Quality Improvement & Performance Management Survey



Similar documents
Performance Management Basics and Resources. Presented by: Jessie Jones, MPHI, Office of Accreditation and Quality Improvement August 27 th, 2013

Learning Objectives Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Course

Evaluation, Performance Management, and Quality Improvement: Understanding the Role They Play to Improve Public Health

Public Health Accreditation Board STANDARDS. Measures VERSION 1.0 APPLICATION PERIOD APPROVED MAY 2011

Lean Six Sigma Training The DMAIC Story. Unit 6: Glossary Page 6-1

Course Overview Lean Six Sigma Green Belt

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE CERTIFIED SIX SIGMA YELLOW BELT

Certified Six Sigma Yellow Belt

Definition of Foundational Public Health Services

ADOLESCENT HEALTH SYSTEM CAPACITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt-EngineRoom

Quality Process in Engineering ISO 9000 and Beyond. Presented by: Roxanne L. Pillar, P.E. October 2014

Alabama Department of Public Health Strategic Plan

Introduction to Public Health: Explaining Its Role in Disasters

MA Department of Public Health

A Brief Overview of Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement for Public Health. Jim Butler James Butler & Associates September 2008

Certified Quality Improvement Associate

Ready or Not: Maximizing Partnerships to Achieve Health Department Accreditation

NEW JERSEY 2/17/15. Welcome! Gaining Ground Performance Management Pre- Workshop Webinar February 18, :00 pm 3:30 pm

The 10 Essential Public Health Services An Overview

Public Health Accreditation Board STANDARDS. Measures VERSION 1.0 APPLICATION PERIOD APPROVED MAY 2011

COLORADO PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE COMPETENCY SETS User Guide

Performance Excellence Process

Principles of Managing Operations (PMO)

Klamath Tribal Health & Family Services 3949 South 6 th Street Klamath Falls, OR 97603

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT EXERCISE L. Leslie Gardner, Ph.D., Assistant Professor School of Business University of Indianapolis

MULTIMEDIA COLLEGE JALAN GURNEY KIRI KUALA LUMPUR

MG1352 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGENMENT UNIT I INTRODUCTION PART-A

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Body of Knowledge

Unit 1: Introduction to Quality Management

Performance Management and Quality Improvement 101. Jack Moran, PhD Public Health Foundation

6. Decide which method of data collection you would use to collect data for the study (observational study, experiment, simulation, or survey):

Define. Measure. Analyze. Improve. Control. Project Name/Description. DMAIC Step Work Done/Tools Used by Team My Role/Contribution

2016 Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Plan

Six Sigma. Breakthrough Strategy or Your Worse Nightmare? Jeffrey T. Gotro, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development Ablestik Laboratories

DMAIC PHASE REVIEW CHECKLIST

Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Identified Knowledge Domains of Public Health

Quality Circle: An Approach to Solve Institutional Problems: A Case Study

Performance Management System Workplan (Indicator 1.2)

Lean Six Sigma for Healthcare

Sample Position Description for Tier 3a: Senior-Level Epidemiologist, Supervisor or Manager

School of Public Health and Health Services Department of Prevention and Community Health

Washington County Public Health Division. Performance Management and Quality Improvement Plan

THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS

The Process. Improvement. Handbook. A Blueprint for Managing Change and. Increasing Organizational Performance. Tristan Boutros.

Using Performance Excellence Models - Part 1:

In implementing the budget, the department will be organized into five major divisions with the following functions:

Online MPH Program Supplemental Application Handbook

Graduate Student Internship Program

Process Improvement Program Project Process

Supplier Training 8D Problem Solving Approach Brooks Automation, Inc.

Hoshin Kanri Planning Process. In today s business world, the goal of any organization is to survive in the market,

Master s Entry into Nursing. Academic Manual

How To Become A Clinical Epidemiologist

How Lean Six Sigma can Change Higher Education. Norma Simons Performance Innovation LLC Secretary ASQ Education Division

Graduate Student Epidemiology Program

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Certification Recommendation. Name (as it will appear on the certificate) Address. City State, Zip

The Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook

Total Quality Management and Cost of Quality

How To Get A Public Health Degree

Nursing (NURS) Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Research

A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT

Improving waiting time in vaccination room using Lean Six Sigma methodology

TOOL D14 Monitoring and evaluation: a framework

KFL&A Public Health Organizational Chart Board of Health for the Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Health Unit

Arkansas State PIRC/ Center for Effective Parenting

The Healthy Michigan Plan Handbook

Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention. Division Budget and Program Briefing for the Institute of Medicine April 9, 2009

Examples of Quality Improvement Projects in Adult Immunization

Immunization Infrastructure: The Role of Section 317

MEDICAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: THEORY AND PRACTICE Previously titled: Core Curriculum for Medical Quality Management

RESEARCH SUBJECT INFORMATION AND CONSENT FORM

TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT

PASRR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. and

Using Evaluation to Improve Programs. Strategic Planning.

ROLE OF HEALTH SERVICES STAFF

School of Nursing, Health, and Exercise Science. Proposed Interdisciplinary Major in Public Health Planned for Fall 2016

DEVELOPING VISION & MISSION STATEMENTS

Saint Paul-Ramsey County Public Health

Transcription:

Quality Improvement & Performance Management Survey Michigan Department of Community Health Public Health Administration February 2012 Prepared by the PHA Office of Performance Improvement and Management and the MPHI, Office of Accreditation and Quality Improvement

Quality Improvement & Performance Management Survey Michigan Department of Community Health Public Health Administration The Office of Accreditation and Quality Improvement at Michigan Public Health Institute is supporting the Michigan Department of Community Health s quality improvement efforts through its National Public Health Improvement Initiative (NPHII) grant by providing quality improvement and performance management training to MDCH staff. This survey is being conducted to assess your knowledge, attitudes, and experiences about quality improvement and performance management in public health. Your answers to the survey questions will be used to help make training activities more responsive to the needs of participants. This survey will take approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your responses will be fully confidential, results will only be reported in aggregate, and you will not be identifiable by your answers. Your participation in this survey is completely voluntary and you are free to decline to answer any question. We would appreciate your response by February 24, 2012. If you have any questions about this survey, please contact: Jessie Jones Tel: 517.324.8387 jjones@mphi.org 1. A. What is your program area? (choose one) Division of Communicable Disease Division of Immunization Division of Genomics, Perinatal Health, and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Division of Environmental Health Women, Infants, and Children Division Division of Family and Community Health Children s Special Health Care Services Division Bureau of Laboratories Chemistry and Toxicology Division Bureau of Laboratories Infectious Disease Division Bureau of Laboratories Quality Assurance Division Bureau of Laboratories Office of Public Health Preparedness Division of Local Health Services Division for Vital Records and Health Statistics Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Control Division of Health, Wellness, and Disease Control Bureau of Local Health and Administrative Services 1

Bureau of Laboratories Bureau of Epidemiology Bureau of Family, Maternal, and Child Health Other (please specify): B. What is your position within your program area? (choose one) Bureau Chief Division Director Division Manager Unit Supervisor/Manager Other (please specify): 2. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding your knowledge and opinions about quality improvement. I have Participated in organized quality improvement activities in the past three years. I can define quality improvement. I can describe the difference between quality improvement and quality assurance. I can describe the benefits of using quality improvement in public health. I can describe the stages of the Plan-Do- Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. Quality improvement involves changing processes. Quality improvement does not involve data. Quality improvement only involves managers. Quality improvement does not consider information from clients or customers When using quality improvement, you should be able to distinguish whether your change is an improvement. 2

I can list the four basic principles of quality improvement. Spending time and resources on quality improvement is worth the effort. 3. Have you, or any of your staff, participated in formal training on the following quality improvement methods or frameworks? Plan Do Study Act You Your Staff Yes No Yes No (PDSA) Baldrige Performance Excellence Criteria Balanced Scorecard Lean Six Sigma Other (please specify) I have not received any training in quality improvement methods. 4. What quality improvement methods have you, or any of your staff, previously used, if any? Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) Baldrige Performance Excellence Criteria Balanced Scorecard Lean Six Sigma Other (please specify) I have not previously used quality improvement methods in my work. You Your Staff Yes No Yes No 3

5. Do you, or any of your staff, have experience using any of the following quality improvement tools? Affinity diagrams Brainstorming Fish Bone/Cause and Effect Diagram Five Whys Forcefield Analysis Gantt Chart Logic Model Matrix Process Map/Flowchart Story Board Check Sheet Control Chart Histogram Pareto Chart Run Chart Scatter Diagram Stratification Other (please specify) You Your Staff Yes No Yes No 6. How often do you use quality improvement methods or tools, such as those listed in the previous two questions, in your current role? (Check One) Never Often (Less than once a year) Often (Several times a year but less than once a month) Very Often (Once a month or more frequently) 7. How often do your staff use quality improvement methods or tools, such as those listed in the previous two questions, in their work? Never Often (Less than once a year) Often (Several times a year but less than once a month) Very Often (Once a month or more frequently) 8. What else would you like to tell us about your or your staff members' use of quality improvement in your work? 4

9. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about quality improvement in your agency. Leaders of my agency are receptive to new ideas for improving agency programs, services, and outcomes. The director and/or the management team of my public health agency work together for common goals. Staff in my agency consult with one another to solve problems. Staff members are routinely asked to contribute to decisions at my public health agency. There is an established process for identifying priorities for quality improvement in my public health agency. Customer satisfaction information is routinely used by many individuals in my public health agency. Accurate and timely data are available for program managers to evaluate the quality of their services Many staff have the authority to change practices or influence policy to improve services within their areas. Many individuals responsible for programs and services in my public health agency have the skills needed to assess the quality of their programs. My public health agency has objective measures for determining the quality of many programs and services. Many staff in my program routinely use systematic methods to understand the root causes of problems. Many staff in my program routinely use best or promising practices when selecting interventions for improving quality. 5

Programs and services are continuously evaluated to see if they are working as intended and are effective. The quality of many programs and services in my agency is routinely monitored. 10. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding your knowledge and opinions about organizational performance management (i.e., the performance of your agency; this is not the same as performance appraisals of individuals). I have utilized a performance management system in this or previous positions. I can define performance management. I can name the four components of a performance management system. A performance management system can inform managers about needed adjustments or changes in policy or program directions to meet goals. A performance management system can frame reports on the success in meeting performance goals. A performance management system can help to improve the quality of public health practice. 11. What performance management methods have you previously used, if any? 6

12. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about organizational performance management in your agency. There are measurable or SMART objectives in place that span all levels of my public health agency. Data are synthesized from multiple programs, divisions, or management areas to examine progress toward agency-wide goals. Programs within my agency regularly identify indicators to measure progress toward achieving objectives. Staff within my program area have responsibility for monitoring progress toward objectives and reporting on progress. Staff in my agency use data on indicators to identify areas where achieving objectives requires focused quality improvement processes. 13. Is there anything else about quality improvement or performance management that you would like to share with us? Thank you for participation in this survey. Again, if you have any questions or comments regarding this survey, please contact: Jessie Jones Tel: 517-324-8387 jjones@mphi.org Michigan Public Health Institute Center for Healthy Communities Office of Accreditation and Quality Improvement 2342 Woodlake Drive Okemos, MI 48864 7 Michigan s Quality Improvement and Performance Management Survey was supported by funds made available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support under 5U58CD001309-02. The contents of this Quality Training Plan are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of or endorsement by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.