Final Sentence in a nocturnal Oil Spill Case Spanish Maritime Safety and Rescue Agency Aerial Survey Department Maritime Aerial Survey Technician Berta Blanco Meruelo
SUMMARY 1. Responsibility areas: Aircraft + Satellite 2. Aircraft detection Cases 3.Final Sentence in a nocturnal oil spill case: M/V Gorgonilla 4.Conclusions 2
SUMMARY 1. Responsibility areas: Aircraft + Satellite 3
1.- RESPONSIBILITY AREAS: 1.500.000 sq. Km., COASTLINE 7.880 Km 101 4
1.- RESPONSIBILITY AREAS :Aircraft + Satellite 101 102 S101 5
1.- RESPONSIBILITY AREAS :Aircraft + Satellite 102 S102 6
1.- RESPONSIBILITY AREAS :Aircraft + Satellite 103 SERVIOLA S103 7
SUMMARY 1. Responsibility areas. 2. Aircraft Detection cases 8
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases: Summary a.- It Introduction ti 1. A. b.- 1 st Case: Night Dt Detectionti c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil d.- 3 rd case: Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) e.- 4 th case: Night Detection +Samples = ( Bilge Discharge) 9
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases a.- Introduction How was It resolved? Sometimes It is difficult confirm a pollution but we try to be optimist and find a new evidence or some data than help us to finish each case. The inspection on board corroborate the conclusions from aircraft survey in many cases. I would like to show 4 cases in which it had been necessary other source to confirm the pollution detected by the aircraft. 1 st Night detection 2 nd Samples = Oil (MARPOL Annex I) + Vegetable Oil 3 rd Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) 4 th Night detection +Samples = Oil (Typical BILGE Discharge) ***Try to analyze what the sensors show because all it was detected in this cases it is mineral oil. 10
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases b.- 1 st Case: Night Detection Bulk Carrier Detection = 21:04 UTC Gibraltar Strength, high traffic Spill Length = 32 Km 11
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases b.- 1 st Case: Night Detection Aircraft reports POLLUTION Detection h = 21:04 UTC Gibraltar Strength, high traffic 12
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases b.- 1 st Case: Night Detection Problems: -NIGHT ( 22:04 Lt.) - No samples. - High density traffic area. Investigation can not confirm POLLUTION 13
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases b.- 1 st Case: Night Detection How was It resolved? We received an email 2 days later from the captain : In fact the duty 3 rd engineer had rigged a portable hose from the poop deck and was pumping overboard directly from the bilge holding tank. A full investigation was ordered on board and it was determinate that the 3 rd Engineer was acting alone. He was not instructed to do this and no one else was aware of what was taking place 14
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil Tanker Vessel on Ballast Detection = 04:50 UTC Last cargo on board Biodiesel/ FAME (Fatty acid Methyl Ester) 15
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil 1.Detection at 04:50 UTC 2. Samples at 08:28 UTC 16
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil 1. Vessel was cleaning tanks. 2. Vessel said: Last Cargo (biodiesel) Residues were discharging through the manifold with a hose 17
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil Tanker Vessel designed to carry different cargoes and to operate with them. In this case 3 oil types on board: A: Slop Tanks, Residues from previous mineral oil cargoes. B: Slop Tanks, Residues from previous mineral oil cargoes + Biodiesel C: Slop Tanks, Residues from Biodiesel. 18
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil Facilities: Daytime. Sea Samples: Helicopter tk takes it. Vessel Samples: Manifold and Slop Tanks samples. Inspection on board. 19
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil Problems: Tanker vessel BIODIESEL/ FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester) Last Cargo on Board Vessel was cleaning tanks. Vessel said : Last Cargo Residues (biodiesel) were discharging through the manifold with a hose. 20
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases c.- 2 nd case: Samples = Mineral Oil + Vegetal Oil How was It resolved? DAYTIME PHOTOGRAFTS + DVD SAMPLES RESULTS Vessel said We are discharging through the Manifold with a hose Last Cargo (Biodiesel) Residues SAMPLES RESULTS: Sea and Manifold samples match: Mineral Oil and Biodiesel Slop Tanks: Biodiesel 21
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases d.- 3 rd case: Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) Bulk Carrier Detection = 07:30 UTC Spill Length = 12 Km 22
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases d.- 3 rd case: Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) 23
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases d.- 3 rd case: Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) 24
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases d.- 3 rd case: Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) UV 08:02:42 UTC 08:06:02 UTC IR 08:02:49 UTC 08:05:49 UTC MRW 08:02:42 UTC 08:05:10 UTC Investigation can not confirm POLLUTION 25
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases d.- 3 rd case: Inoperative OWS (Oil Water Separator) How was It resolved? DAYTIME PHOTOGRAFTS + DVD SAMPLES RESULTS Port State Control MORE DETAIL INSPECTION detected OWS was INOPERATIVE 26
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases e.- 4 th case: Night Detection +Samples (Bilge Discharge) Ro-Ro cargo vessel Detection = 20:51 UTC Spill Length : 6 Km Regular line 27
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases e.- 4 th case: Night Detection +Samples ( Bilge Discharge) Detection= 20:51 UTC Aircraft reports POLLUTION 28
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases e.- 4 th case: Night Detection +Samples ( Bilge Discharge) 6 months before one Satellite Detection and one Aircraft detection reported POLLUTION 29
2.- Aircraft Detection Cases e.- 4 th case: Night Detection + Samples (Bilge Discharge) How was It resolved? Vessel detected 6 months before by satellite image and by the aircraft. Regular Line: 3 detections in the same area and local time. Samples : Fuel Oil + Lubricating Oils,Typical Residues from Bilges 30
SUMMARY 1. Responsibility areas: Aircraft + Satellite 2. Aircraft detection Cases 3.Final Sentence in a nocturnal oil spill case: M/V Gorgonilla 31
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case Chronological process of real case in Spain: October 24 1. A. th, 2008 : Detection vessel with a wake spill of 21 Km February 18 th, 2009: Documentation sent to the Spanish Maritime Administration by the owner s layer, including the Chief Engineer Exposition. February 18 th, 2010: Spanish Maritime Administration applies for a technical report to SASEMAR March 26 th,2010: Spanish Maritime Administration opens an administrative file 2010-2012: Different Courts from Spanish legal system involved January 13 th, 2013: Final Sentence from Supreme Tribunal 32
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case 1. A. Chemical Tanker vessel Night Detection Spill Length = 21 km When detected, vessel declare no discharge is made Two years after detection Vessel says Residual Water was discharged 33
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case Vessel information Communications Aircraft <>Vessel MARPOL more detail inspection Samples from Sea or/and Vessel. Aircraft evidences Photographs Video SLAR IR/UV MRW LFS What we need in each case! 34
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case WHAT WE HAD! Vessel information Communications Aircraft evidences SLAR IR FLIR Communications Vessel deny some discharge 35
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case February 18 th, 2009: Owner lawyer send an exposition from Chief Engineer to Spanish Maritime Administration i ti Chief Engineer alleged that the aircraft spill detected was a residues waters discharge. Attached plans from residues waters plant from the vessel. February 18 th, 2010: Spanish Maritime Administration applied for a technical report to SASEMAR WHAT WE HAD! Vessel information Chemical Tanker vessel but They didn t discharge cleaning tank residues. They said the discharge was from the engine spaces. The spill is Hot Water Aircraft Evidences Night Detection Spill Length = 21 km SLAR /IR 36
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case Night Detection, ti Spill Length = 21 km SLAR /IR sensor record the spill 1 Hr 15 min WHAT ARE YOU SPILLED? 37
3.- Final Sentence in a Nocturnal Mineral Oil Spill Case Spill Length = 21 km Do sensor record hot water? WHAT ARE YOU SPILLED? What is the hot water temperature? Sea water temperature is <15ºC in October. Could the hot water on top of the cold water from Ocean keep the high temperature for more than 1 hr? What is it discharged from the engine spaces? SLAR /IR sensor record the spill 1 Hr 15 min. What kind of substance remain on top of sea more than 1 hr? Could we judge this substance modifies the good state of Ocean? Supreme Tribunal Judge YES 38
SUMMARY 1. Responsibility areas: Aircraft + Satellite 2. Aircraft detection Cases 3.Final Sentence in a nocturnal oil spill case: M/V Gorgonilla 4.Conclusions 39
4.- CONCLUSION Our first goal : PREVENTION 1.- Surveillance tools with Big Range ( time and area):responsibility areas too big 2.- Necessity of sound calibration and certification of Sea pollution Detection system 3.- Aircraft Detection ti Cases: All cases requires two Information Sources aircraft evidences and vessel information ( from communications Aircraft Vessel, MARPOL more detail Inspection and Samples from Sea and/or vessel) 40
4- CONCLUSION Aircraft Detection Cases 1 st case Night detection + Communications with the vessel Captain report an unusual operation on board. 2 nd case Tanker vessel + Communications with the vessel + Samples (Mineral Oil + Vegetable Oil)+ MARPOL more detail inspection This cases required more information from the vessel because - They have ways to move the cargo to different parts from the cargo spaces - They have two or more types of pollution cargoes on board - They have illegal l pollution in two places: cargo spaces and machinery spaces 3 rd case Day detection + MARPOL more detail inspection ( Inoperative Oil water separator) Visual detection allows classify an Oil and the evidence will be a photograph p 4 th case Night detection + Last detections + Samples ( Bilge discharge ) Normally This case is from regular lines. 41
THANK YOU bertabm@sasemar.es 42