Quick Reference Guide Ohio Standards for Professional Development



Similar documents
Standards for Professional Development

GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)

How To Improve Education Planning In Dekalb County Schools

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Educational Leadership Program Standards. ELCC Revised Standards

Ayers Institute Leadership Resources: PSEL Alignment

Job Title: Executive Director of Organizational and Professional Learning

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

Arkansas Teaching Standards

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Georgia District Performance Standards

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Standards for Online Professional Development

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

MPA PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Hawaii Teacher Standards Board Teacher Leader Work Group Report

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

ISTE National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

Office of the Superintendent of Schools MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Rockville, Maryland. May 30, 2013

Standards: What does it mean to Community College Faculty? General Overview & Panel Discussion. OhioMATYC April 12, 2013

NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College

***Draft * Draft * Draft * Draft * Draft*** International Society for Technology In Education (ISTE) Technology Coach Program Standards

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Student Name.

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

Field Experience and Student Teaching Competencies

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

The school principal practices effective cultural leadership when he or she

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

Section 3: Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) Resources Pages 14-18

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Tips for Designing a High Quality Professional Development Program

Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders

Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

Boulder Valley School District Effective Specialized Service Professionals Standards Social Workers and Psychologists

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

North Carolina New Schools Page 1 of 14

North Carolina New Schools Design Principle 1: Ready for College. Beginning Early Steps Growing Innovations New Paradigms

THE FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACH ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Library Media Specialist Rubric

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Literacy Specialist Endorsement

How To Lead By Design

Elementary and Middle School Technology Curriculum Guidelines

P21 Framework Definitions

ON THE SAME PAGE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS THROUGH LABOR-MANAGEMENT COLLABORATION

The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS S) and Performance Indicators for Students 1. Creativity and Innovation

REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION JUNE

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

Virtual Classroom Designer Competency Resources

EDUC 605 Curriculum Development and Assessment.. 3 cr

INNOVATION CONFIGURATION. Broward County Public Schools. Instructional Technology for. 21st Century Teaching and Learning. July 2015 June 2018

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

South Carolina Literacy Competencies. for Reading Coaches

Florida Department of Education. Professional Development System Evaluation Protocol

Superintendent Effectiveness Rubric*

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

Master of Arts in Educational Administration, Principal Endorsement Program Course Sequence and Descriptions

PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS

Literacy Coaching/ Reading Specialists

Educational Leadership

Curriculum and Instruction

Teaching ESL Students in Mainstream Classrooms: language in learning across the curriculum Information for Schools

RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Licensure Program Content Guidelines Matrix for Principal

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

Understanding by Design Wiggins & McTighe

Indiana s Department of Education STEM Education Implementation Rubric

North Carolina. Teacher Working Conditions Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Commission

Evaluation Case Study. Leadership development in special schools

Standards for Educational Leaders (Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors)

The 20 Non-Negotiable Characteristics of Higher Performing School Systems

APPENDIX D: EVIDENCE COLLECTION EXAMPLES

Transcription:

Quick Reference Guide Ohio Standards for Professional Development About the Standards Creating a system of effective learning is one way that school systems can support all educators and encourage improved teaching and Ohio s Standards for Professional Development define the essential elements of a strong learning system. To ensure that the standards represent best practices and research in the field, Learning Forward s Standards for Professional Learning serve as the foundation of this document. The Ohio Standards for Professional Development take a systems perspective; they describe what occurs within an effective system of Ohio s schools and districts will find the standards useful as they implement strong systems of learning to support all educators. Research shows that effective learning impacts teacher performance as well as student achievement. These standards do not represent a new requirement for Ohio s schools and districts. Instead, they are designed to support what effective schools and districts are already doing and help all educators integrate authentic learning into their regular routines. Together, learning standards for teachers and Ohio s new learning standards for students are designed to work in concert to meet the primary goal: enhanced student The Relationship between Professional Learning and Student Learning Research shows the link between learning, teacher skill and student results. High-Quality Professional Development Improved Knowledge, Skills, and Practices Gains in Student Learning 1. To have impact, learning must be high quality. For development to be high quality, school systems, schools and education leaders must organize coherent, sustained Learning must align with standards. Learning must take place within a collaborative system with shared accountability. 2. Professional learning can change what educators know, do and believe. By engaging in contentfocused, carefully constructed learning, educators gain knowledge and skills. When they operate within a collaborative, supportive system, educators can take these new understandings and skills back to the classroom where they will implement and sustain improved classroom instruction. 3. Deeper knowledge, improved skills and enhanced classroom instruction all can work together to produce gains in student Quick Reference Guide - Ohio Standards for Professional Development April 2015 Page 1

Ohio Standards for Professional Development Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students Standard 4: Data requires the use of a variety of sources and types of student, educator and system data to plan, assess and evaluate Standard 1: Learning Communities occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility and goal alignment. Standard 5: Learning Designs integrates theories, research and models of human learning to achieve its intended outcomes. Standard 2: Leadership requires skilled teacher leaders and administrators who develop capacity, advocate and create support systems for Standard 6: Implementation applies research on change and sustains support for implementation of Standard 3: Resources requires prioritizing, monitoring and coordinating resources for educator Standard 7: Outcomes aligns its outcomes with educator performance and student curriculum standards. Ohio Standards for Professional Development Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students Standard 1: Learning Communities occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility and goal alignment. Standard 2: Leadership requires skilled teacher leaders and administrators who develop capacity, advocate, and create support systems for Standard 3: Resources requires prioritizing, monitoring and coordinating resources for educator Engage in continuous improvement Develop collective responsibility Create alignment and accountability Develop capacity for learning and leading Advocate for learning Create support systems and structures Prioritize human, fiscal, material, technology and time resources Monitor resources Coordinate resources Quick Reference Guide - Ohio Standards for Professional Development April 2015 Page 2

Standard 4: Data requires the use of a variety of sources and types of student, educator and system data to plan, assess and evaluate Standard 5: Learning Designs integrates theories, research and models of human learning to achieve its intended outcomes. Analyze student, educator and system data Assess progress Evaluate learning Apply learning theories, research and models Select learning designs Promote active engagement Standard 6: Implementation applies research on change and sustains support for implementation of Apply change research Sustain implementation Provide constructive feedback Standard 7: Outcomes aligns its outcomes with educator performance and student curriculum standards. Meet performance standards Address learning outcomes Build coherence Assumptions of the Standards Ohio s new standards were written with the following assumptions: All educators are responsible for their continued All educators are focused on increasing their effectiveness to enhance student Equity and excellence are the shared goals for all students and educators. Shifts in the Standards Ohio s new expectations for educators learning reflect a number of shifts in our understandings of what constitutes effective development. 1. Effective development can occur within learning communities. When teachers collectively share the responsibility for students success by actively participating in teacher learning teams learning is sustained and has impact on classroom practices. 2. Resources are not always external experts or increased funds. Maximizing resources might mean tapping the expertise of teacher leaders within a school system or identifying more efficient scheduling systems so there is time within the school-day for learning teams to meet and collaborate. Quick Reference Guide - Ohio Standards for Professional Development April 2015 Page 3

3. Professional learning targets are determined by varied sources of data and the impact of learning is evaluated using varied types and sources of students, educator, school and system data. Finally, readers will notice that throughout the document, the phrase learning is often used in place of development. As the Learning Forward website states, this decision signals the importance of educators taking an active role in their continuous improvement and places emphasis on the Effective Professional Development Should Be selected based on analysis of data as well as individual and system goals. Occur over one or multiple sessions, with long-term focus and follow-up. Focus on the day-to-day work of educators (school-based and job-embedded). Be content-specific and individualized. Make use of internal expertise. Be delivered in varied modes, including through learning communities or teacher teams. Focus on implementation of new approaches. Include evaluation of providers and participants. Focus on sustaining change over time, supported by continuous feedback. Intended Audiences and Suggestions for Use While the primary audience for these standards will be those responsible for implementing systems of learning in their schools or districts, they are written for multiple audiences including planners, providers, participants and evaluators of Individuals and organizations will find them useful in the following ways. Guiding Questions For questions targeted to each audience below, see the Guiding Questions document on the Ohio Standards for Professional Development page at education.ohio.gov.) Individual The standards will guide educators in designing their individual plans for Educators School and District Leaders Local Professional Development Committees Members of Higher Education External Vendors learning and identifying effective learning opportunities. School and district leaders responsible for designing, implementing and evaluating systems of learning should use the standards to design, implement and evaluate the system s learning program. Members of local development committees will use the standards to help educators create individual plans and to evaluate the plans of individual educators. Members of higher education institutions should plan course offerings for educators that align with the characteristics of high-quality External vendors of learning should use the standards to ensure that they offer Ohio educators high-quality learning opportunities. The standards ensure that all learning is connected and aligned towards the goal of increasing student Quick Reference Guide - Ohio Standards for Professional Development April 2015 Page 4

Additional Tools and Resources An effective system of learning for educators can have strong impact on teacher practice and student achievement. To commit to these standards, effective school systems must create a culture of inquiry, in which all feel a shared responsibility and a commitment to continuous improvement. These systems will prioritize collaboration and shared leadership, and support meaningful learning with adequate resources. Successful implementation will occur within a system of accountability, focused on measurable data and results. Using the standards to shape more effective learning will require study, thought, discussion and planning. (Learning Forward, Standards for Professional Learning). To assist educators in using the standards, the Ohio Department of Education offers a variety of tools and resources. Resources from Learning Forward also will be helpful for Ohio educators. For more information, go to www.learningforward.org Quick Reference Guide - Ohio Standards for Professional Development April 2015 Page 5