Joseph L. McCourt Middle School Cumberland, RI 02864 Servicing students in grades 6 8



Similar documents
Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Principal Practice Observation Tool

GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards

Curriculum and Instruction

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Source- Illinois State Board of Education (

Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Systemic or school wide, coordinated efforts designed to create a climate for learning

Texas State University University Library Strategic Plan

Position Statement on English Language Arts Education Connecticut State Board of Education December 3, 2008

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Masters of Science in Curriculum & Instruction Core Alignment of Summative Assessments to Standards

I. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

Standards for Excellence

Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

Kentucky Teaching Conditions Standards

DRAFT. Denver Plan Every Child Succeeds

Standards for Professional Development

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

Framework for Leadership

Position Statement on Science Education

The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists

PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

*Performance Expectations, Elements and Indicators

Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [ ]

St Margaret s C of E (VA) Junior School School Behaviour Policy

Masters of Reading Information Booklet. College of Education

The Standards for Leadership and Management: supporting leadership and management development December 2012

... and. Uses data to help schools identify needs for prevention and intervention programs.

GUIDANCE. Rocky River City School District. Globally Competitive Exceptional Opportunites Caring Environment Successful Students

Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders

Graduate Program Assessment Plan 2014 School Psychology, EPSY

HEALTHY. Whole Child Tenet #1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P

NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists

~Empowering and Motivating for Today and Tomorrow~

Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)

Strategic Plan

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MA TESOL

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

Approved by the Virginia Board of Education on September 27, Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia

School-Based Teacher Educators Take On New Roles In Professional Development Schools. Richard E. Ishler University of South Carolina

Oak Park School District. School Psychologist Evaluation

Literacy Education. Master of Science in Education: Program Overview. Program Highlights

Ayers Institute Leadership Resources: PSEL Alignment

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

THE ROLE OF THE SCHOOL COUNSELOR

Educational Leadership

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

North Carolina New Schools Design Principle 1: Ready for College. Beginning Early Steps Growing Innovations New Paradigms

Evaluation of School Psychologists

Goal #1 Learner Success Ensure a distinctive learning experience and foster the success of students.

Rhode Island School of Design Strategic Plan Summary for critical making. making critical

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

DRAFT For use in validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

NORTH CAROLINA PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK STANDARDS

VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Psychologist Observation/Discussion Form TEACHING STANDARD 1

This historical document is derived from a 1990 APA presidential task force (revised in 1997).

Integrative Essay. Elizabeth Slack-Joles

Safe & Caring Schools Policy Revised 2013

AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning

NATIONAL COMPETENCY-BASED TEACHER STANDARDS (NCBTS) A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FOR FILIPINO TEACHERS

Section III. An Excellent Christian Teacher. Characteristics and Expectations. GRCS Handbook 1

West Ranch High School Mission Statement

Park Community Charter School Kaukauna Area School District. Information Technology Plan. (July 1, 2011 June 30, 2014)

Conceptual Framework. A. Overview and Conceptual framework

A Scho ol Reform Framework for Improving Adolescent Literacy for All Students

Indiana School Nurse Effectiveness Rubric

Longridge Primary SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN DATA LABEL-PUBLIC 1

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

The University of Mississippi School of Education

STRATEGIC PLAN

North Carolina New Schools Page 1 of 14

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND FOUNDATIONS

Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals

The school principal practices effective cultural leadership when he or she

Transcription:

Joseph L. McCourt Middle School Cumberland, RI 02864 Servicing students in grades 6 8 Mission Statement: Joseph L. McCourt Middle School (JLMMS) is committed to providing an atmosphere of mutual respect and trust between teachers and students. Teachers will engage in best practices to provide all students with meaningful learning experiences. These experiences will ensure appreciation of one s individuality, as well as a passion for all students to become life long learners and productive members of society. Vision Statement: We believe in: exemplifying cooperation, determination, responsibility, respect and pride fostering a safe, nurturing environment embracing different learning styles supporting academic, social and emotional needs creating curricula that is relevant, exploratory and challenging collaboration to form family and community partnerships Who We Are: At Joseph L. McCourt Middle School, we (faculty, staff and administration) believe that all students can reach their academic potential. We have a multitude of instructional resources available that not only address the core instruction in the classroom, but also target intervention and enrichment as well. The enrichment mindset means fostering intellectual curiosity, emotional engagement, and social bonding. We make clear curriculum choices that meet our students needs on their continuum of learning. The faculty and staff demonstrate great care for our students and their needs. The curriculum that we have adopted and implemented is coherent and standards based. We regularly assess our students formatively and summatively providing them with both informal and formal feedback. One of the most important strengths of Joseph L. McCourt Middle School is the ability to make decisions that are in the best interest of supporting ALL students. We utilize a collaborative decision making process that allows for a collective sense of expertise in the building, as well as a sense of accountability to one another We are a learning community which embraces one another s diverse background. We operate as an orderly climate that has a strong ability to collect, build, and make decisions utilizing student performance data. We place a high importance on reading skills and build our intervention model around research based best practices

that place reading first. We believe that all skills, no matter what the content area is, build off of a student s ability to read well. Standards of Practice 2014 2017 Central office One of the most important partnerships that school leaders can establish with the district office personnel is to leverage support for their individual school needs. Central Leadership team members from Central office have read and approved the standards of practice, and have pledged to provide support for the unique needs of Joseph L. McCourt Middle School. Support is defined as resources, personnel, autonomy, and shared responsibility for the needs of the learning community at JLMMS. School Administration The work that we (faculty, staff and administration) complete each day at JLMMS tends to be more heuristic. Current research regarding best practice in heuristic work calls for experimentation. Because there is no algorithm (single path to a solution) to complete the work, the JLMMS learning community will work tirelessly to devise novel solutions to heuristic problems/work. Routine day to day tasks completed by all staff will come with direction Non routine tasks completed by all staff will depend on self direction and will have autonomy.individuals experience more drive and greater motivation when they are able to have creative autonomy. By allowing staff members the ability to be autonomous, they have the opportunity to pursue mastery and communicate how their daily duties relate to a larger purpose. All stakeholders (students, faculty, staff and administration) at JLMMS will complete all work to the best of their abilities.when the performing and completing of the work is the reward, the learning experience deepens. All work at JLMMS will be performed at optimal levels, resulting in deep learning and ensuring success for all stakeholders All faculty and staff work includes rationale as to why the requested work is important or necessary. In addition, all faculty and staff will be provided with meaningful feedback about their completed work. Feedback will focus on the specifics of the work completed. Positive feedback will focus on the effort put forth. The more that the feedback given is about one s effort and strategy, rather than about achieving a particular outcome, the more

effective it is. Current research on best practices show that adults have three innate psychological needs: competence, autonomy, and relatedness. When those needs are satisfied, adults are motivated, productive and happy. By agreeing to these standards of practice, all stakeholders at JLMMS will move closer to achieving a productive and purposeful learning environment. We understand that intrinsic motivation emerges when people have autonomy over the four T s: task, time, technique, and team. Additionally, people strive to achieve autonomy over four aspects of work: what people do, when they do it, how they do it and with whom they do it. All efforts will be made by the school administration to provide autonomy over the four T s in order for them to achieve autonomy over the four aspects of work. As professionals (faculty, staff and administration), we know that encouraging autonomy does not mean discouraging accountability. We (faculty, staff and administration) presume that people want to be accountable. By combining autonomy with accountability, we ensure that we (faculty, staff and administration) have control over our tasks, time, technique and our team. The school administration will allow faculty/staff to take risks and try new strategies to address school wide/classroom issues. Research on best practices in schools that are high poverty/high performing support this approach. School Wide By reviewing data, we (faculty, staff and administration) realize that truancy is a concern that needs to be addressed in a proactive manner. We will review our current practices, as well as best practice methodologies to increase attendance improve pedagogy improve climate reduce discipline violations Establish programs that help support students struggling with social and emotional needs Establish academic coaches for struggling students to help promote a primary and reliable relationship. Build strong, long term relationships with families Provide an outreach, or offer opportunities, for families to identify their most critical areas of need in understanding the content that is given to their child. Develop community partnerships for support (medical, dental, mental health). Identify the characteristics of our school s demographics, and acknowledge and embrace our population s diversity.

As educators, we will become knowledgeable about issues related to our school s diversity in the broader society and take action where we can have the most influence in our own school community. Recognize the difference between taught skills and hard wired skills by embedding and modeling skills with explicit teaching. As educators, we need to model the behavior we expect students to exhibit Use assessments, both summative and formative, to help guide instruction and utilize resources to serve as a healthy part of everyday teaching and learning. Work to develop effective partnerships to garner resources from sources external to the school and to become a larger part of the community. Faculty/Staff All faculty/staff will utilize a method of communication (website, calendar in the student information system) to provide information to families, students, community members, and stakeholders. Faculty/staff will develop a positive recognition strategies for students that is flexible in nature, but consistently administered. Minutes will be recorded and shared with the school administration through Google Forms for teacher meetings (horizontal/vertical CPT during the school day or early release Wednesdays). The school administration will review and support faculty/staff regarding needs that (need) to be addressed through the minutes. Special Education department will coordinate with general education teachers/paraprofessionals to work with students who have any incomplete work during academic enrichment. Faculty/staff will meet monthly to share best instructional practices that help meet academic standards in their content. Faculty/staff will understand how demographics and diversity influences families lives and student learning. Faculty/staff will explore and establish community based learning programs that have successfully demonstrated particular effectiveness for students living in low income homes and those of other risk factors. Faculty/staff will explore schools that offer a blend of before and after school tutoring, weekend and vacation catch up sessions and sheltered classroom support.

References Jensen, E. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind what being poor does to kids' brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Parrett, W., & Budge, K. M. (2011). Turning high poverty schools into high performing schools. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD. Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us. Daniel H. Pink.. New York: Riverhead.