METRORAIL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS STUDY: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS



Similar documents
Public Safety Voice and Data Interoperability. Robert LeGrande, II. Deputy CTO, District of Columbia NCRIP Program Executive

Power Point Presentation

National Capital Region: Urban Area Security Initiatives Subgrants as of 02/01/12

2010 MWCOG Electricity Consumption by Jurisdiction

National Capital Region: Urban Area Security Initiatives Grants Subgrants as of 01/31/14

PMO MANAGING DIRECTOR

ANNUAL REPORT ON THE METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON REGIONAL INCIDENT COMMUNICATION

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

2013 Ridership: RAIL 209,000,000 trips (approx.) BUS 136,000,000 trips (approx.)

Owner s Procurement Forum

Budget Used Balance Obligation Based Budget: Infrastructure Renewal Program $290.1 $251.2 $38.9

I-95 Corridor Coalition. Best Practices for Border Bridge Incident Management Executive Summary

Total Capital Budget Review

Application for MetroAccess Door-to-Door Paratransit Service For People with Disabilities

STATE SUPPORT FUNCTION ANNEX 2 COMMUNICATIONS

Cell Service and Wireless Remedies for Reception & Coverage. Panel Host Kathleen Austin Panel Participants Dan Leaf Gordon Mansfield Richard Sherwin

Arlington County Fiscal Year 2014 Summary Report on Capital Bikeshare

Planning and Development Committee Board Action Item III-A November 16, 2006 Master Agreements

FY 2015 PERFORMANCE PLAN Office of Unified Communications

United States Department of State FLO: EDUCATION & YOUTH

Office of Unified Communications OUC (UC)

Background Screenings

CELLULAR PHONES AND WI-FI IN THE SUBWAY

Implementing the Transportation Alternatives Program for the National Capital Region

ANNEX B COMMUNICATIONS

2010 METROBUS FLEET MANAGEMENT PLAN

UNDERGROUND CELL PHONE AND DATA SERVICES PROVIDER

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Monterey County Operational Area Emergency Communications System (NGEN) Project Background and Information

Georgia Emergency Operations Plan. Emergency Support Function # 5 Annex Emergency Management

Office of Emergency Management and Communications Central Purpose Key Facts Operations Emergency Management City Operations: Technology: 144

Office of Unified Communications OUC (UC)

Federal Communications Commission Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau

OEMC Four Core Missions

How Safe Are Our Roads?

1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Purpose of the Client s Guide Access to the Client s Guide Verizon WITS 3 Web Site

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item IV-A September 16, 2010 Safety Report

Joint Budget Development Committee Q&A. Response to Questions from the JBDC

Accessibility Advisory Committee

Information Communications Technology (ICT) Innovations Category

FY07 Homeland Security Grants. Dallas City Council Public Safety Committee Briefing November 19, 2007

Office of Emergency Management

ESF 02 - Communications Annex, 2015

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Table of Contents. Training & Exercises, Standard Operating Procedures, and the Future...17

The main purpose of the study was to answer the three following questions:

Money Maker or Tower of Terror? The Benefits (and Burdens) of Cellular Tower Leases

Testimony of Dennis Anosike, Chief Financial Officer Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, DC 20594

Executive Summary region Purpose and Scope Organization of the RECP

This information is provided in preparation for MCECD s public review hearing to be held on January 9, 2013.

NeighborhoodInfo DC Fact Sheet

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Joint Wireless Review Committee Business Case

DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTERS

The State of Maryland s Coverage and Data Collection for the Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network

Continuation Guidance Budget Year Five Attachment E Focus Area E: Health Alert Network/Communications and Information Technology

Table of Contents ESF

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Overview Of Cell Phone Demonstration

Date: December 2,2013 File: /2013-Vol Fire Chief 01 Anne Stevens Senior Manager, Community Safety Policy and Programs

Household Income Effects of the Washington Metro Area

Arlington County FY12 Summary Report on Capital Bikeshare

March 21, Dear Ranking Member Costello:

Verizon, 911 Service and the June 29, 2012, Derecho

Public Safety and Homeland Security. National Broadband Plan Recommendations

2014 Polk County ESF #2 Communications. Public Version. Public Version-Polk County ESF #2 Communications 2014

VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY

WMATA S Automated Track Analysis Technology & Data Leveraging for Maintenance Decisions

a GAO GAO HOMELAND SECURITY Effective Regional Coordination Can Enhance Emergency Preparedness

PROGRAM OVERVIEW. Participating Partners:

GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF CITY WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT MARCH 12, 2010

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

NORTH CAROLINA S RESPONSE TO THE REQUEST FOR COMMENT BY THE NTIA

STATE OF MARYLAND Strategy for Homeland Security

AN ACT ENHANCING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE.

2015 SOLICITATION FOR ENHANCED MOBILITY GRANT APPLICATIONS

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN SEPTEMBER 2010 WASHINGTON, DC

PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE. Functional Coordinator: Fire Chiefs

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION

Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME) Blueprint Version 2.0 Executive Summary

TAP Wireless Pilot Program

September 4, appearing before you today. I am here to testify about issues and challenges in providing for

Attachment H Regional Communications North Central Texas Regional Coordination Plan

2013 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

~ Metro Metrapolita Tnnsportation Authority

Convenience, Control and Efficiency

11/20/2015 THIS DIDN T HAVE TO ABOUT PGFD HAPPEN! 2014 U.S. FIREFIGHTER FATALITY STATISTICS 2014 U.S. FIREFIGHTER FATALITY STATISTICS

City of Sacramento Community Wireless Broadband Network

NEW BLUE LINE CONNECTIONS

Disaster Emergency Communications Division

4 122 b. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Wide Area Network Idi-astructure (IT 10) POLICY STATEMENT

Final Contract Audit Report with Recommendations Contract Audit No. OIG

M E M O R A N D U M. April 15, Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Committee

METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS COMMUTER OPERATIONS CENTER SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

Written Statement Of. Communicating with the Public During Emergencies: An Update of Federal Alert and Warning Efforts

Consolidated Debt Service. #254 Consolidated Debt Service

RESTORATION PROCESS. Step 1 Empire s storm restoration team assesses the damage to the system. This assessment allows Empire. = Location of damage

Unified messaging is provided to over 1,000 users today and continues to increase along with campus growth.

Office of the CIO. Department Description. Goals and Objectives

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL & PROGRAM AUDIT

Transcription:

Study Overview METRORAIL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS STUDY: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Why did MWCOG commission the study? Following the January 12, 2015 incident, the regional Fire Chiefs Committee and DC HSEMA identified a need to assess Metrorail communication systems. MWCOG committees and DCHSEMA commissioned the study in April. The study goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment of Metrorail underground communications systems. Specific evaluation of communication systems effectiveness and regional interoperability; Recommendations maximizing effective communication and emergency response to incidents in the Metrorail system. What did the study find/recommend? What types of recommendations did the study make? The study provided 15 key findings and made 21 corresponding recommendations. The recommendations categories are: infrastructure, radio systems operation and maintenance, 9-1-1 service, as well as policy and procedures. Did the study find new problems or surprises? The study confirmed many known challenges such as cell phone service The planned Metrorail communication systems replacement was also validated. How does the study characterize the existing radio system? Does it work today? The current radio systems work and are operations. Current radio systems require substantial testing and maintenance to continue to operate due to underground conditions and age. WMATA is in the process of initiating the process to replace existing radio systems. WMATA and the Metrorail Fire/EMS agencies test radio systems weekly to improve maintenance and operations until the systems can be replaced. What are the next steps? Many recommendations are in the process of being implemented, for example: The Fire/EMS ROCC liaison position began a pilot test in June. The position is being evaluated and the region is working to identify funding to continue the position and expand operational hours. WMATA initiated the contracting process to replace current underground communication systems. Work will begin in 2016. Tactical Bi-Directional Amplifiers are being purchased. The jurisdictions are developing the deployment plan. MWCOG is working with the appropriate committees to develop and implement work plans for recommendations within their area of responsibility. - Committees include Fire Chiefs and the regional 9-1-1 Directors

WMATA has engaged consultants to evaluate the process to implement recommendations. The Deputy General Manager has committed to funding recommendations such as radio testing methods based on those findings. WMATA anticipates the outside evaluation will be completed by December 2015. Projects will be budgeted for based on the evaluation in 2016. Study Recommendations Is work currently being done on implementing the recommendations? Yes. Several recommendations efforts were underway, including radio outage reporting, placing a Fire/EMS liaison in the ROCC, tactical BDA deployment and enhanced training. How long will it take to implement the other recommendations? Recommendations are near-term, or on-going work, and long-term or work in the planning stages including next generation technology. For example, short-term recommendations include work on replacement parts or the public address system. Long-term recommendations often relate to the installation of new WMATA radio systems. WMATA issued an RFP and work will begin in 2016, but will continue for several years. How do the Study recommendations relate those made by APTA, FTA and NTSB? All APTA, FTA and NTSB recommendations were reviewed and cross referenced with the Communication Study recommendations. The COG study recommendations are in line with the relevant APTA, FTA and NTSB recommendations. Implementation of the COG study recommendations are accounted for in the other agency corrective action plans or WMATA plans and will be coordinated across organizations. What about the costs to implement the study recommendations? WMATA and MWCOG are working to specify implementation costs for recommendations not included in current work plans. Communication systems infrastructure installation costs, such as new radio systems, were already in WMATA budgets. The four major carriers will fund costs associated with cellular service installation. Many recommendations are in the work plans for MWCOG committees. As such, there are no additional costs associated with implementing the recommendations. Does WMATA have the budget to implement the recommendations? If not, where will the funds come from? WMATA has planned and budgeted for a substantial investment to replace the Metrorail communications systems. WMATA has indicated a willing to fund recommendations such as radio system testing in their FY 2017 budget pending the results of their outside evaluation. Metrorail Communication Systems Study FAQ - October 20, 2015 2

Do the recommendations include expanding the hours of the Fire/EMS liaison in the ROCC? The study recommended continuing and expanding the Fire/EMS ROCC liaison position. The Fire Chiefs Committee, MWCOG jurisdictions and WMATA are coordinating to identify funding to support the recommendation. Metrorail 9-1-1 and Cellular Service What did the report recommend for improving underground 9-1-1 call capabilities and cellular service? The report was completed prior to WMATA reaching an agreement in principal with the four major cellular carriers, the Cellular Carrier Team, on continued system installation. The near term recommendation was for Verizon Wireless system should repair and maintain the current system to restore 9-1-1 call tunnel service. WMATA should prioritize support infrastructure installation in areas where Verizon Wireless tunnel service is poor and request the four cellular carriers build in the same areas first. The four cellular carriers should pursue accelerated Neutral Host system installation. MWCOG 9-1-1 Directors and the cellular carriers should review possibilities to provide wireless services to Next Generation 9-1-1, including texting. WMATA is advancing cell phone carrier negotiations to install the equipment necessary for service. When Metrorail 9-1-1 service is consistently in place, where will the calls go? 9-1-1 calls will go to the jurisdiction where the call is placed. WMATA is studying geolocation options to better identify 9-1-1 call locations in the underground portion of the Metrorail system. Were there interoperability recommendations? Will WMATA and the First Responders use the same radio frequencies? WMATA and the Police and Fire/EMS agencies will continue to use different radio frequencies. Protocols are in place to ensure WMATA-agency information exchange during incidents. WMATA and Metrorail jurisdictions should detail interoperability requirements and determine if other forms of communication for alerts and warnings capabilities would be more efficient for alerts and warnings. WMATA and the jurisdictions are currently working toward better video sharing and operation center to operation center communication protocols. Roles and Responsibilities Who is responsible for implementing the recommendations? WMATA, Metrorail jurisdictions and MWCOG committees are assigned to implement each recommendation. 9-1-1 service recommendations rely on cellular carrier negotiations and their commitment to implementation and completion. Metrorail Communication Systems Study FAQ - October 20, 2015 3

Who will hold WMATA and the Metrorail jurisdictions accountable to implement the recommendations? The Metrorail Communications Study Committee will monitor recommendation implementation. The MWCOG Board, CAO and Fire Chiefs Committee will provide additional oversight. Will the WMATA Board need to take action? Management? The WMATA Board will be briefed on the study and recommendations. The WMATA Board will not need to take action on recommendation implementation and funding for actions already in the FY 2017 budget. The WMATA Board may need to work with MWCOG and the jurisdictions to secure additional funding to continue and expand the Fire/EMS liaison position in the ROCC. Underground Communications Background Why are underground radio communications a problem? Vibrations, corrosion and dust in the tunnels create a hostile environment for communication infrastructure and equipment. Metrorail operates and serves riders nearly 20 hours/day. This leaves a limited maintenance window. Tunnel curves and elevation changes interfere with radio wave conduction. 47 (52%) stations, and 50+ miles of track are underground. What are the Metrorail communication systems? Do WMATA and First Responders use the same systems? Metrorail uses four (4) communication systems: - Comprehensive Radio Communications System (CRCS): Metrorail/WMATA; - Public Safety System Radio System (PSRS): First Responders; - Verizon Wireless System: Cellular service only for Verizon and Sprint Customers; - Neutral Host: Cell phone service for the 4 major carriers, only in stations, not tunnels. How does WMATA compare with other transit systems? The consultant used interviews and additional data from comparable transit systems. Metrorail public safety communications are on par, or in some instances, more advanced than other systems. Metrorail Communication Systems Study FAQ - October 20, 2015 4

Study Background Who participated in the Study Working Group? MWCOG members of these committees provided the study oversight: Fire Chiefs Committee and their Public Safety Communications Subcommittee members; and the 9-1-1 Directors Committee; MWCOG and DC HSEMA Staff; Obsidian and Televate conducted the study. Both firms have extensive experience in communication technology, infrastructure and emergency response arenas. Did WMATA have a role in the study? WMATA staff provided technical information, completed interviews and provided Metrorail system access. How was the study conducted? Interviews with stakeholders and Metrorail jurisdiction officials; Technical field tests and measurements of the underground communications systems; Review of communications-related policies and procedures; Research on comparable metropolitan transit systems. How long did the study take? The study was initiated in April 2015 and completed in July 2015. Several recommendations were being implemented prior to completion. The study work group is coordinating regional efforts to implement study recommendations. Is the report available? The executive summary is available upon request from MWCOG. Who/What are the Metrorail jurisdictions? Metrorail jurisdictions are those with stations: Alexandria, Arlington County, the District of Columbia, Fairfax County, Montgomery County and Prince Georges County. Metrorail Communication Systems Study FAQ - October 20, 2015 5