The Changing Shape of Leadership



Similar documents
Northern Kentucky University College of Education and Human Services EDA 649 School System Administration 3 credit hours

The Thoughtful Classroom Program

Assessment Resources and Tools

About the Finalist. Cumberland County Schools North Carolina DISTRICT PROFILE

SUCCESSFUL SCHOOL RESTRUCTURING

Playmakers: Build and lead great

Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Voices Over

100-Day Plan. A Report for the Boston School Committee By Dr. Tommy Chang, Superintendent of Schools. July 15

Leadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition

PRDV.71326COA Common Core Writers Workshop: Teaching Students to Internalize and Apply Writing Strategies for High Quality Student Writing SYLLABUS

Striving for Success: Teacher Perspectives of a Vertical Team Initiative

Orientation and Induction of the Beginning Teacher

Professional Development: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide

Principles to Actions

Section I: Introduction

The Principal as Instructional Leader

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Strategic Advisor for Constituent Services; ASCD, Alexandria, Virginia

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

What Is a Professional Learning Community? Richard DuFour

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

From the Top: Superintendents on Instructional Leadership

Under the Start Your Search Now box, you may search by author, title and key words.

Alignment of State Standards and Teacher Preparation Program Standards

Successful Educational Leadership at High Performing Schools

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Principal Reflection Paper

Teachers as Learners: Elements of Effective Professional Development

EDUC Summer Models of School Improvement and Reform-EDUC Semester Hours 3. Semester/Year Summer 2010

School District of Janesville

Public Education Leadership Project

What Is The Job Of The High School Counselor Understanding The Job Of The High School Counselor

Integrative Essay. Elizabeth Slack-Joles

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Th e Principal s Handbook for Leading Inclusive Schools

A Blueprint for Transforming Philadelphia s Public Schools. Safe, high-quality schools. Fiscal sustainability.

Campaign Manager: Amee Xiong, ;

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards





Copyright 1980 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. All rights reserved.


Using Data to Improve Teacher Induction Programs

A Common North Star: College Summit and the Common Core State Standards

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

professional development design

California Standards Implementation. Teacher Survey

2015 Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act Grants Project Abstracts from the U.S. Department of Education

Research over the past twenty

To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction

S. Dallas Dance, Ph.D.

Serving Gifted Students with Virtual Education in Elementary School

Physical Education Is Critical to Educating the Whole Child

Sustaining the Race to the Top Reforms

Succession Planning at Brevard Public Schools. by Nicholas P. Morgan

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Learning Environments: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

Charles A. Szuberla, Jr.

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Center on Education Policy, Reading First: Locally appreciated, nationally troubled

EDUC 605 Curriculum Development and Assessment.. 3 cr

Self-Guided Tour to NSRF TM Critical Friends Groups TM

DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS. EduStat Case Study. Denver Public Schools: Making Meaning of Data to Enable School Leaders to Make Human Capital Decisions

WILMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Wilmington, Massachusetts. Title I Program District Parent Involvement Plan 2014/2015

Sarasota County Schools: Successful Transition from ANGEL to Blackboard Learn

Professional Learning Communities and the Positive Effects on Student Achievement: A National Agenda for School Improvement

Charles G. Taylor Elementary School A Communication Guide for Parents

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

Joseph L. McCourt Middle School Cumberland, RI Servicing students in grades 6 8

Development of CEL s Teacher Evaluation Rubric

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

ACTION 100 and Students Receiving Special Education Services

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Transcription:

May 2002 Volume 59 Number 8 Beyond Instructional Leadership Pages 61-63 The Changing Shape of Leadership The Annenberg Institute for School Reform's work with principals, superintendents, and other educators yields insights into the collaborative leading and learning going on in today's schools. Deborah King May 2002 Terry, the superintendent of a school district of 63,000 students, is meeting today with the district's Instructional Leadership Team. In addition to Terry, the team includes the chief operating officer, the deputy director of teaching and learning, three deputy superintendents, the chief financial officer, the equity officer, the director of human resources, and nine principals who serve as cluster leaders in the district. The team meets twice a month and spends most of its three-hour meeting discussing the teaching and learning work of the schools. This week, the group is focusing on closing the achievement gap between students of color and their white peers. To set the context for its own learning, the group has invited Ron Ferguson, a Harvard researcher, to start the meeting with a 45-minute presentation summarizing current research findings. After this presentation, Terry poses an essential question to the team: How does what we learned today tie in with our district's focus on high school reform? The discussion generates a number of suggestions for using district resources (including a recently awarded grant) to implement strategies to improve relationships between high school teachers and students. Sarah, the principal of a 550-student elementary school, has changed the content of weekly staff meetings dramatically since the early years of her tenure. Instead of announcements and reminders, today's meeting focuses on the teachers' upcoming visits to one another's classrooms. Sarah begins the session by asking teachers to write a focus question for their peers to guide their observations during the visit. One 2nd grade teacher writes, "When you observe my classroom, what evidence do you see that students are receiving instruction that meets their individual needs as learners?" In groups of four, the teachers talk about what they'll be looking for and how to collect evidence. They review the schedule for visits and decide when they will meet afterwards to give feedback to the teachers being observed. Sarah briefly reviews the agreed-on guidelines for giving and receiving feedback and reminds the teachers that the overall purpose of these

visits is to improve teaching and learning by focusing on what students are doing in the classroom. After the visits, she will meet with teachers to discuss their experiences. Next month, she will share what they have learned at a meeting of principals who serve as her critical friends group. Does this kind of collaborative adult learning happen in real schools? The Annenberg Institute for School Reform is working with principals, superintendents, and district leaders across the country who are proof that it does. During the past five years, Institute staff members have collaborated with several urban school districts to help them design and implement professional development programs that support the learning and professional growth of their administrators. This collaboration features professional learning communities of principals and district leaders who meet regularly to address issues of curriculum, instruction, and assessment. This work enables us to witness firsthand how leaders are rethinking their leadership functions, roles, and practices and provides examples of how leadership for learning benefits both adults and students in schools and districts that are serious about implementing change. How Has Instructional Leadership Changed? The roles of principals, superintendents, and other education leaders have expanded during the past decade to include a larger focus on teaching and learning, professional development, datadriven decision making, and accountability (Institute for Educational Leadership, 2000). With leadership for student learning as the priority, instructional leadership might simply be described as "anything that leaders do to improve teaching and learning in their schools and districts." This view implies that instructional leadership may look different in different communities and, in fact, it does. For example, in a school or district with a significant number of students performing at levels below identified standards, leadership might focus on examining student achievement data to identify areas of weakness and using those data to improve classroom instruction. Conversely, in a school community with a perceived tradition of success, leadership may need to challenge the status quo, promoting such ideas as peer observation to ensure that teaching practices enable all students to learn at high levels. An unsafe school environment that hinders teaching and learning may require that instructional leadership focus first on advocating for improvements in the physical plant. These examples demonstrate the range of challenges that today's administrators face. In dealing with any of these challenges, effective instructional leaders keep the focus on improving teaching and learning and on gathering evidence of student achievement that demonstrates this improvement. What Do Today's Instructional Leaders Do? In our work with effective instructional leaders, we have observed a number of ways in which today's principals, superintendents, and other education leaders work differently than their predecessors. Here are a few of their essential tasks.

Lead Learning Today's principals and superintendents are learning leaders: They participate in regular, collaborative, professional learning experiences to improve teaching and learning. They work alongside teachers in adult learning activities study groups, school visits, and examination of student work. They recognize their own need to develop a broad knowledge base in curriculum, instruction, and assessment, and they seek ongoing professional development activities to achieve that goal (Educational Research Service, 1999). One middle school principal in Houston, Texas, and her staff attended a six-week professional development series focusing on student writing across the curriculum. She now meets weekly with small groups of teachers to look at student work samples and discuss how the work reflects improvement in writing. Focus on Teaching and Learning Instructional leaders maintain and model a focus on improving teaching and learning by helping teachers improve their instructional practices and by making student achievement the highest priority. Terry, for example, identifies a key part of his role as superintendent as being "unequivocal about the focus on teaching and learning." Under his leadership, principals in the district recently read a book on teacher evaluation and supervision in preparation for one of the biweekly meetings in their K 12 area. The discussion centered on the question, What should we look for when we visit classrooms? Later, the area superintendent met with each principal to discuss ways to use classroom observations to inform professional development opportunities for teachers. Develop Leadership Capacity Today's education leaders devote significant time to developing instructional leadership capacity in others in their schools or districts. By distrib-uting responsibilities for getting the work done among teachers and staff members other than the principal or superintendent, they tacitly but clearly acknowledge that every member of the school community has the "potential and right to work as a leader" (Lambert, 1998). In short, leadership resides with the whole school community rather than solely with those who hold formal positions of authority. Distributing leadership in this way goes beyond merely delegating responsibilities for tasks; it provides regular opportunities for everyone in the school community to share what they are learning about their own practice. School or district staff members gradually take on a variety of roles, including coach, facilitator, or participant, to reflect the purpose and content of the work. One principal in a large New England district, for example, starts by facilitating weekly collaborative meetings, gradually transfers the facilitator role to teachers, and then becomes a participant in the meetings. Create Conditions for Professional Learning The new generation of instructional leaders actively create conditions that encourage professional learning communities. Current research findings show that schools that function as learning communities produce higher levels of student learning (Louis, Marks, & Kruse, 1996;

Newmann & Wehlage, 1995). A professional learning community has been defined as "an environment that fosters mutual cooperation, emotional support, and personal growth as they [educators] work together to achieve what they cannot accomplish alone" (DuFour & Eaker, 1998, p. xii). To develop this community, instructional leaders provide regular opportunities for educators to work together on issues of teaching and learning. They allocate time during the school day for conversation and study about effective practices. They model their commitment to their own professional learning by participating in small groups of colleagues who give and receive feedback on their performance. Use Data to Inform Decisions In the current context of performance standards and accountability, instructional leaders know they must develop the skills to collect and use data from a variety of sources to inform school improvement decisions. They work with parents, school board members, and other interested groups to share and interpret achievement results about what students are learning, areas that need improvement, and plans for improvement efforts. Some districts work with research divisions from nearby universities to develop and use electronic tools to disaggregate achievement data and get detailed, ongoing information about student performance. Thus, as teachers evaluate their curriculum and instruction, they can answer such questions as How are all 3rd graders who have been in our school since kindergarten doing in reading comprehension? Trends in student achievement can guide district-level planning; for example, results on the Massachusetts state assessments, showing that Boston high school students had made significant gains in English and math, told the district that its focus on improving instruction in these content areas had been successful. Use Resources Creatively Instructional leaders make creative use of all resources people, time, and money to support school improvement. To make time for teachers to work together, instructional leaders come up with strategies to add to, borrow from, or rearrange the daily schedule. Their focus on improving learning drives every conversation about budget development and every decision about how to use existing resources. One district reallocated funds to provide math coaches in its schools by making the tough choice to cut central-office departments. How Can We Recognize Instructional Leadership? Without question, the current climate of reform has changed the role of education leaders. Today's instructional leaders function in a constantly changing environment and serve students with greater and more diverse needs than ever before. Yet, they are expected to lead their schools to show marked improvements more quickly and with fewer resources at their disposal. They are expected to improve the quality of teachers; maintain safe schools; and turn staffs, parent groups, and business partners into communities of learners. Under the watchful eyes of their parent and business communities, these leaders are challenged to lead and to learn simultaneously.

There is no litmus test for the presence of instructional leadership, nor is there a definitive list of its characteristics or behaviors. In places where instructional leadership truly exists, it becomes an integral, almost invisible, part of how a school community works, lives, and learns together. The behaviors and activities of leaders outlined here offer a variety of lenses through which to look for evidence of instructional leadership. The presence of authentic instructional leadership can be witnessed in the everyday acts of people who take responsibility for improving teaching and learning in the entire school community, and its effectiveness will be revealed in a variety of measures of student achievement. References DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service. Educational Research Service. (1999). Professional development for school principals. (The Informed Educator series). Arlington, VA: Author. Institute for Educational Leadership. (2000, October). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship. Washington, DC: Author. Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757 798. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: University of Wisconsin Madison, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Deborah King is Principal Associate in the Leadership Initiative, Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Brown University, Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912; Debi_King@brown.edu. Copyright 2002 by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) 1703 N. Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 22311 USA 1-800-933-2723 1-703-578-9600 Copyright ASCD, All Rights Reserved Privacy Statement