Western Log Truck Study. Improvements to Dynamic Stability



Similar documents
Keywords: Performance Based Standards, Heavy Vehicles, Productivity, Size and Weight, Freight Efficiency.

5.0 Specialized Vehicle Size and Weight Guidelines and Permits

Guide to: Vehicle Weight and Dimension Limits in Ontario

Recreational Vehicle Towing Guide

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SIZE AND WEIGHT LIMITS

MAXIMUM LEGAL TRUCK LOADINGS AND

OVERSIZE/OVERWEIGHT PERMITS FOR DIVISIBLE LOADS

Contents Explanation of the long term permit No rights can be derived from this overview.

NAME: POWER UNIT ID: NAME OF APPLICANT (RESPONSIBLE MOTOR CARRIER) REGISTRATION/VIN STATE. Meet At: Meet Date: Meet Time:

Trailer 28' 6" or less

Scheduled Operating Authority Application for a Regional Public Transit Service Provider

Quick Reference Guide Filling out a Oversize and or over mass permit application form

80 Ton Low Loader 3 available

FORKLIFT STABILITY. MATERIAL HANDING AND ROBOTICS I. Practical course. Dávid HURI office door number: 324/6

Operating Costs of Trucks In Canada 2005

Final Report OPERATING COSTS OF TRUCKING AND SURFACE INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION IN CANADA

202 Gross Weight - The total weight of vehicle or combination of vehicles including all loads.

The Vehicle Weight and Dimension Regulations, 2010

American Fast Freight

Vehicles are generally separated into two categories; general access vehicles or restricted access vehicles.

Light-Duty Vehicle Purchase Approval Form

Weight and dimensions of heavy commercial vehicles as established by Directive 96/53/EC and the European Modular System (EMS)

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.7/Amend.4 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.7/Amend.4

TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIPS USING AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE MONITORING AND AUDIT SYSTEM

Moscow. Group of Companies. NP - Techno. Beyond the standards. cargo traffic OVERSIZED. heavyweight. bulky SUPER HEAVYWEIGHT

Truck Technology and Innova2on. If things work well, they can work be6er, and if you don t figure out how, the compe==on will.

6 LOADING AND UNLOADING A FLATBED

WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATING PROCEDURES SECTION III, CHAPTER 14

The Heavy Vehicle Collision Repair Specialists

GUIDELINES FOR MOVEMENT OVER SOUTH CAROLINA HIGHWAYS OF OVERSIZE AND OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES AND LOADS

Kuva: Metsäalan ammattilehti

JCB Fastrac in Heavy Goods Vehicle Applications

INFORMATION ON THE MOVEMENT OF OVERSIZE OR OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES AND LOADS

AUGUST 2013 INFORMATION BULLETIN. Livestock transport

3.0 General Permit Guidelines and Information

Quick Reference Guide Filling out a Special purpose vehicle permit application form

On the Road to a Fuel-efficient Truck

PERMITS FOR OVERSIZE AND OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES AND/OR LOADS EXCLUDING WORKOVER RIGS NDHP Motor Carrier Division Ref: 9-6 (04/2014)

Selecting a Tow Vehicle How to choose the best vehicle to tow your horse trailer

This section deals with mandatory and optional equipment for your vehicle as well as suggestions for safer road use.

THE INFLUENCE OF POLICY ON CRASH RATE OF LONG COMBINATION VEHICLES

STATE TABLE OF CONTENTS (CLICK ON STATE TO GO TO THE STATE PAGE DIRECTLY)

Arkansas PHONE: (501) Mon. - Fri. 6:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M. CENTRAL TIME. Legal Limits Legal Limits. Arkansas

IMPACTS OF HIGHER TRUCK WEIGHTS ON ILLINOIS SOYBEAN PRODUCERS

Vehicle Standards Instruction (General 18.0) Projecting Loads Released January 2014

PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY VEHICLES

MOTOR CARRIER SERVICES MoDOT Carrier Express 24-Hour Online System

How To Adjust A Lift Axle Control Valve

Model Year: 2010 Model: Prius Doc ID: RM000001Y3B015X. Title: ALIGNMENT / HANDLING DIAGNOSIS: FRONT WHEEL ALIGNMENT: ADJUSTMENT (2010 Prius)

Cotton Australia Module Restraint Guide 2012 Edition

Sap Nr P042. Doc. Nr. Status Comments Incorporated

Arizona Administrative Code Title 17, Ch. 6 Department of Transportation Oversize and Overweight Special Permits

COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION

Executive Report Wide Base Tires

chapter 3 basic driving skills

MICHIGAN S TRUCK-WEIGHT LAW And TRUCK-USER FEES

One and Two-piece Torque Rods and Replacement Bushings LIT NO:

5 axle Lowbed Semitrailer with Automatic Steering Model ST L3. (Lowbed length approx. 14,000 mm) Technical Specification no.

Rear Impact Guard TEST METHOD 223. Standards and Regulations Division. Issued: December 2003

. Vehicles Carrying Indivisible Articles. Special Purpose Vehicles ƒ Vehicles that require a Pilot or Escort

PERMIT RULES. For The Movement of Oversize and Overweight Vehicles On The Arkansas State Highway System

Trailer Selector Guide for Freight Shipping

Ministerial Declaration (Loaded Silage Trailer) Order 2013

Tyre Awareness Training

What You Should Know About 15-Passenger Vans

Corporate Brochure FALCON MOTOR XPRES S LT D....Solutions to Your Cargo Needs!

Ministry of Transportation Commercial Vehicle Safety and Enforcement Permit Application Online Guide for. ONLINE PERMITS Registration Process

Heavy vehicle stability guide

T81. Model: 4 AOU 1640 Year of manufacturer: Kingpin depth: 1.20m Maximum kingpin load: Axle weights ( C & U ): Tyre size: 235 / 75 R 17.

TITLE 13. LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, CHAPTER 18 SUBCHAPTER 1. PERMITS FOR OVERDIMENSIONAL OR OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES

ESTIMATION OF COSTS OF HEAVY VEHICLE USE PER VEHICLE-KILOMETRE IN CANADA File: T

Vehicle Recovery and Towing

Jargon is easy. to learn, buster

CANADIAN RELOCATION, MOVING YOUR CAR

15-Passenger Van Safety Frequently Asked Questions & Recommendations for Safe Operation

Professional Truck Driver Training Course Syllabus

SAE J1321 (TMC RP-1102) Type II Fuel Consumption Test

MAKING MORE POSSIBLE

Wheel and Torque Specifications

Service Bulletin Trucks Date Group No. Page

Heavier Semis: A Good Idea?

Quest for Speed. Discover Engineering. Youth Handouts

A Guide to Vehicle Aerodynamics

Low Level Order Picker with tiller arm 2.0 tonnes

Vehicle Accident Prevention TRUCK

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OVERSIZE OVERWEIGHT. Vehicle Permitting Handbook CONTENTS

TRUCKERS GUIDE EW MEXICO MOTOR TRA SPORTATIO DIVISIO

Information for Commercial Carriers

Trailer Telematics BY KÄSSBOHRER

Wind Energy - Extreme Blade Transport

Heavy combination vehicle stability and dynamics. An introduction programme for drivers of heavy motor vehicles

COMPUTER SIMULATION OF OFFTRACKING OF TRUCK AND TRAILER COMBINATIONS USING FOREST ROADS. Thomas W. Erkert. In partial fulfillment of the requirements

In safe hands. Ifor Williams Trailers. Since 1958, people have put their trust in our trailers, just ask an owner - they re

Agricultural vehicles guide

Class 3 (miscellaneous) permit application

Urban Freight Networks and Fleet Optimization

FOREST RESOURCES ASSOCIATION INC. TECHNICAL LET S TALK TRUCKING: TRUCK PERFORMANCE AND FUEL CONSUMPTION 1

Safe Reliable Professional

Truck Costing Model for Transportation Managers

Transcription:

Western Log Truck Study Improvements to Dynamic Stability Background The Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada (FERIC), performed vehicle dynamic research into common log truck configurations during the Western Log Truck Study between 1992 and 1998. The main conclusion of this study was that the majority of existing logging trucks failed to meet the minimum criteria for safety performance, when hauling Alberta winter weights. During 1999 and 2000, FERIC undertook a supplementary project to determine what improvements could be made to bring the safety performances up to the minimum standard. Based on the results of this study, recommendations for the specifications of logging trucks have been developed. Possible Improvements 1. Wide track axles: (a) FERIC studied the effects of increasing the track width of the trailer axles to a minimum of 2.9 metres (9.5 feet). The trailer beams and suspension to frame connection points were also widened to provide a wide stance of the vehicle to increase lateral stability and reduce the potential for rollovers. (b) The results indicated that increasing the track width provided the most benefit to vehicle performance. In many cases, this one improvement increased the vehicle performance to the minimum standard. (c) Increasing the track width provides an obvious change to the looks of the vehicle which would make it apparent to anyone that the vehicle has this feature. (d) Installing wide track axles would limit these vehicles to logging trucks only and they would not be able to be used for any other purpose. This could lower their resale value. 2. Tractor track width: (a) Increasing the track width on the truck drive axle also improves the stability, but not to the same extent as for the trailer axle. (b) Requiring the wide track axle on the drives would reduce flexibility and could create a shortage of logging trucks as not all operators would purchase a wide track drive axle unless they were certain that they would be hauling logs.

3. Box loading: (a) Box loading (two way loading) has two benefits. It lowers the center of gravity which improves the rollover stability and it also allows for better axle distribution without an excessive rear overhang. (b) Box loading is a viable option for both pulp and saw mills. Currently some mills are hauling box loads utilizing the brow log to assist in unloading. 4. Trailer bunk width of 3.05 metres (a) Widening the trailer bunk helps to reduce the center of gravity which has a positive influence on rollover stability. The use of wide trailer bunks is best employed together with box loading. 5. Increasing trailer wheelbase and interaxle spacing. (a) Increasing the distance between the turn centers of a logging truck improves performance. However, as this requires longer logs, not all areas of the province could achieve this higher standard. 6. Alternative tires on trailer. (a) Using alternative tires (11R22.5) lowers the center of gravity and provides a minor improvement in performance. Due to the marginal increase in benefit, it is not worthwhile to make this a mandatory specification. 7. Lower bunk height for jeep loggers. (a) Using a goose-neck style jeep will lower the center of gravity of the load and will improve the performance of the vehicle. However, it will restrict the use of straight frame rails which allow the jeep to be pulled up onto the tractor for the return trip to the bush. Recommendations 1. Summary (a) Require all logging configurations built after December 31, 2001 to have wide track axles (2.9 m or 9-6 minimum) on the trailers in order to qualify for winter weights. Trailers built with legal width axles would still be able to haul logs at legal weights, but would not be able to haul at winter weights. Grandfather winter weights for existing logging jeeps and trailers that do not have the wide track axles for a transition period of up to 10 years. The only exception would be for 8-axle B- trains, which have a legal GVW of just 1.5 tonnes less than full winter weight. (b) Encourage the use of the best performing vehicles by increasing their allowable winter weights. These include the tridem drive trucks with tridem pole and hayrack style trailers. This would be effective for the 2001/2002 winter season. (c) Discourage the use of poorer performing vehicles such as the single axle jeep logger and quad wagons by reducing winter weights. This will occur after a transition period of three more winter seasons to allow operators to recover their purchase cost of the equipment. (d) These recommendations will affect only those configurations listed in section 2.

2. Configurations: (a) truck and tandem pole trailer (b) truck and tridem pole trailer May need box loading to equalize axle loading. (c) truck and tridem hayrack trailer Require 3.0 metre nominal wide bunks to lower the center of gravity.

(d) Single axle jeep logger Require wide track axles (2.9 metres) on both the jeep and the pole trailer. As the minimum performance requirements are still not met, reduce the GVW to 60,000 kg. effective for the 2004/2005 winter season. This will provide for three more years of use at a GVW of 65,000 kg., but will limit the weight after that period. (e) Tandem axle jeep logger Require wide track axles (2.9 metres) on both the jeep and the pole trailer (f) truck and tandem pole trailer. Require wide track axles (2.9 metres) on the pole trailer.

(g) truck and tridem pole trailer Require wide track axles (2.9 metres) on the pole trailer. Increase winter weights to: 29,000 kg. on tridem drive 29,000 kg. on tridem pole trailer 65,000 kg. maximum GVW. No grandfathering of legal track width (2.6 metre) pole trailer for heavier winter weights. Increased winter weights on select routes only. Minimum 25% of drive axle weight required on steering axle. (h) truck and tridem semi trailer Increase winter weights to: 27,000 kg. on tridem drive 29,000 kg. on tridem semi trailer 63,000 kg. maximum GVW., 65,000 with picker. No grandfathering of legal track width (2.6 metre) semi trailer for heavier winter weights. Increased winter weights on select routes only. Minimum 27% of drive axle weight required on steering axle. (i) truck and quad wagon Either of two options: Reduce GVW to 60,000 kg, and cap the weight on the full trailer to 32,000 kg. effective for the 2004/2005 winter season. Use a tridem drive truck.

Log Haul Weights (For fall 2001, subject to transition period) Configuration Diagram Summer Winter Summer Picker Winter Picker tandem pole trailer 41,300 kg 55,600 kg 41,300 kg. to 43,100 kg 55,600 kg. to 57,300 kg. tridem pole trailer 48,300 kg. 57,600 kg. 48,300 kg. to 50,200 kg. 57,600 kg. to 59,300 tridem hayrack 46,500 kg. 57,600 kg. 48,300 kg. to 50,100 kg. 57,600 kg. to 59,300 kg. Single axle jeep logger 48,600 kg. 60,000 kg. 65,000 during transition period. 50,400 kg. to 52,200 kg. Dog logger 50,400 kg. N/A 50,400 kg to 52,200 kg. 60,000 kg. 65,000 during transition period. N/A Tandem axle jeep logger 56,500 kg. 65,000 kg. 58,300 kg. to 60,100 kg. 65,000 kg. Tandem axle jeep and tridem pole trailer 63,500 kg. 65,000 kg. 63,500 kg. 65,000 kg.

Log Haul Weights (For fall 2001, subject to transition period) Configuration Diagram Summer Winter Summer Picker Winter Picker B-Train 56,500 kg. 65,000 kg. 56,500 kg. to 60,100 kg. 65,000 kg. Super B-train 63,500 kg. 65,000 kg. 63,500 kg. 65,000 kg. B-train long logger 63,500 kg. 65,000 kg. 63,500 kg. 65,000 kg. tandem pole 47,300 kg. 59,300 kg. 47,300 kg. to 49,100 kg. 59,300 kg. tridem pole. 54,300 kg. 65,000 kg. * 54,300 kg. to 56,100 kg. 65,000 kg. * tridem hayrack 54,300 kg. 63,000 kg. * 54,300 kg. to 56,100 kg. 65,000 kg. * ** * 61,300 kg. if trailer axle is less than 2.9 metre track width. ** Requires minimum steering axle tare weight of 8,100 kg.

3 axle wagon short logs. 50,400 kg. N/A 50,400 kg. to 52,200 kg. N/A 3 axle wagon Short logs 55,300 kg. N/A 55,300 kg. to 57,100 kg. N/A quad wagon 55,300 kg. 60,000 kg. 55,300 kg. 60,000 kg. quad wagon 65,000 kg. during transition period. 61,300 kg. 65,000 kg. 61,300 kg. to 63,100 kg. 65,000 kg. during transition period. 65,000 kg. 3 axle trailer long logs. 50,400 kg. N/A 50,400 kg. to 52,200 kg. N/A 3 axle trailer long logs 53,500 kg. N/A 53,500 kg. N/A