ACTIVITY REPORTING AND PROPOSAL FORM JUDICIAL COUNCIL DIRECTIVES AOC RESTRUCTURING



Similar documents
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES

The information contained in this guideline is the processes typically recommended by Human Resource Services (HRS).

REVENUE BUREAU ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURPOSE & PROCESS SUBJECT TO LMC REVIEW AND REVISION IN SEPTEMBER 2009 INTRODUCTION

Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:

AMOCO SKILLS APPRAISAL

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers

Letter of Expectation Template

MANAGING & EVALUATING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE. A Guide to Classified Employee Performance Management & Evaluation

*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Performance Evaluation Workshop February/March 2015

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

Support Services Evaluation Handbook

NCVIP Overview State of North Carolina

CAMP LEJEUNE NONAPPROPRIATED FUND PERFORMANCE PLAN GUIDE

BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Supervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy

The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System

Internal Audit Report - payroll Projection of Overtime Request

DEFINITIONS. Annual Appraisal the performance evaluation conducted once a year that goes in an employee s permanent record.

CHAPTER Preaward Surveys of Prospective Contractor Accounting Systems

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

Employee Performance Management Program. Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30

BOARD OF REGISTERED NURSING Administrative Committee Agenda Item Summary. Michael Jackson, MSN, RN, Chairperson Administrative Committee

OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR HEADQUARTERS AND COURT COLLECTIONS EMPLOYEES DAVID SLAYTON

Information Technology Classifications Special Compensation Plan for FY 2017

Performance Management Process

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM

Performance Management

Never confuse effort for results. If you're measuring effort as progress, you're not measuring the right thing

Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (PDP) REFERENCE GUIDE

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN

For Area Managers, Heads of Schools, Branch Heads, Supervisors. Managing Performance A guide to managing unsatisfactory performance

Procedure 6.10P Employee Conduct and Discipline FAQ

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal

REAL-TIME LABOR EVALUATIONS. The views expressed in this presentation are DCAA's views and not necessarily the views of other DoD organizations

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES. 1 Compliance with statutory obligations, application of Shire policies & procedures and achievement of Shire objectives.

Commonwealth of Kentucky, hereinafter referred to at the University or as the First Party, and

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS POLICY. Purpose: To provide feedback, coaching and development plans for employees on a regularly scheduled basis.

Reclamation Manual Directives and Standards

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT COACHING AND PERFORMANCE GEORGIA PERIMETER COLLEGE

South Australia Police POSITION INFORMATION DOCUMENT

Evaluating Performance. A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation

Reasons for Change Orders

Human Resources Training. Performance Management Training Module 2: Managing Employee Performance

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

PHASE 8: IMPLEMENTATION PHASE

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide

Government of Trinidad and Tobago

University of California, Berkeley

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY

Performance Management Guide For Managers

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Career Banding Compensation Administration Plan

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees

Performance Appraisal System

Performance Appraisal Handbook

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 whole numbers only, no fractions! Ratings 1 & 5 should be very rare and MUST include comments

Performance Appraisals at UA. Statewide Human Resources Anne Sakumoto, PHR Director Faculty/Staff Training & Development

Four Valuable Performance Evaluation Tools for Employees

STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES INSURANCE DIVISION

Business & Technology Applications Analyst

Human Capital Update


User s Guide to Performance Management

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Setting the Expectation for Success: Performance Management & Appraisal System

COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE PROPOSAL

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Performance Management System

MONITORING AND DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

Staff Performance Evaluation

Defense Base Act History and Purpose of The Act

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE NEW INDIVIDUAL SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT (ISE) RATE STRUCTURE AND OTHER NEW EMPLOYMENT INCENTIVES

CLERK & COMPTROLLER, PALM BEACH COUNTY CLASS DESCRIPTION CLASSIFICATION TITLE: MANAGER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES

This procedure should be read in conjunction with the Purchasing By-Law , as amended from time to time.

Code of Conduct, Statement of Corporate Purpose, Managing Unsatisfactory Performance, SES Performance Management

US Geological Survey. Office of Human Resources Customer Service Plan

UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Audit of Contract Management Practices in the Common Administrative Services Directorate (CASD)

Re: Accessible Transport Strategy Draft Action Plan

University of California Regents Policy 7702 Senior Management Group Performance Management Review Process

Preparing for the Annual Performance Review Meeting

Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland

Chapter 6 Labor-Charging Systems and Other Considerations

City of Bryant Contract for Information Technology Consultant

ONLINE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPAS AT Staff) USER MANUAL (APPRAISER/HOD)

APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES

CLASS SPECIFICATION Human Resources Site Team Manager

Oregon University System

Transcription:

ACTIVITY REPORTING AND PROPOSAL FORM JUDICIAL COUNCIL DIRECTIVES AOC RESTRUCTURING DATE 6/5/2013 PREPARED BY OFFICE NAME Patrick Farrales Human Resources Services Office JUDICIAL COUNCIL DIRECTIVE NUMBER 29 JUDICIAL COUNCIL DIRECTIVE SEC RECOMMENDATION E&P recommends that the Judicial Council direct the Administrative Director of the Courts to develop an employment discipline policy to be implemented consistently across the entire AOC that provides for performance improvement plans. A consistent employment discipline policy must accompany the employee performance appraisal system. Section 8.1B of the AOC personnel manual discusses disciplinary action, but is inadequate. A policy that provides for performance improvement plans and for the actual utilization of progressive discipline should be developed and implemented consistently across the entire AOC. RESPONSE (check applicable boxes) This directive has been completed and implemented: The AOC has drafted a new performance management policy, effective July 1, 2013, which addresses the mandatory performance review of all employees on an annual basis. Details concerning its implementation can be found in the AOC's response to Judicial Council Directive 28. In April 26, 2013, the Judicial Council approved an amendment to Judicial Council Directive 29 to remove the reference to a progressive discipline system in the Directive's language. The AOC Human Resources Services Office has clarified that, as an at-will employer, the AOC is not required to, nor does it routinely, practice progressive discipline like in unionized environments. The AOC realizes that a method to rectify performance issues is still necessary. As such, the amended performance management policy will include reference to the use of a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to provide supervisors with a mechanism for remediating issues that they believe can be remedied. It should be recognized that the administration and maintenance of policies and procedures is an ongoing process of continuous improvement, and although milestones can be achieved, this is an ongoing process. This directive is forwarded to the Judicial Council with options for consideration:

Other: TIMELINE AND RESOURCES FOR IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION DATE OR PROJECTED IMPLEMENTATION DATE RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR IMPLEMENTATION July 1, 2013 The performance management program will ultimately be incorporated in the AOC's HREMS database, which will allow for automated reminders and online forms and documentation. The AOC already possesses the necessary PeopleSoft module for performance management; an external Contractor has been assigned to incorporate the module into the existing database. In the interim, tracking and administration of Performance Management will be assigned to existing HRSO staff for a period of at least one complete performance cycle. This will allow time for the AOC to evaluate the program's effectiveness and address any challenges faced before full implementation into HREMS. ADDITIONAL IMPLEMENTATION INFORMATION (complete only applicable sections) The AOC has updated and expanded policy 3.9 - Performance Management Program to reflect the changes to the program. PROCEDURES/ POLICIES UPDATED OR DEVELOPED The amended policy outlines: (1) the purpose of the program, (2) the three phases of the performance management cycle, and (3) the inclusion of a Performance Improvement Plan for employees who experience performance challenges. Additional details concerning this policy can be referenced in Directive 28. Policy 3 9 Performance Management Program.docx Microsoft Office Word Document 28.2 KB TRAINING UPDATED OR DEVELOPED The AOC will be holding a series of management courses designed to educate managers and supervisors on the performance review process. There will be three courses offered: Setting Expectations and Documenting Performance, Performance Management: Identifying and Addressing Performance Gaps, and AOC Performance Evaluation Process.

SAVINGS COST To implement the performance management program into HREMS, a onetime cost for services provided by a Contractor is included as part of the overall costs of the program. The project is currently budgeted at an amount not to exceed $225,343. Depending on the implementation efforts required, the final cost of the project may be lower than anticipated. Otherwise, no additional costs shall be incurred in this program's implementation. EFFICIENCIES SERVICE LEVEL IMPACT OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS (ADOC) REVIEW AND APPROVAL ADOC REVIEW Administrative Director of the Courts Review Date: 6/13/2013 EXECUTIVE AND PLANNING (E&P) COMMITTEE REVIEW E&P REVIEW Executive and Planning Review Date: 6/17/2013

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS Policy 3.9 PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Policy Number: 3.9 Title: Contact: Policy Statement: Contents: Performance Management Program Human Resources Services Office, Labor and Employee Relations Unit The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) requires periodic feedback to employees regarding their job performance in an effort to best serve the judicial branch while recognizing employee achievements and contributions to the AOC. (A) Employee Performance Management Program (B) Employee Performance Management Cycle (C) Performance Improvement Plan (A) Employee Performance Management Program The performance management program functions as a method to advance AOC operational objectives while recognizing employee achievements and contributions to the AOC. Managing employee performance is an ongoing communication process between a supervisor and an employee. The communication process is a cycle that includes clarifying expectations, identifying and setting goals, providing feedback, and evaluating performance. Overseeing employee performance and providing feedback is not an isolated event, rather it is an ongoing cycle that occurs throughout the year. (B) Employee Performance Management Cycle The employee performance management cycle consists of three phases: planning, feedback, and assessment. Planning Supervisors will develop an annual performance plan, using the Annual Performance Plan and Review Form [hyperlink], to direct employees toward achieving specific goals that support the AOC s operational objectives and the employees professional success. At a minimum, every employee at the AOC will be evaluated on an annual basis, using the Annual Performance Plan and Review Form. Supervisors must communicate with employees regarding their performance expectations throughout the year. Supervisors and employees should collaborate on developing performance goals and expectations. Early planning to achieve goals, together with mutual communication, pave the path to a successful working relationship. New 7/1/13

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS Policy 3.9 PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Guidelines for Determination of the Annual Performance Plan and Setting an Assessment Meeting: Feedback 1. The date of the employee s last step increase will be the designated date for the annual assessment meeting. 2. If the employee s step increase date changes, the new step increase date will become the new evaluation and planning date. 3. If the employee s job classification changes and more than 180 days have passed since the last performance review date, the annual performance plan from the past job classification will be completed by the past supervisor and a new performance plan will be initiated by the new supervisor. 4. If the employee s job classification changes and less than 180 days have passed since the last performance review date, a new performance plan will be initiated by the new supervisor utilizing appropriate information from the past performance review plan. 5. If the employee s supervisor changes during the annual review period, but the job classification has not changed, the new supervisor will be responsible for completing the annual performance review and may consider feedback from the prior supervisor. The new supervisor shall meet with the employee to clarify expectations and may revise the performance plan to meet the needs of the employee s new assignment. Once the performance plan is in place, supervisors are responsible for initiating and providing periodic feedback to employees regarding their job performance. Employees may also request feedback on their performance from their supervisors at any time. While AOC policy states that employee performance should be formally assessed once a year, it is strongly recommended that employees receive a verbal or written performance assessment and feedback on a more frequent basis. Supervisors should acknowledge employee accomplishments or address needs for improved performance as often as necessary. Feedback should be specific to reinforce positive results or provide guidance in areas that need improvement. Supervisors should utilize collaboration, coaching and feedback to ensure that employees achieve positive outcomes. Assessment At the end of the annual performance period, the employee's performance is measured against goals established through the Annual Performance Plan and Review Form in the prior year. This annual assessment meeting is an opportunity for supervisors to communicate with employees regarding their performance over the past year, evaluate employees job satisfaction, and make plans for employees performance goals. New 7/1/13

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS Policy 3.9 PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES At the conclusion of the assessment meeting, the supervisor will ask the employee to sign and date the form that summarizes the employee s performance over the prior year. The supervisor will explain to the employee that the signature acknowledges the contents of their discussion, but is not necessarily an agreement with the supervisor s assessment. Afterwards, the supervisor routes the document to office leadership for final signatures, provides a copy of the signed form to the employee, and sends a copy to the assigned Pay and Benefits Specialist for placement in the employee s personnel file. (C) Performance Improvement Plan An employee who is experiencing performance challenges may be placed on a Performance Improvement Plan ( PIP ) [hyperlink] with the goal of identifying areas of improvement as well as guiding the employee to improved performance. The PIP contents will communicate to the employee: (1) specific areas of work performance that are below expected standards, (2) a plan for improving the employee s work performance, (3) a time frame within which the employee is expected to make improvements, and (4) possible consequences should the employee fail to raise his/her performance to meet the expected standards. The purpose of the PIP is to inform the employee that certain deficiencies have been detected and to give the employee an opportunity to correct or improve their work performance before further action is taken. New 7/1/13