Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System. Frequently Asked Questions. General Questions



Similar documents
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Holistic Rating Training Requirements. Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division

Standard 1: Planning and Evaluation of a Data- Driven Counseling Program

TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview

Leader Keys Effectiveness System Implementation Handbook

Teacher Guidebook

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System

Master s Degree Portfolio Project

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System

Principal Performance Review

Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Implementation Handbook

Georgia Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Implementation Procedures

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Tulsa Public Schools Teacher Observation and Evaluation System: Its Research Base and Validation Studies

Spring 2016 TELPAS Holistic Rating Training System

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals

Leadership Portfolio

Core Goal: Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

Celebrate Success. NC is a Leader in Educator Evaluation. Personnel

Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) Student Manual

Uinta County School District #1 Multi Tier System of Supports Guidance Document

Participant Guidebook

Coaching Expectations

Utah Effective School Counselor Performance Standards

1. Attend the Resident Educator Orientation Session. Date:

A. Student Learning Outcomes (SLO) for the M.S. Degree: Students will

HECAT: Chapter 5 curriculum fundamentals

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

TEACHER EVALUATION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

School Levels of Support. By Dr. Kristine Harms

Health Education Leadership Program Application PDF View for Application Preparation

Delivered in an Online Format. Revised November 1, I. Perspectives

Georgia Department of Education Teacher Keys Evaluation System Trainer Manual. Teacher Keys Evaluation System Handbook

NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

A Study of Efficacy of Apex Learning Cherokee County School District

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)

ONLINE LEARNING AT BRIGHTON HIGH SCHOOL

Math Science Partnership (MSP) Program: Title II, Part B

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation

Administrative Evaluation System

Georgia Milestones Assessment System Preplanning July 2014 DRAFT

2014 School Counselor Performance Appraisal Rubric SAU 21

Introduction The Student as a Representative of GCU Internship Outcomes Selecting a Mentor Internship... 4

Advancing Professional Excellence Guide Table of Contents

Department of Secondary Education Kutztown University of Pennsylvania. Master s Degree Portfolio Project

LEVEL II AOTA Fieldwork Performance Evaluation

Key Assessments School Library Media Specialist

Master of Arts in English Language Learning for Grade PreK 12 Teachers

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

Assessment Plan. UCO Conceptual Framework II.C. Addresses holistic needs of students

National Standards of Quality for Online Courses

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

Comparing Sets of Data Grade Eight

Assessment of Student Learning Mental Health Counseling Program Indiana University- Purdue University Columbus Progress Report

Lewis Frasier Middle School Parent Involvement Policy School Year SCHOOL PLAN FOR SHARED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

U. S. Coast Guard Auxiliary Instructor Development Course Performance Qualification System (PQS) Workbook Appendix B

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Online Professional Development Modules

Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO

Appendix E. Role-Specific Indicators

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT. M.Ed. in Educational Leadership. Program Report

Highly Qualified Teacher Component JUNE 2016

National Standards for Quality Online Teaching

Northeastern State University Online Educator Certificate

Sample Letters. Sample Letters Promotion & Placement

Georgia s Technology Literacy Challenge Fund Grant Application. Bremen City Schools. Section 3: Grant Proposal

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Preschool For All Program Evaluation TEACHER SELF EVALUATION

Teacher Development Workshop ACCOUNTING GRADE 11

Program Self-Evaluation and ACLS Monitoring Tool. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Adult and Community Learning Services

Submitted for Review and Approval Florida Department of Education 5/1/2012

TITLE: Online Teaching Work Group Report and Approval of Criteria for Licensure

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

July Friday Blast. Table of Contents

Administering and Scoring of the Oral Reading Fluency and Maze Tests

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Open Range Schedule

Transcription:

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Frequently Asked Questions General Questions Why is Gwinnett County Public Schools implementing a new evaluation system for teachers? Gwinnett s previous teacher evaluation system, GTEP, was based primarily on observations and rated teacher performance as either Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory. This system did not adequately identify teacher strengths and areas for growth. In a partnership with the Georgia Department of Education, GCPS will now have an evaluation system based on multiple measures that will identify areas of strength and growth. It will also help individualize professional development based on specific needs. Who will be evaluated using the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System? All teachers, full and part time, who provide direct instruction to students Teachers of Record. The GTES does not apply to teacher support positions, such as media specialists and counselors. These teachers will continue to be evaluated with the current evaluation instrument until a new performance based system is developed for those positions. How does the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System apply to teachers of special needs students and English language learners? The Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards, the observation component, will apply like all other teachers of record. The Georgia Department of Education continues to develop guidelines for these teachers relative to Student Growth and Academic Achievement. Teachers will have the answers to these questions prior to this component being used for their evaluation. Who evaluates teachers using the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System? Only trained, credentialed evaluators may evaluate teachers. Evaluators must demonstrate a clear understanding of the evaluation process, the performance standards and rubrics, and be able to rate performance with accuracy. Principals and assistant principals are responsible for

evaluating teacher performance, but some teacher leaders may participate in the data collection process. How are evaluators trained? Evaluators are trained by completing either online training modules or face to face training. Both training models include inter- rater reliability training, assuring that all evaluators follow the same process and can rate performance accurately. All evaluators must pass a credentialing assessment before they can participate in the evaluation process. Are conferences included in the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System? Yes. Three conferences are required during the evaluation cycle. A pre- evaluation will occur prior to the evaluation cycle. A mid- year conference will take place to discuss progress, and a final evaluation conference will occur to review and discuss final evaluation ratings and future expectations. Following each observation, evaluators will provide specific feedback to teachers relative to each standard observed. What is the format for collecting evaluation data? The Gwinnet Teacher Effectiveness System is managed through the Go.Gwinnett Portal within the Professional Development and Evaluation application. Teachers and evaluators will use this application to enter data and communicate performance. Which schools are included in the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System? All GCPS schools will participate in the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System beginning with the 2013-2014 school year. Planning Phase Questions Is there an orientation to the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System? Yes. All employees must receive an orientation prior to being evaluated. The orientation to the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System is available electronically in a link provided in the Professional Development and Evaluation (PD&E) application. Teachers must verify that they have received the orientation within this application.

How will the teacher self- assessment be used? Teachers will complete a self- assessment on the 10 performance standards each year. The ratings and comments will be used as a discussion item during the pre- evaluation conference, and may be used to determine professional learning opportunities. The self- assessment is a required part of the process but is not used by evaluators to rate teacher performance. Implementation Phase Questions What are the components of the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System? The Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System includes two main components: Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards and Student Growth and Academic Achievement. How can I learn more about the 10 teacher performance standards? Appendix I of the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Handbook includes a detailed description of each performance standard, as well as the rubrics and sample performance indicators for each standard. This handbook is located in the HR Employee Evaluation database as well as within the Professional Development and Evaluation tab in the Go.Gwinnett Portal. In addition, seven teacher training sessions are offered from March through July. How are teachers rated on the 10 performance standards? Trained evaluators collect specific evidence for each performance standard. Evidence may include observations, documentation and student perception surveys. Evaluators then determine the quality of the evidence based on rating rubrics for each standard. All evidence and ratings are shared and discussed with teachers throughout the evaluation cycle. Ratings range from Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Development to Ineffective. Is there any way to determine if the documentation falls in the proficient or exemplary range? The evaluator will examine documentation from multiple sources, including formative observations, brief observations, student perception surveys and conference summaries, as well as documentation provided by the teacher. Evaluators will use the Performance Standard rubrics to determine the quality of the evidence for that standard. Totality of evidence and consistency of practice will determine the performance level.

What documentation is needed to move a rating from Proficient to Exemplary? Ratings are assigned based on the quality of evidence observed, not quantity. One example of high quality documentation may not be enough to change a rating. Notice the language of the rubrics to determine the differences between ratings. Evaluators should comment on the quality of evidence provided. How many times will a teacher be observed in this system? Evaluators will observe teacher performance throughout the school year. There are a minimum of two, 30 minute observations and four brief observations of at least ten minutes each. Does the same administrator need to do all observations for the same teacher? No. Principals will decide how to assign evaluators to teachers at their school. What happens if the documentation is excellent, but the observation is poor? Performance on the standards is based on the totality of evidence and most consistent practice. Evaluator comments should reflect the quality of the evidence collected. Will students be evaluating teachers? No. Students in grades 3-12 will complete perception surveys for their teachers. These surveys are aligned to Instructional Strategies, Differentiated Instruction, Positive Learning Environment and Academically Challenging Environment. Questions are designed to assess the learning environment teachers create for their students. Evaluators will use the survey results to help inform ratings on the aligned standards. Evaluation Phase Does the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System include a Professional Development (PDP) process? The Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System is designed to identify areas of strength and growth. Once areas for growth are identified, a PDP may be developed to help improve performance. What is the Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM)? The Teacher Effectiveness Measure is a final score based on the Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards and Student Growth and Academic Achievement.

Student Growth and Academic Achievement What are Student Performance Goals? Student Performance Goals are district developed student achievement goals used to measure student growth for teachers in non state tested subjects. Growth is measured by subtracting the results of a pre- assessment from a post- assessment. A rubric is then used to rate the growth, ranging from Ineffective to Exemplary. What are Student Growth Percentiles? Student Growth Percentiles are a means of measuring growth in student achievement for teachers of state tested subjects (grades 4-8 CRCT and high school EOCT). A more specific explanation of Student Growth Percentiles is provided in the Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System orientation.