December 2010. A survey of mobile phone usage by health professionals in the UK



Similar documents
Review of policy on professional insurance and indemnity

Education and Training Committee, 10 March Professional indemnity insurance. Executive summary and recommendations.

Overview of the UK Health Sector: the NHS. Frances Pennell-Buck

Healthcare support workers in England:

How To Improve Your Business

A framework of operating principles for managing invited reviews within healthcare

SFT F15 Develop and implement a plan for direct response fundraising

Training and education framework for fertility nursing

Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for General Practitioners

TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSES

The Healthcare Leadership Model Appraisal Hub. 360 Assessment User Guide

JOB DESCRIPTION. Chief Nurse

Summary of responses to the consultation and our decisions as a result

Position statement on the education and training of health care assistants (HCAs)

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare

National Initiatives Impacting Healthcare Information Technology (HCIT) in the United Kingdom ehealth Action Plan to Increase HCIT Market Maturity

Institute of Leadership & Management. Creating a coaching culture

Medical leadership for better patient care: Support for healthcare organisations 2015

Nursing our future. An RCN study into the challenges facing today s nursing students in the UK

Triennial Review of NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) A Review of NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) Call for Evidence

Leadership and management for all doctors

Welcome to the HFMA Online Academy

Revalidation of nurses and midwives

The Development of the Clinical Healthcare Support Worker Role: A Review of the Evidence. Executive Summary

Spring in partnership with. Employee Outlook

How to complain about a doctor

Building Equality, Diversity and Inclusion into the NHS Board Selection Process for Non Executives and Independent Directors March 2012 Edition

TELEPHONY BE A PRIORITY FOR YOUR BUSINESS?

Prospectus: Facilities Management

Report on District Nurse Education in the United Kingdom

Nursing & Midwifery Learning Disability Liaison Nurse Acute Services Band 7 subject to job evaluation. Trustwide

Prepared by Ipsos MRBI for the Health Service Executive

Data Continuity Group. Partner Program Overview

Unite the Union Consultation Response to: Health Care and Associated Professions (Indemnity Arrangements) Order 2013

Opening Doors. The Charter for SME Friendly Procurement

Dental Care Professionals Pay Findings from the Dental Business Trends survey

PUBLIC HEALTH WALES NHS TRUST CHIEF EXECUTIVE JOB DESCRIPTION

Guidance for Taking Responsibility: Accountable Clinicians and Informed Patients

How to complain about a doctor. England

A simple yet advanced toolkit enabling you to communicate in new ways with patients and the public.

Ready for revalidation. Guidance on colleague and patient questionnaires

Why SAAS makes sense: The benefits of Cloud Computing for Archiving

Website development Invitation to Tender

Clinical Academic Careers for Nursing, Midwifery and the Allied Health Professions Council of Deans of Health Position Statement

UK Wealth Management Research Portfolio Tribe High-end Doctors

Mobile technology for your world. 2 way paging

Enterprise Mobility Strategy

INTRODUCTION ESCALATING COSTS = DECREASED REVENUE. SMS in the Call Center: How mobile messaging can increase profits and reduce costs immediately

Director of Nursing & Patient Experience

4. Proposed changes to Mental Health Nursing Pre-Registration Nursing

Mobile Marketing. An Inside View from Marketing Managers. A Report by ZinMobi. ZinMobi

Health Education East Midlands Approach to Quality. Change to Quality Management Visits - Process from April 2014.

HARNHAM DATA & ANALYTICS SALARY GUIDE 2013 The definitive source of salary information for the UK Data & Analytics market

[BEAUMONT HEALTH PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY] Beaumont Health Physician Leadership Academy

Impact of the health White Paper. What do doctors think?

freedom business unleashed enterprise cloud computing Your business technologists. Powering progress

Part 2: New business models

Mobile Health in the Health Insurance Industry Kai-Lik Foh, Mobile Health Programme Manager, GSMA

Record keeping. Guidance for nurses and midwives

ICT investment trends in Brazil. Enterprise ICT spending patterns through to the end of 2015 May 2014

ehealth: the future of health care Royal College of Nursing position statement

Enabling efficiency through Data Governance: a phased approach

SMALL BUSINESS REPUTATION & THE CYBER RISK

Northern Ireland Waiting Time Statistics:

The forecast looks bright for cloud based telephony

OPTIMISING PATIENT OUTCOMES THROUGH PHYSICIAN EDUCATION

Your Mobility Strategy Guide Book

Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 11 March 2015 TB Oxford University Hospitals Trust Nursing and Midwifery Strategy

Laying the foundations for The Year of The Cloud

HEALTH AND EDUCATION

Price caps for agency staff: proposed rules and consultation

England. Guide for applicants

Part 4: Trends in procurement

We are the nursing and midwifery regulator for England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Islands.

Workplace representation. Indemnity. We ve got. We ve got. you covered. NMC referrals. Legal advice and support

G Day Perceptions and Buyer Behaviour Latest Consumer Views

Programmatic Advertising. The B2B Marketer Benchmarks, Budgets and Trends

INDEPENDENT AMBULANCE SERVICES TO REGULATE?

Council - 26 March Professional indemnity insurance. Executive summary and recommendations

Research and information management strategy Using research and managing information to ensure delivery of the Commission s objectives

July 2013 Page 1 of 6

NHS saves millions with web3 Source to Pay CASE STUDIES

Enabling efficiency through Data Governance: a phased approach. An Experian white paper

VMware Cloud Adoption Study

Introduction. Building a workforce fit for the digital age

Health and wellbeing benefits survey That s the world of Denplan for you.

Patient Group Directions. Guidance and information for nurses

Volunteer Managers National Occupational Standards

Education Surveys and Trends for

Amendments to the Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) Regulations (Northern Ireland) Consultation Response Report

Brand Loyalty in Insurance Companies

Investment for charities. Good thinking. Well applied.

LanguageLine Solutions. Introduction and Brief Service Overview for Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust

Designing Mobile Apps: A Roadmap for Businesses

Regulation of health apps: a practical guide

REHABILITATION ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WHEELCHAIRS AND SPECIAL SEATING

Information Technology Strategic Plan

Request for feedback on the revised Code of Governance for NHS Foundation Trusts

What is Driving Rapid Growth in the Australian Mobile Advertising Market?

Director of Nursing & Quality. Helen Coleman Associate Director for Nursing Workforce

Transcription:

December 2010 A survey of mobile phone usage by health professionals in the UK

Contents Contents...2! Executive Summary...3! Foreword...4! Methodology...7! Results...8! Mobile phone ownership...8! Mobile network operators (MNOs): market share...9! Mobile network operators (MNOs): contract penetration... 10! Mobile network operators (MNOs): selection criteria...11! Mobile phone handsets: market share...12! Mobile phone handsets: selection criteria...13! Mobile phone spending: average monthly bill...14! Mobile phone spending: bill proportion that relates to work...15! Mobile phone spending: bill proportion that is claimed back... 16! Mobile phone usage at work...17! Mobile phone usage at work: frequency... 18! Mobile phone usage at work: purpose... 19! Mobile phone usage at work: unsatisfied demand...20! Mobile phone usage at work: frequency comparison...21! Mobile phone usage at work: purpose comparison...22! Mobile phone usage at work: perceived employer policy... 23! Mobile phone usage at work: impact on productivity... 24! Conclusion... 25! Appendix 1: Sample characteristics...27! Appendix 2: Survey questions covered...27! http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 2

Executive Summary Introduction Mobile phones have been shown to improve patient care and their use in a clinical environment is becoming more widely accepted. Poor communication is a significant waste of clinician time and healthcare resources. Few studies have quantified the use of mobile phones for communication by health professionals in the UK. Methodology d4 carried out an online survey inviting health professionals to state both their usage of, and attitudes to, mobile phones in the work place. Respondents were approached via email and the internet over 6 weeks during August and September 2010. We received 474 complete responses from registered health professionals. [Alternative editions are available that segment this into (i) 161 GMC registered doctors, (ii) 223 NMC registered nurses and midwives and (iii) 76 registered allied health professionals.] Results 99% of registered health professionals surveyed use a mobile phone 81% use a smart phones (phoned enabled for internet or email use) 80% of registered health professionals surveyed carry a mobile phone while at work o 82% use a mobile phone for communicating with colleagues o 46% for accessing information on the intranet/internet o 18% for running work related software/applications o 18% for communicating with patients Even though o Only 8% of health professionals who incur a work related expense receive compensation for the cost incurred o 25% believe their employer does not allow mobile phone use at work Of the remaining 20% who do not carry a mobile phone at work o 92% stated that they would use one for a work related purpose if provided Across all registered health professionals surveyed o 16% disagreed with the statement: I would be more productive if I had a mobile phone for use at work Conclusion Mobile phone usage by registered health professionals for work related purposes is significant, despite the potential barriers of economics and policy. More should be done to improve clinical communication using mobile technology in order to improve patient care, raise productivity and maximise economic resources. http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 3

Foreword Love them or loathe them, mobile phones are a feature of modern life. Almost every adult in the UK has one, and is familiar with their use as a portable telephone and two-way pager via SMS. From when we wake until we fall asleep, the mobile is, for many of us, always within arm's reach. The lexicon is evolving alongside the technology. In developed markets, the term "mobile phone" is ceding ground to "smart phone", a hybrid device that boasts components and functionality more closely resembling a computer than a telephone. This combination of both physical proximity and digital capability means that we are increasingly able to work anywhere, anytime. This is particularly important for professionals who are constantly on the move and rarely have the opportunity to sit down in front of a desk with a networked computer and/or a landline telephone. The need for good communication in such an inherently mobile and highly complex industry as healthcare, where addressing patient needs is paramount, is perhaps unparalleled. Yet our survey shows that the provision of mobile devices to health professionals by employers is very low. Fortunately for patients, our survey suggests that a high proportion of health professionals are bridging the gap left by their employer and are supporting their duties by carrying their own mobile at work. We applaud this pragmatic and selfless solution to a perceived system failure, particularly given negative employer attitudes to the use of mobile devices in the workplace as reported by some survey participants. The costs incurred by health professionals using their own mobiles for work purposes are not insignificant however. Based on our survey data, d4 estimate these out of pocket expenses, currently absorbed by UK health professionals, are as much as 100 million per year. The lack of financial support for mobile phone usage by UK health professionals is difficult to understand when one considers the cost of poor communication within the healthcare system. Leveraging US research published this year, d4 estimate that poor communication costs NHS hospitals in England alone in excess of 1 billion 1, using conservative figures for wasted doctor time, wasted nurse time, and patients remaining in hospital beds for longer than necessary. The full social impact is likely to be a magnitude higher. Alternatively consider this: the cost of a patient bed day is estimated at 400 and up. This is comparable to the total cost of ownership for a smart phone for an entire year. So, if a smart phone saves one patient bed day per year, it has immediately paid for itself. d4 was founded to address a number of concerns in response to these observations. We believe health professionals should receive more support while the supply of modern technology by their employers fails to meet their needs. At present, the majority of health professionals are purchasing mobile technology through standard retail 1 http://blog.d4.org.uk/2010/09/inefficient-communicationa-1bn-problem-for-nhs-hospitals-in-england.html http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 4

channels. We suggest this has the following drawbacks 1. By acting individually or in small groups, health professionals do not achieve the buying power that should come with belonging to one of the largest sectors in the UK workforce. Over 1.4million health professionals are listed on the nine statutory registers in the UK. 2. Network operators are unable to differentiate the needs of health professionals if they purchase through standard channels and therefore receive the same standard service as per any other retail customer, with limited access to any central service architecture typically deployed across large workforces. 3. Health professionals receive little support to aid their purchasing decisions given a specific use case they might have due to the nature of their work. 4. Despite using a mobile at work to support their duties, health professionals are rarely compensated for this usage. Further, the procurement of this technology is predominantly made from their posttax income. We want d4 to become a social enterprise at a national level, coordinating the significant existing personal expenditure on technology by health professionals to: Improve patient safety, care, and outcomes Reduce the cost of ownership for the individual Raise security awareness and compliance Support enhanced productivity and effectiveness Encourage greater use of mobile devices in the workplace Instead of purchasing products and services as individuals from their post tax income to support their healthcare work, health professionals will be invited to become members of d4 and receive benefits in return, leveraging group purchasing power and tax efficiencies. This will range from the provision of mobile devices (i.e. hardware), digital applications for their mobile devices (i.e. software) and supporting products and services according to an individual s needs. Our goal is to be able to provide health professionals with mobile devices and key applications at prices that are better than they can achieve through typical retail channels. In parallel, we also want to support our members use of this technology in a manner that recognises their professional status, e.g. bespoke, priority assistance from suppliers that differentiates health professionals from retail customers. Over time, we want to help our members further by providing additional good services as directed by them. We are currently working hard to put all the necessary building blocks in place to make this a reality. This includes raising finance to fund the initial startup, negotiating with suppliers to source the technology that health professionals currently use and to build the infrastructure for further growth and innovation. We are also working with the government and other stakeholders to ensure a sustainable future for d4. This survey marks the beginning of the development of d4, by providing an evidence base of current mobile phone usage by health professionals. We hope you find this an interesting and informative document, and we welcome your feedback. James Sherwin-Smith Chief Executive, d4 http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 5

Introduction d4 survey of mobile phone usage by health professionals in the UK Mobile technology has the potential to transform the provision of healthcare in the UK. However looking beyond the hype that surrounds mhealth and its significance for society, we believe there should be a focus on the needs of health professionals, an area that is consistently over looked. After all, if patients are to embrace the freedoms of having access to their own healthcare data to manage their treatment (see the recent consultation paper 2 Liberating the NHS: An Information Revolution ), it is imperative that health professionals are suitably equipped at the point of care, and are therefore in a position to advise patients based on their own assessment and experience of the technology available. The primary purpose of this survey was to establish a simple fact base of UK health professionals usage of, and attitudes to, mobile phone technology. Few studies have attempted to benchmark usage, despite evidence that suggests that this can deliver significant benefits for patients 3,4 and that poor communication 5,6 costs healthcare systems billions of pounds each year. The key questions we wanted the survey to answer were: 1. Are mobile phones used by health professionals at work? 2. Which phones and networks do health professionals use and why? 3. For what purposes are mobile phones used by health professionals, and how often? 4. Are health professionals paying for work related mobile phones use and to what extent? 5. Is employer policy an inhibitor to mobile phone use by health professionals? 6. Do health professionals believe that mobile phones raise their productivity? We believe this document will be useful for a variety of different audiences Health professionals and executives Organisations representing the interests of health professionals and patients Policy makers and regulators Healthcare employers, managers and governors Mobile devices manufacturers Mobile network operators Software developers Patients and the general public as a whole 2 Department of Health (18 October 2010) retrieved from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/consultations/liveconsultations/dh_120080 on 9 Dec 2010 3 Roy G Soto et al., Communication in critical care environments: mobile telephones improve patient care, Anesthesia and Analgesia 102, no. 2 (February 2006): 535-541. 4 K Fitzpatrick and E Vineski, The role of cordless phones in improving patient care, Physician Assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants) 17, no. 6 (June 1993): 87-88, 92. 5 Ritu Agarwal, Daniel Z Sands, and Jorge Díaz Schneider, Quantifying the economic impact of communication inefficiencies in U.S. hospitals, Journal of Healthcare Management / American College of Healthcare Executives 55, no. 4 (August 2010): 265-281; discussion 281-282. 6 http://www.hospitaldr.co.uk/blogs/dr-blogs/mobile-devices-offer-a-step-change-in-communication http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 6

Methodology The target group for this survey was registered health professionals in the UK. Total responses: 639 Complete responses: 565 Valid responses: Specialties: 474 registered health professionals All specialties Survey period: 6 weeks during August-September 2010 Method: Survey type: Sampling: Online questionnaire Multiple choice questions Random, voluntary, anonymous This was an independent survey funded by d4 (Devices 4 Limited) and devoid of commercial influence. The survey was designed and executed by d4, incorporating feedback from external advisers in both the healthcare and market research communities. The chosen design was a balance of different requirements. The aim was to achieve appropriate coverage of the subject area via concise and efficient data capture, using a question set that delivers both insightful and reliable responses. However mobile technology is a fast evolving field. The results of this survey are therefore subject to change over time. It is therefore the intention of d4 to repeat this survey on an ongoing basis. http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 7

Appendix 1: Sample characteristics Sample size Gender Location Professional Experience 474 registered health professionals 96 Male 158 Female 220 not disclosed 397 England 7 Northern Ireland 33 Scotland 19 Wales 18 not disclosed 252 0-5 years 66 6-10 years 55 11-20 years 55 21-30 years 35 30+ years 9.7 years average professional experience. Appendix 2: Survey questions covered 1. What gender are you? 2. Which employment band (or nearest equivalent) are you? 3. Which regulatory body are you registered with? 4. Which year did/will you start working in health care? 5. Which Health Authority area do you work in predominantly? 6. Do you have a mobile phone? 7. What is the brand of your mobile phone handset? 8. What was your main reason for choosing this handset? 9. How did you receive your mobile phone? 10. Is your phone enabled for internet or email use? 11. Which mobile network operator do you have a phone with? 12. What was the main reason for choosing your network operator? 13. What type of deal do you have with the mobile network operator? 14. On average, how much do you spend on your mobile? 15. On average, how much of this is work related? 16. On average, what proportion of your bill do you claim back as a work related expense? 17. Do you carry a mobile phone while at work? 18. During a typical shift, how often would you use a mobile phone? 19. During a typical shift, what would you use your phone for? Please tick all that apply. 20. How is mobile phone usage viewed by your employer? 21. "I would be more productive if I had a mobile phone for use at work." How do you feel about this statement? http://www.d4.org.uk 2010 Copyright Devices 4 Ltd. 27

Order form To order electronic copies of the d4 survey, please send this completed form to d4. Nursing and Midwifery Edition... 200 Medical Edition... 200 Allied Health Professionals Edition... 200 All Health Professionals Edition... 200 Total! 2010-Survey-NMC! 2010-Suvery-GMC! 2010-Survey-AHP! 2010-Survey-ALL Name... Contact telephone... Email address... Building Name/No... Street... Town... City... County/State... Post code/zip... Country... Payment card type... Card number... Card expiry date... Last 3 digits from the back... Name on card... Cardholder s address same as above? Yes! No! (If No, please complete the section below) Building Name/No... Street... Town... City... County/State... Post code/zip... Country... Data Protection: The details supplied will be used to process the payment and will not be passed on to any third party except for the sole purpose of facilitating this payment. Additionally, from time to time we may wish to contact you to update you on our work and activities. If you do not wish us to contact you, please tick here!. >> Please send completed form to d4 via Fax +44 845 686 3435 or Email research@d4.org.uk <<

d4 is a non-profit organisation that aims to improve patient care by placing modern technology in the hands of doctors, nurses and other health professionals. Simply put, we believe that better communication means better care. 2010. All rights reserved. Devices 4 Limited Registered in England & Wales Registered charity no. 1135435 Registered company no. 0711788. Registered office: 275 Wandsworth Bridge Road, London, SW6 2TX Tel: 0845 686 3434 Fax: 0845 686 3435 Email: info@d4.org.uk