Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation



Similar documents
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION RUBRIC

Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

DOMAIN 1 FOR SOCIAL WORKERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

A Framework for Professional Practice

SASED CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE POST OBSERVATION FEEDBACK FORM DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION. Conference Date

Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Language Pathologist

Special Education Teacher

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION REPORT. Levels of Performance

Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal School Counselor Evaluation Appendix C

Colchester School District Teacher Evaluation Model. Framework for Teaching: Components of Professional Practice

AR TESS SCHOOL COUNSELOR RUBRIC

DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL COUNSELORS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Domain 1 for School Counselors: Planning and Preparation L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

DANIELSON FRAMEWORK SCHOOL COUNSELORS

DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation for School Counselors

Kankakee School District No. 111 School Social Worker Performance Evaluation

Professional Development Electronic Plan for Teachers

SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

School Nurse Evaluation Rubric

School Psychologist Rubric Domain 1: Planning and Preparation LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE 1 UNSATISFACTORY 2 BASIC 3 PROFICIENT 4 DISTINGUISHED

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

Kankakee School District No. 111 School Psychologist Performance Evaluation

RUBRIC FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Lincoln Park Public Schools Occupational Therapist Evaluation

DOMAIN 1: School Nurses: Planning and Preparation

Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker

Speech Language Pathologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance

APPR. Supplement B2. Specialized Services (School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers) August 30, 2012

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Counselor Summative Assessment: Evaluation Process

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric

FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT VERSION 1.0. School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric

Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation

VOLUSIA FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING School Counselor

MODIFIED DANIELSON INSTRUCTIONAL FRAMEWORK: SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS

The Danielson Group Behavior Specialists

Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation

Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker

School Psychologist Evaluation

DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

How To Be A School Social Worker

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to. Speech & Language Pathologist (SLP) Teachers

DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review

PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach.

DOMAIN 1: School Psychologists: Planning and Preparation

Westwood Public Schools. Teacher Evaluation Development Team. Guidance Counselor Self Reflection Rubrics

DOMAIN 1 FOR STUDENT RESOURCE TEAM LEADERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE

DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators. DPAS II Guide Revised for Specialists

Enhancing Professional Practice: Overview of the Framework for Teaching. 1 of 25

RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Nurses

Planning & Preparation 2 Minimally Effective

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Marion County Instruction Evaluation System

School Psychologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators

MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS

The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists

Pilot School Counselor Evaluation

Performance Appraisal- Certified Staff

Psychologist uses a limited number of psychological instruments with little or no flexibility to evaluate students.

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

ARCHDIOCESE OF LOUISVILLE PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS

FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Library Media Specialist Rubric

Association of Indiana School Library Educators School Librarian Evaluation Rubric

North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS

DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS

IEP Coordinator Evaluation Rubric

Evaluation of School Psychologists

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to. Career and Technical Education Teachers

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

Summary of the Domains

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.

M.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011

How To Be A Successful School Nurse

SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics

Transcription:

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation Appendix A NAME: DATE: Certificated Employees new to the profession are responsible for ten components in the four domains. Second year Certificated Employees are responsible for six additional components. Third year certificated and renewable contract status employees are responsible for all components in the four domains. New certificated employees to the Mountain Home School District, with a minimum of three years experience are responsible for all components in the four domains. Key: U = Unsatisfactory B = Basic P = Proficient D = Distinguished Domain 1: Planning and Preparation U B P D 1a Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b Knowledge of Students 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d Knowledge of Resources 1e Designing Coherent Instruction 1f Designing Student Assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment 2a Creating an Environment of Respect & Rapport 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c Managing Classroom Procedures 2d Managing Student Behavior 2e Organizing Physical Space Domain 3: Instruction 3a Communicating with Students 3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c Engaging Students in Learning 3d Using Assessment in Instruction 3e Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities 4a Reflecting on Teaching 4b Maintaining Accurate Records 4c Communicating with Families 4d Participating in a Professional Community 4e Growing and Developing Professionally 4f Showing Professionalism Domain 1: Domain 2: Domain 3: Domain 4: Procedures Eval of Certified Teacher Plan 438i Mountain Home School District No. 193

Administrator Comments (unsatisfactory rating must include written documentation): Parental Input Used Provide a description of measurable student achievement data used (50% of the evaluation): PROFICIENT UNSATISFACTORY Evaluator s Recommendation: Continued Employment Placed on Improvement Plan Recommendation of Probation Recommendation for Non-renewal/ Non employment Administrator s Signature Date Employee s Signature Date Procedures Eval of Certified Teacher Plan 438j Mountain Home School District No. 193

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation Rubric Domain 1 1a Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Teacher displays little or no understanding of knowledge and content pedagogy. Teacher displays no understanding of how to correct content errors made by themselves and students. Teacher s content and pedagogical knowledge represents basic understanding, but does not extend to connections with other disciplines or to possible student misconceptions. Teacher s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional goals at least nominally, with clear assessment criteria and standards that have been communicated to students. Teacher uses the assessment to plan for groups of students or individuals. Teacher s knowledge of the content and pedagogy is extensive, showing evidence of a continuing search for improved practice. Teacher actively builds on knowledge of misconceptions when describing instruction or seeking causes for student misunderstanding. 1b Knowledge of Students no knowledge of the developmental characteristics of the age group. partial knowledge of the developmental characteristics of the age group. thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skill, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for groups of students. thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skills, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for individual student learning 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes Teacher s goals are of no value or suitability for the students in the class, consisting of a combination of goals and activities, none of which permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher s goals are of moderate value or suitability for students in the class, consisting of a combination of goals and activities, some of which permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher s goals represent valuable learning and are suitable for most students in the class; they reflect opportunities for integration and permit viable methods of assessment. Teacher s goals reflect highlevel learning relating to curriculum frameworks and standards; they are adapted, where necessary, to the needs of individual students, and permit viable methods of assessment. 1d Knowledge of Resources Teacher displays little to no knowledge of school or district resources available either for teaching or for students who need them. Teacher displays limited knowledge of school or district resources available either for teaching or for students who need them. thorough knowledge of students backgrounds, skill, and interests, and uses this knowledge to plan for groups of students. Teacher seeks out resources for teaching in professional organizations and in the community, and is aware of resources available for students who need them, in the school, the district, and the larger community. 1e Designing Coherent Instruction None or very little of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning. Teacher s lesson or unit has no recognizable structure. Some of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning, while others do not. Teacher s lesson or unit has a recognizable structure. Most of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals and engage students in meaningful learning and the lesson or unit has a clearly defined structure. All of the elements of the instructional design support the stated instructional goals, engage students in meaningful learning, and show evidence of student input. Teacher s lesson or unit is highly coherent and has a clear structure 1f Designing Student Assessments Teacher s approach to assessing student learning contains no clear criteria or standards, and lacks congruence with the instructional goals. Teacher has no plans to use assessment results in designing future instruction Teacher s approach to assessing student learning contains minimal clear criteria or standards, and lacks congruence with the instructional goals. Teacher has few plans to use assessment results in designing future instruction. Teacher s plan for student assessment is aligned with the instructional goals at least nominally, with clear assessment criteria and standards that have been communicated to students. Teacher uses the assessment to plan for groups of students or individuals. Teacher s plan for student assessment is fully aligned with the instructional goals, containing clear assessment criteria and standards that are not only understood by students but also show evidence of student participation in their development. Teacher s students monitor their own progress in achieving the goals. Procedures Eval of Certified Teacher Plan 438k Mountain Home School District No. 193

Domain 2 2a Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Classroom interactions are often inappropriate. Classroom interactions are generally appropriate and free from conflict but may be characterized by occasional displays of insensitivity. Classroom interactions reflect general warmth and caring, and are respectful of the cultural and developmental differences among groups of students. Classroom interactions are highly respectful, reflecting genuine warmth and caring toward individuals. Students themselves ensure maintenance of high level of civility among member of the class. 2b Establishing a Culture for Learning The classroom environment does not reflect a culture for leaning, with none or inconsistent expectations for student achievement, no teacher commitment to the subject, and no student pride in work. Both teacher and students are performing at the below minimal level. The classroom environment reflects only a minimal culture for leaning, with only modest or inconsistent expectations for student achievement, little teacher commitment to the subject, and little student pride in work. Both teacher and students are performing at the minimal level to get by. The classroom environment represents a genuine culture for learning, with a commitment to the subject on the part of teacher and students, high expectations for student achievement, and student pride in work. Students assume much of the responsibility for establishing a culture for learning in the classroom by taking pride in their work, initiating improvements to their products, and holding the work to the highest standard. Teacher demonstrates a passionate commitment to the subject. 2c Managing Classroom Procedures No classroom procedures have been established. Classroom routines and procedures have been established but function unevenly or inconsistently, with some loss of instruction time. Classroom routines and procedures have been established and function smoothly for the most part and with little loss of instruction time. Classroom routines and procedures are seamless in their operation, and students assume considerable responsibility for their smooth functioning. 2d Managing Student Behavior Teacher makes little or no effort to establish standards of conduct for students, monitor student behavior, and respond to student misbehavior. Teacher makes an effort to establish standards of conduct for students, monitor student behavior, and respond to student misbehavior, but these efforts are not always successful Teacher is aware of student behavior, has established clear standards of conduct, and responds to student misbehavior in ways that are appropriate and respectful of the students. Student behavior is entirely appropriate, with evidence of student participation in setting expectations and monitoring behavior. Teacher s monitoring of student behavior is subtle and preventive, and teacher s response to student misbehavior is sensitive to individual student needs. 2e Organizing Physical Space Teacher s classroom is unsafe and cluttered. Teacher s classroom is safe, and essential learning is accessible to all students, but the furniture arrangement only partially supports the learning activities. Teacher s classroom is safe, and learning is accessible to all students; teacher uses physical resources well and ensures that the arrangement of furniture supports the learning activities. Teacher s classroom is safe, and students contribute to ensuring that the physical environment supports the learning of all students. Domain 3 3a Communicating with Students Teacher communication often contains errors and is often inappropriate. Teacher s oral and written communication contains no errors, but may not be completely appropriate or may require further explanations to avoid confusion. Teacher communicates clearly and accurately to students, both orally and in writing. Teacher s oral and written communication is clear and expressive, anticipating possible student misconceptions. Procedures Eval of Certified Teacher Plan 438l Mountain Home School District No. 193

3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Teacher uses little to no questioning and discussion techniques. Teacher s use of questioning and discussion techniques is uneven, with some high-level questions, attempts at true discussion, and moderate student participation. Teacher seeks ways to ensure successful learning for all students, making adjustments as needed to instruction plans and responding to student interests and questions. Students formulate many of the high-level questions and assume responsibility for the participation of all students in the discussion. 3c Engaging Students in Learning Students are not engaged, resulting from activities or material of inadequate quality, inadequate representations of content, or no structure or pacing. Students are intellectually engaged only partially, resulting from activities or material of uneven quality, inconsistent representations of content, or uneven structure or pacing. Students are highly engaged throughout the lesson and make material contributions to the representation of content, the activities, and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure. Students are highly engaged throughout the lesson and make material contributions to the representation of content, the activities, and the materials. The structure and pacing of the lesson allow for student reflection and closure. 3d Using Assessment in Instruction Little to no teacher feedback to students is evident. Teacher s feedback to students is uneven, and its timeliness is inconsistent. Teacher s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality. Teacher s feedback to students is timely and of consistently high quality, and students make use of the feedback in their learning. 3e Flexibility and Responsiveness minimal flexibility and responsiveness to students needs during a lesson. moderate flexibility and responsiveness to students needs and interests during a lesson, and seeks to ensure the success of all students. Teacher s use of questioning and discussion techniques reflects high-level questions, true discussion, and full participation by all students. Teacher is highly responsive to students interests and questions, making major lesson adjustments if necessary, and persists in ensuring the success of all students. Domain 4 4a Reflecting on Teaching Little to no evidence of teacher reflection is evident. Teacher s reflection on the lesson is generally accurate, and teacher makes global suggestions as to how it might be improved. Teacher reflects accurately on the lesson, citing general characteristics and makes some specific suggestions about how it might be improved. Teacher s reflection on the lesson is highly accurate and perceptive, citing specific examples. Teacher draws on an extensive repertoire to suggest alternative strategies. 4b Maintaining Accurate Records maintaining accurate record is ineffective. maintaining accurate records is rudimentary and only partially effective. maintaining accurate records is efficient and effective. maintaining accurate records is efficient and effective, and students contribute to its maintenance. 4c Communicating with Families Teacher fails to consistently communicate with families and does not make an effort to engage families in the instructional program. Teacher complies with school procedure for communicating with families and makes an effort to engage families in the instructional program. Teacher communicates frequently with families and successfully engages them in the instruction programs. Teacher communicates frequently and sensitively with families and successfully engages them in the instructional program; students participate in communicating with families. 4d Participating in a Professional Community Teacher is not contributing to the school and district when specifically requested. Teacher s relationships with colleagues are strained, and teacher does not participate in school and district events and projects when specifically requested. Teacher s relationships with colleagues are cordial, and teacher participates in school and district events and projects when specifically requested. Teacher participates actively in school and district projects, and maintains positive relationships with colleagues. Teacher makes a substantial contribution to school and district events and projects, assuming leadership with colleagues. Procedures Eval of Certified Teacher Plan 438m Mountain Home School District No. 193

4e Growing and Developing Professionally Teacher does not participate in professional development. Teacher s participation in professional development activities is limited to those that are convenient. Teacher participates actively in professional development activities and contributes to the profession. Teacher makes a substantial contribution to the profession through such activities as action research and mentoring new teachers, and actively pursues professional development. 4f Showing Professionalism Teacher makes little to no attempt to ensure that students are well served by the school. Teacher s attempts to serve students based on the best information are genuine but inconsistent. Teacher makes genuine and successful efforts to ensure that all students are well served by the school. Teacher assumes a leadership position in ensuring that school practices and procedure ensure that all students, particularly those traditionally underserved, are honored in the school. ADOPTED: April 20, 2010 Reviewed: September 20, 2011 Revised: August 20, 2012 Revised: October 6, 2014 Procedures Eval of Certified Teacher Plan 438n Mountain Home School District No. 193