International Accreditation Forum, Inc.



Similar documents
IAF Mandatory Document

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:2013 from ISO/TS 22003:2007

IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Food Safety Management System Accreditation to ISO/TS 22003:201X from ISO/TS 22003:2007

IAF Mandatory Document

Application of ISO/IEC for the Accreditation of Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) Certification Bodies

The IAF Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA) Certified Once Accepted Everywhere

(Draft) Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015

IAF Informative Document. Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015. Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015)

IAF Informative Document. IAF Informative Document for the Transition of Management System Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17021:2011 from ISO/IEC 17021:2006

IAF Mandatory Document for the use of Computer Assisted Auditing Techniques ( CAAT ) for Accredited Certification of Management Systems

IAF Mandatory Document for the Transfer of Accredited Certification of Management Systems

IAF Mandatory Document. Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation of Management Systems Certification Bodies. Issue 1, Version 2 (IAF MD 17:2015)

How do I gain confidence in an Inspection Body? Do they need ISO 9001 certification or ISO/IEC accreditation?

IAF Mandatory Document for Duration of QMS and EMS Audits

IAF Mandatory Document DETERMINATION OF AUDIT TIME OF QUALITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (IAF MD 5:2015)

List of EA Publications. And International. Documents

Accreditation in Europe

FSSC Q. Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008. Quality module REQUIREMENTS

An Alternative Method for Maintaining ISO 9001/2/3 Certification / Registration

Memorandum of Understanding

International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation. Laboratory Accreditation or ISO 9001 Certification? global trust. Testing Calibration Inspection

EA-7/01. EA Guidelines. on the application. Of EN Publication Reference PURPOSE

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems

EA IAF/ILAC Guidance. on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020:1998

IAF Mandatory Document for the Application of ISO/IEC in Medical Device Quality Management Systems (ISO 13485)

Guidance for accreditation of EN 15224:2012 Health care services Quality management systems Requirements based on EN ISO 9001:2008

International Accreditation Forum, Inc.

HKCAS Supplementary Criteria No. 8

The value of accredited certification

TG TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC :2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES

International Accreditation Forum, Inc. (IAF) Resolutions IAF Twenty-Ninth Annual General Assembly Milan, Italy

Enhancing Food Safety Through Third Party Certification

FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FSSC 22000

ROLE OF THE APEC SPECIALIST REGIONAL BODIES

Publicizing your ISO 9001 : 2008 or ISO : 2004 certification

3. Criteria for Recognition of Certification Bodies

Accreditation and Competence?

IECEx On-Line Certificate System

Chain of Custody of Forest Based Products - Requirements

Voluntary Certification Scheme for Traditional Health Practitioner

UNCITRAL United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Introduction to the law of electronic signatures

National Institute of Justice

Standards and accreditation. Tools for delivering better regulation

Asset Management Systems Scheme (AMS Scheme)

Certification Process Requirements

ISO 9000 FOR SOFIYifrARE QUALITY SYSTEMS

Rules for the certification of IT (Information Technology) Service Management Systems

Accreditation according to ISO/IEC in Europe. Historic EA Europeing Accreditation Assessment Experience from Technical assessment

ISO Registration Guidance Document

ETSI TS V2.1.1 ( )

IACS QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CERTIFICATION SCHEME (QSCS)

International Organization for Standardization

Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification

Info 15:2 TRAINING 2015/2016. Info 13:19

Document Reference APMG 15/015

Certified Once Accepted Everywhere Why use an accredited certification body?

Submission on Insolvency Practitioner Regulation To the Competition, Trade & Investment Branch, Ministry of Economic Development.

QSS 0: Products and Services without Bespoke Contracts.

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué Issy-les-Moulineaux

Aerospace Guidance Document

INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING ALLIANCE: EDUCATIONAL ACCORDS

Association for Project Management Business Management System

MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR LABORATORIES AND INSPECTION BODIES

The Benefits of Accreditation for Developing Countries

International Requirements for Organic Certification Bodies (IROCB)

Foreword Introduction - The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) Scope Section Overview Normative References...

FSSC Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II

Conformity assessment Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems

Systems and software engineering Lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) Part 5-6-2:

The Emerging ISO International Standard for Certification of Software Engineering Professionals

EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY

Information Security Management Systems

ISO/IEC Part 1 the next edition. Lynda Cooper project editor for ISO20000 part 1

American National Standards. value of the ANS designation

FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FSSC 22000

ISO 9001:2015 Draft International Standard Overview

Australian Transport Council. National Standard for the Administration of Marine Safety SECTION 5

Food Safety. Management Systems. Scope of Accreditation

UKAS Guidance for bodies operating certification of Trust Service Providers seeking approval under tscheme

Radio Spectrum and Technical Standards Advisory Committee

European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes

The Role of HACCP/FSMS in UAE Product Certification Schemes

National Accreditation Board for Certification Bodies. Accreditation Criteria

Procedure PS-TNI-001 Information Security Management System Certification

International Accreditation Forum, Inc. (IAF)

RECOMMENDATION. on the Evaluation of Quality Management System of National Metrology Institutes

Certification Process Requirements

Assessment Strategy for. Audit Practice, Tax Practice, Management Consulting Practice and Business Accounting Practice.

Human Diversity Management Systems. Diversity-Management Sytems based on ÖNORM S 2501

CP14 ISSUE 5 DATED 1 st OCTOBER 2015 BINDT Audit Procedure Conformity Assessment and Certification/Verification of Management Systems

Smart Meters Programme Schedule 2.5. (Security Management Plan) (CSP South version)

VdS Guidelines for the Certification of quality management systems

ISO/IEC Registration Guidance Document

ETSI EN V2.2.2 ( )

Transcription:

IAF ML 3:2012 IAF MLA Document GUIDANCE FOR RESPONDING TO INQUIRIES ON IAF MLA SIGNATORY EQUIVALENCE AND ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS (IAF ML 3:2012)

SIGNATORY EQUIVALENCE AND ON ACCEPTANCE OF Page 2 of 9 The (IAF) details criteria for the accreditation of bodies that provide conformity assessment services, and such accreditation facilitates trade and reduces demands for multiple conformity assessment activities. Accreditation reduces risk for business and its customers by assuring that accredited Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) are competent to carry out the work they undertake within their scope of accreditation. Accreditation Bodies (ABs) that are members of IAF and the CABs they accredit are required to comply with appropriate international standards and the applicable IAF application documents for the consistent application of those standards. ABs that are signatories to the IAF Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA) are evaluated regularly by an appointed team of peers to provide confidence in the operation of their accreditation programs. The structure and scope of the IAF MLA is detailed in IAF PR 4 - Structure of IAF MLA and Endorsed Normative Documents. The IAF MLA is structured in five levels: Level 1 specifies mandatory criteria that apply to all ABs, ISO/IEC 17011. The combination of a Level 2 activity(ies) and the corresponding Level 3 normative document(s) is called the main scope of the MLA, and the combination of Level 4 (if applicable) and Level 5 relevant normative documents is called a sub-scope of the MLA. Main scope of the MLA includes activities e.g. product certification and associated mandatory documents e.g. ISO/IEC Guide 65. The attestations made by CABs at the main scope level are considered to be equally reliable. Sub scope of the MLA includes conformity assessment requirements e.g. ISO 9001 and scheme specific requirements, where applicable, e.g. ISO TS 22003. The attestations made by CABs at the sub scope level are considered to be equivalent. The IAF MLA delivers the confidence needed for market acceptance of conformity assessment outcomes. An attestation issued, within the scope of the IAF MLA, by a body that is accredited by an IAF MLA signatory AB can be recognized worldwide, thereby facilitating international trade.

SIGNATORY EQUIVALENCE AND ON ACCEPTANCE OF Page 3 of 9 CONTENTS 1. Scope 5 2. References 5 3. Guidance 5 Issue No: 2 Prepared by: IAF MLA Committee Date: October 15, 2012 Approved by IAF Members Date: October 15, 2012 Issue Date: October 15, 2012 Application Date: October 15, 2012 Name for Enquiries: Elva Nilsen, Corporate Secretary IAF Contact: Phone: +1 (613) 454 8159; Email: secretary@iaf.nu

Page 4 of 9 SIGNATORY EQUIVALENCE AND ON ACCEPTANCE OF 1. SCOPE 1.1 This document provides guidance that should be used by IAF Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA) signatories and other IAF members, as appropriate, to respond to inquiries regarding the equivalence of accreditations of IAF MLA signatories and on acceptance of certification documents. Note: Certification document is a generic term used in this publication that describes the formal document, such as a letter or a certificate issued by an accredited certification body. The certification document is where the accredited certification body attests that the product including processes or services, system or person, fulfills the requirements contained in the identified standard or normative document. 2. REFERENCES 2.1 IAF PL6 IAF Memorandum of Understanding 2.2 IAF ML4 Policies and Procedures for a Multilateral Recognition Arrangement on the Level of Single Accreditation Bodies and on the Level of Regional Groups 2.3 IAF/ILAC A2 IAF/ILAC Multi-Lateral Mutual Recognition Arrangements (Arrangements) Requirements and Procedures for Evaluation of a Single Accreditation Body 2.4 IAF PR4 Structure of the IAF MLA and List of IAF Endorsed Normative Documents Note: Available on the IAF Website at www.iaf.nu under Publications 3. GUIDANCE 3.1 IAF/ILAC A2 section 2, clause 2.2.1.6, requires accreditation bodies to have a program to promote the Arrangement with major stakeholders. The IAF MLA as specified in IAF ML 4 requires signatories to: recognize the operation of the other participating bodies as providing equivalent outcomes within the same scope of the MLA; and recommend and promote the acceptance of the certification document that bears a participating accreditation body s symbol (preferably in association with the IAF MLA Mark), and is within the scope of the MLA, as being on an equal basis with those of its own accredited bodies.

Page 5 of 9 IAF MLA signatories and other IAF Members should take into account this IAF guidance when responding to inquiries on the equivalence of accreditations of IAF MLA signatories and on acceptance of certification documents. 3.2 The approach and content of IAF MLA signatories and other IAF Member s responses may vary depending on the nature of the inquiry and the level of knowledge of the inquirer. In many cases, IAF MLA signatories and other IAF Members receive inquiries by phone and the inquirer is often satisfied with a response by phone. In other cases, an inquirer may request a written response with an explanation of IAF MLA signatory equivalence. 3.3. As appropriate, the response may need to contain one or more of the following elements: 3.3.1. Brief description of IAF and the purpose of the IAF MLA. Example: The (IAF) is an international association of accreditation bodies and other interested stakeholders that aims to facilitate international trade by working to remove barriers that may result from marketplace demands for specific certifications. To accomplish this objective, the IAF has established a Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA). IAF accreditation body members are allowed to sign the IAF MLA only following the successful completion of a peer evaluation process. The purpose of the IAF MLA is to ensure that the certification documents issued by Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) accredited by IAF MLA signatories are the result of competently conducted conformity assessment activities. Each IAF MLA signatory recognizes the operation of the other signatories as providing equivalent outcomes within the same scope of the MLA. Each IAF MLA signatory also recommends and promotes the acceptance of certification documents that bear an IAF signatory accreditation symbol (preferably in association with the IAF MLA Mark) and are being issued within the scope of the MLA.

Page 6 of 9 3.3.2. Brief description of the peer evaluation process that is used to provide confidence in the competence of accreditation activities of other IAF MLA signatories. Example: Accreditation body members of IAF are admitted to the IAF MLA only after a rigorous and stringent evaluation of their operations by a peer evaluation team. The peer evaluation team is charged with ensuring that the applicant member complies fully with both the international standards and relevant IAF application documents. These peer evaluations and the formal monitoring and re-evaluations of each member are designed to ensure that all the members of the IAF MLA operate their accreditation systems in a competent and equivalent manner. 3.3.3. A statement regarding the accreditation activities or scope covered by the IAF MLA. 3.3.3.1 Example for cases where the IAF MLA covers only the levels 1, 2 and 3 (refer to the MLA structure in PR4): Note: As the main scope does not include the conformity assessment scheme requirements, Levels 4 & 5 e.g. ISO TS 22003 and ISO 22000, equivalence of certification documents cannot be claimed. In this situation, certification documents can be claimed to be equally reliable as the CAB has been deemed to comply with Level 3, e.g. ISO/IEC 17021 requirements. However, if required, accreditation body attestations can be claimed as being equivalent. We, as well as NAME of AB, are both signatories to IAF MLA for the accreditation of TYPE OF CAB. As IAF MLA signatories, both accreditation bodies and TYPE OF CAB they accredit are required to operate in a competent manner and in accordance with appropriate international standards and associated IAF application documents. TYPE OF CAB accredited by both organizations must be competent to conduct conformity assessments to the appropriate normative document, in accordance with applicable international standards. As a consequence of the above, we recognise the accreditation granted by NAME OF AB as being equivalent to our own and that certificates that bear the NAME

Page 7 of 9 OF AB accreditation symbol are equally reliable to certificates issued by CAB s accredited by ourselves. Note: The TYPE OF CAB should relate to the actual enquiry. In the case of main scope, an example would be certification bodies providing product certification services. An example for sub-scope would be certification bodies certifying management systems to ISO 9001. 3.3.3.2 Example for cases where the IAF MLA covers the 4 th and 5 th levels: We, as well as NAME OF AB, are both signatories to the IAF MLA for the accreditation of TYPE OF CAB. As IAF MLA signatories, both accreditation bodies and TYPE OF CAB they accredit are required to operate in a competent manner and in accordance with appropriate international standards and associated IAF application documents. As a consequence, we recognize that certification documents that bear NAME OF AB accreditation symbol (preferably in association with the IAF MLA Mark), issued by a TYPE OF CAB accredited by NAME OF AB, are equivalent as certification documents issued by a TYPE OF CAB accredited by ourselves.

Page 8 of 9 3.3.4. A statement as to whether the activity identified in the inquiry is included within the scope of the IAF MLA. Example: The CAB that has issued the subject certification document is accredited by NAME OF AB, which is a signatory to the IAF MLA. The certification document has been issued within NAME OF AB scope of the IAF MLA. or Example: The ISO 9001:2008 certification document bears the NAME OF AB accreditation symbol and the IAF MLA Mark which indicates that the certification document has been issued by a CAB that is accredited by an IAF MLA signatory with the appropriate scope to the IAF MLA. or Example: The subject certification document has been issued by NAME OF CAB which is accredited by an IAF MLA signatory and issued within NAME OF AB scope of the IAF MLA. 3.3.5. A reference to the IAF website for additional information on the IAF MLA. Example: Additional information on IAF, the IAF MLA, as well as a list of IAF MLA Signatories is available at: http://www.iaf.nu End of document.

Page 9 of 9 Further Information For further Information on this document or other IAF documents, contact any member of IAF or the IAF Secretariat. For contact details of members of IAF see - IAF Web Site - <http://www.iaf.nu> Secretariat: IAF Corporate Secretary, Telephone +1 (613) 454 8159 Email <secretary@iaf.nu>