Anchorage School District Overview November 2011



Similar documents
ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Allen Elementary School

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

South Dakota DOE Report Card

San Joaquin County Special Education

Kodiak Island Borough School District

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Fremont Elementary School 1255 E. Market Street Salinas CA, (831) Grades K-6 John J. Jimenez, Principal

Elmhurst Community Prep

Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High

Kaweah High School

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students

Who is Aurora? Supplement A: Education. An Overview of demographic and social data and trends

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

California Department of Education. School Accountability Report Card. Reported Using Data from the School Year. Published During

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

KIPP Scholar Academy. Tiffany Moore, Principal West Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90062

Sky Mountain Charter Eric Schoffstall A o b u o t u t O u O r u r S c S h c o h o o l C n o t n a t c a t

Colorado Springs School District 11

River Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

South Sutter Charter. Mr. Eric Schoffstall, Director El Centro Blvd. East Nicolaus, CA

For Canyon View School

ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR

Bangor Central Elementary School Annual Education Report

State of New Jersey

John Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Greenville ISD. Danna Myers Chief Academic Officer January 2015

Brookside Elementary. William Cameron, Principal. 116 Butterfield Rd. San Anselmo, CA

iq Academy California Los Angeles School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

For South Bay High School

Ocean Grove Charter. Eric Schoffstall, Administrator North Highway Nine Boulder Creek, CA 95006

Legislative Position. Texas Elementary Principals and Supervisors Association

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Richmond College Preparatory

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Fammatre Elementary School

Bryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE (555) Administration.

Sierra Academy of San Diego

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

English Learner Program Description White Bear Lake Area Schools

K.L. Carver Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Main Street Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Top of the World Elementary School Tree Top Lane Laguna Beach, CA (949) Grades K-5 Ron La Motte, Principal

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Data Collection and Reporting

Sacramento Charter High

Louisiana s Schoolwide Reform Guidance

Rhode Island KIDS COUNT Presents: Newport Data in Your Backyard ~~~

STRATEGIC SCHOOL PROFILE Middle and Junior High School Edition. Great Oak School. Oxford School District

Statistical Profile of the Miami- Dade County Public Schools

School Accountability Report

This report provides the executive summary for Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2014.

Advanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.

For Farragut Elementary School

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

California Virtual Academy at Maricopa School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

State of New Jersey

Moberly School District. Moberly School District. Annual District Report Accredited with Distinction.

Template for Local Grantee Evaluations ISBE 21st Century Community Learning Center Program. II. Overview and History of Program

Hispanic High School Student Graduates of Two-Way Bilingual Programs: Attitudes Toward School, Education and the Two-Way Program

Los Angeles County Special Education

Transcription:

Anchorage School District Overview November 2011 Anchorage School District Enrollment by Ethnicity, 1997-2011 Total: 7,81 9,767 9,71 9,206 100% 9% 2% 7% 9% 13% 90% % 8% 6% 7% 6% 6% 80% 10% 11% 11% 10% 70% 13% 60% 13% 1% 0% 9% 0% 68% 30% 60% % 7% 20% 10% 0% 1997 2001 2006 2011 Enrollment The Anchorage School District is a large, ethnically, economically, and linguistically diverse district in southcentral Alaska. Enrollment has been just under 0,000 students for over a decade (see chart below) but the composition of those students has changed, with more students from diverse backgrounds. Economically Disadvantaged (Low-Income) Students In the last five years, the number and share of students from economically disadvantaged homes has increased significantly. The number of low income students increased from 16,769 in the 200-06 year to 21,778 in 2010-2011, boosting the percentage from 3 percent of all students to percent (see table). multiple or unknown African American Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander Alaska Native/American Indian White Number and Percent of Anchorage School District Students Identified as Economically Disadvantaged, 2006 and 2011 200-06 2010-11 Economically disadvantaged 16,769 21,778 Not disadvantaged 32,9 27,28 Total Enrollment 9,71 9,206 Percent economically disadvantaged 3% % Special Programs In addition to the growth in numbers of low-income students, the number of students in many special programs has also increased. As the table on the next page shows, the district served double the number of students in its migrant programs in 2010-11 as in ASD Students served by Special Programs, 200/06 and 2010/11 200 2006 2010-2011 Change, 2006-2011 Bilingual 690 97-1.3% Migrant 1287 291 101.3% Title 1 Homeless 1767 239 38.0% Title 1 School wide 8070 10198 26.% Indian Education 2032 3378 66.2% Gifted 303 80 0.9% Special Education 81 8,660 1.% Total District Enrollment 971 9206-1.0% CAEPR c/o Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage Alaska 9908-61 Telephone (907) 786-13 Fax (907) 786-7739 E-mail: CAEPR@uaa.alaska.edu www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/caepr

200-06. Also seeing substantial growth were the Title I Homeless and School-Wide, Indian Education, and Gifted programs. But during the same period, the number of children served by bilingual programs declined, and special education enrollment changed little. Top Five Languages spoken by ASD English Language Learners, 200-06 and 2010-11 200_06 2011_11 Spanish 1,99 1,38 Hmong 819 1,16 Samoan 2 977 Filipino 687 731 Yupik * 30 Korean 9 * Other 1,6 1,19 *=not in the top five that year; included in Other While the number of students eligible for and served by bilingual programs has dropped in the last five years, the number of languages students in those programs speak has remained large. Four of the top five languages five years ago are still in the top five. Korean has been replaced by Yup ik as the fifth most common home language for English language learners. In addition to the languages listed in the table below, the district serves student speaking 86 other languages, ranging from Albanian to Ibo to Navajo to Tlingit. Transiency The district reports a transiency rate for each of its schools, calculated for any given school by dividing the number of students enrolled for fewer than 170 days at that school by the total number enrolled in the school at any point in the school year. This rate measures the percentage of students who changed enrollment during the school year not those who changed schools between one year and the next. The overall district transiency rate in 2010-2011 was 26.71 percent, meaning that just over 13,000 of the district s students changed schools during the year. Transiency rates vary widely from school to school; the ones reported here are all from the 2010-2011 school year. Elementary schools with the lowest transiency rates see about one in ten students come or go during the school year; in those with the highest rates, more than two of every five students is transient. Transiency at middle and high schools varies almost as much, with middle schools from 12 percent to 30 percent and high schools from 1 percent to 36 percent. The highest rates are, not surprisingly, in schools that serve at-risk students. Continuation School, a computer-based school serving expelled students, had a 100 percent transiency rate. Alternative programs have the lowest transiency rates, with Chugach Optional (an interdisciplinary curriculum, with emphasis on student need and interest, individualized learning, and flexible space and schedules) and Northern Lights ABC (a back-to-basics curriculum) have transiency rates of. percent and 6.9 percent, respectively. District Overview, p 2

Suspensions and Expulsions In each of the last two years the school district imposed about,00 suspensions and 0 to 100 expulsions. But many students who are suspended may be suspended more than one time in the Anchorage School District Suspensions and Expulsions, 2009/10 and 2010/11 2009-2010 2010-2011 Suspensions Elementary 102 90 Middle 198 1391 High 2130 21 Total 680 76 Expulsions Middle 18 9 High 8 97 Total 66 106 ASD Expulsions by Cause, 2009/10 and 2010/11 Middle High Incident Type school school Total Drugs, Street 9 2 61 Alcohol, Sales 1 8 9 Weapons-Other 6 1 21 Assault 6 13 19 Arson/Fire 2 6 8 Criminal Acts 0 6 6 Other 3 8 Total 27 1 172 school year, so the suspension numbers represent fewer than,00 students; we don t know how many fewer. Fighting is among the top reasons for suspension at all grade levels. In elementary schools, fighting, dangerous actions, disruptive behavior, and willful disobedience account for about two-thirds of suspensions. In middle school, fighting, dangerous actions, willful disobedience, and reckless and unsafe behavior account for about half of all suspensions. In high school, drugs, willful disobedience, fighting, obscenity/profanity, and disruptive behavior account for about half of all suspensions. Looking at expulsions drugs and alcohol accounted for over 60 percent of expulsions in the last two years, followed by weapons, assault, and arson. District Overview, p 3

Retention and Dropout rates The district reports the retention rate that is, the share of students held back in a grade for students in kindergarten through 8 th grade. Over the last ten years, the rate has declined from over two percent to less Retention Rate for grades K to 8, 2001 to 2011 than one-half of one 2. percent. The definition used to calculate the rate 2 the number of students 1. retained in grades k through 8 divided by the 1 enrollment in those 0. grades does not appear to have changed in that time. Percent of Student retained in grade 0 The dropout rate is calculated by dividing the number of dropouts each year in grades 7 through 12 by the total enrollment Anchorage School District Dropout Rate by in grades 7 through 12. type of student, 2006-2011 District dropout rates have 9% been gradually declining 8% over the last five years. 7% 6% % % 3% 2% 1% 0% 06_07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities Migrant All Students Changes in who was counted as a dropout, and when they were counted, make longer-term longitudinal comparisons unreliable in establishing trends. Students do not always tell school officials they are dropping out of school. They may simply stop attending, either during the year, or fail to return after summer break. In those cases, it is left to school officials to ascertain whether students have transferred to other schools or dropped out. When students transfer to other public schools, officials will know because there will be a request for the student s records, but this is not necessarily the case if they transfer to home school. District Overview, p

3.0% 30.0% 2.0% 2010-2011 Dropout rate by type of school 28.9% Not surprisingly, dropout rates in middle school are much lower than the district-wide average, and rates for those in alternative schools for students who have not succeeded in the district s comprehensive high schools are much higher. 20.0% 1.0% 10.0%.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.%.% Middle Schools Polaris & Steller Comprehensive High Schools Alternative High Schools Dropout rates vary considerably across the district s main high schools, in ways that are not fully explained by different demographics. In 2011, some of the high schools with low dropout rates among students not economically disadvantaged had some of the higher dropout rates among economically disadvantaged students. But at other schools both groups of students had relatively low (or high) rates. Dropout Rate by High School and Economic Status Non-Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 1% 12% 10% 8% 6% % 2% 0% 10.2% 8.9% 8.9% 7.1% 7.3%.6% 3.7% 3.% 3.0% 2.8% 2.7% 12.3% 2.1%.3% 1.7% Bartlett Service East All HS West Chugiak Dimond Eagle River 6.3% 0.8%.6% South District Overview, p

Graduation Rates In 2010-2011 year, the state changed how it calculates the high school graduation rate. The new four-year graduation rate shows the number of students who enter ninth grade and graduate in four years or less. The five-year rate shows the number of students who enter ninth-grade and graduate in five years or less. The two rates together give a better picture of how many students do graduate (although some graduate later) rather than failing to complete high school. If the new state calculation were applied to the 2010 graduating class, the four-year graduation rate would have been 71.0 percent. The four-year graduation rate increased by 1.1 percentage points from the 2009-2010 to the 2010-2011 school year. Anchorage School District Four year Graduation Rate, 2007-2011 2006_07 2007_08 2008_09 2009_10 2010_11 Old Method 63.02% 6.26% 70.01% 69.71% New Method 71.0% 72.1% Four Year and Five Year Graduation Rates, Students who entered 9th grade in Fall 2006 80% 70% 60% 71.0% 7.% 8.% 78.1% 2.% 1.3% 68.0% 7.% 0% 0%.2% 1.1% 30% All Students Economically disadvantaged Students with diabilities Limited English proficient Migrant Source: ASD Profile of Performance 2010-2011 District Overview, p 6

Teachers, Administrators, and other Staff The chart below shows district employment on a full-time equivalent (FTE) basis in 2000-2001 and in 2010-2011. Total employment has grown about 19 percent. About 8 percent of the jobs are funded by restricted funds grants and short term funding which are up from about 6 percent of jobs in 2001. About 2. percent are funded by student nutrition funds. Teachers make up the largest share of jobs and the largest share of the increase in jobs as well. There were 38 more teachers in 2011 than in 2001, 288 of them paid from the general fund. The largest number of new teacher positions were 30 additional health teachers; 2 additional teachers needed because of providing elementary planning time; 23 additional counselors; 18 additional English Language learner teachers; 1. additional Gifted Program teachers, and 13. Nurse, Librarian, Technology and Reading teachers for Begich Middle School and Eagle River and South High Schools (which were built after 2001). Growth in ASD Employment, 2001-2011 (FTE) By source of funding 2000-2001 2010-2011 Percent Growth General Fund FTE 028.2 82.1 16% Non-General fund FTE 92. 719.8 6% Total FTE 20.6 63.9 19% Teaching assistants showed the second largest growth, at 268 additional FTE. Because many of the teaching assistant positions are less than full time, the 880 FTE of teaching assistants in the district in 2011 represents more than 880 jobs. Between 2001 and 2011 the district added about 17 FTE in special education assistants, and 3. FTE of assistants to cover expanded full-day kindergarten programs. 7000.0 Anchorage School District Employment (FTE) 2000-2001 and 2010-2011 63.9 6000.0 000.0 000.0 3000.0 20.6 0.0 3.3 37.2 328.6 612.0 122.0 73.3 03.7 3.9 362.1 880. 11. Maintenance/Warehouse/Custodial Clerical Administration, Professional, Technical Drivers/Attendants/Food Service 2000.0 1000.0 322. 3636.9 Principals Teacher Assistants 0.0 2000-2001 2010-2011 Teachers Source: March 2 2010 Memo from Carol Comeau to the School Board 2010-2011 numbers are proposed budget, not actual District Overview, p 7

Number of Teachers Contract Salary Levels of Teachers, 2011 mean=$60,3 1000 900 90 932 800 700 600 00 00 89 300 38 200 100 10 16 0 Under $0,000 $0-9,000 $0-9,000 $60-69,000 $70-79,000 0ver $80,000 Salary level Contract salary only - does not inlude addenda We have contract salary information for just over 3,000 teachers employed by the district in May 2011. Their average salary is $60,3; about percent make less than $0,000 (mostly teachers who work part time) and about percent make over $80,000. Source: Alaska DEED Certified Staff Accounting Database Teacher Turnover Over the last decade, the district s teacher turnover (defined here as the percentage of teachers in any given year who do not work in the district the following year) has varied around 10 percent. This rate is similar to that in other urban districts in Alaska, and well below that of many rural districts and the statewide average. 16.0% Percent of Teachers Leaving Selected Districts, 2002-2010 1.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% Alaska Total Fairbanks Anchorage Mat-Su.0% 2.0% 0.0% 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-200 200-200 200-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 Source: Alaska DEED Certified staffing database District Overview, p 8

Teacher Qualifications In 2010-2011, 2 percent of the district s teachers had earned a master s or higher degree; 6 percent were National Board certified. In the last five years, the percent of classes taught by highly qualified teachers increased from 7 percent to almost 100 percent. Percent of ASD Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers, 2007-2011 100 90 80 70 60 0 0 30 20 10 0 93. 97. 8 87 7 2006_07 2007_08 2008_09 2009_10 2010_11 Source: Alaska DEED Certified staffing database In May 2011, just over 70 percent of the classes taught by teachers not classified as highly qualified were at the high school level. Math was the most frequent subject area taught by teachers not classified as highly qualified teachers, but still accounted for only about one-quarter of the classes taught by such teachers. Number of Classes Taught by Non-HQ Teachers, May 2011, by subject and level Subject Elementary Middle Secondary Science 2 7 1 Social Studies 1 17 2 Language Arts 17 0 Math 7 18 6 Other 13 32 Total 19 72 221 Source: Alaska DEED Certified staffing database District Overview, p 9