Lea Valley Growers Association - Newsletter May 2016 Issue No. 449



Similar documents
10.1 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS AND LANDSCAPING (FULL - MINOR)

Beattie v Secretary of State for Social Security,

The Green Belt A Guide for Householders

Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes

Planning, Local Government & Administrative Law Case Update. May by Mark C. Mohammed, Advocate

Pre-application advice from the Planning and Development Service at Torridge District Council.

1 Welcome. The exhibition comprises a series of boards which provide some background information to show you our initial ideas for the site.

Manchester City Council Planning and Highways Committee 2 June 2011

Mr and Mrs John Inkster & Mr and Mrs Michael Inkster v Crofters Commission

Analysis: Scotland & Reast v British Credit Trust Ltd

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and EDMUND BICAR. 2010: March 25; May 3.

The land is allocated within the Westbury on Trym Conservation Area and the land is protected by a blanket TPO 340.

WHY YOU SHOULDN T DISCLOSE ALL MEDICAL RECORDS IN PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION

The NSS - Rural Development and Rural Settlement

AUSTRALIA S THREE LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT

PLANNING SERVICES UNIT

Claverham Community College

Coventry Development Plan 2016 Appendix 89. Glossary of Key Terms

Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services

Conducting a Land Use Inventory

CHANGE OF USE FROM AGRICULTURE TO A USE FOR CARAVAN STORAGE COMPOUND AND OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA -T-UL-L-Y-

Stowmarket Area Action Plan (AAP) Examination

Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT Between :

JUDGMENT. From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. before. Lord Neuberger Lord Mance Lord Clarke Lord Sumption Lord Reed

GAMBLING LICENSING ABIGAIL HUDSON NOVEMBER 2015

PLANNING SUPPORT STATEMENT. 29 Fernshaw Road, London SW10 0TG MRS. GAIL TAYLOR & MRS. KAREN HOWES. Prepared For TR/6570

Practice and Procedure for Claimants and Defendants in Credit-Hire Cases. William Hibbert

Credit Hire Update: Stevens v Equity Syndicate Management Limited [2015]

UNFAIR DISMISSAL: WHEN WILL THE COURTS ALLOW EXTENDED TIME LIMITS?

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Reasons why it is expedient to issue an enforcement notice:

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SECURITY

The achievement of all indicators for policies in the whole plan collectively contribute to the delivery of Policy 1

Case Name: Hamilton (City) v. Veri. Between City of Hamilton, and Victor Veri. [2014] O.J. No Ontario Court of Justice Hamilton, Ontario

Rochdale Unitary Development Plan Review: : Inspector s Report

LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION

The Court of Protection Rules 2007

Information for Applicants

Landlord Insurance. Summary of cover

Reform to Lost Years Damages in Mesothelioma Claims

Pre Application Advice Charging Scheme and Post Application Service Introduction (1 st February 2014)

Development in the Green Belt

NSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET

NIHL and success fees Andrew Hogan Barrister at law 1

Landlord Insurance. Summary of cover. October _ACLD0520ZB_BRO_A5.indd 1 23/10/ :20

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

BASILDON BOROUGH COUNCIL

1.2 Analyse matters to be considered by the judge when awarding damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity

Legal Watch: Personal Injury

Presented by Jim Smith Operations Manager

The Court of Protection Transparency Pilot

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

Legal Watch: Personal Injury

LITTLEHAMPTON TOWN COUNCIL DEPUTY TOWN CLERK & RESPONSIBLE FINANCIAL OFFICER

How to claim BPS online in Check Change Complete Confirm

Settlement Hierarchy Methodology

Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Welcome Welcome to the public exhibition for development at Bowman Field. This exhibition provides an overview of the proposals for the site.

been asked to be a witness - what do I do?

INDIANA BOARD OF TAX REVIEW Small Claims Final Determination Findings and Conclusions

SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA (Magistrates Appeals: Criminal)

Monthly Newsletter - August 2015

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

Nowhere to run: insolvency is no protection from possession proceedings. SEPTEMBER 2011 Peter Marcus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 116/09 [2010] NZSC 109 MATTHEW JOHN BIRCHLER NEW ZEALAND POLICE

2015 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF KANSAS E REPORT #9. Paul Johnson March 6, 2015 POLICY BATTLES

Planning, Design & Access Statement

How To Write A Practice Direction

East Midlands Intermodal Park, South Derbyshire Proposals for a Strategic Rail Freight Interchange

DEPRECIATION AND TRADING STOCK CONFUSION UNCONFOUNDED. by Barrie Akin

Public Survey for Phase I

Public Trustee (Fees & Charges Notice) (No.1) Public Trustee Act 1978, section 17 PUBLIC TRUSTEE (FEES AND CHARGES NOTICE) (NO.

INSOLVENCY (BANKRUPTCY & LIQUIDATION) AND CHARGING ORDER POLICY

Florida Foundation Seed Producers, Inc.

TRAVEL / TRANSPORT & AIDS / EQUIPMENT. Countering a Schedule with such claims. Adam C Chippindall, Guildhall Chambers

NEGLIGENT SETTLEMENT ADVICE. Daniel Crowley and Leona Powell consider the Court s approach to negligent settlement advice.

Transcription:

In this Months e-newsletter @Leavalleygrower www.lvga.co.uk Lea Valley Growers Association - Newsletter May 2016 Issue No. 449 info@lvga.co.uk Victory for Valley Grown Nurseries in Planning Battle Association response to Government consultation Growers in the News Nursery for Rent - Roydon Free Red Tractor Audit Packs Free Job Advertising

Victory for Valley Grown Nurseries in Planning battle against the Lee Valley Park The Court of Appeal has given its long awaited judgment in the case of R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Epping Forest DC and Valley Grown Nurseries Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 404. The case involved a challenge to the grant of planning permission for a 92,000 square metre glasshouse extension on a site lying within both the Green Belt and the Lee Valley Regional Park, and also less than a mile from a Special Protection Area and Ramsar site. The appeal raised wide ranging issues concerning the interplay between the statutory presumption in favour of the development plan and the NPPF, the requirements of the Habitats Directive, and the meaning and effect of NPPF policy for the construction of agricultural buildings in the Green Belt. Peter Village QC and Ned Helme, acting for Valley Grown Nurseries, successfully defended the appeal on all grounds. The principal issue in the case concerned the consequences of a proposal being appropriate (or not inappropriate ) development in the Green Belt. The glasshouse was appropriate, since it was a building for agriculture under the first bullet of paragraph 89 of the NPPF. The LVRPA contended that an appropriate proposal caused no definitional harm but that it could cause actual harm to the openness of the Green Belt, or to the purposes of including land in it, and that any such actual harm should be given substantial weight under paragraph 88 of the NPPF. Giving the judgment of the Court, Lord Justice Lindblom rejected the LVRPA s argument, finding that it would mark an unheralded change from previous Green Belt policy under PPG2 and that it would negate the purpose of categorising agricultural buildings as appropriate. Lord Justice Lindblom agreed with Mr Justice Dove (who had heard the case at first instance) that appropriate means appropriate to the Green Belt such that an appropriate agricultural building is regarded by the NPPF as not inimical to openness or Green Belt purposes. That was the real significance of a development being appropriate in the Green Belt, and the reason why it does not have to be justified by very special circumstances. That was not to say that proposals for the erection of agricultural buildings in the Green Belt will escape other policies in the NPPF, and in the development plan, including policies directed to the visual effects of development and the protection of countryside or the character of the landscape. However, the Council s approach to such matters in this case was unimpeachable and the grant of permission was therefore lawful.

NFU & Lea Valley Growers Consultation Response: Rural Planning Review. The Association recently met with Housing and Planning officers from Epping Forest District Council to discuss Nursery Workers Accommodation. The importance of purpose built accommodation was highlighted in order to attract and retain horticultural workers at a time when labour is becoming increasingly difficult to find. The Association also fed back several issues to be included within the NFU response to the Rural Planning Review (Call For Evidence), published by the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and these have been included as follows. Within the Lea Valley, the current policies of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority and their remit interpretation regarding Horticultural businesses demonstrate a failure to recognise the economic importance and potential of the glasshouse industry within the park area, and this is stifling the sustainable development and competitiveness of the important glasshouse businesses in this region who grow up to three quarters of some of the UK s Salad crops. Although Epping Forest District Council have generally been supportive to Glasshouse expansion inside and outside of the Lee Valley Regional Park they remain opposed to the development of Agricultural tied purpose built workers accommodation, which, is becoming increasingly important for Horticultural businesses to attract permanent and seasonal workers. A copy of the full response can be seen at the following https://www.nfuonline.com/nfu-consultation-response-to-the-rural-planning-review-april-21-2016-final/

Growers in the News

Nursery for Rent Glasshouse Nursery to rent in Roydon, Essex. Five Acres of Glasshouses Thermal Screens Natural Gas Boiler Hoogendoorn Environmental Computer Available October 2016 Contact Andy on 07979 852 227 for further details

Free Audit Pack Available Contact Lee Stiles on 01992 625 076 for your copy Advertise Jobs Nationally for FREE We are pleased to announce that the NFU now has a new job vacancy offering online that is FREE for members. Advertise for free now by visiting the NFU Job Pages admin section using your standard NFU online login details. Further information on how to create a job posting is available in the NFU Online Members area or by contacting Call First on 0370 845 8458. https://jobs.nfuonline.com/

The NFU Mutual in Cheshunt has extended its telephone opening hours as follows:- Monday to Friday Saturday Bank Holidays 5 pm to 8 pm 9 am to 12:30 pm 9 am to 8 pm Policyholders and new customers wishing to transact Car, Commercial Vehicle, Home, Horse and Travel Insurance outside of our normal 9-5 office hours will be directed to the NFU Mutual Call Centre in Glasgow by ringing our usual office telephone number 01992 625 076. Visit our website at www.nfumutual.co.uk/cheshunt for further details.

Directory Insurance, Pensions, Investments, Health & Safety, Financial Services, Personal Accident L A Stiles, NFU Mutual 01992 625 076 www.nfumutual.co.uk/cheshunt Horticultural Supplies CMW Horticulture 01430 422222 enquiries@cmwhorticulture.co.uk Electricians B S Bruce & Son 01279 442233 sales@bsbruce.com K D Electrical - 01992 892 403 sales@kdelectrical.com Biomass Rob Jones, ARG Biomass - 07855 494467 or rob@argbiomass.co.uk If you would like to advertise within the newsletter contact Lee Stiles at Lee.stiles@LVGA.co.uk If you would like to receive this newsletter via email, add more recipients or unsubscribe please forward details to Lee.stiles@LVGA.co.uk