PRESCRIBED GRAZING NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD. (Acre) Code 528



Similar documents
Past and Current Research on Natural Resource Issues in the Blue Mountains

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Department of Forest and

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

What Is Holistic Planned Grazing?

BSc in Environmental and Conservation Sciences Wildlife and Rangeland Resources Management Major

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

STATEMENT OF RON HUNTSINGER NATIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S

Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe National Forest;

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Fayette County Appraisal District

UGIP Technical Committee Key Principles of Grazing Management

Managing Fire Dependent Wildlife Habitat without Fire. A Land Management Practice That: 100 Years of Fire Suppression in Ponderosa pine ecosystems

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Biodiversity Concepts

Appendix C. Municipal Planning and Site Restoration Considerations

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

Management Plan Template For Conservation Easements Held by CPW

MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Strategic Plan for Research and Development Water, Air, and Soil Strategic Program Area

Effects of Climate Change on Grasslands. Jeff Thorpe Saskatchewan Research Council June 27, 2012

The importance of ESD concept for rangeland monitoring program and rangeland management in Mongolia

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

San Jacinto County Appraisal District PO Box 1170 Coldspring, Texas (Fax)

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

Growth of Pasture Plants

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

It s hard to avoid the word green these days.

Propagules adapted to wind dispersal n Propagules water dispersed n

Available FSA and NRCS Disaster Assistance Programs Crop Insurance: Prevented Planting and Failed Acreage Considerations Click on title for video

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

MONITORING TOOLS AND METHODS. Michelle Buzalsky Rangeland Management Technician Shoshone National Forest

Enhancing Biodiversity. Proactive management of biodiversity in intensive agriculture

Technology For Adaptation. Forestry Conservation Management. Dr. Javier Aliaga Lordemann

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Smoke Management Plan

LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Forest Watershed Tree Thinning Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in the Manzano Mountains of New Mexico

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Guidelines for Degraded Landscape Management (Deliverable #16) September 30, 2013

Public Land Management and Interdependent Collection of Programs

Fire Management needs assessment and priority actions

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Amherst County Public Schools. AP Environmental Science Curriculum Pacing Guide. College Board AP Environmental Science Site

STATE LEVEL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) AND THE NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Ecosystem services in grasslands: evidence, trade-offs and restoration. James Bullock NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

Population Ecology. Life History Traits as Evolutionary Adaptations

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, Canada

- POLICY - Disaster Recovery Assistance Program

Developing a Prescribed Fire Burn Plan: ELEMENTS & CONSIDERATIONS

NATURAL RESOURCES DEGREES AND CERTIFICATES. Environmental Conservation A.S. Degree (formerly Natural Resources)

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

Fighting Fire with Fire: Can Fire Positively Impact an Ecosystem?

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

Origins and causes of river basin sediment degradation and available remediation and mitigation options. Feedback from the Riskbase workshop

Water Quality Management

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

Standards Oversight Council (SOC) Supporting Technical Standards for Urban and Rural Soil and Water Conservation

Long Term Challenges for Tidal Estuaries

Soil and Vegetation Management: Keys to Water Conservation on Rangeland

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Sagebrush steppe post-fire rehabilitation projects: Using the past to guide the future

Payments for Ecosystem Services: towards improved biodiversity conservation and water security in South Africa, a semi-arid, developing country

PEST MANAGEMENT (CSP Enhancements) January 2006 Enhancement Activity Task Sheet

The Albert J. and Mary Jane Black Institute for Environmental Studies

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

The Canadian Drought Experience: Lessons Learned

Appendix C. Re-vegetation and Rehabilitation Sub-Plan

Ecosystem Restoration in British Columbia An Overview. Greg Anderson Provincial Ecosystem Restoration Manager 2009

Transcription:

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD PRESCRIBED GRAZING (Acre) Code 528 DEFINITION Managing the harvest of vegetation with grazing and/or browsing animals. PURPOSE Improve or maintain desired species composition and vigor of plant communities. Improve or maintain quantity and quality of forage for grazing and browsing animal s health and productivity. Improve or maintain surface and/or subsurface water quality and quantity. Reduce accelerated soil erosion, and maintain or improve soil condition. Promote economic stability through sustainable forage use. Improve and maintain riparian and watershed function. CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES This practice applies to all lands where grazing and/or browsing animals are managed. CRITERIA General Criteria Applicable to All Purposes Removal of plant material will be in accordance with site production limitations, rate of plant growth and the physiological needs of forage plants and the nutritional needs of the animals. Adjust intensity, frequency, timing and duration of grazing to meet the desire objectives for the plants communities and the associated resources, including the grazing and/or browsing animals. Manage kind of animal, animal number, grazing distribution, length of grazing and/or browsing periods and timing of use to provide grazed plants sufficient recovery time to meet planned objectives. The recovery period of non-grazing can be provided for the entire year or during the growing period of key plants. Deferment (non-grazing period less than one year) and rest (non-grazing period equal or greater than one year) will be planned for critical periods of plant needs. Protect soil, water, air, plant and animal resources when locating livestock feeding, supplementing, handling and watering facilities. Manage grazing and/or browsing animals to maintain adequate vegetative cover on sensitive areas (i.e. riparian, wetland, habitats of concern, karst areas). Schedule livestock movements based on rate of plant growth, available forage and allowable utilization target. Defer or rest areas from grazing or browsing for a period of time to ensure the success of brush control, seeding or other conservation practices that causes stress or damage to key plants. Develop contingency plans to deal with expected periodic weather, fire and/or insect concerns. Conservation practice standards are reviewed periodically and updated if needed. To obtain the current version of this standard, contact your Natural Resources Conservation Service. NRCS CARIBBEAN AREA, SEPTEMBER 2006

528-2 the Health and Vigor of Plant Communities. Duration and intensity of grazing and/or browsing will be based on desired plant health and expected productivity of key forage species to meet management objectives. Adjust intensity, frequency and timing of grazing and/or browsing to meet the desired objectives for the plant communities and the associated resources, including the grazing and/or browsing animal. Schedule livestock movements based on rate of plant growth, available forage and utilization. Plan periodic deferment from grazing and/or browsing to maintain or restore the desired plant community following episodic events, such as wildfire or severe drought. Where appropriate, periodic soil testing for nutrient status and soil reaction and application of fertilizer and/or soil amendments according to soil test recommendations to enhance plant vigor. Quantity and Quality of Forage for Livestock Health and Productivity Plan grazing and/or browsing to match forage quantity and quality goals of the producer and within the capability of the resource to respond to management. Use the nutritional capability of pasture plants to optimize delivery of nutrients to the animals. Reduce animal stress and mortality from toxic and poisonous plants. Livestock feeding, handling, and watering facilities should be designed and installed in a manner to improve and/or maintain animal distribution. These facilities should also be designed and installed to minimize stress, the spread of disease, parasites, contact with harmful organisms and toxic plants. Supplemental feed and/or mineral requirements should be balanced with the forage consumption to meet the desired nutritional level for the kind and class of grazing and/or browsing livestock. Surface and/or Subsurface Water Quality and Quantity. Maintain adequate ground cover and plant density to maintain or improve infiltration capacity and reduce runoff. Maintain adequate ground cover and plant density to maintain or improve filtering capacity of the vegetation Minimize concentrated livestock areas to enhance nutrient distribution and improve or maintain ground cover. Riparian and Watershed Function. Minimize concentrated livestock areas to enhance nutrient distribution and improve or maintain ground cover. Provide adequate ground cover and plant density to maintain or improve infiltration capacity and reduce runoff. Provide adequate ground cover and plant density to maintain or improve filtering capacity of the vegetation. Avoid undesirable shifts in plant community composition, structure and function that could imperil watershed function. Additional Criteria to Reduce Soil Erosion and Maintain Soil Condition Maintain adequate ground cover, litter and canopy to maintain or improve infiltration and soil condition. Minimize concentrated livestock areas, trailing, and trampling to reduce soil compaction, excess runoff and erosion.

528-3 Food and/or Cover for Wildlife Species of Concern Manage plant height, structure, density and diversity for desired wildlife habitat. The prescribed grazing plan will maintain adequate cover, provide for necessary deferment time and duration and livestock density to ensure nesting and brood rearing success. Additional Criteria for Management of Fine Fuel Load Plan intensity, frequency, and timing of grazing/browsing to reduce hazardous fuel loads. Additional Criteria to Promote Economic Stability through Grazing Land Sustainability. Evaluate the economics of the forage system and associated infrastructure. Develop a prescribed grazing plan that provides forage for as much of the year as possible to minimize supplemental feed cost. Develop a contingency plan to ensure resource management and economic feasibility without resource degradation. Use the nutritional capability of pasture plants to optimize delivery of nutrients to the animals in order to maintain high reproductive performance that promotes economic sustainability. CONSIDERATIONS Utilization or stubble height target levels are tools that can be used in conjunction with monitoring to help ensure that resource conservation and producer objectives are met. Where practical and beneficial, start the grazing sequence in a different management unit. When weeds are a significant problem prescribed grazing and/or browsing should be implemented in conjunction with other pest management practices to promote plant community resistance to invasive species and protect desired plant communities. Consider improving carbon sequestration in biomass and soils through management of grazing and/or browsing to produce the desired results. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The prescribed grazing plan shall conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws. Seek measures to avoid adverse affects to endangered, threatened, and candidate species and their habitats. Prepare a prescribed grazing plan for all management units where grazing and/or browsing will occur according to state standards and specifications. Prescribed Grazing Plan will include: Goals and Objectives clearly stated. Resource Inventory that identifies existing resource conditions, concerns and ecological site or forage suitability group potentials. Identify opportunities to enhance resource conditions. Location and condition of structural improvements such as fences, water developments, etc. Forage Inventory of the expected forage quality, quantity and species of forage in each management unit(s) during the grazing period. (Utilize Forage Inventory Tool). Forage-Animal Balance developed as a sustainable grazing plan for the management unit(s), which ensures forage produced or available meets forage demand of livestock. Grazing Plan developed for livestock that identifies periods of grazing and/or browsing, deferment, rest, and other treatment activities for each management unit. Contingency plan developed that details potential problems (i.e., severe drought, flooding, insects) and serves as a guide for adjusting the grazing prescription to ensure resource management and economic feasibility without resource degradation. Monitoring plan developed with appropriate records to assess whether the

528-4 grazing strategy resulted in a positive or upward trend and is meeting objectives. Identify the key areas and key plants that the manager should evaluate in making grazing management decisions. (Utilize the Pastures Condition Scoresheet Standard for Tropical Grass/Legume Mixed Pastures Tool). OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Operation. Prescribed Grazing will be applied on a continuing basis throughout the occupation period of all grazing units. Adjustments will be made as needed to ensure that the goals and objectives of the prescribed grazing strategy are met. Maintenance. Monitoring data will be used on a regular basis within the prescribed grazing plan to insure that objectives are being met, or to make necessary changes in the prescribed grazing plan to meet objectives. All facilitating and accelerating practices (e.g. Fence (382), Pest Management (595), Brush Management (314), Pasture Planting (512) (etc.) that are needed to effect adequate grazing and/or browsing distribution as planned by this practice standard will be maintained in good working order and are being operated as intended. REFERENCES Archer, S., and F.E. Smeins. 1991. Ecosystem level processes. Grazing Management an Ecological Perspective, chapter 5, R.K. Heitschmidt and J.W. Stuth, eds., Timber Press, pp. 109 139. Bedunah, D. J. and R. E. Sosebee, Editors. 1995. Wildland Plants. Physiological Ecology and Developmental Morphology. Society for Range Management, Denver, CO Blackburn, W.H., F.B. Pierson, C.L. Hanson, T.L. Thurow, and A.L. Hanson. 1992. The spatial and temporal influences of vegetation on surface soil factors in semiarid rangelands. Transactions of the ASAE. 35:479 486. Blaser, R.E., et al. 1986. Forage-animal management systems. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. Briske, D.D. 1991. Developmental morphology and physiology of grasses. Grazing Management, an Ecological Perspective, Ch. 4, R.K. Heitschmidt and J.W. Stuth (eds.), Timber Press, pp. 85 107. Briske, D.D., and J.H. Richards. 1994. Physiological responses of individual plants to grazing: Current status and ecological significance. In Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West, N. Vavra, W.A. Laycock, and R.D. Pieper (eds.), Society for Range Management, Denver, CO, pp. 147 176. Heath, M.E., D.S. Metcalfe, and R.F. Barnes. 1978. Forages, the science of grassland agriculture. Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa Hodgson, J. 1990. Grazing management- Science into practice. Longman handbook in Agriculture. J. Wiley and Sons. New York, New York Holechek, J.L., R. Valdez, R. Pieper, S. Schmemnitz, and C. Davis. 1982. Manipulation of grazing to improve or maintain wildlife habitat. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 10:204-210 Smith, D., R.J. Bula, and R.P. Walgenbach. 1986. Forage Management 5 th ed. Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co. Dubuque, Iowa Stoddard, L.A., A.D. Smith, and T.W. Box. 1975. Range management. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Taylor, Jr. 1986. Hydrologic characteristics of vegetation types as affected by livestock grazing systems, Edwards Plateau, Texas. Journal of Range Management 39:505 509. Taylor, Jr. 1988. Infiltration and interrill erosion responses to selected livestock grazing strategies, Edwards Plateau, Texas. Journal of Range Management 41:296 302. Taylor, Jr. 1988. Some vegetation responses to selected livestock grazing strategies, Edwards Plateau, Texas. Journal of Range Management 41:108 114.

528-5 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1997. National range and pasture handbook. Washington, DC. Vallentine, J.F. 1990. Grazing management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Waller, S.S., L.E. Moser, and P.E. Reece. 1985. Understanding grass growth: The key to profitable livestock production. Trabon Printing Company, Kansas City, MO. Warren, S.D. 1987. Soil hydrologic response to intensive rotation grazing: A State of Knowledge. pp. 488-501. In: Y. S. Fok (ed.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Infiltration Development and Application. January 6-9, 1987. Water Resources Research Center, Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.