BIOPROCESS SIMULATION, ECONOMICS AND DESIGN CHARLES L. COONEY DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING COURSE MIT, CAMBRIDGE, MA



Similar documents
Monoclonal Antibody Production: Building the Platform. Andrew Clutterbuck Eden Biodesign Ltd.

Eden Biodesign ebook Monoclonal Antibody Production: Building the Platform

Eco- and water efficiency development prospects in Pulp-Board integrate.

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

Marmara Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Kimya Bölümü / Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PROTEINS

Biotechnology, Downstream

Customer Application Brief. Filtration Processes Applied in Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Production. Bioprocess, Biologicals, & Pharmaceutical

Protein purification methods, a practical approach

COST ESTIMATION Fixed Capital Investment Direct Costs ChE Design I esign

Advances in Biopharmaceutical and Vaccine Manufacturing Plants

General Properties Protein Nature of Enzymes Folded Shape of Enzymes H-bonds complementary

Decaffeination of Raw, Green Coffee Beans Using Supercritical CO 2

The Importance of Developing a High Yield of Product

Algae Harvesting, Dewatering and Extraction

Downstream Processing in Biotechnology. J.A. Wesselingh and J. Krijgsman

HUBER Vacuum Rotation Membrane VRM Bioreactor

Process Simulation and Modeling for Industrial Bioprocessing:

Biopharmaceutical Process Optimization with Simulation and Scheduling Tools

Techno-economic and ecological evaluation of a wood biorefinery

A World of Biomanufacturing: Shortages or Global Glut?

Methods of Grading S/N Style of grading Percentage Score 1 Attendance, class work and assignment 10 2 Test 20 3 Examination 70 Total 100

Specific Challenges in Large-Scale Manufacturing of Peptide as API s Presentation at TIDES Conference, Las Vegas, April 25 29, 2004

ISOLATION OF CAFFEINE FROM TEA

Biomanufacturing Vision for the Future

DNA SPOOLING 1 ISOLATION OF DNA FROM ONION

Contract No: Disclaimer:

Overview of Upstream and Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals

Advanced Treatment of Hazardous Wastes(1) Advanced Treatment of Hazardous Wastes(2) Advanced Environmental Chemistry. Design of Solid Waste Landfill

STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES. Chemical and Technical Assessment. Prepared by Harriet Wallin FAO 2004

Protein Synthesis and Purification: Microbial Versus Mammalian Systems

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. HIS-Select Nickel Affinity Gel. Catalog Number P6611 Storage Temperature 2 8 C

Economic and technical assessment of desalination technologies

Single Step Clarification & Capture of a Recombinant Protein from E. coli Osmotic Shock by Crossflow Chromatography

The Grand Miramare Hotel Santa Margherita (Portofino) Italy March 19 22, Inspiring Innovation and Excellence

UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation Kit

Refinery Equipment of Texas. Mini - Refinery Feasibility Overview

A new, integrated, continuous purification process template for monoclonal antibodies

Reuse of Alternative Water Sources for Cooling Tower Systems Two Case Studies Using Non-Traditional Water Sources

El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board. Application for Renewal Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit

Applications of Organic Solvent Nanofiltration in the Process Development of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. Dominic Ormerod

Technology Transfer of CMC Activities for MAb Manufacturing ge healthcare (

Liquid II Cell Culture Media Manufacturing Plant. Overview Facilities Water for Injection Sterile Environment Media Handling Cleanroom Interior

In Vitro And In Vivo Production Of Antibodies

Prentice Hall. Chemistry (Wilbraham) 2008, National Student Edition - South Carolina Teacher s Edition. High School. High School

Biotechpharma company profile

BioBusiness Biopharmaceutical Ingredients Recombinant albumins & albumin fusion Dermot Pearson, Strategic Product Director, NZ Biopharma

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Reading instructions to partitioning in aqueous two-phase systems

SYNERGISTIC APPLICATION OF ADVANCED PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Lecture 28. Potash Fertilizers - Potassium Sulphate

Dairy Proteins. Table of Contents. Section Page. Cheese Milk Protein Review 2. Basic Flows and Definitions of Milk Products 4

Classic Immunoprecipitation

Large Biogas Plants in Denmark -technology and operation experience

Dissolved and precipitated oxalate

Process-scale purification of monoclonal antibodies polishing using Capto Q

Application Note. Separation of three monoclonal antibody variants using MCSGP. Summary

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

WHEY PRODUCTS. Demineralised whey powder is made by removing dissolved salts and water.

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

Using SPE Technology to Develop a New Rare Earth Production Paradigm at Bokan, Alaska

Oasis HLB Cartridges and 96-Well Plates

Green Principles Atom Economy Solventless Reactions Catalysis

HiPer Ion Exchange Chromatography Teaching Kit

Membrane Filtration Technology: Meeting Today s Water Treatment Challenges

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

Water for Injection (WFI) and Pure Steam Production in a Lean Manufacturing Environment. Larry Zanko Project Manager STERIS Corporation

PHYSICAL SEPARATION TECHNIQUES. Introduction

Challenges in the cgmp Manufacturing of hescs: Lessons Learned from Monoclonal Antibodies

Waste Incineration Plants

MAB Solut. MABSolys Génopole Campus 1 5 rue Henri Desbruères Evry Cedex. is involved at each stage of your project

Vaccine Manufacturing Facilities of the Future. Howard L. Levine, Ph.D. Vaccines Europe London, England December 1 2, 2010

KİMYA SANAYİ VE DI TİC.LTD. Tİ.

2.500 Desalination and Water Purification

Orange Fruit Processing

Multiple Products in a Monoclonal Antibody S88.01 Batch Plant

Phosphate Recovery from Municipal Wastewater through Crystallization of Calcium Phosphate

IMMERSION MANAGEMENT SERVICE KG

OUTLOOK FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN SUGAR PROCESSING. For presentation at the. AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK FORUM 1999 February 23, Stephen J.

HighPure Maxi Plasmid Kit

Your partner in immunology

Dedicated Project Management

Luca Romagnoli, Ph.D. Business Development Manager

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

The design of fermenter

Chuck Neece Director Research and Development FUMPA BioFuels

HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT PLAN SUMMARY SETHNESS PRODUCTS COMPANY LIQUID CARAMEL COLOR

CHEMICAL REACTIONS OF COPPER AND PERCENT YIELD KEY

PURIFICATION TECHNIQUES

Keystone Review Practice Test Module A Cells and Cell Processes. 1. Which characteristic is shared by all prokaryotes and eukaryotes?

Hardness ions also interfere with many chemical processes such as chemical compounding and aqueous cleaners.

20 TWh biodrivmedel genom jäsning - bioteknik KSLA Seminarium Jan Lindstedt SEKAB E-Technology

Process Simulation and Modeling Strategies for the Biotechnology Industry

FDA and the Compounding Pharmacy

"Small and large molecules bioproduction by mammalian and microbial fermentation"

Introduction to Process Engineering Economics. based on size of major equipment items allow to decide whether to invest in a detailed study

Dehydration. Dehydration UNIT. operations. bioprocess plants

Transcription:

BIOPROCESS SIMULATION, ECONOMICS AND DESIGN CHARLES L. COONEY DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING COURSE MIT, CAMBRIDGE, MA

PROCESS SYNTHESIS & PROCESS ANALYSIS Where do you begin Process Design? Information on Products, raw materials, etc. M&E balances, sizing, costing, economic evaluation

YOUR GOAL IF YOU DON T KNOW WHERE YOU ARE GOING AND YOU DON T HAVE A MEANS OF MEASURING WHERE YOU ARE THEN YOU WON T KNOW WHEN YOU ARRIVE

STEPS IN PROCESS DESIGN 1. Product definition Product specifications Defines analytical needs Market size 2. Select the synthetic technology 3. Create process flow diagram (PFD) 4. Material & energy balances to calculate costs Materials (reagents and consumables) Equipment Utilities Labor 5. Assess assumptions and uncertainty 6. Identify economic and quality hot spots 7. Assess profitability and risk 8. Create the R/D agenda

WHAT DO I WANT & NEED TO KNOW FOR PROCESS MODELING AND SIMULATION What is the cost of goods? What are the cost sensitive operating parameters? What are the assumptions and where is the uncertainty? Where are the economic hot spots? Where should one focus R&D? What is the impact of process change on cost and quality? Are there alternative processes? Where are the process bottlenecks? How can I increase throughput & profitability? PROFIT = VF M ( S P S A C M )

WHEN SELECTING UNIT OPERATIONS THERE ARE CHOICES AND DECISIONS MUST BE MADE Bioreactor Intracellular Products Extracellular Products Cell Harvesting 1. Centrifugation 2. Microfiltration 3. Ultrafiltration Cell Disruption 1. Homogenization 2. Bead Milling 3. Osmotic Shock Cell Debris Removal 1. Centrifugation 2. Microfiltration 3. Vacuum Filtration 4. Press Filtration Product Extraction By 1. Organic Solvents 2. Polymer/Polymer 3. Polymer/Salt 4. Supercritical Fluids 5. Adsorption 6. Reverse Micelles 7. Distillation Biomass Removal 1. Vacuum Filtration 2. Centrifugation 3. Microfiltration 4. Ultrafiltration 5. Press Filtration 6. Candle Filtration 7. Flotation Denatured Products Renaturation 1. Solubilization 2. Reoxidation Concentration 1. Ultrafiltration 2. Evaporation 3. Reverse Osmosis 4. Precipitation 5. Crystallization 6. Extraction 6. Adsorption 7. Distillation Final Purification 1. Adsorption 2. Gel Filtration 3. Diafiltration 4. Electrodialysis 5. Electrophoresis High Purity Requirements Low Purity Requirements Dehydration or Solvent Removal 1. Spray Drying 2. Freeze Drying 3. Fluid Bed Drying Contemporary Downstream Processing of Biological Materials Figure by MIT OCW.

Overview Bioengineering Conversions, Yields Process Flow Diagram Raw Materials Volume/Mass of Product Equipment prices Utilities Labor Consumables Purchase Equipment Cost Multipliers Operating Costs Capital Investment

CASE STUDIES Protein synthesis using mammalian cells for Monoclonal Antibody production Microbial process producing the antibiotic Penicillin Alkaline Protease production by microbial fermentation

CASE OBJECTIVES Flowsheet formulation Material and energy balances Equipment size estimation Estimation of capital costs Estimation of operating cost Profitability Assay for the process

Monoclonal Antibodies In vitro use (antigen identification, antigen purification) In vivo use (therapeutic applications, diagnostic tools) Growing market: 2,400 kg in 2006 (Chovav et al., 2003) New MAb entering the market; in the biopharmaceutical development pipeline Need for new production facilities and optimization of existing plants Chovav et al.: The state of biomanufacturing; UBS's Q-series: London, 2003.

Penicillin V O O N H H H S CH 3 N CH 3 Hydrophobic β-lactam O CH 3 Produced by Penicillium chrysogenum Penicillin G and V main penicillins of commerce Used a human medicine and in animal health Further processed to semi-synthetic penicillins Annual production penicillin: 65,000 tons Price penicillin V: $11/BU, or $17-18/kg

1. Estimation of Capital Investment

Types of Cost Estimates Stage of Development Order-of-Magnitude estimate (> +/- 30%) Study estimate (+/- 30%) Preliminary estimate (+/- 20%) Definitive estimate (+/- 10%) Accuracy Detailed estimate (+/- 5%)

Equipment Size and Cost Bioengineering Process Flow Diagram Fermenter Volume/ Mass of Product Equipment prices Purchase Equipment Cost

Fermenter Size/ Amount of Product Plant size can be derived from: Volume and number of fermenters Annual amount of product to produce Decision based on: Market Volume Technical feasibility Own business plan / competitor

Process Flow Diagram: Penicillin S-101 S-105 S-117 S-102 S-103 S-116 P-8 / AF-102 Air Filtration S-104 P-1 / V-101 S-106 Blending / Storage Medium S-107 S-109 S-110 S-108 P-2 / V-102 Blending / Storage Glucose S-111 P-4 / ST-101 S-112 P-3 / MX-101 Heat Sterilization Mixing S-115 P-7 / V-103 Fermentation S-118 P-9 / V-106 Storage S-150 S-151 S-119 P-20 / RVF-101 S-152 Removal Biomass P-21 / HX-101 Cooling S-153 S-113 S-114 P-6 / AF-101 Air Filtration P-5 / G-101 Gas Compression S-176 S-167 S-166 S-174 S-175 P-31 / FBDR-101 S-168 S-173 P-26 / BCF-101 Basket Centrifugation S-177 Fluid Bed Drying S-164 S-163 S-165 P-25 / V-104 S-162 Re-ectraction + Crystallization S-172 S-161 S-158 S-160 P-23 / CX-101 Centrifugal Extraction P-24 / MX-104 Neutralization S-159 S-156 P-29 / MX-103 Adding Fresh Butyl Acetate S-155 S-157 P-22 / MX-102 Acidification S-154 P-32 / V-105 Storage Penicillin Sodium Salt S-178 P-27 / CSP-101 Component Splitting S-169 S-170 P-28 / MX-105 Neutralization S-171

Equipment Cost Costs for major pieces of equipment in PFD Prices obtained from: Vendor quotations Previous projects Literature (e.g. Peters et al.) Default values simulation software Cost estimate for unlisted equipment Peters, M., Timmerhaus, K. and West, R.: Plant design and economics for chemical engineers; McGraw Hill: Boston, 2003.

Price Indices Purpose: To estimate cost data from previous projects, analogous sources, different times, etc. Most frequently used Prices Indices: Marshall & Swift Index (M&S Index) Chemical Engineering Index Estimating the cost: Present cost = (original cost) x (Index value Today) (Index value at time original cost was obtained)

Total Plant Direct Cost Purchased Equipment Cost (PC) $ 12.4 Million Installation 1.0 12.4 = Process Piping 0.75 9.3 = Instrumentation 0.8 9.9 = Insulation 0.05 = 0.6 X(PC) Electrical 0.15 = 1.9 Buildings 2.5 31.0 = Yard Improvement Auxiliary Facilities 0.15 0.8 = = 9.9 10.7 Total Plant Direct Cost $ 89.3 Million

Direct Fixed Capital Investment Total Plant Direct Cost (TPDC) $ 89.3 Million Engineering 0.25 = 22.3 X(TPDC) Construction 0.35 = 31.2 Total Plant Indirect Cost (TPIC) Total Plant Cost = TPDC + TPIC $ 53.6 Million $ 142.8 Million Contractor s Fee 0.06 = 8.6 X(TPC) Contingency 0.1 = 14.3 Direct Fixed Capital $ 165.7 Million

Total Capital Investment Direct Fixed Capital (DFC) $ 165.7 Million Start up/validation cost 0.05 DFC = 8.3 Working Capital: 30 days* Total Capital Investment (TCI) = 0.7 $ 174.7 Million * Covering labor, raw material, utilities and waste treatment cost

Economy of Scale Six-Tenth Factor: Derived from statistical/empirical data K 2 = K 1 (P 2 /P 1 ) 0.6 K = investment cost; P = annual capacity Example: MAb: 381 kg MAb per year, $175 Million investment cost Estimated investment cost for a 500 kg plant: K 2 = 175 (500/381) 0.6 = $206 Million

Penicillin: Equipment Purchase Costs Purchase costs Cost ($ million) Basket Centrifuge Crystallization Unit Compressors Air Filters Fermenters Heat Sterilizer Blending Tanks Rest 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

MAB: Allocation Equipment Cost Purchased Equipment Cost to Sections Final Filtration HIC $ million Ion Exchange Chr. Protein A Chr. Primary Recovery Bioreaction Inoculum Preparation 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

2. Estimation Operating Cost

Process Diagram Consumables Consumables Raw Materials Utilities Labor Bioreaction Downstream Processing Final Product Waste Waste

Raw Material Costs Amount of a compound x its Price Possible sources: Supplier Internal data Literature, e.g. Chemical Market Reporter Sales catalogues Pricing is very dependent on source and volume

Consumables Factors: Amount per batch Replacement frequency/ operating hours Price Sources of data: Experiments Supplier data Literature, default value simulation software Estimates by analogy Major consumables: adsorption/chromatography resins membranes (filtrations, dialysis, diafiltration etc.)

Waste Waste treatment normally not part of the PFD Waste types and costs* Solid waste: Non-hazardous: $35/ton Hazardous: $145/ton Liquid waste/wastewater: $0.5/m 3 Emissions: cost depend on composition Treatment mandated by environmental laws *Peters, M., Timmerhaus, K. and West, R.: Plant design and economics for chemical engineers; McGraw Hill: Boston, 2003.

Energy Consumption Typical energy consumptions: Process heating & cooling HVAC Evaporation/distillation Bioreactor aeration, agitation Centrifugation, cell disruption, etc. Utility costs: Electricity: 4.5 ct/kwh Steam: 4.40 $/ton Cooling water: 8 ct/m 3

Labor Cost Amount of labor: Calculated from demand for each process step Defines the number of people per shift/number of shifts Hourly cost Internal company average value Literature, e.g. Peters et al. (2003): skilled labor: 34 $/h Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov)

Depreciation Depreciation cost = pay back of investment cost Depreciation period Life time of project: 3-10 years Depreciation method: Straight line (same $ every year) Declining balance, e.g. MACRS

Facility-Dependent Costs: MAb Direct Fixed Capital (DFC) $ 165.7 Million Insurance 0.015 2.5 = Local Taxes 0.025 DFC = 4.1 Contractor s Fee 0.055 = 9.1 Maintenance 0.06 9.9 = Depreciation period 10 years Depreciation 0.10 TCI = 16.6 Annual Facility-Dependent Cost $ 42.3 Million

Operating Cost MAb Raw Materials 3.5 Consumables 8.2 Total Labor Cost (TLC) 3.9 Utilities 0.024 Laboratory/QC/QA 0.6 TLC = 2.3 Waste Treatment/Disposal 0.006 Facility-Dependent Costs 42.3 Operating Cost $ 60.3 Million

3. Uncertainty Analysis

Uncertainty Analysis Process Data, Literature, Estimates Environmental Assessment Process Model (SuperPro Designer) Economic Assessment Uncertainty Analysis Scenarios Monte Carlo Simulations Sensitivity Analyses

Penicillin: Worst + Best Case Scenario Objective Functions Worst Case Base Case Best Case Unit production Cost [$/kg] 28.0 16.0 10.5 EBITDA [$ million] -18 4.0 31 Scenarios based on chosen minimum and maximum values for input variables

Monte Carlo Simulation Uncertain variables: Objective functions: Technical parameters e.g. product concentration S-10 S-10 S-10 S-10 S-11 P-8 / AF-1 Air Filtratio S-11 Environmental Indices Supply chain parameters e.g. media price S-10 S-10 P-1 / V-1 Blending / Storage Me S-11 P-4 / ST-1S-11 S-15 S-15 P-3 / MX-1 Heat Sterilizat Mixing S-10 S-10 S-11 S-11 P-20 / RVF- S-15 S-11 P-21 / HX-1 S-10 Removal Biom Coolin P-7 / V-1 S-11 P-2 / V-1 Fermentati P-9 / V-1 S-15 Storag Blending / Storage Glu S-11 Monte P-6 / AF-1 S-11 Carlo simulations Air Filtratio S-16 S-16 S-15 P-22 / MX-1 P-5 / G-1 S-15 Acidificatio S-15 Gas Compres S-16 P-23 / CX-1 S-16 S-17 S-16 S-16 Centrifugal Extrac S-17 P-24 / MX-1 Neutralizati S-15 S-15 S-16 P-25 / V-1 S-16 Re-ectraction + Crystall S-17 P-26 / BCF- S-15 P-31 / FBDR- S-16S-17 Basket Centrifuga S-17 Fluid Bed Dry S-17 P-29 / MX-1 Adding Fresh Butyl Ac Unit Production Cost Market parameters e.g. product selling price P-32 / V-1 Storage Penicillin Sodium S-17 P-27 / CSP- S-16 Component Split S-17 P-28 / MX-1 Neutralizati S-17 Return on Investment

Penicillin: Parameters for Monte Carlo Simulation Yield biomass on glucose Maintenance coefficient (glucose) Precursor utilization efficiency Final biomass concentration Final production concentration Aeration rate Agitator power Downstream recovery yields (each step) Recycling yields: butyl acetate, acetone Price glucose Price phenoxyacetic acid Electricity cost ($/kwh) Selling price product

Probability Distribution: Input Variables 0.0300 0.0200 0.0100 0.0000 44.6 52.3 60.0 67.6 75.3 Final product concentration: Normal distribution, Std.-Dev.: 10% 0.0200 0.0150 0.0100 0.0050 0.0000 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.1 Agitator power: Normal distribution, Std.-Dev.: 20%, min: 1.5 kw/m 3, max: 3.5 kw/m 3 0.0250 0.0200 0.0150 0.0100 0.0050 0.0000 2.1 7.6 13.0 18.4 23.8 Price glucose: Beta distribution, α = 3.49; β = 1.2, Distribution type fits best actual data

Probability Distribution UPC: Technical Parameters 3500 3000 2500 Frequency 2000 1500 1000 500 0 12.1 14.5 16.9 19.3 21.7 UPC ($/kg)

Probability Distribution UPC Unit Cost probability 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 Supply chain/market par. all parameters pen concentration only Tech. Par. without pen conc. 0 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 UPC [$/kg]

Production of Alkaline Protease for Detergent Use Alkaline protease is an important additive for use in laundry detergents. The objective is to simulate the operation of a plant to produce 6,000 ton/y of crude enzyme (e.g. containing 250 tpa of pure protein). The plant will use five (5) 150 m 3 fermentors and operate with a 75 h process cycle time.

Production of Alkaline Protease Fermentor Hold Tank Flocculant Addition Membrane Filtration Rotary Vacuum Filtration Crystallization ph or salt adjustment Figure by MIT OCW.

Alkaline Protease Average Flowrate (kg/hr) 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 T102 VF201 UF202 SD401 SW502 1.2 Product Yield 0.8 0.4 0.0 T102 VF201 UF202 SD401 SW502 Specific Activity (solids wet basis) 40 30 20 10 0 T102 VF201 UF202 SD401 SW502 Figure by MIT OCW.

Improving Titer 1000 800 Product cost ($/kg) 600 400 200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Initial enzyme concentration (g/l) Figure by MIT OCW.

WHERE ARE THE PROBLEMS? INADEQUATE ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES SIMPLISTIC MODELS WITH ASSUMPTIONS VARIANCE IN SIGNALS AND PERFORMANCE INEFFICIENCIES IN USE OF INFORMATION INEFFICIENT LEARNING