY FATIGUE Oh no, not another. 30

Mobilizing Your Expertise and Investing in your Future To make best use of MSPB (and other) data, establish a performance improvement team Physician or nurse champion with authority for quality improvement Finance representative who understands the flow of Medicare fee-for-service claims data and continuum claims and costs Analyst to interface MSPB data with the hospital s clinical, financial databases, and VBP, RRP, and HAC data Clinician with patient transition responsibilities Coordinate with other performance improvement projects and information systems data governance The team leader should have in-depth understanding of analytic issues and clear reporting lines to both the physician leaders and senior financial managers 31

Your Hospital 2017 Performance Period Ends 2015 VBP 2% Process 5% 12-31 Pt Experience Care 25% 12-31 Safety 20% -PSI-90 6-30 -HAI 12-31 Outcomes - 30 Day Mortality 25% 6-30 MSPB - Efficiency 25% 12-31 RRP 3% 6-30 HAC 1% Domain 1 6-30 Domain 2 12-31 32

Thank You! Good Luck! Have Happy Interoperable Data! 010010110101101000101010101111010101101010101101010001010101 010010110101101000101010101111010101101010101101010001010101 010010110101101000101010101111010101101010101101010001010101 33

Questions Dale.Schumacher@Rockburn.org 34