Mr. Javier Guzmán Calafell, Deputy Governor, Banco de México J.P. Morgan Investor Seminar Washington, DC, 15 April 2016
Outline 1 External Conditions 2 Macroeconomic Policy in Mexico 3 Evolution and Outlook for the Mexican Economy 4 Final Remarks 2
The global economic situation has remained difficult through 2016. It deteriorated significantly during the first weeks of the year as a result of a combination of factors: A slow pace of expansion in the AEs and a continued weakening of growth in EMEs. Persistent doubts about China s economic outlook and policy management. Further downward pressures on commodities prices. Renewed concerns about the divergence of monetary policy in the main AEs. Severe difficulties in some of the main global commercial banks. Apprehension about the strength of economic fundamentals in a number of EMEs. Subsequently, there has been some improvement in sentiment as a result of a moderate recovery in oil prices, and signals that monetary policy in some of the main AEs would adhere to a cautious approach. Nonetheless, the outlook remains complicated and subject to a high degree of uncertainty. 3
The policy response in some AEs to weak economic activity and very low inflation has included negative interest rates. The evidence suggests that these actions have contributed to ease monetary and financial conditions through several transmission channels. However, the experience with negative policy rates is modest and there appear to be limits to the extent to which rates can go negative and to the period during which they can remain in place, mainly due to their potential unintended consequences: A sharp increase in the use of cash in the economy. An adverse impact on the profitability of commercial banks. Financial stability risks. A weakening of institutions with long duration liabilities. Negative implications for savers. Therefore, the ultimate outcome of setting reference rates below the zero lower bound is surrounded by uncertainty. 4
Outline 1 External Conditions 2 Macroeconomic Policy in Mexico 3 Evolution and Outlook for the Mexican Economy 4 Final Remarks 5
Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 Jan-16 Apr-16 There have been two broad stages of monetary policy in Mexico since 2013. The first one, through mid-2014, is characterized by a downward path of the reference rate to a historically low level at 3.0 percent, with the second showing high volatility in international financial markets and pressures on the exchange rate, ultimately leading to increases in the reference rate. March 2013: 50 bps cut in response to structural changes in the process of price determination of the economy. Mexico: Target for the Overnight Interbank Interest Rate Annual % September 2013 through June 2014: 100 bps decline as part of an effort to stimulate the economy. September 2014 through December 2015: Stable at historical lows, as both a negative output gap and progress on the inflation front persisted, in the context of mounting pressures on the MXN. February 2016: 50 bps increase as part of a coordinated policy response to deteriorating conditions. December 2015: 25 bps hike following lift-off from the Federal Reserve. 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 April 1/ 2.5 1/ Data through 14 April 2016. Source: Banco de México. 6
In December 2015, the target for the overnight interbank interest rate in Mexico was increased by 25 basis points. Notwithstanding the presence of a low inflation rate, a negative output gap, and stable long-term inflation expectations, the monetary policy stance was modified in light of: The hike in US interest rates. The consequent risks for the exchange rate and inflation from potential disorderly adjustments of capital flows, in an environment of nervousness in international financial markets, the high integration of the Mexican economy with that of the US, and a very open capital account. 7
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 In early 2016, conditions deteriorated further. In particular, volatility in the international financial markets increased and further drops in oil prices affected the economy through several channels: a. The terms of trade and the trade balance. Mexico: Oil Terms of Trade Index Feb-2014 = 100, 3-month moving average Mexico: Trade Balance % of GDP 3.0 120 2.0 2.0 100 1.0 0.0 80-1.0 February 60 40 Total Oil Non-Oil -0.9-2.0-3.0-4.0 Source: Banco de México with data from SAT, Secretaría de Economía, Banco de México and INEGI. Source: SAT, Secretaria de Economía, Banco de México and INEGI. 8
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 b. Public finances. 12 10 Mexico: Oil Revenues of the Public Sector % of GDP and US dollars per barrel <- Pemex <- Federal Government Mexican Crude Oil Basket Price -> 120 100 8 80 6 60 4 40 2 20 0 0 Source: SHCP and Pemex. 9
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 c. Pemex revenues. Own Revenues Pemex: Financial Results % of GDP Budgetary Expenditures Financial and Primary Balances 3.5 3.5 Financial Balance 2.0 3.0 3.0 Primary Balance 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.5-0.5 0.0 0.0-1.0 Source: SHCP and INEGI. 10
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 The real exchange rate depreciated significantly as a result of these shocks. Mexico: Real Exchange Rate Index, 1990 = 100 150 Depreciation 140 130 Bilateral (US) Multilateral (49 countries, trade-weighted) 120 110 100 90 80 January February 70 60 Source: Banco de México. 11
However, the large depreciation of the MXN went beyond the adjustment required as external conditions deteriorated. This is explained by the use of the peso as a hedging instrument against risks in other emerging market currencies, and of automated mechanisms for high-frequency trading purposes in order to generate, and take advantage of, volatility in the MXN market. In this context: The peso-usd rate reached a historical high. The effectiveness of the market intervention mechanisms in place since late 2014 was impaired. Exchange rate expectations deteriorated. 12
The coordinated macroeconomic policy response has been based on three complementary strategies: 1. An adjustment to the fiscal stance of the public sector in various fronts, including: A preventive cut in programmable expenditures of the federal government and PEMEX during 2016, with the required additional adjustment already programmed for 2017. In the case of Pemex, further to the expenditure cuts, the government has announced the implementation of a number of measures aimed at strengthening the company s financial position, including: (i) a capital injection (26.5 billion pesos), (ii) liquidity provision through the exchange of tradable government securities for most of a 2015 government promissory note for the payment of pensions (47 billion pesos); and (iii) a lower tax burden on oil exploration and extraction in 2016 (savings of 50 billion pesos). Taking into account the combined effect of these measures, as well as Banco de México s operational surplus in 2015, the PSBR and the public debt are expected to show during 2016 figures below those originally programmed (3.5 and 48.6 percent of GDP, respectively). 13
2. A 50 basis points increase in the target for the overnight interbank interest rate to 3.75 percent, given the increased risk of a surge of inflation expectations beyond levels consistent with the consolidation of the 3 percent target. Although this does not represent the beginning of a cycle of interest rate increases, the central bank will remain vigilant of the evolution of inflation and inflationary expectations and adjust the monetary policy stance if needed. 3. Termination of the daily US dollar auction mechanisms in the foreign exchange market. Discretionary interventions in the MXN market are not ruled out, should extraordinary conditions arise. 14
2-Jan-16 11-Jan-16 20-Jan-16 29-Jan-16 7-Feb-16 16-Feb-16 25-Feb-16 5-Mar-16 14-Mar-16 23-Mar-16 1-Apr-16 10-Apr-16 Some results are readily visible. The peso has appreciated with respect to the dollar and the currencies of other emerging market economies Nominal Exchange Rates of the MXN Index 16-Feb-2016 = 100 16-Feb-2016 104 102 Depreciation 100 98 96 94 Bilateral (USD) Multilateral (48 countries, trade-weighted) 92 90 Source: Banco de México and J.P. Morgan, with data through 14 April 2016. 15
the yield curve has flattened 14-Apr-2016 18-Feb-2016 16-Feb-2016 Yield Curve on Government Securities % 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 5 10 20 30 Day Months Years Source: Banco de México and Proveedor Integral de Precios (PiP). 3.0 16
and foreign investment in MXN-denominated government securities remains at high levels. Holdings of Government Securities by Non-Residents 1/ Billion pesos 2,400 2,000 Total 1/ Bonds CETES 1,600 1,200 800 400 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1/ Total includes CETES, Bonos, Udibonos, Bondes and Bondes D. 2/ Data through 5 April 2016. Source: Banco de México. April 2/ 17 0
Outline 1 External Conditions 2 Macroeconomic Policy in Mexico 3 Evolution and Outlook for the Mexican Economy 4 Final Remarks 18
The Mexican economy continues to show a moderate rate of growth. Mexico: Total Output Annual % change, s.a. 15 IGAE* GDP 10 5 0-5 January 4Q-2015-10 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 s.a. / Seasonally adjusted. */ Monthly GDP proxy. Source: INEGI. 19
Manufacturing exports remain weak, but the share of Mexican exports in the US market has increased. 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Manufacturing Exports Index 2008=100, s. a. Total US Other 170 160 150 12.46 Mexico s Share in US Non-Oil Imports %, s.a. 12.68 13.05 13.34 13.82 140 130 120 110 100 90 February 80 70 J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F 2013 2014 2015 2016 s. a./ Seasonally adjusted. Source: Banco de México with data from SAT, SE, Banco de México and INEGI. s.a. / Seasonally adjusted. Source: Banco de México with data from the US Department of Commerce. 20
2013 2014 2015 2013 2014 2015 2016 Economic activity continues to be supported by private consumption, in turn stimulated by the evolution of the wage mass, remittances and bank credit. The recovery of investment has lagged, but an increase in domestic financing to the private sector is underway. 115 Private Consumption Determinants Index 2013-I = 100, s.a. 170 Domestic Financing to the Private Non-Financial Sector Annual % change of nominal balances 25 112 <- Formal employment 1/ 156 109 <- Real wage mass 2/ Remittances 3/ -> 142 Household Consumption Firms 20 106 128 103 114 15 100 100 97 94 March February 4Q-15 86 72 10 s.a. / Seasonally adjusted. 1/ Total employees registered at IMSS. 2/ Quarterly data. 3/ Denominated in MXN, atconstant prices. Source: Banco de México with data from Banco de México, IMSS and INEGI. Source: Banco de México. 4Q-15 5 21
Economic growth is expected to continue recovering, although downside risks persist and the output gap is projected to remain negative throughout 2016-2017. 7 6 Real GDP Growth Projections Annual % Output Gap Estimates and Projections % of potential, s.a. 2015 Q4 2016 Q4 2017 Q4 7 6 5 2016 2017 5 4 Banco de México 1/ 2.0 3.0 2.5 3.5 4 3 Banamex Survey 2/ 2.30 2.75 3 2 Banco de México Survey 3/ 2.40 2.96 2 1 1 0 0-1 -1-2 -2-3 -3-4 -4-5 -5-6 -6-7 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 Q2 Q4 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 s.a./ Seasonally adjusted. 1/ Quarterly Report, October-December 2015, released 3 March 2016. 2/ Median projection of the 6 April 2016 release. 3/ Median projection of the March 2016 survey, released 1 April 2016. Source: Banco de México, Banamex and INEGI -7 22
Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15 Sep-15 Nov-15 Jan-16 Mar-16 Despite the significant depreciation of the MXN, inflation has remained below the target Consumer Price Index and USD/MXN Exchange Rate Annual % change 30 Inflation Variability Interval 25 USD/MXN CPI 20 15 10 2.60 5 March 0 Source: Banco de México and INEGI 23
Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 Oct-15 Jan-16 without signs of contamination to non-tradable goods. Core Price Index: Durable Merchandise and Other Annual % change 4 3 Durable Merchandise Other Core 2 1 March 0 Source: Banco de México and INEGI. 24
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 In addition, inflation expectations for both 2016 and 2017 remain low, albeit slightly above the target. Importantly, medium- and long-term inflation expectations have recently shown further convergence to levels more consistent with the permanent target, but upside risks have not disappeared. Inflation Expectations Annual % 2016 2017 Banco de México 1/ Close to 3 percent Around 3 percent Banamex Survey 2/ 3.23 3.30 Banco de México Survey 3/ 3.31 3.38 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 Next 3-8 years (Banamex) Next 5-8 years (Banco de México) Next 4 years (Banco de México) Permanent target 3.2 March April 3.0 2.8 1/ Quarterly Report, October-December 2015, released 3 March 2016. 2/ Median expectation ofthe 6 April 2016 release. 3/ Median expectation of the March 2016 survey, released 1 April 2016. Source: Banco de México and Banamex. 25
Mexico s economy has maintained a steady, although moderate, pace of growth during 2012-15, even with a considerable weakening of activity abroad. Selected Economies: Real GDP Growth Annual % 1981-2008 2000-2008 2012-2015 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Mexico United States LAC exc. Mexico 0.0 LAC: Latin America and the Caribbean. Source: IMF (World Economic Outlook, April 2016). 26
Change in CPI Inflation Mexico is one of the few EMEs which over the period 2013-2015 recorded higher economic growth and a decline in inflation. Recent structural reform efforts should contribute to a better performance in the future. 8 Emerging Market Economies: Change in Real GDP Growth and CPI Inflation, 2013-2015 % points 6 Russia 4 Brazil Colombia 2 Peru Chile Turkey Hungary 0-2 South Africa Korea China Thailand Malaysia Mexico Poland -4 Indonesia India -6-7 -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 Change in Real GDP Growth Source: IMF and national statistics agencies and central banks. 27
Outline 1 External Conditions 2 Macroeconomic Policy in Mexico 3 Evolution and Outlook for the Mexican Economy 4 Final Remarks 28
Notwithstanding the difficult external conditions, the Mexican economy continues to show moderate rates of growth and low inflation. The policy efforts underway, coupled with the expected upturn in industrial output in the US and the ongoing impact of the efforts of structural reform, should allow a gradual strengthening of economic activity. With a negative output gap expected to persist, the main challenge for monetary policy will likely be to contain potential inflationary pressures deriving from the effect of external events on the exchange rate. Naturally, in an environment of apprehension in international financial markets, monetary policy will probably have little room for maneuver in the face of higher interest rates in the United States. Furthermore, with uncertain world economic conditions likely to continue, the monetary policy stance may need to be adjusted, should risks to inflation arise, irrespective of the timing of normalization of monetary policy in the United States. In any event, the Banco de México will continue to monitor closely all determinants of inflation to ensure its convergence to the 3 percent target. 29