HSF Transition: A focus on the next steps in cislunar space

Similar documents
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA s. Pioneering Next Steps in Space Exploration

NASA Space Technology Programs ISS Research and Development Conference June 27, 2012 Richard B. Leshner, Ph.D. Program Executive SBIR/STTR

MISSION OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE FLIGHT DIRECTOR OFFICE. STS-106/ISS 2A.2b/ INCREMENT 0C-2

SpaceX Overview Tom Markusic Director, McGregor Rocket Development Facility 27 July, SpaceX

NASA ISS Research Academy and Pre-Application Meeting. Erin Beck Mission Integrator August 4, 2010

BUILDING TRANSATLANTIC PARTNERSHIPS IN SPACE EXPLORATION THE MPCV-SM STUDY

Space Shuttle Mission SPACE SHUTTLE SYSTEM. Operation. Luca d Agostino, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Università di Pisa, 2010/11.

Space Flight Project Work Breakdown Structure

Space Technology Mission Directorate

Running Head: An Analysis of Shuttle Crew Scheduling Violations 1. An Analysis of Shuttle Crew. Scheduling Violations.

TOPO Trajectory Operations Officer

Space Exploration. A Visual History. Philip Stooke

Commercial Crew Transportation System Certification Requirements for NASA Low Earth Orbit Missions

Robotic Pre-Cursor Contribution to Human NEA Mission. H. Kuninaka JSPEC/JAXA

Why Invest in Space Technology?

Telepresence for Deep Space Missions Project

Table of Contents. I. Introduction II. Goals III. Sector Guidelines IV. Cross-Sector Guidelines... 6

Mars Sample Return Campaign: An Overview. Dr. Firouz Naderi Associate Director NASA s JPL

Can Hubble be Moved to the International Space Station? 1

DEOS. Deutsche Orbitale Servicing Mission. The In-flight Technology Demonstration of Germany s Robotics Approach to Service Satellites

Spacecraft Power for Cassini

SpaceÊ ShuttleÊ Program Artifacts

AIDA: Asteroid Impact & Deflection Assessment A Joint ESA-NASA Mission. Joint ESA NASA AIDA Team

Iodine RF Ion Thruster Development Busek Co. Inc. Vlad Hruby PhD, President

Autonomous Operations for Small, Low-Cost Missions: SME, EOR (STEDI), DATA, and Pluto Express OUTLINE. Visions for Future, Low-Cost Missions

Interna'onal Standards Ac'vi'es on Cloud Security EVA KUIPER, CISA CISSP HP ENTERPRISE SECURITY SERVICES

NASA Strategic Plan 2014

Does currently available technology have the capacity to facilitate a manned mission to Mars?

The Space Shuttle: Teacher s Guide

IAC-15-D2.1 NASA S SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM PROGRAM UPDATE. Todd May NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, USA, todd.may@nasa.gov

NASA Office of Inspector General

NASA Technology Roadmap Update Overview

SPACE OPERATIONS, INC. Executive Summary October 2013

Graduate Systems Engineering Programs: Report on Outcomes and Objec:ves

ESA s Data Management System for the Russian Segment of the International Space Station

Overview of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Mishap Investigation Results For Public Release

HOW TO BUILD A NANORACKS PAYLOAD: NANOLABS

The Threat of Orbital Debris and Protecting NASA Space Assets from Satellite Collisions 28 April 2009

A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING ON-ORBIT PROPELLANT REFUELING

A Service-based Architecture for Automated Guidance, Navigation, & Control Flight Software

Exploration and Science: The Role of the Moon

Advanced Communication Systems

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics School of Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Graduate Program (S.M., Ph.D., Sc.D.

Lunar Program Industry Briefing

Regolith-Derived Heat Shield for Planetary Body Entry and Descent System with In-Situ Fabrication

Space Launch System Status Briefing to NAC Space Operations Committee

The µtorque Momentum-Exchange Tether Experiment

Space Technology Mission Directorate

Commercial Crew Program Status

International Space Station Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (ISS CDRA) Concepts and Advancements

Laguduva Kubendran, PhD, MBA Program Executive, NASA HQ GSFC Emerging Commercial Suborbital Capabilities Workshop September 7,

A long time ago, people looked

Developing Metrics in Systems Integration (ISS Program COTS Integration Model)

The NASA Global Differential GPS System (GDGPS) and The TDRSS Augmentation Service for Satellites (TASS)

JPL ANOMALY ISSUES. Henry B. Garrett Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, 91109

The Apollo Program. PTYS 395 October 9, 2008 Sarah Mattson

ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) Future Development for Exploration

Capitalize on your carbon management solu4on investment

Satellite Breakup Risk Mitigation

Space Export Controls Update

Solar Power for Outer Planets Study

Strategy and Architecture to Establish 'Smart Plants'

How Long Do You Need To Achieve Your Scientific Objectives?

Mission Spacecraft and Operations Overview MAVEN Science Community Workshop December 2, 2012

2015 Small Satellite Market Observations. Copyright 2015, SpaceWorks Enterprises, Inc. (SEI)

Beyond LEO: Life Support Requirements and Technology Development Strategy

Miniaturizing Avionics Technologies for Small Body Missions

SCADE Suite in Space Applications

IAC 09 C3.4.5 SUSTAINABILITY ON-ORBIT: SPACE SOLAR POWER AND CLOUD COMPUTING CONSTELLATION TWO EXAMPLES OF INTERNATIONAL OFFSET PROJECTS

Effec%ve AX 2012 Upgrade Project Planning and Microso< Sure Step. Arbela Technologies

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

Space Cloud: From a Distributed On-board Computer to a Federated System-of Systems in Space Daniel Lüdtke, Volker Schaus, Andreas Gerndt

Case Study. The SACM Journey at the Ontario Government


Transcription:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration HSF Transition: A focus on the next steps in cislunar space Sam Scimemi Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters HEO NAC NASA Headquarters March 2016

Bigger Picture Near-term execution 2

Evolution in perspective and in detail Discussion here at the HEO NAC will inform the next evolution of our plans for the next full NAC later this summer 3

Transitioning HSF from ISS to Cislunar Space (Earth Reliant to the Proving Ground) 4

Framework Context Instead of declaring a definite end date for ISS, NASA will focus on considerations such as Short term crewed habitation missions are being executed in cislunar space while ISS is still operational and being utilized Exploration research and technology/system development activities requiring ISS as a testbed are essentially complete There is an expanded commercial market and broad private/government/academic demand for LEO-based platforms that are based on private and/or public/private business models Value benefit of the ISS has been sufficiently achieved Maximizing international ISS partnership and participation Safe sustainment of the ISS will remain paramount Based on todays planning and reasonable progress towards our goals, transitioning HSF and ISS could be expected in the mid-2020s NASA is working with stakeholders, International Partners and industry to develop plans for transitioning the ISS and the Partnership The Partnership should explore possible outcomes for the ISS platform at its end-oflife De-orbit, disassemble, turn over portions to private industry, maintain government ownership, others ideas 5

Transition from ISS to Cislunar Space: Framework Today Ends with tes+ng, research and demos complete* Phase 0: Explora+on Systems Tes$ng on ISS Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission Marks Move from Phase 1 to Phase 2 Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Tes$ng of Explora+on Systems Ends with one year crewed Mars-class shakedown cruise Phase 2: Cislunar Valida$on of Explora+on Capability *There are several other considera+ons for ISS end-of-life Mid-2020s 2030 6

Draft - Top-Level Phase Objectives Phase 0: Explora4on Research and Systems Tes4ng on ISS Test Mars-capable habita4on systems ECLS, environmental monitoring, crew health equipment, explora+on genera+on EVA suit, fire detec+on/suppression, radia+on monitoring Complete human health & performance research and risk reduc+on ac+vi+es Demonstrate explora4on related technologies and opera4ons Autonomous crew opera+ons Docking, prox ops Phase 1: Cis-lunar Flight Tes4ng of Explora4on Systems Demonstrate that SLS and launch processing systems can insert both Orion and co-manifested payloads into cis-lunar space Demonstrate that Orion and mission opera4ons can conduct crewed missions in cis-lunar space at least for 21 days Demonstrate Mars-extensible systems and mission opera4ons that reduce risk for future deep space missions (with EVA) beyond 21 days Phase 2: Cis-lunar Valida4on of Explora4on Capability Validate Mars class habita4on and habita+on system func+onality and performance Validate Mars class human health and performance Validate opera+onal readiness to leave Earth-Moon system via one year+ shakedown cruise (no resupply/crew exchanges, limited ground interac+on, etc.) enables enables enables Robo+c manipula+on technology and techniques demonstra+ons Remote presence technology development and demonstra+ons Earth/space science Enable development of LEO commercial market Validate cis-lunar as staging orbits Use of high power SEP for deep space missions Asteroid related origins of the solar system science objec+ves Demonstrate real-+me robo+c lunar surface ac+vi+es In situ resource u+liza+on demonstra+ons Origins of the universe, lunar rover vola+le sample return Other scien+fic or research objec+ves?

Next slides will focus on a discussion of Phase 1 objectives 8

Draft - Cis-lunar Flight Testing of Exploration Systems EM-1 Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Tes$ng of Explora+on Systems OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate integrated SLS/Orion capability from launch through recovery in cis-lunar space Obtain ascent and in-space environments data Demonstrate performance of communica+ons, network, and tracking capabili+es Demonstrate ground processing and opera+onal support Deploy secondary payloads Asteroid Retrieval Crewed Mission Marks Move from Phase 1 to Phase 2 Considera+ons, Constraints, and Unknowns: - Ini+al mission design driven by need to meet flight test objec+ves MISSION ELEMENTS AND CAPABILITIES: SLS Block 1 (EM-1) Orion Secondary Payload deployment 9

Draft - Cis-lunar Flight Testing of Exploration Systems Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Tes$ng of Explora+on Systems EM-2 OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate SLS/Orion crewed cislunar transporta+on and trajectory capability in cislunar space up to 21 days w/ 4 crew Demonstrate co-manifested payload capability in cis-lunar space (~ 5MT or be_er) Asteroid Retrieval Crewed Mission Marks Move from Phase 1 to Phase 2 Considera+ons, Constraints, and Unknowns: - Ini+al mission design driven by need to meet flight test objec+ves - Ini+al co-manifes+ng planning driven by conserva+ve analysis - Proximity opera+ons under evalua+on MISSION ELEMENTS AND CAPABILITIES: SLS Block 1B (EM-2 and subsequent) Orion Co-manifested capability (in work) 10

Draft - Cis-lunar Flight Testing of Exploration Systems Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Tes$ng of Explora+on Systems EM-Next 2-3 OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate extended crewed opera+ons in cis-lunar space with 4 crew beyond 21 days Demonstra+on of crew health and performance systems par+cularly exercise, medical, and radia+on protec+on Demonstrate deep space EVA capability Deploy co-manifested element(s) in cislunar space Perform ARCM mission objec+ves MISSION ELEMENTS AND CAPABILITIES: SLS Block 1B Orion Co-manifested element(s) with docking, power, propulsion and mission augmenta+on capabili+es to support increasingly ambi+ous missions in Phase 2 (ARM robo+c spacecraa) Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission Marks Move from Phase 1 to Phase 2 Considera+ons, Constraints, and Unknowns: - Mission(s) orbit driven by ARCM mission objec+ves - Co-manifes+ng capability under analysis - Partner discussions con+nue on execu+on of ARM and ARCM missions and co-manifested elements - Number of addi+onal missions required to execute ARCM dependent on risk buy-down of previous missions and eventual co-manifes+ng capability 11

Draft - Phase 1 Flight Test Objectives CATEGORY Transporta4on Transporta4on Transporta4on Transporta4on Transporta4on Transporta4on Transporta4on Habita4on Working in Space Habita4on Working in Space Habita4on Working in Space Habita4on Working in Space Opera4ons Working in Space Opera4ons Working in Space Opera4ons Working in Space Opera4ons Working in Space Opera4ons Working in Space Opera4ons Working in Space Explora4on Working in Space Explora4on Working in Space Staying Healthy Staying Healthy FLIGHT TEST OBJECTIVE Demonstrate Orion s capability to extract co-manifested payload from SLS fairing. Determine Orion s ability to support missions with at least 4-Crew longer than 21 days in conjunc+on with addi+onal elements. Evaluate Orion s depress/repress for EVA con+ngency opera+ons. Evaluate Orion s off-axis (tail-to-sun) performance. Evaluate EUS TLI Performance with Orion plus Co-Manifested Payload. Evaluate high-power electric propulsion systems. Evaluate high-efficiency, high-power solar arrays in deep space. Demonstrate crew accommoda+ons for Beyond-LEO condi+ons. Evaluate the performance of electrical components in a deep-space radia+on environment. Evaluate cislunar transit habitat airlock and EVA system servicing accommoda+on for ability to support con+ngency EVA opera+ons. Evaluate cislunar transit habitat airlock and EVA system servicing accommoda+on for ability to support nominal deep space mission EVA opera+ons. Demonstrate transi+on between crewed and uncrewed opera+ons, including configura+on for remote/dormant opera+ons and reac+va+on for crewed support. Demonstrate human spacecraa opera+ons in the presence of communica+ons latency. Demonstrate independent (On-board) mission and trajectory design/planning capability. Demonstrate Earth-independent deep space naviga+on. Evaluate stowage strategies to handle logis+cs and trash within available stowage volume for deep space missions. Demonstrate side-by-side human and robo+c opera+ons. Demonstrate collec+on and return of geologic asteroid samples. Demonstrate research sample acquisi+on, handling, analysis, and cura+on requiring environmentally controlled condi+ons with no cross-contamina+on permi_ed. Demonstrate/evaluate space radia+on protec+on and monitoring. Demonstrate/evaluate human health, performance, and environmental health in a hos+le and closed environment. Staying Healthy Evaluate the effects of deep space on complex organisms, plants, food, medicines, and animal models. 12

Forward work: Need to parse draft lower level objectives into individual EM missions and co-manifested elements PROVING GROUND OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION (EXAMPLES) Demonstrate SLS ascent, booster separation, core stage separation, Orion and co-manifested cargo insertion into LEO and on cis-lunar trajectory including guidance targeting accuracy. ICPS/EUS burn, engine restart capability & disposal. Deliver Orion, crew & cargo to cis-lunar. Secondary payload deployment from ICPS/EUS. Crew module ingress, cabin pressure leak check, egress after splashdown. Recovery of flight crew no more than 2 hours after splashdown. Autonomous piloting of spacecraft through ascent, in-space including cis-lunar and entry flight phases with automated and manual control capability. Ascent to LEO, commit to Lunar trajectory (TLI burn), outbound and return trajectory correction burns (between Earth/Moon), Entry, tending in and exit from cis-lunar orbit (possibilities include Near Rectilinear Orbit (NRO), Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO), Hybrid Triple). Cis-lunar rendezvous, proximity operations, docking, separation. Control trajectory using OMS engine and SM auxiliary thrusters. CM separation burns, trajectory adjustment prior to EI. Earth return including trajectory correction burn, separation burn following SM jettison, high speed (11km/sec) guided Earth re-entry, Entry Interface and splashdown landing location targeting Open and evolvable exploration architecture that increases SLS upmass capability to LEO from 70 mt (Block 1) to 105 mt (Block 1B), SLS payload volume from 5m (LVSA) to 8.4m (USA). Crewed duration in space extends beyond 21 days (Orion only capability). Maximum crew size capability increases from 4 to 6 crew. Accomplish commercial and international partner goals and mission objectives in deep space. Cis-lunar rendezvous, prox ops, docking, undocking, separation. Navigation from LEO using GPS, in deep space using star tracker and DSN. Communication in LEO via SN, in deep space via DSN, ship-to-ship, laser communications. EVA operations including Crew suit-up, prebreathe operations, airlock ingress, depress, egress, Extra- Vehicular Operations, ingress, hatch closure, airlock pressurization and leak check, suit doffing. Spacecraft consumables management (propellant, He), power battery/solar array management (insolation, eclipse, LEO, deep space), thermal system balance, maintenance. Logistics, Staging in cis-lunar including departure, dormancy, reactivation and later return. Cargo operations, stowage, transfer, destow, disposal, inventory, maintenance and repair, daily planning, information transfer with Earth, system maintenance, periodic system checks and cleaning Crew consumable management (food, water, O2, N2). Evaluate crew health, performance, risk mitigation techniques in deep space environment. Radiation monitoring, crew cabin humidity control, carbon dioxide removal, water quality, food preparation, crew exercise, hygiene, sleep, mental health, telemedicine, medical kit, PPE, smoke/fire monitoring, toxic atmosphere monitoring. Crew cabin temperature control, Vestibule leak check, hatch opening, ingress, outfitting, egress, hatch closure, vestibule depress, water recycling, atmospheric revitalization, PPCO2 control, O2 and cabin pressure maintenance. Co-manifested cargo operations, staging in cis-lunar, departure, remote tending, dormancy, reactivation, re-rendezvous and docking Enable deep space robotic precursor missions, remote observation, imagery & data collection, technology experiments and demonstrations, payload deployments, crew assisted scientific sample return Crew and autonomous data collection, retrieval including imagery, flight crew medical experiments, in-cabin (CM) pressurized science (short and long duration), external (SM) UnPressurized Cargo (UPC), crew assisted deep space scientific sample return, secondary payload deployment from ICPS/EUS, data return Advance integrated human/robotic operations via spacecraft command & control, systems maintenance, health & status monitoring. Manual/autonomous command & control of spacecraft, integration with ground team on Earth accounting for time lag, remote operation of uncrewed assets in cis-lunar 13

Discussion 14