UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE



Similar documents
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF COURT ORDER ENTERED IN FTC v. IRA SMOLEV, ET AL. FOR DEFENDANT BRUCE TURIANSKY ON DEFINITIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Case 3:16-cv Document 2-1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION TO AUTHORIZE DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) Magistrate Judge Sidney I.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

IN RE: SKECHERS TONING SHOE : CASE: 3:11-md TBR PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION : : MDL No.: 2308

This is a special proceeding commenced by the Attorney General of the State of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. WHEREAS: Plaintiff, the United States of America, has

CHAPTER 2-A. LOUISIANA DEFERRED PRESENTMENT AND SMALL LOAN ACT

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

CHAPTER FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION

Senate File Enrolled

Case 1:04-cv JD Document 110 Filed 03/22/2006 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:12-cv RLY-MJD Document 19 Filed 03/04/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 82 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS

SAMPLE ESCROW AGREEMENT APPLICATION SOFTWARE SOURCES CODE

STATE BOARD OF COLLECTION AGENCIES

Case 2:10-cv IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

8:13-cv GRA Date Filed 02/07/13 Entry Number 12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON DIVISION

Michie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.

Park Hill School District reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive informalities or irregularities in any proposal.

Sec. 17. EFFECTIVE UPON ENACTMENT. This Act, being deemed of immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment. CHAPTER 1146

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

BY-LAWS OF THE EASTERN GAS COMPRESSION ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I PURPOSES.. 2 ARTICLE II OFFICES... 2 ARTICLE III MEMBERSHIP... 2

PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. Incorporated Under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware BYLAWS AS OF 10/23/2013 * * * * *

Insurance Producer Agreement

LR Case management pilot program for criminal cases. A. Scope; application. This is a special pilot rule governing time limits for criminal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Nebraska Loan Broker Act Chapter 45, Article 1, Section f to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Case 2:13-cv DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

the Northern District of lllinois, the present address of which is http ://www. ilnd.uscourts. gov.

Interlocal Cooperation Contract

AMENDED BY-LAWS OF STEELCASE INC. Amended as of: April 17, 2014

Case 1:09-md LAK-GWG Document 1188 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case3:12-cv CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

Case 2:10-md CJB-SS Document Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 27

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se

Case 5:09-cv JAR Document 391 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

You have retained us and we hereby agree to serve as your advertising agency in accordance with and subject to the following terms and conditions:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Case No

WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PRO SE CUSTODY PACKET

REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT to be executed in duplicate

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY RETIREE HEALTH CARE TRUST (the TRUST) AND [INVESTMENT MANAGER]

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

Case 1:15-cv WSD Document 3 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT' COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Case No. I: IS ~c.

GUARDIANSHIP LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA for General Guardians - Guardians of the Person-Guardians of the Estate

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Columbia, South Carolina November 12, 2015

BYLAWS TEXAS AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION, INC. ARTICLE I OFFICES. Section 1.02 The corporation may change its registered office or change its

Sterling Health Services, Inc. Administrative Services Agreement

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS CLASS ACTION THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS; PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. against LEAD CONCEPTS, INC. and CHRISTOPHER WEIR (collectively referred to as

PROCEDURES FOR THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE MEDIATION PROGRAM FOR INSURANCE CLAIMS FOLLOWING STORM SANDY

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1

Limited Agency/Company Agreement

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

Regular Session, ACT No To amend and reenact R.S. 9:3573.1, (A), (1), (8), (9) and (10), ,

The Mortgage Brokerages and Mortgage Administrators Act

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

MICHAEL T. CHULAK & ASSOCIATES

Chapter 213. Enforcement of Texas Unemployment Compensation Act... 2 Subchapter A. General Enforcement Provisions... 2 Sec

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

NEW YORK FALSE CLAIMS ACT

Investment Advisor Representative Agreement

EX ahcaagreement.htm AHCA AGREEMENT Back to Form 8-K Exhibit 10.1

TITLE 81. BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CHAPTER 22. MISSISSIPPI DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT [REPEALED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013]

BYLAWS CENTRAL FLORIDA ESTATE PLANNING COUNCIL, INC. Table of Contents

CONSENT ORDER (As to Respondents North America Marketing, LLC and TM Multimedia Marketing, LLC)

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

BYLAWS THE NAEPC EDUCATION FOUNDATION. (A Delaware Nonprofit Corporation) ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS

BY-LAWS OF MISSOURI ONE CALL SYSTEM, INC.

Articles of Association. SQS Software Quality Systems AG

TEXAS NOT FOR PROFIT ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF CIFC CORP. (as in effect on July 19, 2011)

NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code through *

corporation with its principal place of business in the City of

BY-LAWS OF ECOLAB INC. (A Delaware corporation) AS AMENDED THROUGH OCTOBER 29, 2015 ARTICLE I OFFICES

Restrictions on Buying and Selling Stock and Securities (Insider Trading Policy)

Charles Carroll Financial Partners, LLC INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTRACT

United States District Court Southern District of Florida. Case No. -Civ- -

Transcription:

THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY 1 1 1 1, Plaintiff, WADE COOK FINANCIAL CORP., and WADE COOK SEMINARS, INC., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Defendants. Case No. C00-Z CONTEMPT ORDER AGAINST WADE COOK FINANCIAL CORP., STOCK MARKET INSTITUTE OF LEARNING, and WADE BRUCE COOK (Proposed) Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("Commission or FTC"), having applied for an Order to Show Cause Why defendants Wade Cook Financial Corp. ( WCFC ), Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc. (the successor to Wade Cook Seminars, Inc.) ( SMIL ), and Wade Bruce Cook should not be found in contempt of the Consent Decree issued by this Court on October 1, 00 ( Order ), and this Court having considered the arguments made and the pleadings, declarations, exhibits, and memoranda filed by the parties, now makes the following findings and enters the following Contempt Order: DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Contempt Order, unless otherwise indicated, the following definitions shall apply: A. Defendants means Wade Cook Financial Corp., Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc., Wade Bruce Cook, and their subsidiaries, successors and assigns. B. "Clearly and prominently" means as follows: CONTEMPT ORDER - Page 1 () 0-0

1 1 1 1 1. In an advertisement communicated through an electronic medium (such as television, video, radio, and interactive media such as the Internet and online services), the disclosure shall be presented simultaneously in both the audio and video portions of the advertisement. Provided, however, that in any advertisement presented solely through video or audio means, the disclosure may be made through the same means in which the ad is presented. The audio disclosure shall be delivered in a volume and cadence sufficient for an ordinary consumer to hear and comprehend it. The video disclosure shall be of a size and shade, and shall appear on the screen a sufficient length of time for an ordinary consumer to read and comprehend it. In interactive media the disclosure shall also be unavoidable and shall be presented before the consumer incurs any financial obligation.. In a print advertisement, promotional material, or instructional manual, the disclosure shall be in a type size and location sufficiently noticeable for an ordinary consumer to read and comprehend it, in print that contrasts with the background against which it appears. In multi page documents, the disclosure shall appear on the cover or first page.. In a promotional seminar the disclosure shall be provided to each seminar attendee in written form, in a single page document containing no other information, in a type size sufficiently noticeable for an ordinary consumer to read and comprehend it, in print that contrasts with the background against which it appears. C. Stock means common stocks, bonds, and options or other derivative interests in common stocks or bonds. D. Disclosure period shall mean the period of four calendar quarters that ends not more than days prior to the date of the representation that triggers the disclosure. E. Rate of Return means the amount of gain or loss in the stock brokerage accounts of the corporate defendants for the applicable disclosure period expressed as a percentage of the amount invested. The Rate of Return shall be calculated in the manner set forth in the Order. FINDINGS 1. Defendants have violated Paragraph I.A of the Order by failing to clearly and prominently CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0

1 1 1 disclose WCFC s Rate of Return achieved during the relevant disclosure period as required by the Order, at Financial Clinics, on the WCFC web site, and in other promotional materials.. Defendants have violated Paragraph I.E of the Order by failing, in connection with the promotion, offering for sale, or sale of any investment seminar or program, to possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiates representations made at Financial Clinics.. Defendants have violated Paragraph II.B of the Order by mailing the Notice and Proof of Claim for the Redress Program to consumers in envelopes carrying the return address for Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc., instead of the return address for the FTC Redress Program.. Defendants have violated Paragraphs II. C and D of the Order by failing to process, evaluate, and pay refunds in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Order.. Wade Bruce Cook has violated Paragraph II.H of the Order by failing to pay past due refund payments owed by WCFC.. Defendants are in civil contempt of the Order and coercive and compensatory sanctions and other equitable relief are appropriate. 1 ORDER I. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants shall obtain from each consumer who pays to attend any stock market investment seminar a signed and dated disclosure form clearly and prominently containing the current Rate of Return prior to accepting payment for the seminar. A copy of the signed disclosure shall be provided to the consumer. If a signed disclosure is not obtained by WCFC and a copy provided to the consumer prior to WCFC accepting payment from the consumer for any stock market investment seminar, or if the disclosure form does not contain the correct Rate of Return, the contract for the stock market investment seminar shall be rescinded and a refund given at the request of the consumer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: II. A. The redress provisions of Paragraph II of the Order shall be extended, in the manner described below, to consumers who paid to attend the Wall Street Workshop or any other stock market CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0

1 1 1 1 investment seminar offered by defendants, between October 1, 00, and the date of entry of this Contempt Order, and who otherwise meet the eligibility and qualifying criteria of the Order, except that a subsequent purchase of the IQ Pager Package (the IQ Pager bundled with other products including seminars), a Wall Street Workshop Retake, or any seminar the fee for which is $0 or less, shall not make the consumer ineligible to participate in the Redress Program under this Contempt Order; B. Eligible consumers under this Contempt Order shall be sent the Notice and Proof of Claim appended as Attachments A and B, in envelopes bearing the FTC Redress Program return address established by the Redress Administrator or the return address for the FTC s Northwest Regional Office, as soon as possible but in no event later than sixty (0) days after entry of this Contempt Order; C. Consumer claims under this Contempt Order shall be evaluated in accordance Paragraphs II.C and II.D of the Order, except that Attachments C, D, and E to this Contempt Order, filed herewith under seal, shall be used instead of Attachments C, D, and E to the Order, which are also filed under seal. D. The amount to be refunded to consumers qualifying for a refund under this Contempt Order shall be the entire contract amount less any gain realized during the twelve month period, or lesser period if less than twelve months have elapsed, following attendance at the stock market investment seminar; E. To establish their qualification for a refund under this Contempt Order consumers must submit their monthly brokerage statements or other complete brokerage records that establish their gains and losses from trading stocks for the entire twelve-month or shorter relevant period following attendance at the stock market investment seminar, or the Schedule Ds from their tax returns for the tax years covering the entire twelve-month or shorter relevant period for themselves and any entity they used for trading stocks, excluding trading accounts managed by someone other than the claimant, such as mutual funds or managed IRA accounts. No other documentation shall be required; F. The trades to be considered when determining gains and losses for the purposes of establishing qualification for a refund to post-order claimants shall be only those trades completely transacted during the twelve months, or lesser period if less than twelve months have elapsed, following attendance at the stock market investment seminar, and shall not include unrealized gains, carry over gains from periods prior to attending the stock market investment seminar, or gains from stocks purchased prior to attending the stock market investment seminar, unless the sale of said stock results from an options transaction; CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0

1 1 1 1 G. Cook and WCFC shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment of refunds to consumers under this Contempt Order. III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consumers who participated in the FTC Redress Program under the Order, and whose claims have been denied for no other reason than that they returned the required documentation untimely, shall be reinstated in the redress program and their claims processed according to the criteria set forth in the Order. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consumers who participated in the FTC Redress Program under the Order and whose claims have been denied for failure to return additional information requested by WCFC, where the consumers have already provided either twelve months trading records, or tax records for the relevant twelve month period, shall be reinstated in the redress program and their claims processed according to the criteria set forth in the Order. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consumers who participated in the FTC Redress Program under the Order and who did not attend the Wall Street Workshop they paid to attend, and whose claim was denied because they failed to return information requested by WCFC (other than Attachments D and E), shall be reinstated in the redress program and their claims processed in accordance with Attachments C, D, and E to the Order. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that consumers who participated in the FTC Redress Program under the Order and who did not trade during the twelve months after attending the Wall Street Workshop they paid to attend, and whose claim was denied because they failed to return information requested by WCFC (other than Attachments D and E), shall be reinstated in the redress program and their claims processed in accordance with Attachments C, D, and E to the Contempt Order. VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rigby & Associates, is appointed Redress Administrator to administer the FTC Redress Program, with full authority and control over the Redress Program. The Redress CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0

1 1 1 1 Administrator shall be the agent of this Court in acting as redress administrator under this Contempt Order. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (0) days of entry of this Contempt Order defendants shall deposit into an escrow account designated by the Redress Administrator, the sum of five million dollars ($,000,000). In the event that the balance of funds in the escrow account drops to five hundred thousand ($00,000), the Redress Administrator may apply to the Court for a Supplemental Order requiring defendants to deposit additional funds into the account. IX. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if within thirty (0) days from the date of entry of this Contempt Order defendants have not deposited $ million into the escrow account designated by the Redress Administrator, then the FTC may apply to the Court for additional relief, including appointment of a receiver for WCFC and SMIL. X. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Redress Administrator shall re-mail the Notice and Proof of Claim under the Order to each claimant who did not return a Proof of Claim after the initial mailing, and whose claim form was not returned by the Post Office as undeliverable. The envelope in which the Notice and Proof of Claim is mailed shall bear the FTC Redress Program return address established by the Redress Administrator. XI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants and their employees shall fully cooperate with and assist the Redress Administrator in fulfilling its duties and obligations. Such cooperation and assistance shall include, but not be limited to, providing any information and documents to the Redress Administrator that the Redress Administrator deems necessary to exercising its authority and discharging its responsibilities. XII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants are hereby restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly destroying, secreting, defacing, transferring, or otherwise altering or disposing of any documents of the defendants relevant to the redress program, including, but not limited to, books, records, accounts, writings, graphs, charts, audio and video recordings, computer records, and other data compilations, CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0

1 1 1 1 electronically-stored records, or any other papers of any kind or nature. XIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Redress Administrator and all personnel retained by the Redress Administrator, are entitled to reasonable compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the performance of duties pursuant to this Contempt Order, subject to the approval of the Court. Such compensation and reimbursement shall be paid from the redress funds deposited by defendants into the escrow account designated by the Redress Administrator. The Redress Administrator shall apply to the Court for approval of such compensation and reimbursement on a bi-monthly basis, filing with the Court and serving on the parties statements, which shall include a description of all services provided and expenses incurred, with the first such statement filed no more than 0 days after the date of this Contempt Order. XIV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Redress Administrator shall file with the Clerk of this Court a bond in the sum of $,000.00 with sureties to be approved by the Court, conditioned that the Redress Administrator will well and truly perform the duties of the office and abide by and perform all acts the Court directs. CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0

SO ORDERED, this day of, 0. THOMAS S. ZILLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Respectfully submitted by: Eleanor Durham Randall H. Brook Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 1 1 1 1 CONTEMPT ORDER - Page () 0-0