TECHNICAL REPORT on the disinfection systems in dental unit water lines.



Similar documents
Media fills Periodic performance qualification (Re-Validation)

Prevention of Nosocomial Infections with KLEANIK Self - Disinfecting Drain Trap

AFDO 2010, Norfolk, VA James Marsden Regents Distinguished Professor Jasdeep Saini Kansas State University

UTILIZATION of PLASMA ACTIVATED WATER in Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Medicine. JSC TECHNOSYSTEM-ECO Moscow, Russia April, 2009

Testing of disinfectants

BIOFIL Terminal Filters

Expert Opinion. on the efficacy of. EndoDet and EndoDis + EndoAct. for cleaning and disinfection of. Olympus Gastroscope Type GIF-2T200.

Test Method for the Continuous Reduction of Bacterial Contamination on Copper Alloy Surfaces

N-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one (MBIT) New Solution for In-can Preservation

ABSTRACT. CFU/ml in case of air water syringe, log 10 CFU/ml in case of high speed air turbine hand-piece and log 10

THE ROLE OF RISK ANALYSIS IN THE FOOD QUALITY & SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Ozone in Cooling Towers : Hygiene for us

OFFICIAL STANDARDS OF THE UIAA MEDICAL COMMISSION VOL: 19

Microbiological Testing of the Sawyer Mini Filter. 16 December Summary

Proficiency testing for food and water microbiology

PETITION FOR EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF REGULATED MEDICAL WASTE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION

Testing the Efficacy of Antimicrobial Substrates. Inhua Muijrers-Chen, Ph.D. Zuyd University of Applied Sciences

Marine Microbiological Analysis of Ballast Water Samples

Current methods: late results (2 to 3 days) contamination spread in the distribution system water consumed

Disc Diffusion Susceptibility Methods

Presentation at the 3 rd SAFOODNET seminar

STUDIES ON THE AIR QUALITY IN A DAIRY PROCESSING PLANT

Research on staphylococcus spp in biofilm formation in water pipes and sensibility to antibiotics

Legionella (associated) risk management. Andrew Vickers Health Protection Programs Public Health Services SA Health

The Microbial Bioburden of USP 797 Compliance. Simplifying Environmental Quality and Control Practices for Pharmaceutical Compounding

QUANTITATIVE TESTS FOR THE EVALUATION OF DISINFECTANT ACTIVITY

CHALLENGES AND FUTURE FORECASTS OF MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN WATER MICROBIOLOGY

New solutions for in-can preservation in the making for Europe

National Food Safety Standard Food microbiological examination: Aerobic plate count

CULTURE MEDIA FOR COSMETICS INDUSTRY ACCORDING TO ISO STANDARD

URINE CULTURES GENERAL PROCEDURE

FINAL EVENT LIFE+ BIOMOMI BIO-MONITORING AND AUTOMATIC MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION CONTROL SYSTEM OF INDUSTRIAL HYDRAULIC CIRCUITS

Thermo Scientific Barnstead TII Pure Water Systems. Pure water. Pure research. Total confidence.

SUITABILITY OF THE H 2 S METHOD FOR TESTING UNTREATED AND CHLORINATED WATER SUPPLIES

BACTERIA COUNTS IN RAW MILK

Raw Milk Quality Tests Do They Predict Fluid Milk Shelf-life or Is it time for new tests?

Microorganisms in water

Presentation at the 3 rd SAFOODNET seminar

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts MICROBIOLOGICAL SAFETY VALIDATION OF FOOD PROCESSES

How To Use An Antibody

BACTERIAL ENUMERATION

Flexible Endoscopes: The A,B,C s of Monitoring Manual Cleaning Efficacy!

Comparative Efficacy of Hand Rubs Containing Alcohol or Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

HOTLINE Blood and Fluid Warmer: Sustained Performance and Safety

Ultra Violet Disinfection

VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION

Validating and Monitoring the Cleanroom

Lab Exercise 3: Media, incubation, and aseptic technique

Efficacy of Ozone in Eradication of Legionella pneumophila from Hospital Plumbing Fixtures

Transferring a Broth Culture to Fresh Broth

How To Interpret Laboratory Results for Airborne Fungal (Mould) Samples

Tools for risk assessment in the food industry. Research Scientists Satu Salo & Kaarina Aarnisalo, VTT

Basic Requirements For Aseptic Manufacturing Of Sterile Medicinal Products A Comparison Between Europe And USA

Detergents in CSSD. Wim Renders

DENTAL UNIT WATER What Are You Doing About Yours?

Ozone Inactivation Kinetics of Multiple Antibiotic Resistant Strains of Bacteria in Water.

Cleaning and Disinfection Agenda. 1. Cleanroom Classification. Cleanroom Classification. What does contamination mean? Types of contamination

Spore Busters. L élimination des spores de Clostridium difficile. Het verwijderen van Clostridium difficile sporen.

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

Val Robson University Hospital Aintree. Liverpool U.K.

Microbiological Evaluation of the STI Series 2000 Medical Waste Treatment Process

Gamma Sterilisation Validation according to ISO Sterilising dose -

Basics of UV Disinfection

University of Sarajevo : IKBM, UMB

Guidance Note on Flushing

IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER UNKNOWN BACTERIAL SPECIES: OU

Aerobic Count. Interpretation Guide. 3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Aerobic Count Plate

Testing Surface Disinfectants

Cleaning. By the end of this chapter, you will be able to: Introduction. Definitions. Chapter 9

US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs

This project is financed by the EUROPEAN UNION. HACCP Case study Feta cheese

Environmental Monitoring of Clean Rooms

Etiology and treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis the Croatian experience

Bacteria Control Troubleshooting Guide for Automated Watering Systems

Cal Water 1961 Petra Lane, Placentia, CA (800) CAL-WATER (800) FAX: (714)

MONITORING THE BIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DRINKING WATER IN THE DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

Selection of Disinfectants for Use in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Tim Sandle Head of Microbiology Bio Products Laboratory

Kemisan Water and Wastewater Disinfection Technologies. HypoX. HYPOCHLOROZONE Chlorine Oxygen based Disinfectant

Quantifying Bacterial Concentration using a Calibrated Growth Curve

USP Guidances on Environmental Control including related USP, FDA, EMEA & PDA Activities. James Agalloco Agalloco & Associates

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Prevention. Basics of Infection Prevention 2 Day Mini-Course 2013

EXPERIMENT 13: THE IDEAL GAS LAW AND THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF GASES

Preventive Care Solutions. Clinpro. Comfortable Oral Care. The healthy. smile concept. Clinpro Prophy Powder Clinpro Prophy Paste

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

Professional Certification in Biological Waste Management Examination Content, Sample Questions & References

OECD GUIDELINES FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS

Solid Organ Transplantation

PREVENTING THE RISK. of viruses, spores, fungi and bacteria. Healthcare. Hospitals, dentists, nursing homes, etc. Transport

USAF Dental Evaluation & Consultation Service

ble spore suspension may be maintained at 2 to 8 for a validated

Welcome to Implementing Inquirybased Microbial Project. Veronica Ardi, PhD

VIRTUAL EXPERIMENT 5A OXYGEN RELATIONSHIPS (REVISED FROM THE ON-LINE MANUAL)

1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan

Flow Cytometry Analysis of the Activity of Disinfecting Agents Tested with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli

Transcription:

TECHNICAL REPORT on the disinfection systems in dental unit water lines. Part I. Microbiological field tests Purpose: checking the hygienic quality of the water delivered by a Cefla Dental Group dental unit, equipped with both continuous disinfection (WHE) and non-continuous disinfection (BIOSTER) systems. In the period February-May 2013, we tested the effectiveness of the continuous sanitisation system with 550 ppm of H2O2 (Peroxy Ag+) installed on a dental unit of the Cefla Dental Group supplied to the Dental School of Turin. The test dental unit, like all the other units at the Dental School, at the end of each work day was submitted to a disinfection cycle with H2O2 (Peroxy Ag+) at 3%. The treatment was performed in the morning in case of downtime due to holidays or weekend breaks. During work on patients, the dental unit would deliver tap water mixed with hydrogen peroxide at the final concentration of 550 ppm H2O2. The tests on the effectiveness of the sanitising system were not carried out by testing for Legionella, as the microbial loads detected at the Dental School (and systematically measured by this Department) were not such as to allow for anti-microbial effectiveness measurements; therefore, tests were performed on other microbial indicators (Pseudomonas spp, P. aeruginosa and total bacterial count at 22 and 37 C). All samplings were carried out in the morning and submitted to monitoring for three months, with sampling every 15 days.

The test results, listed in the report dated 10 th June 2013, show that in none of the test runs bacterial contamination was detected - except for the first (basal) test performed after installation and in the absence of sanitisation treatments. Turin, 3 rd August 2014 The Lab Manager Prof. Carla Zotti The Test Manager Dr. Savina Ditommaso

Turin, 10 th June 2013 RE: scientific validation results regarding the continuous disinfecting system for inlet water to the Cefla Dental Group dental unit. Following our earlier agreements and contract entered into by the Cefla Company, the Dental School and the Hygiene Applied Serology and Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Turin, tests were carried out on water samples taken from the dental unit, in order to evaluate the continuous disinfecting system (600 ppm of H2O2) for inlet water to the dental unit. The tested parameters were: a) Total Bacterial Count (TBC) at 22 and 37 C c) Pseudomonas spp d) Pseudomonas aeruginosa The tests were performed according to the reference standards: UNI EN ISO 6222 and UNI EN 12780 Monitoring was performed for 3 months, and samplings were repeated every fifteen days using outlet water from the syringe and turbine of the tested dental unit. The results of the microbiological tests (expressed in Colony Forming Units, CFUs) are shown in the table below:

Sampling date: TBC at 22 C TBC at 37 C Pseudomonas spp P. aeruginosa Basal (2/2/ 2013) >300 CFU/ml >300 CFU/ml >300 CFU/250 ml >300 CFU/250 ml 26/02/2013 12/03/2013 26/03/2013 08/04/2013 22/04/2013 07/05/2013 21/05/2013 Except for the first (basal) sampling, none of the tested samples during testing showed any microbiological contamination (no detected bacteria in the tested volume) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was equally undetected. The Lab Manager Prof. Carla Zotti The Test Manager Dr. Savina Ditommaso

TECHNICAL REPORT on the disinfection systems in dental unit water lines. Part II. Microbiological tests on prototype Purpose: Validate continuous disinfection of inlet water to the dental unit on the device simulator (CEFLA Dental Group). On the test bench prototype developed by CEFLA and installed at DSSPP tests were performed on the pathogen Legionella pneumophila sg. 1 (ATCC 33152) to determine the effectiveness of the Peroxy Ag + disinfectant at the concentration of 540 ± 10 ppm of H2O2. The tests on water samples taken from the continuous disinfection device simulator were carried out by experimentally contaminating the device with Legionella in order to evaluate the dental unit inlet water sanitising system. The test results are shown in the report dated 13 th November 2013, and suggest that, in the samples taken from effluents after contact times of 7 minutes and 10 minutes, the 99.99% = 4 log reduction prescribed by the EN standards to be able to claim the bactericidal activity of the solution used had not been achieved. In the sample taken after 60 minutes of hold time, a decrease >= 4 log was observed (reduction >= 99.99% of the inoculum). Therefore, the obtained field results (report dated 10 th June 2013) are possibly attributable not to the continuous system exclusively, but to the synergic action resulting from the protocol applied at the Dental School (treatment at 3% and continuous treatment).

It is possible, but yet to be demonstrated, that the continuous system ensures the persistent presence of disinfectant, but the only way of evaluating the actual efficacy of the concentration used (540 +- 10 ppm of H2O2) in the absence of 3% treatment would be testing the dental unit in the absence of such treatment. The continuous system alone at the concentration of 540 ± 10 ppm of H2O2 can help maintain, during one-hour activity pauses, a decrease >= 99.99% of any present Legionella loads. Turin, 3 rd August 2014 The Lab Manager Prof. Carla Zotti The Test Manager Dr. Savina Ditommaso

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH BY CEFLA S.C. Tax Code 80088230018 VAT IT02099550010 Hygiene Applied Serology and Microbiology Laboratory Turin, 13 th November 2013 RE: results of the scientific validation of the continuous disinfecting system Simulator for inlet water to the Cefla Dental Group dental unit Following our earlier agreements and contract entered into by the Cefla Company, the Dental School and the Hygiene Applied Serology and Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Turin, tests were carried out on water samples taken from the continuous disinfection device Simulator, experimentally contaminated with Legionella pneumophila sg 1, in order to evaluate the sanitising system (540 ±10 ppm of H2O2) for dental unit inlet water. The tests were performed using as a reference standard EN 13623 (2010). Test conditions: Inoculum: Legionella pneumophila sg 1 (ATCC 33152) Diluent: hard water (HW) Ambient temperature (approximately 22 C) Test product: 540 ±10 ppm of Peroxy Ag+ (H2O2 3%) Neutraliser: 0.25 g/l catalase Effluent sampling times: 7 min., 10 min., 60 min. Test performance time: 10 th September - 4 th October Calculation of results: log10 = log10 inoculum log10 sample.

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH BY CEFLA S.C. Tax Code 80088230018 VAT IT02099550010 Hygiene Applied Serology and Microbiology Laboratory Before performing the test on the Simulator, neutralisation method validation tests were carried out (by filtration, mixed neutraliser, neutraliser with catalase). The test results showed that the most suitable method for Peroxy neutralisation is neutralisation with 0.25 g/l catalase. Test results: Flow sampling after 7 min contact time: log10 <1 Flow Sampling after 10 min contact time: log10 <1 Sampling after 60 min hold time: log10 4 Conclusion: On the basis of the obtained results the test product Peroxy Ag+, at a concentration of 540 ±10 ppm, showed bactericidal activity against Legionella pneumophila sg 1 only after a contact time of 60 minutes. The Test Manager Dr. Savina Ditommaso