Vendor Evaluation Matrix Tool Presented By: Developed By: Version: Date: Description: Table of Contents:



Similar documents
Vendor Evaluation Matrix

Monitoring Health IT and EHR Goal Achievement

Workflow Redesign Templates

Goals and Objectives for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Implementation

Vendor Management for Critical Access Hospitals

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

Nortec. ACT Now! Nortec EHR. Qualify & Receive $44,000. An Integrated Electronic Health Record Software.

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Project Management for Critical Access Hospitals

EMR Adoption Survey. Instructions. This survey contains a series of multiple-choice questions corresponding to the 5-stage EMR Adoption Model.

Nortec. ACT Now! Nortec EHR. Qualify & Receive $44,000. An Integrated Electronic Health Record Software.

EMR Technology Checklist

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation.

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Andrew C. Bledsoe, MBA, CHPA, PCMH CCE Executive Director. Northeast KY Regional Health Information Organization.

Certified Electronic Health Record Scheduling Billing eprescribing. Why Consider ABELMed for your practice?

Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual

Guide To Meaningful Use

Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption

Special Topics in Vendor- Specific Systems. Outline. Results Review. Unit 4 EHR Functionality. EHR functionality. Results Review

Certified Electronic Health Record Scheduling Billing eprescribing. The ABEL Meaningful Use Criteria Guarantee

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

MicroMD EMR version 7.6

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor

15 things you should know before shopping for an EHR

NCQA Standards Workshop Physician Practice Connections - Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC -PCMH )

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

Going beyond Meaningful Use with EMR solutions from the Centricity portfolio

Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH): Communication and Care Coordination

1. Introduction - Nevada E-Health Survey

Indigo EHR/PM Solution with Revenue Cycle Management. Copyright 2011 Health One Technology Solutions. All rights reserved.

NCQA PCMH 2011 Standards, Elements and Factors Documentation Guideline/Data Sources

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Look at what innovation can do

AAP Meaningful Use: Certified EHR Technology Criteria

Custom Report Data Elements: 2012 IT Database Fields. Source: American Hospital Association IT Survey

EHR Software Feature Comparison

EMDEON CLINICAL SOLUTIONS

Practice Partner Electronic Medical Record and Practice Management Solution

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

How To Prepare For A Patient Care System

Advancing Health Equity. Through national health care quality standards

Costs and Limitations Disclosure For MEDITECH s 2014 Edition Certified Products

EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

InSync: Integrated EMR and Practice Management System

STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Meaningful Use Stage 2

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 2013 AHA ANNUAL SURVEY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPLEMENT

Running Head: WORKFLOW ANALYSIS 1. Workflow Analysis of a Primary Care Clinic Before and After Implementation of an Electronic Health Record

Reducing Medical Errors with an Electronic Medical Records System

New Brunswick EMR Program. Functionality Workbook

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

Appendix 2. PCMH 2014 and CMS Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements

Using Electronic Prescriptions (erx)

Four rights can t be wrong: why now is the right time to implement an EHR

Eric Jamoom and Chun-Ju Hsiao National Center for Health Statistics

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEFINING AND DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHRs)

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

Fully Integrated Electronic Health Record and Practice Management Software

I couldn t believe that a simple internet browser can help me so much, thanks to Health Highway.

Health Information Technology

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF YOUR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. A collaborative training offered by Highmark and the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative

MEDITECH LSS Data Systems. Medical and Practice Management Suite

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE: OA-RX

ABOUT MDFLOW SYSTEMS. We know healthcare, we get results.

APPENDIX C CROSSWALK OF PPC-PCMH-CMS STANDARDS AND ELEMENTS TO MEDICAL HOME CAPABILITIES BY TIER

MICROMD EMR VERSION OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS

Meaningful Use Objectives

EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

EHR Introduction for the Practicing Physician

Transcription:

Vendor Evaluation Matrix Tool Presented By: The National Learning Consortium (NLC) Developed By: Health Information Technology Research Center (HITRC) Vendor Selection and Management Community of Practice Version: 1.0 Date: October 21, 2011 Description: The Vendor Evaluation Matrix tool is a general evaluation tool that rates the basic functionalities of an electronic health record (EHR) using a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Table of Contents: Vendor Eval Matrix Ratings The National Learning Consortium (NLC) is a virtual and evolving body of knowledge and tools designed to support healthcare providers and health IT professionals working towards the implementation, adoption and meaningful use of certified EHR systems. The NLC represents the collective EHR implementation experiences and knowledge gained directly from the field of ONC s outreach programs (REC, Beacon, State HIE) and through the Health Information Technology Research Center (HITRC) Communities of Practice (CoPs). The following resource is a tool used in the field today and recommended by boots-on-the-ground professionals for use by others who have made the commitment to implement or upgrade to certified EHR systems. Introduction Page 1 October 21, 2011

Vendor Evaluation Matrix Instructions: Score each vendor on a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of your prioritized items. Total up your ratings for each vendor to help make your comparisons. Write the names of the vendors you are comparing in the watermark space provided in vendor columns. Use the blank rows at the end of the worksheet to ask your own questions. Functionality/Usability Priority Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C Charting Can the system accommodate (and potentially improve) my workflow? Can I easily build and/or customize off-the-shelf templates? Does the system offer a variety of data entry options, e.g., dictation, voice recognition, structured notes, etc.? Can I make subsequent edits and addendums to clinical documentation? Does the system alert me about unfinished portions of the clinical documentation and can I bypass it if necessary? Can I access other such clinical information as previous labs, progress notes, etc. from a patient s electronic chart while charting? Does the system allow me to multi-task, e.g., create task, order lab, etc. while charting? Does the system allow me to forward patient information to staff, other physicians, etc. via e- mail, electronic faxing, messaging, etc.? Does the system ensure that only authorized clinicians can sign clinical documentation? Prescriptions Vendor Eval Matrix Ratings 2 October 21, 2011

Can I complete a prescription within a few clicks? Can I look up medication information and is this information valuable? How extensive (and how sensitive) is the system s interactions checking capability, e.g., drug-drug, drug-allergy, drug-food? How accurate is the system in identifying drugcondition warnings, e.g., pregnancy? Can I refill a medication within a few clicks? Can previous sigs be viewed from the refill screen? Can the system handle multiple drug formularies? Can the system send prescriptions electronically to pharmacies in my local market? Lab and Results Management Can I complete a lab order within a few clicks? Can the system send lab orders electronically to laboratories, hospitals, etc. in my local market? Can I pull up and review lab results within a few clicks? Can the system receive lab results electronically from laboratories, hospitals, etc. in my local market? Does the system notify me of abnormal lab results and provide normal ranges? Can the system show me trending of results over time? Can I create and/or customize off-the-shelf order sets? Decision Support Does the system utilize clinical information from all parts of the chart to provide decision support? Does the system alert me when patient data indicates intervention is recommended? Vendor Eval Matrix Ratings 3 October 21, 2011

Can I access medical literature, clinical guidelines, etc.? Disease and Population Management Assuming good data entry for all patients, can I query the system and identify patients that have a particular condition, are on a certain medication, etc.? Does the system track patients for follow-up and send out reminders? Can I create ad-hoc reports or am I limited to ones provided off-the-shelf? Can I customize these reports? Does reporting module handle and/or queries together? Health Record Management Can I look up a patient by a number of different criteria, e.g., name, MRN, SSN, etc.? Does the system provide a summary view of a patient s health status? Does the system handle other such clinical documents as x-rays, reports, etc.? Does the system allow me to maintain patient lists, e.g., problems, allergies, medications, etc.? Can I organize patient information within the system in a similar way to my paper charts? Clinical Tasking & Messaging Can I access and manage various tasks, e.g., sign progress notes, review labs, etc. within a few clicks? Can I task or message someone else in the practice and do it with a few clicks? Does system alert me of overdue tasks and urgent lab results? How disruptive are the alerts, are they customizable and can they be overridden? Can I manage tasks and messages from a computer other than my own? Financial considerations Vendor Eval Matrix Ratings 4 October 21, 2011

Roughly how much could the system cost my clinic? Can you offer an Application Service Provider (ASP) option, purchase option, or monthly subscription option? Roughly how much do the software licenses cost? About how much will on-going maintenance and upgrades cost? How often will a support person(s) be available once the system goes LIVE in case of any system difficulty? How are the licenses issued? Concurrent user versus per practitioner? TOTAL SCORE Vendor Eval Matrix Ratings 5 October 21, 2011

Vendor Eval Matrix Ratings 6 October 21, 2011