Fostering Further Collaboration between PMDA and Applicants with Efficient Project Management in Drug Development

Similar documents
CDISC standards and data management The essential elements for Advanced Review with Electronic Data

ICD-9-CM to MedDRA Mapping How Well Do the. Disclaimer

Japan PMDA and CDISC Standards. Yuki Ando Senior Scientist for Biostatistics Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)

Stakeholders identification: key success factor for the implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems

2009 Life Sciences Industry Document Management/Collaboration Survey. DIA Disclaimer Benchmark / Survey Objectives

Overview of CDISC Implementation at PMDA. Yuki Ando Senior Scientist for Biostatistics Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)

How Industry Can Partner with FDA in Defining a Risk- Based Monitoring Program

Certification for Data Managers- How high is the bar?

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON TABLET FRIABILITY GENERAL CHAPTER Q4B ANNEX 9(R1)

How Transparent are Regulatory Agencies with regard to Review Timelines? Disclaimer

ISO Identification of Medicinal Products (IDMP) and HL7 Structured Product Labeling (SPL) Disclaimer

FDA's Module 1 Update: From Ideas to Implementation. Jared C. Lantzy, PMP

An Overview of the Medical Devices Single Audit Program

Risk Management Plan (RMP) Guidance (Draft)

Med-Info. New Act on Medical Devices in Japan. TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH. International expert information for the Medical Device industry

Post-Approval Change Management: Challenges and Opportunities An FDA Perspective

Why Are Drugs So Expensive? Learning About the Drug Development Process

GMP and QMS Regulation in Japan

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan. Fiscal Year 2010

and Regulatory Aspects

Safety Risk Assessment in Drug Development

Clinical trials in haemophilia

History and Principles of Good Clinical Practice

Registration of Class B Medical Devices

Safety Is Global: Contemporary Pharmacovigilance and Medical Product Risk Management Strategies

Introduction to Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System

Quality by Design Concept

PEDIATRIC MEDICINES: GLOBAL MARKETS

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Approaches To The Collection Of Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Data

Overview of Risk Management

UNDERSTANDING THE EC DIRECTIVE 98/79/EC ON IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICES

Application for Accreditation of Foreign Manufacturers

white paper Conducting Clinical Trials in Japan: A CRO Perspective

Medical Device Marketing Authorization System (MDMA) MDMA User Manual

OECD Recommendation on the Governance of Clinical Trials

CenterWatch. volunteering. clinical trial. for a.

Data Management and Good Clinical Practice Patrick Murphy, Research Informatics, Family Health International

Pharmaceutical Quality & Clinical Research Quality: The Interaction

Target Product Profile (TPP) Process. Dr. Michele Sharp, PharmD, Sr. Director, Regulatory Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company

EMA Update Clinical Trials

Meetings with CDER Judit Milstein

EU PAS Register Guide

Managing Clinical Operations Risks. Lars Schmiedeberg

GMP/Regulatory Environment in the

Increase Hepatitis C Virus Screening and Treatment

Diagnostic Tests. Brad Spring Director, Regulatory Affairs

Introduction. 1. General outline. 1) Position of the Healthcare Policy. 2) Basic principles of the Healthcare Policy (Article 2 of the Promotion Act)

Company Profile Osaki, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan Tel

Comparing GCP Requirements for Medical Device Clinical Trials in the US and Japan

The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are

Medical Information Role in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Course Certificate In. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Research: Clinical Research Monitoring & Coordination

Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Making the Right Choice

Drug Development Models in China and the Impact on Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies

Migration of Controlled. Compliant SharePoint Document Management Systems. Presented by: Joe Lucadamo

Our name ASPHALION derives from the Greek word asphaléia, alluding to values such as firmness, stability, certainty and reliability.

Prospect of ICT Utilization at Core Clinical Research Hospitals

Adopting Site Quality Management to Optimize Risk-Based Monitoring

Pediatric Research Networks A Plan for a Collaboration in Europe. Daniela Gunz Head Clinical Trial Operations Switzerland June 9, 2011

Submission of comments on 'Policy 0070 on publication and access to clinical-trial data'

Why Monitoring Is More Than Just SDV

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE Q4B ANNEX 12

Disclaimer.

Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research. EHR Compliant to Clinical Trial Requirements. Oct Disclaimer

GLOBAL EDUCATION PROGRAM

Risk Management Plan (RMP) on Biologicals and NCE

1

Medical Product Development Certificate Program

Understanding the Japanese culture and approval process

Research Administration at the University of Maryland

Medical Devices. Notified Bodies and the CE certification Process for Medical Devices. European Surgical Robotics Demonstration Day

Enterprise RIM: Building the Business Case. Steve Gens. Bethesda Maryland: February 25, Managing Partner Gens and Associates, Inc.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Coding with MedDRA. MedDRA and the MSSO

A CRO's Dilemma - The CDMS Validation Package that Failed Client Audits 19.OCT Disclaimer

Key considerations for outsourcing late phase clinical research

Q Financial Results and Corporate Update. November 4, 2015

Current Status of Databases in Japan

UNIQUE DEVICE IDENTIFICATION. and in the European Union. Laurent SELLES Senior Coordinator for International Relations Health Technology and Cosmetics

Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

Post-authorisation safety studies and the EU PAS Register

Singapore Clinical Trials Register. Foo Yang Tong Director Clinical Trials Branch Health Products Regulation Group HEALTH SCIENCES AUTHORITY

Safety Risk Management Company Perspective

An FDA Perspective on Post- Approval Change Management for PAT and RTRT

Barriers and Solutions for the Expansion of Clinical Research in Latin America

Sharing Industry Clinical Trial Data: Improving Public Health While Maintaining the Oversight Relationship Between Regulator and Sponsor

Careers in Medical and Scientific Writing

Use of MedDRA in CTCAE and in the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Electronic patient diaries in clinical research

Introduction to the CTA & NDA process in China

3rd China - Japan Symposium on Drug Development- focusing on Current Status of

GLOBAL EDUCATION PROGRAM

Regulatory strategies for small companies /SMEs

White Paper January Top Ten Reports in Clinical Performance Management

Clinical Trials and SPA Fall, 2014

School of Pharmacy TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

Pharmaceutical Companies and Medical Publishers Working together in a world of increasing regulation

Medidée Services SA. Nano-Tera.ch. 05 February 2015 part 12. Special Issues Q&A Session. Michael Maier

The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers C 2010

Transcription:

Fostering Further Collaboration between PMDA and Applicants with Efficient Project Management in Drug Development Kazuishi Sekino Review Director Office of New Drug I Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices Agency Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan

Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to DIA, its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. DIA and the DIA logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Drug Information Association Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 2

Outline of Presentation 1. Current Situation of Approval Review 2. The Elements of Project and Priority 3. Progress Management of Approval Review Process 4. Progress Management of Scientific Advice process 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 3

Review Time for New Drugs (median) (Months) (Total review time = Regulatory review time + Applicant s time) The PMDA s Second Mid-term Plan The PMDA s Third Mid-term Plan (Numbers of approved products) FY2014 PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency <https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000206389.pdf> 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 4

Six regulatory Authorities Approval Time of New Drugs in 2004-2013 EU US Japan Canada Switzerland Australia Regulatory Affairs Professional Society 2015/1/14 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 5

The PMDA s Third Mid-term Plan(FY2014 to FY2018) The plan for prompt realization of zero review lag for new drugs Review Time for New Drugs (Priority Review) Total review time (Regulatory review time + Applicant s time);9 months(6 months + 3 months) Review Time for New Drugs (Standard Review) Total review time (Regulatory review time + Applicant s time) ;12 months(9 months + 3 months) Target percentile FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 60% 60% 70% 70% 80% PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency <http://www.pmda.go.jp/guide/jyohokokai/kohyo/file/1-7keikaku3.pdf> 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 6

Outline of Presentation 1. Current Situation of Approval Review 2. The Elements of Project and Priority 3. Project Management for Process of Approval Review 4. Project Management for Process of Scientific Advice 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 7

The Three Elements of Project and Priority Time (start and end time, the necessary time) Resource (reviewers) Project Scope, Quality (different each time) Top Priority (Mandatory Goal) Second Priority (Goal to Strive) Allowance Time Resource Scope, Quality プロジェクトマネジメント 理 論 編 ( 第 2 版 ) 総 合 法 令 出 版 一 部 改 変 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 8

Outline of Presentation 1. Current Situation of Approval Review 2. The Elements of Project and Priority 3. Project Management for Process of Approval Review 4. Project Management for Process of Scientific Advice 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 9

Flow of Review for New Drugs (in the past) Submission PMDA MHLW Pre- Submission Meeting NDA Filling PMDA s Evaluation List of Questions to Applicant PMDA s Evaluation External Expert Discussion PMDA s Opinion PAFSC Approval by MHLW Standard Review 1.9-2.5 months Initial Meeting Assessment Report 0.2-0.7 months 4.7-8.3 months 1.2-1.9 months 0.7-1.9 months Standard Review: Total 12 months Priority Review: Total 9 months MHLW: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare NDA: New Drug Application PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency PAFSC: Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Safety Council 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake <Administrative Notice of MHLW, March 30, 2012> 10

Pre-submission Meeting for Approval Review 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 11

Flow of Review for New Drugs (at present) Submission PMDA MHLW Pre- Submission Meeting NDA Filling PMDA s Evaluation List of Questions to Applicant PMDA s Evaluation External Expert Discussion PMDA s Opinion PAFSC Approval by MHLW Standard Review Priority Review 2.4 months 1.9 months Initial Meeting 0.6 months 0.3 months Assessment Report 5.7 months 1.5 months 0.9 months 4.4 months 1.3 months 0.8 months Standard Review: 12 months Priority Review: 9 months MHLW: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare NDA: New Drug Application PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency PAFSC: Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Safety Council 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake <Administrative Notice of MHLW, January 30, 2015> 12

Outline of Presentation 1. Current Situation of Approval Review 2. The Elements of Project and Priority 3. Project Management for Process of Approval Review 4. Project Management for Process of Scientific Advice 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 13

Flow of Scientific Advice for New Drug Development Applicant s Action Intention to Apply Submission of Document Response to List of Questions Response to PMDA s Opinion Pre- Submission Meeting Scheduling Preparing Document PMDA s Evaluation List of Questions to Applicant PMDA s Evaluation PMDA s Opinion to Applicant Face to Face Meeting Minutes 1 week (2-5 weeks) (1 week) 1 week (1 week) 1 week 1 month 2 months (8-11 weeks) 5 weeks PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 14

Number of Scientific Advice for New Drugs (Review Category 1; Gastrointestinal Drugs etc.) (N) <https://www.pmda.go.jp/0017.html> 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 15

US & EU Japan Example of the GANNT chart (I) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Hypothetical situation Best timing? Reflection of PMDA s opinion to protocol? Top-Line Results Scientific Advice PMDA PMDA Applicant s Decision Making Phase I trial Phase II trial Delay of enrollment of Japanese patients? FDA, EMA FDA, EMA Global Phase III trial Phase I trial Phase II trial EMA: European Medicines Agency FDA: US Food and Drug Administrationl PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 16

US & EU Japan Example of the GANNT chart (II) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Hypothetical situation Best timing? Phase I trial PMDA Reflection of PMDA s opinion to protocol? Best road map? FDA, EMA, PMDA Top-Line Results Scientific Advice Applicant s Decision Making FDA, EMA Global Phase II trial Global Phase III trial Phase I trial Phase IIa trial EMA: European Medicines Agency FDA: US Food and Drug Administrationl PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 17

Items for the Project Management Time (starting and ending time, the required time) Project Resource (reviewers) Examples of items for the project management The target product profile The strategic development plan (and current status) The GANNT chart (development history and project scheduling, including discussion to regulatory agencies) etc. Scope, Quality (different each time) Effective utilization of pre-submission meeting (sharing the information between applicant and PMDA) プロジェクトマネジメント 理 論 編 ( 第 2 版 ) 総 合 法 令 出 版 一 部 改 変 PMDA: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 18

Thank you for your attention. Welfare of patients! E-mail: sekino-kazuishi@pmda.go.jp 2015 DIA, Inc. All rights reserved. 12th Annual Meeting DIA JAPAN 2015 November 15-17 Tokyo Big Sight Ariake 19

Ask