Statistical Brief #25: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Characteristics by Average Payroll for the Private Sector in 2001



Similar documents
STATISTICAL BRIEF #48

STATISTICAL BRIEF #160

STATISTICAL BRIEF #98

STATISTICAL BRIEF #209

STATISTICAL BRIEF #230

No Employee Contribution Health Insurance in the US - State Overview

STATISTICAL BRIEF #155

STATISTICAL BRIEF #189

STATISTICAL BRIEF #182

Medical Expenditure and Health Insurance in the United States

Health Insurance - A statisticical Overview For Employers

STATISTICAL BRIEF #90

STATISTICAL BRIEF #369

STATISTICAL BRIEF #207

STATISTICAL BRIEF #322

STATISTICAL BRIEF #251

STATISTICAL BRIEF #285

STATISTICAL BRIEF #436

STATISTICAL BRIEF #330

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435

Private Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance

THE GROWING COST OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE HEALTH CARE COSTS AND SPENDING IN NEW YORK STATE

Papers presented at the ICES-III, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

Data Bulletin Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component

Using the MEPS-IC* to Understand the Impact of the ACA**

STATISTICAL BRIEF #40

HEALTH INSURANCE COST STUDY

A Helping Hand For New York s Small Businesses. Health Insurance Tax Credits

This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare. Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget

GAO EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

Health Insurance Tax Credits

Supplemental Disability Insurance Calculation

ICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE

Full-Time Poor and Low Income Workers: Demographic Characteristics and Trends in Health Insurance Coverage, to

Research. brief CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE: FIRM SPENDING AND WORKER COVERAGE

Small Business Federal Tax Credit vs. Maryland State Subsidy Program

ACTUARIAL VALUE AND EMPLOYER- SPONSORED INSURANCE

How Teacher Health Plans Compare with Plans Offered by Milwaukee Area Employers

ICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE

PART A: General Information

Taxable Income on Group Life Insurance in Excess of $50,000

Health Insurance in the Small Business Market: Availability, Coverage, and the Effect of Tax Incentives

Alice M. Zawacki and Amy K. Taylor. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No January 2005

How To Get A Small Business Health Insurance Plan For Free

EMPLOYEE PROPOSED COMPENSATION PLAN- Subject of Public Hearing CENTERVILLE CITY SALARY ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES- FY 2013

ObamaCare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment

Trends in Employer- Sponsored Insurance Related to Children s Coverage

Over the last several years, the Bureau

Short Term Disability Insurance Coverage paid by you

california Health Care Almanac California Employer Health Benefits Survey: Fewer Covered, More Cost

North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters Health Fund ( Plan ) Employer Exchange Notice ( Notice )

New Employer Group Enrollment Information

How Non-Group Health Coverage Varies with Income

Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2013 Current Population Survey

956 CMR: COMMONWEALTH HEALTH INSURANCE CONNECTOR AUTHORITY

Employee benefits are an important aspect

california Health Care Almanac California Employer Health Benefits Survey

Health Insurance Coverage in the U.S. The New Census Bureau Numbers for 2000 and The Trend into 2001

Alaska Employer Health-Care Benefits: A Survey of Alaska Employers

Declining Health Insurance in Low-Income Working Families and Small Businesses

Voluntary Short Term Disability Insurance

State of Louisiana Barber and Beauty Shops Survey August 1998

State of Arkansas Barber and Beauty Shops Survey August 1998

Why are Health Insurance Premiums So Much Higher for Public Employers Compared to Private Employers?

Figure 1. Majority of U.S. Workers Get Health Insurance Through Employers, 2007

Household health care spending: comparing the Consumer Expenditure Survey and the National Health Expenditure Accounts Ann C.

Health Reform Employer Impact Analysis. Sample Employer. Prepared for. Date

Health Care Expenditures for Uncomplicated Pregnancies

Understanding your Forms W-2 and 1042-S

Profile of Rural Health Insurance Coverage

Home BancShares, Inc.

Comparing Methods for Imputing Employer Health Insurance Contributions in the Current Population Survey 1

Common Complex Scenarios. Consumers Who Receive an Offer of Employer-Sponsored Coverage

Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2012 Current Population Survey

Benefits through the stages of your life. Understanding Effective Salary

Salary Effective Date for Life and Disability Insurance Calculations. Overview

Introduction... Distinctive Features of the Benefits Environment... Key Changes in Recent Years...

Health Care and Business: The Bottom Line. The High Cost of Doing Nothing

Lynn A. Blewett, Ph.D. Professor, University of Minnesota

Frequently Asked Questions About The Health Insurance Market in Vermont

How To Get A Health Insurance Tax Credit For Small Businesses

ICI ReseaRCh Perspective

Introduction. California Employer Health Benefits

Health Economics Program

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009

THE MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH CARE REFORM ACT: WHAT MUST EMPLOYERS DO?

230 N. Park Blvd Suite 102 Grapevine, TX 76051

MEPS Insurance Component. Glossary of Health Insurance Terms

Quarterly Economics Briefing

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS. Is the addressee title/department and mailing address the same as shown in the address label? Mark "X" only one box.

Christy Tinnes, Brigen Winters and Christine Keller, Groom Law Group, Chartered

Health Care Cost and Insurance Coverage in Five Southern States

2013 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SURVEY REPORT. Medical benefits Health-insurance costs Premium coverage Retirement plans Paid leave

Self-Insured Health Plans: Recent Trends by Firm Size, , p. 2

FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING

THE FUTURE OF EMPLOYER BASED HEALTH INSURANCE FOLLOWING HEALTH REFORM

Overview of Methodology for Imputing Missing Expenditure Data in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

401(k) Plans and Retirement Savings: Issues for Congress

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF HOURLY COMPENSATION COSTS

Transcription:

Statistical Brief #25: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Characteristics by Average Payroll for the Private Sector in 2001 By: John Sommers, Ph.D. Introduction One of the primary sources of health coverage in the United States is coverage provided through employers for their current employees. According to data from the 2001 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC), approximately 63 million of the 114 million employees from the private sector are enrolled in a health insurance plan sponsored by their employers. Many factors are correlated with whether an employee has access to a health insurance plan sponsored by his or her employer and, if so, whether the employee enrolls and what the employee contributes toward the cost of this coverage. Employer characteristics commonly acknowledged to correlate with characteristics of employer-sponsored health insurance include the size of the employer, the industry, the presence of a union, and the level of employee compensation. This analysis of data from the 2001 MEPS-IC examines the offer, eligibility, and enrollment rates and level of employee contributions for private-sector establishments grouped by the average payroll per employee (compensation excluding fringe benefits). Each group or quartile contains 25% of the total number of employees in the private sector, and each group represents establishments with progressively higher average payrolls. Thus, the first group contains 25% of total employment in all the establishments, comprising those establishments with the lowest average payroll per employee. Additional details on the grouping methodology are contained in the definitions section of this report. This analysis compares the offer, eligibility, and enrollment rates and contributions of private-sector employees toward employer-sponsored health insurance for these quartiles. Only those differences that are statistically significant at the.05 level are discussed.

Briefly Stated Without exception, the offer, eligibility, and enrollment rates increased across the payroll quartiles - these rates are lowest for the first payroll quartile and highest for the highest payroll quartile. The type of coverage (single or family) that employees selected also varied by compensation level. For example, the rate of enrollment in single coverage among all enrolled employees was highest for the first payroll quartile, second highest for the second payroll quartile, and lowest for the highest payroll quartile. Average annual employee contributions toward premiums for both single and family coverage declined as the payroll quartile rose. The highest average contributions were required of the employees in the lowest payroll quartile, and the lowest contributions were observed for employees in the highest payroll quartile. Findings In 2001, 72.3% of all employees in the first payroll quartile, 89.4% of those in the second payroll quartile, 96.0% of those in the third payroll quartile, and 97.9% of those in the fourth payroll quartile worked where health insurance was offered (Figure 1). Because part-time employees generally are not offered coverage, rates were also examined for full-time employees to remove the effects caused by differing numbers of part-time employees in each of the quartiles. Regardless of whether the data examined were for all employees or for full-time employees only, the percent who worked where health insurance was offered went up significantly from the first to the second quartile and from the second to the third quartile. The rates were also higher for the fourth quartile compared to the third quartile, but differences were not significant. The percent of employees eligible for health insurance in establishments that offer health insurance followed this same pattern for all employees and full-time employees. As shown in Figure 2, only 79.4% of full-time employees were eligible for health insurance in the first payroll quartile, while 93.2% were eligible in the fourth payroll quartile, which had the highest average payrolls. Employers control whether health insurance is offered and who is eligible. As shown in Figure 3, when employees had a choice to enroll in employer-sponsored health insurance, the enrollment rates rose with increasing payroll quartiles. Among all eligible employees in the establishments in the first payroll quartile, only 64.9% enrolled in health insurance, compared to 77.4% in the second quartile, 83.0% in the third quartile, and 85.7% in the fourth quartile.

Considering the offer (72.3%), eligibility (56.8%), and enrollment (64.9%) rates in the first payroll quartile, shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively, the percent of all employees who were enrolled in employer-sponsored health insurance in 2001 was approximately 26.7% (72.3% times 56.8% times 64.9%). The same values for the second, third, and fourth payroll quartiles were approximately 51.4%, 68.3%, and 75.2%, respectively. The type of coverage (single or family) that employees selected also varied by compensation level. The enrollment rates for single coverage of 56.2% for the first quartile and 51.5% for the second quartile were much higher than the national average of 46.3% (Figure 4). The rate for the third quartile was 44.8%, which did not significantly differ from the national average. For the fourth payroll quartile, the value was 40.5%, which was significantly lower than the national average. Figure 5 shows that contributions toward premiums for both single coverage and coverage for a family of four follow a descending pattern from the first to the fourth payroll quartile. The higher the average payroll per employee, the lower the average contribution per employee for employer-sponsored health insurance. Single contributions fall from $672 per enrollee for the first quartile to $409 for the fourth quartile. Likewise, across the groups, the employee contribution toward the premium for a family of four falls from $2,075 to $1,580. Definitions Quartiles Quartiles are groups of establishments, each which contains 25% of the total employment. The following process was used to determine the establishments within each of these employment quarters or quartiles: The establishments were placed in order from lowest to highest average payroll per employee. Starting with the lowest establishment, the employment was summed until the cumulative employment of the establishments on the list was 25% of the total employment of all establishments. The establishments on the list to that point are considered to be in the first quartile. The second quartile begins with the next establishment on the list and includes all establishments from that point on the list until the cumulative employment reaches 50%. The third quartile includes all establishments after the second quartile and ends with the establishment that brings the cumulative employment to 75% of the total. The fourth quartile includes all establishments above the third quartile.

Using this process, the establishments were broken into groups of 25% of the employment, with each group having establishments that had a higher average payroll per employee than the previous set. Establishment In this statistical brief, an establishment is defined as a single business location. Multiple establishments can be controlled by a single entity denoted as a firm. Establishments from the same firm can be in different payroll quartiles as defined above. Payroll Payroll includes all forms of compensation, such as salaries, wages, commissions, dismissal pay, bonuses, and employee contributions to pension plans. Payroll excludes fringe benefits. This definition is the same as used by the Internal Revenue Service on Form 941. About the MEPS-IC The MEPS-IC is a survey of business establishments and governments that collects information on employer-sponsored health insurance, such as whether insurance is offered, enrollments, types of plans, and premiums. The survey is conducted annually by the U.S. Bureau of the Census under the sponsorship of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The yearly response rate has averaged 78% for in-scope sample units. (Approximately 4% of the original sample is out-of-scope in a typical year.) A total sample of 42,000 establishments was selected for the 2001 survey, prior to accounting for losses due to non-response and out-of-scope (primarily out-of-business) cases. For more information on this survey, see MEPS Methodology Reports 6, 8, and 10 and the MEPS-IC Technical Appendix, available on the MEPS Web site: www.meps.ahrq.gov.