Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood



Similar documents
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

6.01 FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

5 Most Common Planning & Management Problems in Ontario County, Canada

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

Flood Protection Tips

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

2015 CRS Community Outreach. City of Folly Beach, South Carolina Flood Plain Management Offices PO Box 48 Folly Beach, SC ext 1838

Division of Water Frequently asked floodplain questions

APPENDIX B: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SURVEY RESULTS

Flood Damage Prevention in Delaware County, NY

STATE OF INDIANA AMENDMENT #4 TO ACTION PLAN FOR CDBG SUPPLEMENTAL DISASTER RECOVERY FUNDS (Method of Distribution Section Only)

London Borough of Merton Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

A Comprehensive Summary

Anchorage All-Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2004

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

2012 Program Report. Agricultural Group Drainage Program

County Watersheds. Total Project Cost - $11.1 M. Project Description. Funding Sources. Project Milestones. Service Impact

Tropical Storm Allison

Successfully Surviving the Flood. Date: October 31, 2001 Federal Triangle Stormwater Study Working Group Paul Tertell, PE

Bolton s Flood Risk Management Strategy

HAZARD VULNERABILITY & RISK ASSESSMENT

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

Table of Contents ESF

Chapter 10. The National Flood Insurance Program

Barre City City-wide Policy and Program Options

FEMA Flood Zone Designations

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SCREENING QUESTIONS

Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005

K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name

LOS ANGELES COUNTY S FLOODING HISTORY:

Disaster Debris Management Christopher M. Cignoli, P.E.

INFORMATION BULLETIN BUSINESS FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDE ACE GLOBAL RISK ENGINEERING. Flood risk assessment. Introduction

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

House Research Department General Fund Appropriations in Flood Relief Bills

Burnt River Black River and Gull River Flood Contingency Plan

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Flood After Fire Fact Sheet

Chapter 6: Mitigation Strategies

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

TOWN OF STRATFORD PURCHASING DEPARTMENT STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT. Subject: Disaster Recovery Grant Management and Administration Services

1. Review your insurance policies and coverage with your local agent.

Association of State Flood Managers Annual Conference Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Structural Damage Due to Floods

MassDEP Natural Disaster Guidance for Coastal and Inland Wetland Resource Area Impacts: Hurricane or Tropical Storm Sandy

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

Guidelines for. Permeable Pavement

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

Appendix B. Property Owner Questionnaire

TEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer

Welcome to the Inland Wetlands Commission Town of Barkhamsted, CT

Flooding and Flood Threats on Trenton Island

Flood Insurance Repetitive Loss Property

ADDENDUM TO THE 2014 WEST WINDSOR TOWN PLAN

A. Flood Management in Nevada

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Information For Residents In The High-Risk Flood Zone

DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Section 5 Floodplain Management Tools

Introduction to Storm Preparedness and Response and Minimizing Risk and Damage. The Not So. Beauty of Storms. Safety Cleanup Repair Overtime

Town of Warwick, Village of Florida, Village of Greenwood Lake and Village of Warwick MULTI JURISIDICTIONAL, MULTI HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN DRAFT

7) Coastal Storms: Multi-Hazard Analysis for New York City

STAFF REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL DOMESTIC FLOOD PROTECTION POLICY

Post-Flood Assessment

Focus Areas: Program/Project Management, Repetitive Loss Properties, Flood Map Modernization, Standard Business Processes.

Tokyo, Japan. William L. Carwile, III FEMA Associate Administrator Response and Recovery. Most catastrophic natural disaster in United States in the

A Guide to the Role of Community Flood Wardens

Pennsylvania Flood Safety Awareness Week March 6-10th, 2015

PLANNING FOR THE TEMPORARY DISPOSAL OF DISASTER DEBRIS WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO PUT IT?

Insurance Questions: Clothes washers and dryers, food freezers and the food in them are covered if there is contents coverage.

Town of Union Community Rating System News

Chapter 4 Natural Hazards and Emergency Management

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

The Hydrologic Cycle. precipitation evaporation condensation transpiration infiltration surface runoff transport groundwater water table.

London Borough of Croydon Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery NACo Justice & Public Safety Symposium January 2014

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Town of Canmore Flood Recovery Action Plan January canmore stands strong canmore stands strong

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

And Flood Resilient Design in Austin, Texas

1. Why is Lee County getting new flood hazard maps? 3. What are the benefits of the new flood hazard maps?

Town of Amherst Flood Plan Annex

Section 6: Mitigation Strategy

Probability Magnitude/Severity Warning Time Duration CPRI Flood

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

A Guide to New National Flood Maps & New National Flood Insurance Program Premiums and Requirements

Flood Mitigation Workgroup Final Findings and Recommendations Part 1 Immediate Needs and Short-Term Plan. June 4, 2015

Lesson 5. After a Disaster: Recovery and Hazard Mitigation Programs. Disaster Assistance

Objective 4: Enhanced community education, flood awareness and preparedness

Transcription:

Suffield Suffield is a rural community located along the Massachusetts border. It encompasses about 42.2 square miles and has a population of about 15,735. Suffield s terrain rises from an elevation of 22 feet above sea level at the Connecticut River to its highest point of 691 feet above sea level on West Suffield Mountain. Suffield s land area contributes to three watersheds: the Farmington River Watershed to the west, the Stony Brook Watershed centrally and the main stem of the Connecticut River Watershed to the east. The Connecticut River runs the length of the eastern boundary of Town. Other major watercourses include Clay, Deep, Fourmile, Mountain Brook, Muddy, Philo, Rawlins and Stony Brooks. State routes 75, 168, 187 and 190 provide major transportation routes through town. Agriculture, manufacture of ice cream, industrial gases, small tools, and warehousing are the principal industries. Part of Bradley International Airport and the North Central Connecticut Correctional facility are also located in Suffield. Challenges Suffield has approximately 5,469 housing units of which 27 units are located in flood hazard zones. There are also another 31 structures located in flood hazard zones. There are a few areas throughout the town prone to street flooding during heavy storm events. Ensuring proper maintenance of drainage structures is a challenge due to decreased staffing and budget levels. Maintaining accessibility throughout Town during storms can be a challenge given the streams, steep slopes, and narrow roads in some areas. Also, certain areas in the more rural West Suffield are more vulnerable to power outages because of the large number of trees near the roads. Suffield has worked to reduce its vulnerability to natural hazards. There has not been any construction or demolition since 2008 in floodplain or other vulnerable areas of Suffield. In 2008, the Town added Section V.K. Flood Damage Prevention to the Zoning Regulations. The National Flood Insurance Program has paid five property damage claims in Suffield totaling $5,733 to-date. Suffield has no Repetitive Loss Property claims to-date. Although flooding is not as large a concern in Suffield as in some other communities, a significant flood event could result in much damage. CRCOG used FEMA s Hazus-MH model to analyze the risks that the Town of Suffield might face from a major flood. The model estimates that economic losses to the town including residential and commercial damage and business interruptions due to a flood having a 1% chance of occurring any given year (the 100-year flood) would be over $24 million. The impacts of such a flood are summarized below: Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood Households Displaced 258 People Needing Shelter 291 Buildings at Least Moderately Damaged 12 Total Estimated Economic Losses $24,030,000 Total Residential Building & Content Losses $14,600,000 Total Commercial, Industrial & Other Building & Content Losses $9,400,000 Total Business Interruption Losses $40,000 CRCOG also used FEMA s Hazus-MH model to analyze the risks that the Town of Suffield might face from a hurricane as powerful as the 1938 hurricane. The model estimates that economic losses to the 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 393

town including residential and commercial damage and business interruptions due to such a Category 3 hurricane would be nearly $56 million. The impacts of such a storm are summarized below: Estimated Damages from a 1938 Strength Hurricane Households Displaced 6 People Needing Shelter 0 Buildings at Least Moderately Damaged 465 Buildings Completely Damaged 32 Total Estimated Economic Losses $56,400,000 Total Residential Building Losses $44,700,000 Total Commercial, Industrial & Other Building Losses $5,800,000 Total Business Interruption Losses $5,900,000 Total Debris Generated 49,404 tons Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 206 According to information from the Connecticut Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security, the three federally declared natural disasters of 2011 resulted in total expenses to the municipality of nearly $1.5 million. These expenses include debris and snow removal, emergency protective measures and repairs to damaged infrastructure and buildings but do not include damages experienced by private citizens and businesses. 2011 Disasters Damage Amounts Eligible for 75% Reimbursement Under FEMA Public Assistance Program 100% of Amount Eligible for 75% Reimbursement Applicant: Total Damages Eligible Municipality DR-4023-CT DR-4046-CT for Public Assistance DR-1958-CT Irene Severe Weather Due to 2011 Disasters 2011 Snow August 2011 Oct 2011 Alfred) Town of Suffield $48,872.01 $26,647.77 $1,411,547.33 $1,487,067.11 Goals, Objectives and Strategies In the 2008 Plan, Suffield identified the following three goals and associated objectives; however, no strategic actions were identified. For the 2014-2019 update, Suffield has articulated a number of strategic actions to pursue to meet its goals and objectives. GOAL: PROTECT LIFE AND PROPERTY AND MINIMIZE ECONOMIC LOSSES FROM WINTER STORMS Objective 1: Improve the ability of public works and residents to prepare and respond to severe weather. Strategic Actions: 1.1 Conduct periodic educational outreach to residents on storm readiness and property maintenance issues. Lead: Emergency Management Director 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 394

, FEMA Timeframe: 2014-2019: Annual outreach Objective 2: Reduce the amount of debris and loss of power from severe winter storms through preventative tree maintenance. The town has had several thousand cubic yards of tree material removed along the roads in the past two years. Strategic Action: 2.1 Secure contractual tree removal services and equipment prior to storm response and cleanup. Lead: Public Works, Tree Warden Timeframe: 2014-2019: Annual GOAL: PROTECT LIFE AND PROPERTY AND MINIMIZE ROAD BLOCKAGES FROM FLOODING Objective 1: Reduce the likelihood of flooding by improving existing natural and artificial drainage systems. Strategic Actions: 1.1 Amend zoning regulations to require low impact development techniques in new development. Lead: Planning and Zoning Timeframe: Expected to be completed by end of 2014 1.2 Preemptively clean debris out of select drainage structures before and during heavy storm events. Lead: Highway Foreman. (Practice will be initiated in 2014 and carried out throughout the 2014-2019 plan period.) Timeframe: 2014-2019 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 395

Objective 2: Reduce flood threats to existing properties. Strategic Actions: 2.1 Encourage property owners to refrain from dumping debris into stream channels and drainage culverts. Lead: Planning and Zoning, Conservation Commission Timeframe: 2014-2019: Annual outreach 2.2 Conduct a study to identify the worst areas of surface flooding and develop methods to alleviate the problem areas. Lead: Town Engineer Potential Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Funds Timeframe: 2015-2016 Objective 3: Improve maintenance of waterways and structures. Strategic Action: 3.1 Develop inspection program for culverts and other stormwater management structures. Lead: Public Works Director, Highway Foreman Timeframe: Expect to complete first round of inspections in 2014 GOAL: PROTECT LIFE AND PROPERTY AND MINIMIZE ELECTRICAL DISRUPTIONS FROM TORNADO/HIGH WINDS Objective 1: Reduce the amount of debris and loss of power from severe storms through preventative tree maintenance. 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 396

Strategic Action: 1.1 Secure contractual tree removal services and equipment prior to storm response and cleanup. Lead: Public Works, Tree Warden Timeframe: 2014-2019: Annual 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 397

Map 56: Suffield Population Density, Dams and Flood Zones 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 398

Map 57: Suffield Flood Plains, Repetitive Loss Areas, Dams and Important Facilities 2014-2019 Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 399