Microbiological Evaluation of the STI Series 2000 Medical Waste Treatment Process



Similar documents
or

Lab Exercise 3: Media, incubation, and aseptic technique

EH&S. Sheet. Fact. Safe and Effective Use of Autoclaves. What are autoclaves? Factors for effective sterilization. Dry heat cycle - when to use

Decontamination and Waste Management

History Note:Statutory Authority G.S. 130A ; Eff. Oct. 1, 1990; Amended Eff. April 1, 1993.

National Food Safety Standard Food microbiological examination: Aerobic plate count

KGI MEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Microbiological Testing of the Sawyer Mini Filter. 16 December Summary

AUTOCLAVE PROGRAM. SOP Bio-006 FOR THE USE OF AUTOCLAVE FOR STERILIZATION OF MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL WASTE SOP

Eliminating Medical Waste Liabilities Through Mobile Maceration and Disinfection

Autoclave Safety. Autoclaves are sterilizers using high pressure and high temperature steam. The potential safety risks for the operators are:

Biological Indicators and

Infectious Waste Management Plan

Comparison Study of the Growth Promotion Capabilities of Self Contained Biological Indicator Culture Medium in Extended Steam Sterilization Cycles

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY Biohazardous Waste Program

Fundamental Autoclave Techniques

Compliance Bulletin Solid Waste Medical Waste Treatment reviewed/revised February 2012

A Guide to the Handling and Disposal of Medical Waste Contents

MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF BIOLOGICAL WASTE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY. July 2003

BACTERIAL ENUMERATION

MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF BIOLOGICAL WASTE AT TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH GUIDELINE

Steam Sterilization Cycles for Lab Applications

Steam Sterilization and the 2007 Revision of PDA Technical Report 1

Biohazardous Waste Disposal. Table of Contents

STERILIZATION AND DISINFECTION

Professional Certification in Biological Waste Management Examination Content, Sample Questions & References

"ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR THE REGULATION OF MEDICAL WASTE" IN HEALTH CARE FACILITIES LICENSED BY THE MISSISSIPPI STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Testing Surface Disinfectants

Medical or Biological Waste: Storage, Treatment, Disposal and Transportation Plan

Quantifying Bacterial Concentration using a Calibrated Growth Curve

UCCS Biosafety Management Policy

American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

Fact Sheet on Steam Sterilizers at Stanford University

Accurate Convenient Affordable Results in 24 Hours. Mail-to-Lab Spore Testing. Mail-to-Lab Spore Testing

Laboratory Biosafty In Molecular Biology and its levels

Guidance on safe use of Autoclaves

Test Method for the Continuous Reduction of Bacterial Contamination on Copper Alloy Surfaces

INTRODUCTION. Viral shedding is crucial for Gene Therapy Products Safety linked with shedding data

Revised EHS Biosafety. 1 Select appropriate containers/bags for autoclaving.

MODULE 2D ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGICAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (EMLAP) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

The University of Texas at San Antonio Office of Environmental Health, Safety and Risk Management. Part A. Biological Waste Management Safety Plan

Effective Heat Sterilization in CO 2 Incubators

Expert Opinion. on the efficacy of. EndoDet and EndoDis + EndoAct. for cleaning and disinfection of. Olympus Gastroscope Type GIF-2T200.

3 Attest Biological Monitoring System

Bacterial Transformation with Green Fluorescent Protein. Table of Contents Fall 2012

Biohazardous Waste Management Plan

Potentially Infectious Medical Waste

MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL POLICY. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 31, 1991 REVISED DATE: April 1, 2008 I. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH DISPOSAL POLICY:

University of Colorado at Boulder

EUROTUBO DELTALAB 4. PETRI DISHES AND LOOPS

GENOME RUSSIA PROJECT BLOOD SAMPLES COLLECTION, DNA EXTRACTION AND DNA QUALITY CONTROL PROTOCOLS

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Safe Autoclave Operations

Sample Pharmacy CLEANING AND SANITIZING PROCEDURE P-304.1

From: Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery To: Ships and Stations Having Medical Department Personnel

UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND REGULATED MEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

UCD School of Agriculture Food Science & Veterinary Medicine Master of Engineering Science in Food Engineering Programme Outline

Copyright 2009, International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER)

FACT SHEET : Using Autoclaves Safely

Private Water Supplies Sampling Manual. A Field Guide

FACT SHEET. Recent Developments in Clinical Waste Treatment Technologies

BSL 1 Laboratory Biosafety Manual

LAB 4. Cultivation of Bacteria INTRODUCTION

Integration of a fin experiment into the undergraduate heat transfer laboratory

Laboratory Line. Vertical and Bench-Top Life Science Autoclaves

CHAPTER 5 SHIPPING PROCEDURES

Transport and Mailing Systems

Because You Can t See Sterile.SM

General Permit Application for Regulated Medical or Chemotherapeutic Waste Processing

3. It is recommended that the water supply into the facility can be obtained from two (2) separate water lines if possible.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES DIVISION OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA

Transformation Protocol

Result: COMPLETE Report Date: 08-OCT-2012

Texas Regulations on Medical Waste

Commercial Medical Waste Treatment Products. Protects Operators, the Environment and the Community.

Clinic Washer-Disinfectors. Washer-Disinfector Line

Orange Fruit Processing

CENTRAL SERVICE REGULATIONS FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTERS

Standard Operating Procedure for Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Lachat Method)

BUGS" THAT PRODUCE DRUGS TO KILL "BUGS Microbes Produce Antibiotics

How To Size A Stenner Pump

Medical Waste Management Plan

How To Manage Medical Waste In Turkistan

DRAFT Standard Operating Procedure for Long-Term Archiving of PM 2.5 Filters and Extracts

University of Otago. Laboratory Biohazard Waste Disposal. Guidelines

Total Aerobic Bacteria, Yeasts and Molds

Safety. matters. CryoMACS Products

CHAPTER V: DISPOSAL OF WASTES CONTAMINATED WITH INFECTIOUS AGENTS

TECHNIQUES FOR STEAM STERILIZING LABORATORY WASTE

APPENDIX D INFECTIOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Dartmouth College. Institutional Biosafety Committee. Biohazardous Waste Disposal Guide IBC Approved: 10/7/15

Nu G Medical Waste System Technology (Pyrolysis / Thermal Decomposition)

Creatine Kinase (CK) Enzymatic Assay Kit Manual Catalog #:

Transferring a Broth Culture to Fresh Broth

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Work Package 8. Sample Collection and Storage

The Role of the Laboratory in Clinical Trials. Basma Elgamal, M.D. Professor of Clinical Pathology National Cancer Institute, Cairo University

Top 10 considerations when validating an autoclave

HOW TO IMPORT FOREIGN SOIL and HOW TO MOVE SOIL within the UNITED STATES

Incubator with mechanical convection

Transcription:

WNWN International,Inc. WNWN International Phone: 860-675-1217 Fax 860-675-1311 PO Box 1164 Burlington, CT. 06013 USA Microbiological Evaluation of the STI Series 2000 Medical Waste Treatment Process January 25, 2005

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Microbiological Evaluation S TI Series 2000 Medical Waste Treatment Process The treatment and destruction of medical waste by the STI Series 2000 M edical Waste Treatment Process (STI) as evaluated utilizing Bacillus atrophaeus spore strips. The STI is designed to shred and treat medical waste to render it unrecognizable. The capabilities of the STI process to treat conventional medical waste have been documented for and approved by regulatory agencies. This testing evaluates the STI as an alternative medical waste treatment technology with the ability to treat pathologic waste. The STI Series 2000 M edical Waste Treatment Process (STI) is designed to mechanically shred medical waste and treat it through a thermal process. When operated in accordance with all manufacturers' instructions, the system will render the waste unrecognizable and reduce its bioload for safe disposal in the solid waste stream. To evaluate the efficacy of the STI Series 2000, known concentrations of a biological indicator, i.e., Bacillus atrophaeus spore strips were added to test waste loads under routine operating conditions. Samples were processed through the STI Series 2000 and then returned to an independent microbiology laboratory where they were cultured and monitored for the growth of the biological indicator. The optional use of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) was not be used during the efficacy testing. For purposes of efficacy testing and evaluation, the optional use of NaOCl solution was replaced with water to demonstrate that the STI system can achieve efficacy solely based on steam treatment. The water injection rate was the same volume as the recommended deodorizing injection rate, specified by STI. Following treatment, spore strips were sent to an independent lab for qualitative testing. After homogenation of samples, serial dilutions were made of the sample. Controls were evaluated utilizing the same techniques as employed with test samples. Identical testing was conducting on STI units are two different locations (M uhlenberg M edical Center and LabCorp, both in the state of New Jersey). No growth of B. atrophaeus was detected in any of the 18 spores test samples indicating a >6 log 10 reduction. These test results demonstrate the ability of the STI Series 2000 M edical Waste Treatment Process to effectively treat medical waste.

Note on organizations involved in this project Several organizations were involved in this microbiological evaluation. They include the following: WNWN International Burlington, Connecticut US based company with over 15 years experience in all facets medical waste management at the domestic and international level. This organization developed the protocols and organized the testing among all parties. Information From Science West Sand Lake, New York US based company provided on-site management of samples and data collection at the test sites. Sterilator Company Cuba, New York US based company producing commercially available spore strips This organization provided Bacillus atrophaeus spore strips. BIoCI System Raleigh, North Carolina US based company providing bacterial spore strips and products as well as microbiological analytical services related to biological indicator testing. This organization was responsible for conducting the B. atrophaeus spore strip analysis.

Efficacy Protocol

S TI Medical Waste Treatment Process Bacillus atrophaeus spore strip Microbiological Efficacy Protocol I. Purpose The STI Series 2000 M edical Waste Treatment Process (STI) is designed to mechanically shred medical waste and treat it through a thermal process. When operated in accordance with all manufacturers' instructions, the system will render the waste unrecognizable and reduce its bioload for safe disposal in the solid waste stream. To evaluate the efficacy of the STI Series 2000, under routine operating conditions involving the use of heat generated by injection of steam for waste treatment, with test waste loads spiked with known concentrations of a biological indicator, i.e., Bacillus atrophaeus. Samples will be processed through the STI Series 2000 and then returned to an independent microbiology laboratory where they will be cultured and monitored for the growth of the biological indicator. The optional use of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) will not be used during the efficacy testing. For purposes of efficacy testing and evaluation, the optional use of NaOCl solution will be replaced with water to demonstrate that the STI system can achieve efficacy solely based on steam treatment. The water injection rate shall be the same volume as the recommended deodorizing injection rate, specified by STI. II. Process Description The STI system consists of a lift, an intake hopper, shredding chamber, and jacketed steam treatment auger. Once the waste in introduced into the intake hopper and its cover secured, the packaged waste is scalded with steam prior to shredding. Next, the shredder is engaged to reduce the volume of waste and to expose its maximum surface area to achieve appropriate treatment. The shredded material is then further subjected to additional direct steam impingement in the steam auger section via the delivery of steam to the inside of the auger. The waste is moved through the inclined auger which is surrounded by a steam jacketed chamber. Waste materials are subjected to temperatures at a minimum of 205 degrees F o (travel temperature range 205 to boiling) for an exposure period of 60 minutes or more. III. Microbiological Testing A. Preparation of Biological Indicator and Inoculation of Test Load Samples 1. The biological indicator, Bacillus atrophaeus (ATTC 9372), will be prepared by Sterilator Company, Inc. of Cuba, NY using standard laboratory practices i.e. US Pharmacopoeia for the cultivation of microorganisms. Spore strips will contain a population of no less 1e6. Analysis will be performed by BIoCI systems, Inc. of Raleigh, North Carolina.

2.. A total of six (6) control and nine (9) test samples will be prepared, packaged separately into glassine envelopes and then immediately transported, via insulated container maintained at approximately 4 o C, to the test site for efficacy testing. B. Processing of samples through the STI medical waste treatment process Three (3) test cycles will be conducted on a single day and involve the following types of samples: 1. Samples Types a. Control samples: i. Field Controls (FC - 3 samples) Spore strips transported to and from the test site without processing in the STI Series 2000; and ii. Untreated Controls (UC - 3 samples) Spore strips transported to the test site and processed, without thermal treatment. Also, the addition of sodium hypochlorite for odor control will be replaced by only water during the shredding phase through the STI Series 2000 with a sufficient amount of surrogate of waste to assure transit through the auger. b. Test Samples i. Treated Samples (TS - 9 samples) - Spores samples transported to the test site and processed through the STI Series 2000 with thermal treatment. 2. Sample processing through the STI a. Untreated Controls (UC) One (1) cycle, involving i. Each of the three (3) samples wil initialy be placed into an egg carier (perforated plastic container provided by the STI) and the egg introduced into the STI through a sampling port below the shredding chamber. The egg will then become entrained in a minimum volume of waste (similar in composition to the waste generated at the test site) as it is conveyed along the incline screw through the treatment chamber (without the use of steam to heat the walls or be injected into jacketed area) until it exits this section at the end of the process.. ii. Upon exiting, each of the samples will be removed from the egg, placed into a quart plastic bag, the bag marked with UC and immediately refrigerated to maintain sample integrity before shipment to the testing laboratory within an insulated container, with cold packs, to maintain the temperature at approximately 4 o C. Temperature monitoring strips will be used in all shipments to confirm adequate temperatures and specimen integrity. Temperatures will be periodically recorded.

b. Field Controls (FC) i. Upon receipt at the test site, each sample will be placed into a quart plastic back, the bag marked with FC and immediately refrigerated to maintain sample integrity before shipment to the laboratory within an insulated container, with cold packs, to maintain the temperature at approximately 4 o C. c. Test Samples (TS) Three (3) separate tests cycles at full unit capacity, each involving the following procedures - i. As with the UC, except that each of the three (3) eggs will exposed to thermal treatment through the heated walls and direct injection of steam into the jacked section. As mentioned above, same quantity of water will be injected through the chemical injection for the purposes of testing and evaluation of efficacy. ii. Upon exiting, each of the samples will be removed from the egg, placed into a quart plastic bag, the bag marked with TS and immediately refrigerated to maintain sample integrity before shipment to the laboratory within an insulated container, with cold packs, to maintain the temperature at approximately 4 o C. During the test procedure, the following data will be recorded: -Date -Name of responsible test manager -Insertion time of each sample into the unit -Removal time of each sample from the unit -Additional remarks, observations, or comments - Treatment parameters i.e., temperatures -.Temperatures in auger section recorded at 15 minute intervals -. Residence time will be calculated and recorded for each individual sample - Waste composition shall be noted for all tests loads IV. Recovery of S piked Organisms* A. Processing of samples - All control and test samples shall be packaged, handled, transported and analyzed in the same manner. 1.For each sample, aseptically transfer strip/disk into a sterile tube containing glass beads and 10mL sterile DI water (yielding 1e 1 dilution). 2. Vortex tube until sample is homogenized. 3. Mix well then serially dilute by transferring 1mL of previously prepared dilution to the next 9mL dilution tube. 4. Plate cooled heat-shocked dilutions, 1mL per plate, overlay with TSA. 5. Invert and incubate plates at 30-35 C for 24-48 hrs.

Dilutions are made so there are between 30-300 colonies. All results will be reported. *Reference: BIoCI SOP # 070-L002 - Bacillus atrophaeus Spore Strip Population Assay V. Calculations: Demonstration of Disinfection Efficacy A. Data from the following tests is necessary to determine the disinfection efficacy of the STI Unit. All concentrations shall be converted using a logarithmic table before calculations are performed, i.e. 2x10 5 cfu/ml = 5.301. Xo = Mean initial concentration (log 10 ) of organisms per BI Xu = Mean concentration (log 10 ) of recoverable organisms per BI after being processed through the unit without the benefit of treatment Xt = Concentration (log 10 ) of organisms per BI after being processed through the STI M edical Waste Treatment Process with the benefit of treatment. Disinfection Efficacy Equation: Xu - Xt = Xf Xf = log 10 reduction in concentration of organisms due to treatment process Acceptance Criteria: A 6 log reduction of biological indicator (B. atrophaeus) Note: All efficacy tests will be conducted, analyzed, and certified by a microbiologist. 11/24/04 EK Revised 12/5/04 EK

On-site Operational Data

INFORMATION FROM SCIENCE P. O. BOX 408 WEST SAND LAKE, NEW YORK 12196 VOICE/FAX 518-674-1713 E-MAIL IRASALKIN@AOL.COM EFFIC ACY TESTING OF STI MEDIC AL WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM MUHLENBURG MEDICAL CENTER DECEMBER 8, 2004 The following are the descriptions of each of the three test runs, each involving one (1) egg per run containing the (3) bacterial spore samples: Test Run # 1 Responsible test manager Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM) Insertion time 3:37 pm Eggs I Retrieval times Egg I = 5:29 pm Residence times Egg I = 1 hr/52 min Temperature recorded Time 0 208 o F lower clave; 211 o F upper clave Time 15 min 208 o F lower clave; 212 o F upper clave Time 30 min 208 o F lower clave; 211 o F upper clave Time 45 min 209-210 o F lower clave; 211-212 o F upper clave Time 60 min 209-210 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 75 min 211-212 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 90 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 105 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Test Run # 2 Responsible test manager Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM) Insertion time 3:48 pm Eggs II Retrieval times Egg II= 5:50 pm Residence times Egg II= 2 hr/02 min Temperature recorded Time 0 208 o F lower clave; 212 o F upper clave Time 15 min 209-210 o F lower clave; 211-212 o F upper clave Time 30 min 209-210 o F lower clave; 211-212 o F upper clave Time 45 min 211-212 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 60 min 211-212 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave

Time 75 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 90 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Time 105 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Time 120 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Test Run # 3 Responsible test manager Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM) Insertion time 4:03 pm Eggs III Retrieval times Egg III = 6:02 pm Residence times Egg III = 1 hr/59 min Temperature recorded Time 0 209-210 o F lower clave; 211-212 o F upper clave Time 15 min 211-212 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 30 min 211-212 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 45 min 211-212 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 60 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 75 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 214-215 o F upper clave Time 90 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Time 105 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Time 120 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 215-216 o F upper clave Average duration of exposure all test runs = 1 hr/57 min Average temperature of exposure all test runs = 211.8 o F lower clave; 213.6 o F upper clave 4. Return of Samples At the conclusion of all testing,samples were removed from refrigeration, packaged in an insulated container with frozen cold packs and Fed Exed, overnight to BIoCI Laboratory. Samples were received at the laboratory by 10:30 am the following day. Submitted by: Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM)

INFORMATION FROM SCIENCE LLC P. O. BOX 408 WEST SAND LAKE, NEW YORK 12196 VOICE/FAX 518-674-1713 E-MAIL IRASALKIN@AOL.COM EFFIC ACY TESTING OF STI MEDIC AL WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM LABCORP LABORATORIES DECEMBER 9, 2004 The following are the descriptions of each of the three test runs, each involving one (1) egg per run containing the (3) bacterial spore samples: Test Run # 1 Responsible test manager Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM) Insertion time 1:54 pm Eggs I Retrieval times Egg I = 3:32 pm Residence times Egg I = 1 hr/38 min Temperature recorded Time 0 213-214 o F lower clave; 216-217 o F upper clave Time 15 min 214-215 o F lower clave; 216F-217 o F upper clave All subsequently temperature readings remained constant at 214-215 o F lower clave; 216F-217 o F upper clave Test Run # 2 Responsible test manager Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM) Insertion time 2:01 pm Eggs II Retrieval times Egg II Residence times Egg II Temperature recorded Time 0 214-215 o F lower clave; 216F-217 o F upper clave All subsequently temperature readings remained constant at 214-215 o F lower clave; 216F-217 o F upper clave Test Run # 3 Responsible test manager Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM) Insertion time 2:09 pm Eggs III Retrieval times Egg III = 3:57 pm Residence times Egg III = 1 hr/48 min

Temperature recorded Time 0 214-215 o F lower clave; 216F-217 o F upper clave All subsequently temperature readings remained constant at 214-215 o F lower clave; 216F-217 o F upper clave Average duration of exposure all test runs = 1 hr/05 min Average temperature of exposure all test runs = 214 o F lower clave; upper clave 216 o F 4. Return of Samples At the conclusion of all testing,samples were removed from refrigeration, packaged in an insulated container with frozen cold packs and Fed Exed, overnight to BIoCI Laboratory. Samples were received at the laboratory by 10:30 am the following day. Submitted by: Ira F. Salkin, Ph.D., F(AAM)

Test Results

Ap pe nd ix 1 BI Co BIoCI Systems, Inc. LABORATORY TEST REPORT Customer ID: Date issued: WNWN (Report # 293-2) 2004-12-15 T est performed: BI Population Test - Bacillus Atrophaeus (subtilis) S TI Medical Waste Treatment S ystem 1000pph T est performed by: J. Falkowski Date: 2004-12-10 Product ID: Ste rilatorcompany Inc. biological indicator (in glassine envelope) without waste. Teste d at STI System at LabCorp, NJ ((Lot RA17 Exp 2006-04-26, Label population: 2.3e7 per BI) Sample ID Average CFU Recovered Population Not Heat-shocked Heat-shocked Dilution Factor Not Heat-shocked Heat-shocked Untreated Control #1 39 26 e5 0.39e7 (3.9e6) 0.26e7 (2.6e6) Untreated Control #2 104 84 e5 1.0e7 0.84e7 (8.4e6) Untreated Control #3 40 30 e5 0.4e7 (4.0e6) 0.3e7 (3.0e6) Sample ID Average CFU Recovered Population Not Heat-shocked Heat-shocked Dilution Factor Not Heat-shocked Heat-shocked Field Control #1 266 203 e5 2.7e7 2.0e7 Field Control #2 425 339 e5 4.3e7 3.4e7 Field Control #3 349 290 e5 3.5e7 2.9e7 Sample ID Average CFU Recovered Population Not Heat-shocked Dilution factor Not Heat-shocked Exposed S1 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S2 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S3 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S4 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S5 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S6 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S7 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S8 0 1.1 Less than 1.1 Exposed S9 0 1.1 Less than 1.1