ATTORNEY GENERAL S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT CONCERNING EXPERT DEPOSITIONS



Similar documents
Case 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 6

SUGGESTION OF SUBSEQUENTLY DECIDED AUTHORITY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1312 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 6

SECRETARY S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 932 Filed 11/22/13 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendants.

Case 2:13-cv Document 490 Filed in TXSD on 08/22/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case Doc 352 Filed 05/31/12 Entered 05/31/12 12:23:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EXECUTIVE BRANCH RESPONDENTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE PETITION FOR REVIEW

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 929 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. v. Civil Action No. 13-cv-861

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 04/15/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:13-cv Document 343 Filed in TXSD on 06/18/14 Page 1 of 11

Nos , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 262 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 5

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT LUCINDA G. MILLER; ELAINE KING-MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees

Case 1:13-cv RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 34 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT re~ ~ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:03-cv WMH Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2007 Page 1 of 8

Case 0:08-cr RHK-AJB Document 393 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 4. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs-Intervenors : CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.

SECRETARY'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ALASKA

Case 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 89 Filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Plaintiffs: KATHRYN H. HALL; DANNY E. STROUD; DICK R. MURPHY, Ph.D.; MARK D. HILLMAN; WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, MARK BAISLEY; and SHIRLEY J.

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1075 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S EXPERT DISCLOSURE

Case: 1:08-cv SAS-KLL Doc #: 102 Filed: 01/15/14 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1181

Case 1:13-cv GK Document 19-2 Filed 09/27/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:10-cv OLG Document 150 Filed 11/12/12 Page 1 of 6

Case3:13-cv JST Document52 Filed04/29/14 Page1 of 5

Case: HRT Doc#:135 Filed:07/06/15 Entered:07/06/15 13:35:01 Page1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case: 4:12-cv CEJ Doc. #: 182 Filed: 07/17/12 Page: 1 of 4 PageID #: 4880

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

AMICUS BRIEFS FILED IN SUPPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, BY CATEGORY

DEFENDANT DEBRA JOHNSON S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Rule 12(c) and 12(h)(2))

Motion to Consolidate Hearings on Preliminary Injunction and Merits & Brief In Support. Motion. Brief in Support

The Cost (in Time, Money, and Burden) of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CONSTITUTIONFACTS.COM

Case 3:15-cv N Document 65 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:12-cv RMB-AMD Document 40 Filed 03/14/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 497 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VINCINAGE OF CAMDEN

Case 1:14-cv RJL Document 19 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. CASE NO. 3:01-cv-1275-J-25 HTS

Case 1:11-cv RC Document 27 Filed 07/30/12 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION PARTY-IN-INTEREST D.C. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 11 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv WSD

Case 3:14-cv H-JMA Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


Office of Attorney General ( OAG ) Right-to-Know Officer 15 th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120

Case 1:12-cv JAL Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/05/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:14-cv ST Document 136 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

itf.ce!v f G JNiTEO ST/i.TtS ATTORNfY State of Hawaii (202) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 316 Filed: 03/27/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:2738

Case 1:13-cv GBL-TRJ Document 54 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 318

2013 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the Tarrant County Bar Association, we are

Case 2:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 111 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 864

United States District Court

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 05/23/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:118

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/11/2013 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 188 Filed 08/11/11 Page 1 of 13

: In re : Chapter 11 : MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY; et al., : Case No (REG) : Debtors : : :

COURT USE ONLY Case Number: Names:

) ) AGS. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPfA&f\ I44\( THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LUMINANT GENETION COMPANY LLC, OAK GROVE MANAGEMENT )

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 52 Filed 07/03/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:11-mc GK-DAR Document 12 Filed 01/11/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv RDM Document 11 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA and STATE OF COLORADO, Defendants.

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA **************************************

* DEC , '' \(I\

Case 1:03-cv HHK Document Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

mg Doc 226 Filed 03/16/12 Entered 03/16/12 15:42:11 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

Contact Information for Participants in Remand Process in National Wildlife Federation v. NMFS, CV RE

CASE 0:11-cv MJD-FLN Document 96 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:11-cv JRG Document Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 32304

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER

Transcription:

Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 270 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, v. Plaintiff, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, ERIC KENNIE, et al., Defendant. TEXAS STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, et al., TEXAS LEAGUE OF YOUNG VOTERS EDUCATION FUND, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. TEXAS LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al., VICTORIA RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00128 (RMC-DST-RLW Three-Judge Court ATTORNEY GENERAL S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT CONCERNING EXPERT DEPOSITIONS

Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 270 Filed 07/02/12 Page 2 of 5 24F. It is implausible that PVID would increase turnout. Shaw Dep. 148:23-152:11. 24G. Observations of two states with PVID are insufficient to draw general conclusions concerning PVID requirements and voter turnout. Shaw Dep. 144:25-148:22. 24H. Peer-reviewed articles provide more credible findings and should receive greater weight than self-published papers. No peer-reviewed article has concluded that PVID does not depress turnout. Shaw Dep. 143:17-145:11, 165:4-9; Ex. 545 66-71. 65I. Minority voters are less likely to hold state PVID. Sager Dep. II 137:13-139:6. 41F. Survey data for law and policy requires greater accuracy necessitating additional time and resources than political polling, which is limited by exigency and assesses only attitudes. Marker Dep. 18:9-23:1, 43:7-47:7, 53:8-55:18, 130:11-131:11. 41G. Low survey response rates and limited ability to identify phone numbers can introduce bias. Weighting responses can correct in part. Marker Dep. 152:11-153:16, 202:4-207:5; Shaw Dep. 73:2-75:16, 107:17-110:19, 152:11-153:16. 41H. The VRNID survey had a phone append rate of 35.4%, half the typical rate for a Texas survey and 14.7% less than the first survey. Shaw Dep. 99:22-100:16; Ex. 571. 41I. Dr. Shaw confirmed that he had reached low income populations but not that the proportion matched the VRNID list. Shaw Dep. 106:17-109:11; supra 55B-55C. 41J. 77.2% of VRNID respondents are owner-occupants, along with 66.3% and 75.0% in the Black and Hispanic surveys. Ex. 574-576. Dr. Shaw did not set out these rates, Ex. 572-573, which far exceed the census estimates, let alone the VRNID list. RJN 14. 41K. The VRNID surveys contain potential bias far in excess of policy or political surveys and are not sufficiently reliable to establish ID possession rates. Supra 41A-J. 1

Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 270 Filed 07/02/12 Page 3 of 5 Date: July 2, 2012 RONALD C. MACHEN, JR. United States Attorney District of Columbia Respectfully submitted, THOMAS E. PEREZ Assistant Attorney General /s/ Daniel J. Freeman T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, JR. MEREDITH BELL-PLATTS ELIZABETH S. WESTFALL BRUCE I. GEAR SPENCER FISHER JENNIFER L. MARANZANO RISA BERKOWER DANIEL J. FREEMAN Attorneys Voting Section U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530

Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 270 Filed 07/02/12 Page 4 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 2, 2012, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing via the Court s ECF system on the following counsel of record: Jonathan Franklin Mitchell Adam W. Aston Matthew Hamilton Frederick Patrick Kinney Sweeten Office of the Attorney General of Texas jonathan.mitchell@oag.state.tx.us adam.aston@oag.state.tx.us matthew.frederick@oag.state.tx.us Patrick.sweeten@texasattorneygeneral.gov Adam K. Mortara John M. Hughes Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP adam.mortara@bartlit-beck.com john.hughes@bartlit-beck.com Counsel for Plaintiff John Tanner john.k.tanner@gmail.com Nancy G. Abudu M. Laughlin McDonald Katie O Connor Arthur B. Spitzer American Civil Liberties Union nabudu@aclu.org lmcdonald@aclu.org koconnor@aclu.org artspitzer@gmail.com Debo P. Adegbile Leah C. Aden Elise C. Boddie Ryan Haygood Dale E. Ho Natasha Korgaonkar NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund dadegbile@naacpldf.org laden@naacpldf.org eboddie@naacpldf.org rhaygood@naacpldf.org dho@naacpldf.org nkorgaonkar@naacpldf.org Michael Birney de Leeuw Douglas H. Flaum Adam M. Harris Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson douglas.flaum@friedfrank.com adam.harris@friedfrank.com michael.deleeuw@friedfrank.com Counsel for Texas League of Young Voters Intervenors Counsel Texas Legislative Black Caucus Intervenors

Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 270 Filed 07/02/12 Page 5 of 5 Jon M. Greenbaum Mark A. Posner Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights mposner@lawyerscommittee.org jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org Ezra David Rosenberg Michelle Hart Yeary Dechert LLP ezra.rosenberg@dechert.com michelle.yeary@dechert.com Robert Stephen Notzon Robert@notzonlaw.com Gary L. Bledsoe Law Office of Gary L. Bledsoe and Associates garybledsoe@sbcglobal.net Nina Perales Amy Pederson Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. nperales@maldef.org apederson@maldef.org Counsel for Rodriguez Intervenors J. Gerald Hebert hebert@voterlaw.com Chad W. Dunn Brazil & Dunn chad@brazilanddunn.com Counsel for Kennie Intervenors Myrna Perez Wendy Robin Weiser Ian Arthur Vandewalker The Brennan Center for Justice myrna.perez@nyu.edu wendy.weiser@nyu.edu ian.vandewalker@nyu.edu Counsel for NAACP Intervenors s/ Daniel J. Freeman DANIEL J. FREEMAN Attorney, Voting Section U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530