Mechanics of Currency Hedged Indices

Similar documents
Measuring Volatility in Australia

Sukuk Liquidity Trends

Looking Down Under: An Approach to Global Equity Indexing in Australia

AN INSIDE LOOK AT S&P MILA 40

Considerations for a Global Approach to Property Investing

THE U.S. INFRASTRUCTURE EFFECT INTERVIEW BY CAROL CAMERON

Laddering a Portfolio of Municipal Bonds

A Closer Look at Interest Rate Floors

Identifying the Differences Between VIX Spot and Futures

S&P GSCI Crude Oil Enhanced Index Methodology Supplement

Taking the Pulse of the U.S. Healthcare Market

Examining Yield Strategies Through S&P Municipal Bond Indices

To Hedge or Not To Hedge: Foreign Currency Exposure in Canada

S&P Target Date Scorecard

Guide to the Dow Jones Corporate Bond Index

Identifying the Differences Between VIX Spot and Futures

Target Date Versus Relative Risk: A Comparison of 2 Retirement Strategies

Dow Jones Composite All REIT Indices Methodology

The Nuts and Bolts of Fixed Indexed Annuities

S&P 500 Low Volatility Index

Practice Essentials. Index-Linked Insurance Products 201 THE S&P MIDCAP 400 AND ITS ROLE IN INDEXED INSURANCE PRODUCTS

INDEX-BASED INVESTING

S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index Methodology

S&P Environmental and Socially Responsible Indices

Does Past Performance Matter? The Persistence Scorecard

DOES PAST PERFORMANCE MATTER? THE PERSISTENCE SCORECARD

Mexico s Bond Market: An Introduction

S&P/ASX 200 VIX Methodology

Using a Low-Volatility Approach to Temper Emerging Market Risk

Index-Based Insurance Risk Management Solutions

National Credit Default Rates Continued Their Upward Trend in December 2014 According to the S&P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices

REITs: Making Property Accessible

Investing: Index-Linked Emerging Markets

DIGGING DEEPER INTO THE U.S. PREFERRED MARKET

S&P Global Bond Futures Index Series Methodology

LIMITING RISK EXPOSURE WITH S&P RISK CONTROL INDICES

DJSI Ethical Europe Low Volatility Index Methodology

CONSUMER CREDIT DEFAULT RATES DECREASE IN SEPTEMBER 2015 ACCORDING TO THE S&P/EXPERIAN CONSUMER CREDIT DEFAULT INDICES

S&P SHARIAH INDICES METHODOLOGY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Income Inequality And State Tax Revenue Trends

How To Compare China To International Markets

Preferred Shares 1: INTRODUCTION TO PREFERRED STOCKS. 1.1 What Are Preferred Stocks?

Interactive Brokers LLC

MBIA U.K. Insurance Ltd.

S&P Healthcare Claims Indices

Workshop B: Credit Spread Trends In The Energy Sector

Largest South African Non-Life Insurer, Santam Ltd., Assigned 'A-' Long-Term And 'zaaa' National Scale Ratings

Iceland-Based Non-Life Insurer Tryggingamidstodin Ratings Affirmed at 'BBB-'; Outlook Stable

CHINESE ONSHORE BONDS

The Beauty of Simplicity: The S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index

S&P LTVC Global Index Methodology

Dogus Holding 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Sustained Investments And Expected Completion Of Garanti Sale; Outlook Negative

Selective Insurance Group Inc. And Operating Companies Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Negative

Research Update: Bermuda Long-Term Sovereign Rating Lowered To 'AA-' On Revised Rating Methodology; Outlook Stable.

Evaluating Insurers Enterprise Risk Management Practice

Insurer Mapfre Ratings Raised To 'A' On Spain Upgrade; Outlook Stable

A PRIMER FOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE BONDS

Long-Term Rating On Heartland Bank Ltd. Raised To 'BBB'; Outlook Negative

Swedish Housing Company Willhem Affirmed At 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Stable

Dominion Gas Holdings LLC

Market Data Analysis - Pacific Life

Four Ratings Raised From GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables Funding L.L.C.; 10 Ratings Affirmed

Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe

A Financial Analysis of Energies and Gas Pipelines

Japan Housing Finance Agency Series S-1 To S-12 Structured Notes 'AAA (sf)' Ratings Affirmed

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

S&P 500 Bond Index Methodology

Criteria Insurance General: Summary Of Standard & Poor's Enterprise Risk Management Evaluation Process For Insurers

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority; Toll Roads Bridges

Rising cost of health care and creditworthiness in the G-20 sovereigns

Pohjola Non-Life Insurance Downgraded To 'A+' After Government Support Review Of Pohjola Bank; Outlook Remains Negative

S&P INDICES Research & Design June 2010

DIVIDEND INVESTING AND A LOOK INSIDE THE S&P DOW JONES DIVIDEND INDICES

Fibria Celulose S.A. Upgraded To 'BB+ From 'BB' On Debt Reduction, Outlook Stable

RoD Canada 50 Tracking Index Methodology July 2014

FWD Life Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. Assigned 'A-' And 'cnaa' Ratings; Outlook Stable

2013 Distribution Summary Investor, Premium & e -Series Breakdown of Cumulative Distributions for the Period January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013

Denmark-Based Life Insurer Danica Pension Livsforsikringsaktieselskab Rated 'A-'; Outlook Stable

Gemini Securitization Corp., LLC (As Of May 2014)

Research Update: Ratings On The Republic Of Iceland Placed On Watch Negative After The Electorate Rejects Icesave Agreement A Second Time

Nationale Borg Group Outlook Revised To Developing On Uncertainties Related To Sale News; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

RESEARCH UPDATE. Global Ad Agency Publicis Groupe BBB+ Rating Still On CreditWatch Negative After Announcement Of Razorfish Acquisition.


ASR Nederland NV Assigned 'BBB+' Rating; Ratings On Core Insurance Operations Affirmed; Outlook Stable

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Residential Real Estate Company Deutsche Wohnen 'BBB+' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Conwert Takeover Offer

Health Care Service Corp. Outlook Revised To Negative From Stable; Ratings Affirmed

Outlooks On Six Insurance Groups Revised To Stable From Negative After Outlook On U.S. Revised To Stable

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CC' On Intended Debt Restructuring; Outlook Negative

RatingsDirect. Friendswood, Texas; General Obligation. Edward R McGlade, New York (1) ; edward.mcglade@standardandpoors.

International Finance Corp. 'AAA/A-1+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

RBS Citizens Financial Group Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative; Stand-Alone Credit Profile Lowered To 'a-'

Six Russian Real Estate Companies On CreditWatch Amid Higher Interest Rates, Weakening Demand, Sharp Ruble Depreciation

Kuwait Projects Co. (Holding) Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Stable

Molibdenos y Metales 'BBB-' Rating Affirmed On Improving Leverage, Outlook Still Stable

Electricity Transmission System Operator TenneT's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To Intermediate; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Sirius International Group Outlook Revised To Stable On Plans To Retain Its Strategy Post Acquisition; Ratings Affirmed

Codelco Rating Outlook Revised To Negative On Lower Copper Prices, 'AA-' Rating Affirmed

SNS REAAL Insurance Operations (SRIO) On Watch Developing After Announced Sale News

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To "Intermediate"; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Transcription:

EQUITY 101 Global Mechanics of Currency Hedged Indices CONTRIBUTORS Sabrina Salemi Manager, Strategy and Global Equity Indices sabrina.salemi@spdji.com Philip Murphy, CFA Vice President, North American Equities philip.murphy@spdji.com Keith Loggie Managing Director, Index Development keith.loggie@spdji.com OVERVIEW Suppose a U.S. investor is bullish on Japanese equities but does not wish to bear the risk of Japanese yen depreciation versus the U.S. dollar. She wants to invest USD 100,000 in Japanese stocks but avoid currency risk. To make her investment, assuming an exchange rate of USD/JPY=100, every USD 1 invested will be converted to JPY 100 in order to purchase the shares. At the end of her holding period, she will sell the shares and receive monetary proceeds denominated in Japanese yen. She will then convert this amount back to U.S. dollars, or in other words, she will sell Japanese yen for U.S. dollars. Since she believes that the future exchange rate may be less favorable in terms of U.S. dollars, she chooses to hedge the currency risk. Exhibit 1 shows the trade-off she faces. There are two scenarios, hedged or unhedged, for a given hypothetical movement in the U.S. dollar value of the Japanese yen, assuming no change in the value of underlying investments such as stocks or bonds. Hedging aims to ensure that the investor will receive USD 100,000 at the end of her holding period, regardless of exchange rate fluctuations. However, it could result in forfeiting gains if the Japanese yen were to appreciate versus the U.S. dollar. On the other hand, an unhedged position would result in a gain if the Japanese yen appreciates or a loss if it depreciates relative to the U.S. dollar. Exhibit 1: Hedging Scenarios and Currency Movements Hedging could result in forfeiting any gains that would be made if the Japanese yen were to appreciate versus the U.S. dollar. Initial Investment USD 100,000 (JPY 10M) If hedged at USD/JPY=100 and the yen... If not hedged at USD/JPY=100 and the yen... Strengthens to USD/JPY=95 Weakens to USD/JPY=105 Strengthens to USD/JPY=95 Weakens to USD/JPY=105 The future U.S. dollar value of yen doesn't affect investment value. Investment Value= USD 100,000 The future U.S. dollar value of yen increases investment value by USD 5,263. Investment Value= USD 105,263 The future U.S dollar value of yen decreases investment value by USD 4,762. Investment Value= USD 95,238 Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Chart is provided for illustrative purposes. Exchange rates are hypothetical values used to simplify example. No other investment returns or costs have been factored in the outcome. This example also assumes currency returns are fully offset by hedge returns, but perfect hedges do not exist.

CURRENCY HEDGING IN AN INDEX Global investors can lock in forward exchange rates to manage potential currency risk by taking positions in currency forward contracts, or by hiring an investment manager to do so. Profits (or losses) from forward contracts are offset by losses (or profits) in the spot value of the currency, thereby negating exposure to the currency. Currency hedged indices are designed to represent this technique within the index calculation. They seek to measure a combination of the performance of an underlying index and that of currency forward contracts used to hedge relevant exchange-rate risk. Currency hedged indices seek to measure a combination of the performance of an underlying index and that of currency forward contracts used to hedge relevant exchangerate risk. Exhibit 2: Currency and Index Changes Period JPY/USD Spot S&P/TOPIX 150 S&P/TOPIX 150 (USD) S&P/TOPIX 150 USD Hedged Index July 31, 2015 123.895 1,389.51 1,440.76 1,915.89 Aug. 31, 2015 121.185 1,279.02 1,358.06 1,760.88 Change in Period (%) 2.24-7.95-5.74-8.09 Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Data as of Aug. 31, 2015. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Table is provided for illustrative purposes and reflects hypothetical historical performance. Please see performance disclosures at the end of this document for more information regarding the inherent limitations associated with back-tested performance. In Exhibit 2, we see that during August 2015, the change of the S&P/TOPIX 150 USD Hedged Index (-8.09%) came close to the local currency (Japanese yen) index, the S&P/TOPIX 150 (-7.95%). Returns of currency hedged indices tend to come closer to those of local indices the lower the interest rate differential is between the two relevant countries. Interest rate differentials are reflected in currency forward rates and are the most significant cost to currency hedging. For Japan and the U.S., interest rates are close to one another, and this is reflected in how tightly the August 2015 return of the S&P/TOPIX 150 USD Hedged Index came to that of the local currency S&P/TOPIX 150. CURRENCY HEDGED INDEX MECHANICS S&P Dow Jones Indices standard currency hedged indices are calculated by hedging beginning-of-period balances using rolling one-month forward contracts. The amount hedged is adjusted on a monthly basis. 1 The secondto-last business day of each month is the index reference day. Continuing with the example above, the level of the S&P/TOPIX 150 USD Hedged Index was 1,900.52 as of the reference day in July 2015, and we equate the index level to a hypothetical portfolio value of USD 1,900.52. The equivalent amount of Japanese yen, based on that day s ending spot exchange rate of USD/JPY=124.335, would be JPY 236,301. This is the monetary value, expressed in Japanese yen, to be hedged for the upcoming month. On the rebalancing day, which is the last business day of the month, the index hypothetically enters into a currency forward contract to sell JPY 236,301 at the end of the next month. The one-month forward exchange rate at the close of business on the rebalancing day is USD/JPY=123.859, so we will 1 For more information on hedged computations, please refer to the Currency Hedged Indices section of the Index Mathematics Methodology. 2

sell JPY 236,301 to buy USD 1,907.82 at the end of the next month. This transaction locks in the amount of U.S. dollars the investor will buy at month s end. Note that it does not guarantee that the investor will have sufficient Japanese yen to complete the transaction at the end of August 2015 that is a function of the performance of the underlying index. Unhedged equity risk is the main source of risk within a currency hedged index Equity risk remains unhedged and is the main source of risk within a currency hedged index. Another smaller risk stems from timing. As of the index reference day (July 30, 2015), it is determined that JPY 236,301 will be sold forward the following day (the index rebalance day, July 31, 2015) to receive USD 1,907.82 at the end of August 2015. Those hypothetical trades are filled at the prevailing foreign exchange rate and index level at the close of business on July 31, 2015. From July 30, 2015, to July 31, 2015, the Japanese yen value of the hedged index has changed, and this relatively small difference represents a residual, unhedged currency exposure. If a U.S. investor were to replicate the currency hedged index, on the index rebalance day they would exchange U.S. dollars for Japanese yen at the spot rate. The July 31, 2015, value of the USD hedged index would be USD 1,915.89. The spot exchange rate is USD/JPY=123.895, so they will invest JPY 237,369 in stocks of the S&P/TOPIX 150. As determined on the prior day, they will also enter into a forward contract to sell JPY 236,301 at the end of August 2015. The difference between the amount invested in stocks and the amount hedged with a forward contract is JPY 1,068 and it would be considered unhedged exposure. As noted previously, however, the equity risk of the entire investment would also be unhedged. Unfortunately for our investor, by the end of August 2015, her investment in Japanese stocks is worth only JPY 218,493, marking a loss of JPY 18,876. At the end of August 2015, she still has an obligation to exchange Japanese yen for U.S. dollars, and we already know that she will buy USD 1,907.82 with the proceeds of her investment. However, she has JPY 18,876 less than when she started. To quantify the loss that is attributable to currency hedged equity exposure, we subtract JPY 1,068 (which was the unhedged Japanese yen value from beginning of August 2015) from the total loss of JPY 18,876. This shows that JPY 17,808 of the total loss resulted from currency hedged equity exposure. To reconcile the loss due to currency hedged equity exposure with the level of the currency hedged index, we express JPY 17,808 in terms of U.S. dollars and divide by the month-end spot rate of USD/JPY=121.185. This shows the loss in U.S. dollar terms to be USD 146.94, and in index terms it represents an externality that must be accounted for to reconcile the ending hedged index value. If we add USD 146.94 to the ending USD hedged index level of USD 1,760.88 we get USD 1,907.82, the amount we calculated that would be received in U.S. dollars from the currency forward contract. In the real world, this amount would be additional U.S. dollars needed at month s end to fulfill the terms of the currency forward contract that was entered into at the start of the month. 3

Exhibit 3: Currency Hedged Index Replication and Reconciliation The relatively small amount of residual currency risk is typically much less significant than underlying equity risk, because it represents the currency and equity performance over one day instead of an entire month. Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Chart is provided for illustrative purposes. There is some rounding used in the example because actual index calculations use more decimal places. SUMMARY Currency risk can be largely eliminated once a currency forward contract is in place, but underlying equity risk remains and becomes the main driver of variable performance. As a result, the performance of a currency hedged index may be positive or negative. To reiterate, equity risk is not hedged out like currency risk is. In addition to this source of unhedged risk, there is a smaller one. Because the Japanese yen value of the hedged index on the reference date is different than on the rebalance date (when the currency forward contract is entered into), there is a relatively small amount of residual currency risk remaining in the index. This unhedged risk is typically much less significant than the underlying equity risk, because it represents the currency and equity performance over one day instead of an entire month. During August 2015, the local currency S&P/TOPIX 150 dropped roughly 8%. The poor equity performance was not hedged in the currency hedged version of the index, and it declined about 8%. Our example illustrates a case in which U.S. investors would have been better off with an unhedged position. Because the value of the Japanese yen appreciated relative to the U.S. dollar, the equity losses would have been partially mitigated by currency appreciation. This is shown by the return of the S&P/TOPIX 150 (USD), which only dropped 5.74%. Hedging is therefore a double-edged sword it largely removes currency uncertainty, but that involves sacrificing potential currency gains as well as losses. LIKE WHAT YOU READ? Sign up to receive updates on a broad range of index-related topics and complimentary events. 4

PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURES The S&P/TOPIX 150 USD Hedged Index was launched on June 21, 1999. All information presented prior to the launch date is back-tested. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. Complete index methodology details are available at www.spdji.com. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. S&P Dow Jones Indices defines various dates to assist our clients in providing transparency on their products. The First Value Date is the first day for which there is a calculated value (either live or back-tested) for a given index. The Base Date is the date at which the Index is set at a fixed value for calculation purposes. The Launch Date designates the date upon which the values of an index are first considered live: index values provided for any date or time period prior to the index s Launch Date are considered back-tested. S&P Dow Jones Indices defines the Launch Date as the date by which the values of an index are known to have been released to the public, for example via the company s public website or its datafeed to external parties. For Dow Jones-branded indicates introduced prior to May 31, 2013, the Launch Date (which prior to May 31, 2013, was termed Date of introduction ) is set at a date upon which no further changes were permitted to be made to the index methodology, but that may have been prior to the Index s public release date. Past performance of the Index is not an indication of future results. Prospective application of the methodology used to construct the Index may not result in performance commensurate with the back-test returns shown. The back-test period does not necessarily correspond to the entire available history of the Index. Please refer to the methodology paper for the Index, available at www.spdji.com for more details about the index, including the manner in which it is rebalanced, the timing of such rebalancing, criteria for additions and deletions, as well as all index calculations. Another limitation of using back-tested information is that the back-tested calculation is prepared with the benefit of hindsight. Back-tested information reflects the application of the index methodology and selection of index constituents in hindsight. No hypothetical record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, there are numerous factors related to the equities, fixed income, or commodities markets in general which cannot be, and have not been accounted for in the preparation of the index information set forth, all of which can affect actual performance. The Index returns shown do not represent the results of actual trading of investable assets/securities. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC maintains the Index and calculates the Index levels and performance shown or discussed, but does not manage actual assets. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor may pay to purchase the securities underlying the Index or investment funds that are intended to track the performance of the Index. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause actual and back-tested performance of the securities/fund to be lower than the Index performance shown. As a simple example, if an index returned 10% on a US $100,000 investment for a 12-month period (or US $10,000) and an actual assetbased fee of 1.5% was imposed at the end of the period on the investment plus accrued interest (or US $1,650), the net return would be 8.35% (or US $8,350) for the year. Over a three year period, an annual 1.5% fee taken at year end with an assumed 10% return per year would result in a cumulative gross return of 33.10%, a total fee of US $5,375, and a cumulative net return of 27.2% (or US $27,200). 5

GENERAL DISCLAIMER 2015 by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial, Inc. All rights reserved. Standard & Poor s and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC ( S&P ), a subsidiary of McGraw Hill Financial. Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC ( Dow Jones ). Trademarks have been licensed to S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Redistribution, reproduction and/or photocopying in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission. This document does not constitute an offer of services in jurisdictions where S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P or their respective affiliates (collectively S&P Dow Jones Indices ) do not have the necessary licenses. All information provided by S&P Dow Jones Indices is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons. S&P Dow Jones Indices receives compensation in connection with licensing its indices to third parties. Past performance of an index is not a guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. S&P Dow Jones Indices does not sponsor, endorse, sell, promote or manage any investment fund or other investment vehicle that is offered by third parties and that seeks to provide an investment return based on the performance of any index. S&P Dow Jones Indices makes no assurance that investment products based on the index will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC is not an investment advisor, and S&P Dow Jones Indices makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any such investment fund or other investment vehicle. A decision to invest in any such investment fund or other investment vehicle should not be made in reliance on any of the statements set forth in this document. Prospective investors are advised to make an investment in any such fund or other vehicle only after carefully considering the risks associated with investing in such funds, as detailed in an offering memorandum or similar document that is prepared by or on behalf of the issuer of the investment fund or other vehicle. Inclusion of a security within an index is not a recommendation by S&P Dow Jones Indices to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice. These materials have been prepared solely for informational purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable. No content contained in these materials (including index data, ratings, credit-related analyses and data, research, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P Dow Jones Indices and its third-party data providers and licensors (collectively S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties ) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content. The Content is provided on an as is basis. S&P DOW JONES INDICES PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. S&P Dow Jones Indices keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P Dow Jones Indices may have information that is not available to other business units. S&P Dow Jones Indices has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. In addition, S&P Dow Jones Indices provides a wide range of services to, or relating to, many organizations, including issuers of securities, investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment banks, other financial institutions and financial intermediaries, and accordingly may receive fees or other economic benefits from those organizations, including organizations whose securities or services they may recommend, rate, include in model portfolios, evaluate or otherwise address. 6