How To Improve Your Knowledge Of Psychology



Similar documents
Operations Management OIT Assessment Report Operations Management Mission Statement:

Biology Program Health Sciences Program Assessment Report

Operations Management OIT Assessment Report Operations Management Mission Statement:

CSM. Psychology, BS. 3. Students can demonstrate knowledge and understanding in history and systems, research methods, and statistics.

Mechanical Engineering Technology Assessment Report

Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plan

UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan Master of Education in Counseling School of Education March 14, 2014

Oregon Institute of Technology Bachelor of Science Degree in Dental Hygiene Degree Completion Outreach Program

Curriculum Proposal Training Assessment Forms Center for Teaching and Learning

Radiologic Science Degree Completion Program Assessment Report

Assessment Report

Program Outcomes and Assessment. Learning Outcomes

DEPARTMENT OF NURSING C.W.POST CAMPUS LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK

2006 Assessment Report

UNM Department of Psychology. Bachelor of Science in Psychology Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Department of Political Science. College of Social Science. Undergraduate Bachelor s Degree in Political Science

Vision, Mission, and Process

Introduction to Educational Psychology AEDP235. Spring A. AEDP 235 Introduction to Educational Psychology (3)

Outcomes Data School Psychology EdS Program

Ed.S. School Psychology Program Guidebook

Ph.D. in Art History Academic Assessment Plan

Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate Course Change

Assessment Findings and Curricular Improvements Department of Psychology Undergraduate Program. Assessment Measures

STUDY AT ONE OF THE WORLD S BEST UNIVERSITIES

PROGRAM PUBLIC INFORMATION

Ph.D. in School Psychology Academic Assessment Plan

Western Carolina University Program Assessment Plan Program: School Psychology College of Education and Allied Professions

WASHBURN UNIVERSITY DUAL DEGREE PROGRAM School of Law (J.D.) & School of Business (M.B.A.)

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

Professional Education Unit

ACCOUNTING DEGREE PROGRAM (M.P.A.)

Program Outcome Assessment Report. Criminal Justice Program. Department of Behavioral Sciences. Southeastern Oklahoma State University

Alternate Route to Interim Teaching Certification Program Application

AVIATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT

Degree Programs Nathan M. Bisk College of Business

UNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience

Matrix of Graduate Program - MBA Student Learning Outcomes for Public Disclosure Identify Each Intended Outcome

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

Department of Communication Studies M.A. Program Annual Report

Master of Arts in Higher Education (both concentrations)

THE LINCOLN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF NURSING COURSE SYLLABUS. INSTRUCTOR: TBA EXTENSION: XXX OFFICE: XXX XXX OFFICE HRS: XXX OTHER: (Hybrid)

Outcome: Compare and contrast different research methods used by psychologists including their respective advantages and disadvantages.

1 List of Program Level Learning Outcomes (generally five)

North Carolina A&T State University

Criminal Justice Studies,.A.A.

Dubai School of Government Master of Public DSG MPA

Please see current textbook prices at

The Lincoln University Department of Health Sciences Nursing Program

Radiologic Science Degree Completion Program Assessment Report

Assessment of Student Learning Plan (ASLP): ART Program

CTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT

College of Science/Psychology

Electrical and Electronic Engineering Assessment Report Fall 2007 Spring 2008

2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook

Dean: Erin Vines, Faculty Member: Mary Gumlia 12/14/2009

Assurance of Learning Assessment Process

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Department of Management

Western Carolina University Marketing B.S B.A Business Assessment Plan for

THE LINCOLN UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY CITY Department of Psychology & Human Services COURSE SYLLABUS

Wichita State University School Psychologist, Narrative Describing the Operation of the Program Assessment Plan Approved

M.S. in Criminal Justice Program Assessment Plan October 2007

ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TAXATION (M.S.T.) DEGREE OCTOBER 2012

Transcription:

I. Introduction History Assessment Report Applied Psychology Program 2011-2012 The Department of Humanities and Social Sciences added the Bachelor of Science in Applied Psychology in 1997. The program has become well established and continues to grow and evolve. A minor in Psychology is also available to students. The Applied Psychology program serves students in the major, students in the minor, and serves General Education by providing courses that fulfill social science requirements. Enrollment trends Enrollment for the Applied Psychology major started very high, with 195 students enrolled in Fall of 2002. Between the 2002 and 2011 academic years, the Applied Psychology program has had a consistently stable number of students, totaling between 125 and 157 students actively enrolled each year. In Fall 2011 the Applied Psychology program had 137 students listing psychology as their primary major. This figure represents 14% of the students enrolled at OIT in the Fall 2011 term. Students in the program tend to be local; therefore it is not surprising that enrollment trends have dropped somewhat since the initial offering of the program It should also be noted that many students transfer into the program as juniors or seniors, having completed the general education requirements within another major or at another college (e.g., KCC). Graduation rates The Applied Psychology program had 35 students graduate during the 2011-2012 academic year. Historically, the program has graduated between 42-56 students annually. This represents a small decline in the rate of graduation based upon the numbers of active enrollee. II. Program Purpose, Objectives, and Student Learning Outcomes Applied Psychology Program: Mission Statement The mission of the Applied Psychology program is to enable students to apply general knowledge of psychology and in-depth knowledge and skill in specific areas of psychology to communicate effectively, think critically, behave ethically and with cultural awareness, and work interpersonally with people from a wide variety of backgrounds. Applied Psychology Program: Objectives 1. To produce graduates with effective interpersonal skills that can work in a variety of practical settings 2. To enable students to obtain the knowledge and skills necessary for immediate employment and/or graduate study in psychology and related areas 1

3. To provide opportunities for students who wish to apply psychology training to employment in business and human service related organizations or to prepare for graduate programs in related areas 4. To serve as a minor to complement other programs on campus Applied Psychology Program: Outcomes NOTE: These Program Student Learning Outcomes are currently under review by program faculty and it has been decided to remove prior learning outcomes 1 and 3 due to vagueness. They will be reinstated as new outcomes with clearly delineated performance criteria that are closely aligned with the American Psychological Association s national guidelines for undergraduate psychology programs. New PSLO s are marked in italics. 1. Students will demonstrate an understanding of and be able to use major research methodologies in psychology, including design, data analysis, and interpretation 2. Students will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of relevant ethical issues including a general understanding of the APA Code of Ethics 3. Students will demonstrate basic counseling skills. 4. Students will demonstrate effective writing conventions by using APA style effectively in empirically based reports, literature reviews and theoretical papers. 5. Students will demonstrate effective oral communication skills in various formats (e.g. group discussion, debate and lecture). III. Three-year Cycle for Assessment of Program Learning Outcomes The learning outcomes will be assessed on a three-year cycle as demonstrated in Table 1. Program Learning Outcomes 2009 /10 Students will be able to demonstrate an understanding of and be able to use major research methodologies in psychology, including design, data analysis, and interpretation. Students will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of relevant ethical issues including a general understanding of the APA Code of Ethics. 2010 /11 2011 /12 2012 /13 Students will demonstrate basic counseling skills. Students will demonstrate effective writing conventions by using APA style effectively in empirically based reports, literature reviews and theoretical papers. Students will demonstrate effective oral communication skills in various formats (e.g. group discussion, debate and lecture). Table 1. Three-year cycle for assessment of Applied Psychology learning outcomes. 2013 /14 2014 /15 2

IV. Summary of 2011-2012 Assessment Activities The Applied Psychology faculty met 9/27/11. We agreed that we will continue to focus assessment efforts in the courses that make up the core of the Applied Psychology curriculum, including the required Emphasis Electives. The free elective psychology courses will not be included in our program assessment. Our decision is based on the following those courses typically have lower enrollment so the samples would be small and not necessarily representative of the outcomes of the program as a whole. We will include web sections of target classes. See Appendix A for Course by SLO matrix with 2010-11 target courses. (NOTE this may change as we continue to revise the PSLOs) 1. Program Outcome 1: Students will demonstrate an understanding of and be able to use major research methodologies in psychology, including design, data analysis, and interpretation Direct Assessment #1 We conducted assessments in PSY 313 (Fall and Spring terms) where students were able to learn and practice the principles of good research methodology. Measurement was through two direct means of assessment: 1) their final grade based upon a final comprehensive examination (fall term) and 2) their final written report scored with a rubric (Spring term). Data analysis will be measured in the spring term utilizing a written paper. Results are shown in Table 2. Performance Criteria Demonstrate understanding of Research Designs Demonstrate understanding of Research Designs (Fall) Demonstrate understanding of Research Designs (Spring) Assessment Method MC exam questions Essay format Research paper format Measurement Scale # of correct answers out of 40 # of correct points out of 20 # of correct points out of 40 Table 2. Assessment results for SLO #1, fall 2011/spring 2012, PSY 313 Minimum Acceptable Performance 70% at 28 or correct 70% at 14 or 70% at 28 or Results 71% at 28 or correct 57% at 14 or 89% at 28 or Strengths and Weaknesses Students in the PSY 313 class (Research Methods- Fall 2011) performed at acceptable levels on items assessing their understanding of fundamental principles of research design when provided a structured format for assessment. However, the data suggests a weakness in their ability to critically analyze the information about research methodology. This suggests that the students have acquired some basic understanding of Research Methodology but need to improve on their ability to critically analyze the 3

material in a conceptual manner. We will continue to assess their understanding of research methodology in the spring term utilizing a written report (with attached rubric) focused on the critical understanding of research methodology. Changes in the classroom assignments will incorporate opportunities for analysis of published research within the classroom setting in order to improve their critical analysis of research methodology. During the spring term we will also assess their understanding of data analysis. The fall data suggests that the course material is sufficient for the basic understanding of research methodology. The subsequent results from the Spring term analysis of student understanding of research methods through the utilization of a research report indicated that substantial changes had been made to the learning of research methods by students. This was accomplished through a significant change in the teaching methods and resources utilized in the classroom. The incorporation of a research paper instead of an essay format of testing was utilized to measure student learning and application of research methodology. This was a successful change in the demonstration of learning of this learning objective. Indirect Assessment #1 We can assess this using the student IDEA summaries and a course related student survey conducted at the time of the final evaluation. Results are shown in Table 3. Minimum Performance Criteria Assessment Measurement Acceptable Method Performance Gaining factual knowledge IDEA summary 5 point 3.5 on 5-point Learning fundamental IDEA 5 point 3.5 on 5-point principles summary Learning how to use IDEA 5 point 3.5 on 5-point resources summary Learning how to analyze IDEA 5 point 3.5 on 5-point ideas summary Table 3. Results from the IDEA Center assessment, fall 2011, PSY 313 Results 5.0 4.9 5.0 4.8 Strengths and Weaknesses The essential factors of learning how to use resources was ranked by 92% of the students as being met. In measuring how well the students believed they gained factual knowledge and fundamental principles of research methodology a full 100% ranked the teacher and the course as meeting those objectives satisfactorily. Strengths: Student performance exceeded acceptable performance levels on all criteria. The data indicate that students demonstrated a basic understanding of research methodology in psychology and the application of that knowledge in a research paper format. 4

Weaknesses: A weakness in the demonstration of their understanding of research methodology was noted in the fall term through the use of an essay format of testing. Instructional and resource changes were implemented and during the spring term there was significant evidence that students had developed a stronger understanding of research methodology, and could apply their understanding to the application of research methodology in the form of a research paper. V. Student Learning Improvement Plan Applied Psychology Program Student Learning Outcome 1: Students will demonstrate an understanding of and be able to use major research methodologies in psychology, including design, data analysis, and interpretation. The results from the direct assessment indicate that students are demonstrating an understanding of major research methodologies in psychology and can apply their learning by performing the necessary requirements for a research paper. These papers indicated a proficiency in research design, and data analysis and interpretation at the undergraduate level of proficiency. Results from the indirect assessment indicate that the students strongly agreed that the instructor and the course provided excellent opportunities for the learning of factual knowledge and principles of research methodology. VI. Changes to be considered by psychology faculty during this academic year In an attempt to provide useful information about the skills learned by the psychology students and to comply with the PSLO standards of assessment and the American Psychological Guidelines for Undergraduate Psychology Programs, the psychology faculty has continued the process of reviewing the PSLOs and modifying and adding needed learning outcomes. The Psychology faculty will be meeting following the end of the spring term to determine what changes need to be made in the curriculum so that the Psychology Program continues to meet the PSLO standards of assessment and the guidelines from the American Psychological Association. In previous years the psychology program has incorporated the ISLO standards of assessment so that in addition to the previously stated learning outcomes (Learning outcomes 1-5), we have implemented procedures for measuring group work which will be included in the 2012-2013 academic year, lifelong learning which was part of the previous ISLO academic year assessment report (2010-2011). The American Psychological Association has suggested that students also be assessed on professionalism and personal growth. The Psychology Program will also be implementing a means of measuring these factors in the learning objectives and this will be determined by the psychology faculty at the fall program meeting. Appendix A 5

Applied Psychology Program Learning Outcomes x PSY Core Course/Emphasis Core Course Matrix for 2011/12 Assessment Program Learning Outcome Students will demonstrate an understanding of and be able to use major research methodologies in psychology, including design, data analysis, and interpretation 1 st year 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year PSY 301 PSY 420 PSY 313 PSY 317 PSY 421 PSY 334 PSY 422 PSY 341 PSY 423 PSY 347 PSY 360 PSY 410 Fall PSY 201 PSY 215 PSY 220 Winter PSY 202 PSY 216 PSY 311 PSY 317 PSY 330 PSY 335 PSY 342 PSY 347 PSY 361 PSY 410 Spring PSY 203 PSY 220 PSY 312 PSY 313 PSY 317 PSY 331 PSY 339 PSY 347 PSY 410 PSY 416 PSY 420 PSY 421 PSY 422 PSY 423 PSY 420 PSY 421 PSY 422 PSY 423 PSY 456 PSY 480 6