Loss Given Default What is your potential loss position in the current volatile environment?



Similar documents
Income Inequality And State Tax Revenue Trends

Workshop B: Credit Spread Trends In The Energy Sector

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC-' On Heightened Risk Of Missing An Interest Payment; Outlook Negative

Interactive Brokers LLC

Selective Insurance Group Inc. And Operating Companies Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Negative

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CC' On Intended Debt Restructuring; Outlook Negative

Rising cost of health care and creditworthiness in the G-20 sovereigns

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority; Toll Roads Bridges

Kuwait Projects Co. (Holding) Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Stable

Four Ratings Raised From GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables Funding L.L.C.; 10 Ratings Affirmed

Electricity Transmission System Operator TenneT's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To Intermediate; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Insurer Mapfre Ratings Raised To 'A' On Spain Upgrade; Outlook Stable

Research Update: Banco Monex S.A. Rated Global Scale 'BB+/B', National Scale 'mxa+/mxa-1' Rating Affirmed. Table Of Contents

Volkswagen Bank Ratings Lowered To 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Negative

Evaluating Insurers Enterprise Risk Management Practice

Italy-Based Veneto Banca Downgraded To 'BB+/B' On Increased Economic Risk; Outlook Negative

Research Update: DNB Bank ASA Ratings Affirmed At 'A+/A-1' On Bank Criteria Change; Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To "Intermediate"; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Icelandic Utility Landsvirkjun Outlook Revised To Stable After Similar Action On Iceland; 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed

Swedish Housing Company Willhem Affirmed At 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Stable

NorthStar Education Finance Inc. Series 2006-A Ratings Affirmed

Three Spanish Government-Related Entities Upgraded To 'BBB/A-2' Following Similar Sovereign Action; Outlook Stable

S&P Takes Rating Actions On Section 15 Bonds Issued By Various Danish Mortgage Banks

Business Development Bank of Canada 'AAA' Rating Affirmed On Continuing Federal Government Support

RBS Citizens Financial Group Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative; Stand-Alone Credit Profile Lowered To 'a-'

Revised Criteria for Rating Nonbank Financial Institutions And Financial Services Companies

Market Data Analysis - Pacific Life

ASR Nederland NV Assigned 'BBB+' Rating; Ratings On Core Insurance Operations Affirmed; Outlook Stable

Research Update: Danish Mortgage Bank DLR Kredit A/S Assigned 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings. Table Of Contents

Japan Housing Finance Agency Series S-1 To S-12 Structured Notes 'AAA (sf)' Ratings Affirmed

Sirius International Group Outlook Revised To Stable On Plans To Retain Its Strategy Post Acquisition; Ratings Affirmed

Swedbank Outlook Revised To Stable From Negative On Improved Business Position; Ratings Affirmed At 'A+/A-1'

Residential Real Estate Company Deutsche Wohnen 'BBB+' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Conwert Takeover Offer

Dominion Gas Holdings LLC

Russia-Based EvrazHolding Finance And Sibmetinvest Rated 'B+', Unsecured Notes Rated 'B+'; Outlook Stable

MBIA U.K. Insurance Ltd.

Lake Oswego, Oregon; Water/Sewer

Fibria Celulose S.A. Upgraded To 'BB+ From 'BB' On Debt Reduction, Outlook Stable

French Social Security Agency ACOSS Short-Term 'A-1+' Rating Affirmed On Integral Link, Critical Role To French State

Lear Corp.'s Recovery Rating Profile

Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer

Danish Bank DLR Kredit Affirmed At 'BBB+/A-2'; Junior Subordinated Debt Downgraded To 'BB'; Outlook Remains Stable

Dutch Private Bank F. van Lanschot Bankiers Outlook Revised To Negative On Weaker Environment; 'A-/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe

Interest-Only Loans Could Destabilize Denmark's Mortgage Market

Research Update: PRI Pensionsgaranti Mutual Insurance Company Assigned 'A' Ratings; Outlook Stable. Table Of Contents

Iceland-Based Non-Life Insurer Tryggingamidstodin Ratings Affirmed at 'BBB-'; Outlook Stable

Polish TV Operator TVN S.A. And Parent Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Positive On Announced Acquisition By Scripps

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Spain-Based IT Service Provider Amadeus IT Holding Rating Raised To 'BBB/A-2' On Strong Financials, Outlook Stable

Denmark-Based Life Insurer Danica Pension Livsforsikringsaktieselskab Rated 'A-'; Outlook Stable

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Negative

Health Care Service Corp. Outlook Revised To Negative From Stable; Ratings Affirmed

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC+' On Weak Earnings And Delays In Customer Payments; Outlook Negative

Gemini Securitization Corp., LLC (As Of May 2014)

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed And Removed From CreditWatch; Outlook Stable

Belgium-Based Insurance Group Ageas Upgraded To 'A' On Strengthened Financial Risk Profile; Outlook Stable

Long-Term Rating On Heartland Bank Ltd. Raised To 'BBB'; Outlook Negative

Outlooks On Six Insurance Groups Revised To Stable From Negative After Outlook On U.S. Revised To Stable

New York Life Insurance Co. 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed On Criteria Review; Outlook Stable

UBI Banca Ratings Lowered To 'BBB-/A-3' On Heightened Economic And Industry Risks In Italy; Outlook Negative

Covea Group Core And Guaranteed Companies Outlooks Revised To Positive; 'A' Ratings Affirmed

Asia Insurance Co. Ltd.

Largest South African Non-Life Insurer, Santam Ltd., Assigned 'A-' Long-Term And 'zaaa' National Scale Ratings

Guardian Life Insurance, Core Operating Subsidiaries 'AA+' Ratings Affirmed On Criteria Review, Outlook Negative

Six Russian Real Estate Companies On CreditWatch Amid Higher Interest Rates, Weakening Demand, Sharp Ruble Depreciation

Delta Lloyd Ratings Lowered To 'A-'; Still On CreditWatch Negative

Four Subsidiaries Of Covea Assigned Ratings On High Integration Within Group; Outlook Stable

German Utility RWE Downgraded To 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Iceland-Based Utility Landsvirkjun Rating Raised To 'BB+' On Improved Stand-Alone Credit Profile; Outlook Negative.

International Finance Corp. 'AAA/A-1+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Turkey-Based Appliance Manufacturer Vestel Outlook Revised To Positive; 'B-' Rating Affirmed

Constellium Holdco B.V. Recovery Rating Profile

RatingsDirect. Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation. Edward R McGlade, New York (1) ; edward.mcglade@standardandpoors.

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. And Subsidiaries 'BBB' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; The Outlook Is Stable

Dogus Holding 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Sustained Investments And Expected Completion Of Garanti Sale; Outlook Negative

Banco Mercantil do Brasil S.A. Global Scale 'BB-/B' And National Scale 'bra-' Ratings Affirmed

Ten Japanese Insurers Downgraded; Outlooks On Two Other Insurers Revised Down To Stable Following Downgrade Of Japan

Tri-Township Consolidated School Building Corp., Indiana Tri-Township Consolidate School Corp.; School State Program

Research Update: Klabin Ratings Raised To 'BB+' On Improving Financial Profile. Table Of Contents

Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais Upgraded To 'BB+' From 'BB' On Stronger Business Risk Profile, Outlook Stable

Research Update: Belgian Community of Flanders Outlook Revised To Negative After Same Action On Sovereign; 'AA+' Rating Affirmed.

Molibdenos y Metales 'BBB-' Rating Affirmed On Improving Leverage, Outlook Still Stable

FWD Life Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. Assigned 'A-' And 'cnaa' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Stand-Alone Credit Profiles: One Component Of A Rating

Global Multiline Insurer AXA Group 'A+' Ratings Affirmed On Resilient Financial Profile; Outlook Stable

Sul America Upgraded To 'BBB-' And Sul America Companhia Nacional de Seguros To 'BBB+' Under New Criteria Review

A Financial Analysis of Energies and Gas Pipelines

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Assessing Financial Practices Analytical Framework Assessment Methodology Analytical Process And Supporting Documentation

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

Swedish Bank SEB's Improved Capital Leads To Upgrade Of Hybrid Instruments; SEB Affirmed At 'A+/A-1'; Outlook Stable

Research Update: Ratings On Russian Independent Gas Producer OAO NOVATEK Raised To 'BB+/ruAA+'; Outlook Stable

Mounting Student Debt Is Reshaping The U.S. Student Loan Market

Italian Veneto Banca 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed And Removed From CreditWatch Negative Following Review; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Ratings On The Republic Of Iceland Placed On Watch Negative After The Electorate Rejects Icesave Agreement A Second Time

Nationale Borg Group Outlook Revised To Developing On Uncertainties Related To Sale News; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Pohjola Non-Life Insurance Downgraded To 'A+' After Government Support Review Of Pohjola Bank; Outlook Remains Negative

Ratings On Three Finnish Banks Affirmed On Subdued Economic Recovery; Outlooks Remain Negative

Research Update: Bermuda Long-Term Sovereign Rating Lowered To 'AA-' On Revised Rating Methodology; Outlook Stable.

Transcription:

Loss Given Default What is your potential loss position in the current volatile environment? Complete your credit risk assessments with recovery analyses. Evaluate potential economic losses for a range of exposures in various asset classes with an extensive suite of Loss Given Default (LGD) benchmark data, models and services. A full suite of analytical services to help you assess and mitigate risk Meet Your Regulatory Requirements and More Develop and implement LGD methodologies to support the Advanced Internal Ratings Based approach (AIRB) under Basel II, or to simply comply with industry best practices Enhance existing LGD models and methodologies in preparation for AIRB recognition Validate and benchmark internally developed LGD models Build customized LGD/EAD estimation methodology using existing Decision-tree frameworks calibrated to S&P Capital IQ data and best practice approaches Access various LGD client data pooling and collection exercises by region and asset class including Project Finance and Leveraged Finance Access our LossStats model and database of North American corporate recoveries A Fully Transparent Methodology Extensive sector coverage includes mid-size to large Corporates, Financial Institutions, Insurance Companies, Project Finance, Asset Finance, Real Estate, Trade Finance, Local & Regional Governments and Sovereigns. Robust tools support peer and scenario analysis and active portfolio management based on recovery risk. Distinguish Good Loans From Bad Ones lower PD higher lower ACCEPT LOW RISK FOCUS ON COLLATERAL VALUE AND SECURITY ENFORCEABILITY LGD higher FOCUS ON ENSURING OBLIGOR RISK RATING IS CORRECT REJECT HIGH RISK Separation of the two credit risk dimensions probability of default (PD) risk and recovery risk enables you to both analyze and manage the distinct risks in different ways. Facilities can be structured most effectively by minimizing expected losses. Additional features include: Increased consistency, transparency and granularity of internal recovery ratings Fully transparent and intuitive methodologies with detailed regulatory related documentation, a user guide and on-site training A time-efficient and user-friendly interface with input factors either readily available from public or standard sources or easily determined Continuously reviewed testing results and models that ensure their conceptual soundness and strong performance These capabilities may also be effective when assessing unlisted companies. 1

Lgd Estimation Scorecards Scorecards are thoroughly tested internal ratings-based methodologies that produce facility-specific estimates of LGD in the low default environment. Cover a wide range of asset classes and sub-sectors More than a dozen industry- and asset-class specific off-the-shelf scorecards produce a point LGD estimate on a continuous scale, which can be mapped to any discrete recovery scale Consistent approach across asset classes via the same underlying statistical framework facilitates use of more inputs based on expert judgment whenever recovery data is limited Delivered in a user-friendly Excel spreadsheet framework for easy integration into your platform Get a fast and effective solution when there is insufficient internal data to build a statistical model. Our methodologies leverage the analytical process of Standard & Poor s Ratings Services, most recent regulatory guidance and best industry practices. Sample Lgd Corporates Scorecard Obligor Characteristics and Bank Policy Industry Enterprise/Asset Valuation Recovery Policy Jurisdiction Industry-Sector Type of Assets Volatility per Asset Type Stress Factor in Case of Default Workout LGD or Liquidation Scenario Location of Assets LGD Point Estimate Recovery Rating Facility Characteristics Debt Structure and Subordination Total Debt and Liabilities Debt Cushion Debt Priority Pledged Collateral Assets Pledged to Facility Assets Pledged to Other Facilities Recovery Enhancement Guarantees Insurances Decision-Tree Models This is a Facility Risk Rating methodology that captures information and calculation of LGD and Exposure at Default (EAD) for each facility. It enables you to adhere to Basel II AIRB principles and best industry practices and is employed by leading Basel II AIRB banks. Uses your own empirical loss rates to the furthest extent possible and blends the available empirical data with in-depth analysis; internal data can be supplemented with external sources to substantiate the level of chosen risk factors Incorporates your own expertise in development of the methodology, including choice of risk drivers, number and complexity of Decision-Tree paths in the model Includes a Lending Value Allocation methodology for facilities secured by one or more specific types of collateral; collateral gets reapportioned to all facilities that have access to it Solution has an empirical basis, but accommodates for the necessary level of analytical insight required to fully capture LGD risk drivers Supports compliance with new regulatory frameworks (such as Basel III), especially in stress testing 2

and model governance Borrower Type Model Base LGD Calculation Adjustments Collateral Value Small & Medium Enterprises Yes Collateralized? Collateral Cash Marketable Securities Accounts Receivable Inventory Lending Value Allocation Current Exposure/ Facility Type/Maturity EAD Estimate Qualitative Adjustments Jurisdiction/ Industry Adjustments Commercial & Industrial Equipment Real Estate Base LGD Factor Facility Coverage Ratio Base LGD Estimate Guarantee Adjustment No Seniority Secured All Assets Unsecured Subordinated Debt Above/ Debt Below Downturn Adjustment Overrides Banks/NBFIs Final LGD Risk Rating Other Sectors Specialized Sovereigns Public Sector Enterprise Sector Benchmark Project Finance Agriculture Sample Decision Tree Framework LossStats Model This model forecasts LGD values by applying a mathematical framework to the 4,000+ recovery estimates in the LossStats database of ultimate recovery data and distressed debt trading-price information. Enables estimation of potential ultimate recovery and 30-day post-default recovery (by selling the asset) for specified defaulted assets, using U.S. data Validation Validation provides the assessment of loss estimations of individual facilities as well as a review of the use of internal recovery ratings or LGD estimates in the credit process. Solutions include validation diagnosis, framework and process design, performance testing (benchmarking and backtesting where relevant) and review of your internal validation procedures 3

Benchmarking Benchmarks are developed by placing an objective, structured framework around our existing methodology rather than on the basis of heterogeneous historical data. Provides a solution to benchmarking in segments where there are few or no public recovery ratings Performs equally well for entities publicly rated by Standard & Poor s Ratings Services and those that are not publicly rated, as well as those that are listed and not listed, independent of the size of an entity or facility Once benchmarks are generated, various statistical tests are performed and reported comparing your facility ratings with Standard & Poor s assessments Sample Histogram of Debt Cushion and Collateral Percent of Observations (%) 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 to 10 10 to 20 20 to 30 30 to 40 40 to 50 50 to 60 60 to 70 70 to 80 80 to 90 90 to 100 >=100 Recovery Rate (%) Debt Cushion >50% with Collateral Debt Cushion <=50% with Collateral Debt Cushion >50% without Collateral Debt Cushion <=50% without Collateral For illustrative purpose only Using S&P Capital IQ s LossStats database of facilities, the bimodal behavior of recovery rates known from the retail sector appears to hold for large obligors as well. Depending on key facility characteristics (here, debt cushion and secured debt versus unsecured debt) actual recovery rates tend to be either very high (right-hand side) or very low (left-hand side). Relatively few observations are centered around mean values of recovery. Data Enhancement CreditPro Recovery Reports and Data This information provides LGD data based on more than 800 public and private U.S. companies that have defaulted since 1987. Sample Data Snapshot Debt Type Instrument Count Percentage of Debt Total Defaulted Amount Bank Debt 1,709 41.39 349,945,173,051 Senior Secured Bonds 391 7.05 59,633,976,858 Senior Unsecured Bonds 1,260 37.77 319,353,979,137 Senior Subordinated Bonds 564 9.02 76,243,751,663 Subordinated Bonds 434 4.34 36,676,855,714 Junior Subordinated Bonds 54 0.43 3,598,084,795 Grand Total 4,412 100.00 845,451,821,218 This includes credit loss information on more than 4,000 defaulted bank loans and high yield bonds, as well as other debt instruments of almost $1 trillion in defaulted principal. 4

Instrument Recoveries Report (2006 to 2012) Recovery Rate (%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 AVG: 72.7% AVG: 37.0% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year Bank Debt Senior Unsecured Bonds For illustrative purpose only Client Data Pooling Peer LGD data helps provide benchmarks as well as fills gaps in internal data for more comprehensive regulatory compliance and model building. S&P Capital IQ has successfully led data consortia in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia by providing the independence and objectivity that is necessary to make these collaborative projects successful Leverage the Power of S&P Capital IQ Solutions Explore the range of analytic tools available to help you assess and mitigate loss given default risk. S&P Capital IQ brings you a suite of products PD Scorecards Evaluation of the probability of default (PD) risk associated with asset finance (AF), project finance (PF) and trade finance (TF) transactions. Sector-Specific Corporate PD Rating Scorecards Sector-Specific Financial Institution PD Rating Scorecards Sovereign, Local Regional Government PD Scorecards AF PD Rating Scorecards Commodity Finance PD Rating Scorecards Commodity Trader PD Rating Scorecards PF PD Rating Scorecards LGD Scorecards Evaluation of the LGD risk associated with asset finance, project finance and trade finance transactions. Asset Based LGD Scorecard Decision Tree LGD Scorecard AF LGD Scorecards Commodity Finance LGD Scorecards PF LGD Scorecards DATA Differentiation of historical default and loss severity of your portfolio in comparison with the market. LGD Database CreditPro PD Data PF Data Pooling Consortium benchmarking Comparison or validation of internal ratings and PD or LDG generated by your model with an independent and reliable external reference LGD Benchmarking PD Benchmarking stress testing Validate PD, LGD and EAD Stress Testing Models Model Validation Backtesting Conceptual Soundness Benchmarking 5

contact US London +44(0) 20 7176 7176 New York +1 212 438 5625 Hong Kong +852 2533 3588 Sydney +61 1 9255 9886 risk_marketing@ spcapitaliq.com www.spcapitaliq.com Copyright 2013 by Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC (S&P). All rights reserved. This material was prepared by S&P Capital IQ Risk Solutions. S&P Capital IQ Risk Solutions is part of S&P Capital IQ, a brand of McGraw-Hill Financial. No content (including valuations, ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or tomissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an as is basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P and its affiliated do not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P s public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. STANDARD & POOR S, S&P, LOSSSTATS, and CREDITPRO are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC. EXCEL is a registered trademark of the Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. 6 081301