Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater



Similar documents
Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Metal Ion + EDTA Metal EDTA Complex


WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION

Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

Wastewater Nutrient Removal

Ion Exchange Softening

Coagulation and Flocculation

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

AESF Aerospace / Airline Plating Forum - Tulsa, OK.

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

MOLES AND MOLE CALCULATIONS

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

Experiment 16-Acids, Bases and ph

Appendix D lists the Field Services Standard Operating Procedures. Appendix E lists the Biological Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures.

Iron and Manganese BACTERIA AND IRON AND MANGANESE

Iron and manganese are two similar elements

8 Chemicals from water treatment and distribution

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM REMOVAL FROM INDUSTRIAL WATSEWATER BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION METHOD

ION EXCHANGE FOR DUMMIES. An introduction

Chemical Reactions in Water Ron Robertson

THE NWF WATER PURIFICATION PROCESS FRESH WATER IN A NATURAL WAY. Esko Meloni Ferroplan Oy

Treatment options for hydrogen sulfide. Testing for hydrogen sulfide

Basic Chemistry of Chlorination

Hardness - Multivalent metal ions which will form precipitates with soaps. e.g. Ca 2+ + (soap) Ca(soap) 2 (s)

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (OPERATING MANUALS )

ENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING. Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan

How To Remove Iron From Water

Facility Classification Standards

Unit A: Studying Materials Scientifically

Planning, Designing, Monitoring and Inspection of Wastewater Treatment Systems of Industries

Using Magnesium Hydroxide

DEIONIZATION IN A "NUT SHELL"

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

The formation of polluted mine water

To meet our acceptance criteria, we may require you to partially treat your wastewater before it discharges to sewer.

ABC CIRCUITS 10 Circuit Drive Circuit Town, IN SLUG CONTROL PLAN

ION EXCHANGE RESINS INTRODUCTION

1332 CHAPTER 18 Sample Questions

SECTION 6 PLANNING AND DESIGN OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT CENTERS

Choosing an Effluent Treatment Plant

IB Chemistry. DP Chemistry Review

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

Sulfites for Oxygen Control

Silica Over-Saturation, Precipitation, Prevention and Remediation In Hot Water Systems Edited By Dave Peairs, Cal Water, Technical Director

Irrigation Water Quality for Greenhouse Production

Experiment 18: ph Measurements of Common Substances. Experiment 17: Reactions of Acids with Common Substances

In-Situ Bioremediation Demonstration of Coal-Based Acid Mine Drainage. Tide Mine Site Indiana County, Pennsylvania

Appendix B: Water Treatment Scenarios from AMD Treat

Enhanced Organic Precursor Removals Using Aged Filter Media Page 1. Enhanced Organic Precursor Removals Using Aged Filter Media

CHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF EVERYDAY HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS

Chapter 16: Tests for ions and gases

Chem 1100 Chapter Three Study Guide Answers Outline I. Molar Mass and Moles A. Calculations of Molar Masses

1.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality

DRINKING WATER - LAB EXPERIMENTS. Coagulation and flocculation LAB EXPERIMENTS. Jartest

Standard methods in water analysis

TREATMENT OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANT WASTE WATER IN FLORIDA FOR DISCHARGE AND RE USE PURPOSES

1. Read P , P & P ; P. 375 # 1-11 & P. 389 # 1,7,9,12,15; P. 436 #1, 7, 8, 11

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

Industrial Water Reuse and Wastewater Minimization

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

Writing and Balancing Chemical Equations

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

Feasibility study of crystallization process for water softening in a pellet reactor

REFERENCE DATA SHEET FOR CHEMICAL AND ENZYMATIC DRAIN CLEANERS By: William D. Sheridan, CIH, CHMM

WATER CHEMISTRY AND POOL WATER BALANCE

General Chemistry II Chapter 20

CWD BALDWIN PLANT NEW RESIDUALS HANDLING SYSTEM

How To Water System

ACIDS AND BASES SAFETY PRECAUTIONS

5. Which temperature is equal to +20 K? 1) 253ºC 2) 293ºC 3) 253 C 4) 293 C

Water Water Treatment Plant Tour

INCINERATION IN JAPAN

6 Reactions in Aqueous Solutions

HOMEWORK 4A. Definitions. Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Questions

Remediation of Water-Based Drilling Fluids and Cleaning of Cuttings

PART I: MULTIPLE CHOICE (30 multiple choice questions. Each multiple choice question is worth 2 points)

Residuals Management Somersworth Drinking Water Treatment Facility. Ian Rohrbacher, Treatment Operator IV

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

BASIC WATER TREATMENT OF STEAM BOILERS

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

The Electrical Control of Chemical Reactions E3-1

How To Remove Selenium From Water

Experiment 8 - Double Displacement Reactions

Chapter 1: Moles and equations. Learning outcomes. you should be able to:

POTW PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESSES

Name: Class: Date: 2 4 (aq)

Chemistry Post-Enrolment Worksheet

MALAYSIA S REQUIREMENTS ON INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEMS -The WEPA Workshop and Annual Meeting February 2013 Siem Reap, Combodiaby

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

6) Which compound is manufactured in larger quantities in the U.S. than any other industrial chemical?

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Complexometric Titrations

Transcription:

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater Engineering Research Center Report David M. Ayres Allen P. Davis Paul M. Gietka August 1994 1

2

Removing Heavy Metals From Wastewater Introduction This manual provides general guidelines on how to remove dissolved metals from wastewaters for discharge to sanitary sewer systems. Each of the various stages or operations of wastewater treatment will be discussed with their role in the metals removal process. The treatment train described is general for metals removal. Some variations will exist among different systems. This manual is intended to provide, in layman s terms, a better understanding of the precipitation process as applied to industrial wastewater treatment. Definitions The following words or phrases are commonly used when discussing metal removal. Caustic - Refers to sodium hydroxide (NaOH). When caustic is added to water, the water becomes strongly alkaline (ph > > 7). Concentration - The quantity of a material in a given volume of solution. Dilute Solution - A weak solution; a relatively small quantity of a material in a large volume of solution (i.e., water). Heavy Metals - Metals, when in significant concentrations in water, that may pose detrimental health effects. Heavy metals include lead, silver, mercury, copper, nickel, chromium, zinc, cadmium and tin that must be removed to certain levels to meet discharge requirements. Metal Hydroxides - When caustic is added to water containing heavy metals, a metal hydroxide solid or precipitate is formed. mg/l - Milligrams per liter, a representation of the quantity of material present in a solution. Same value as ppm. 3

ph - A term used to describe the acid-base characteristics of water, typically measured by a ph meter. Specifically, the concentration of H + ions in water. Formally, ph is the negative logarithm of the H + concentration, i.e., ph = -log [H + ]. The following values indicate the classification of a water: ph < 7 refers to acid solutions ph > 7 refers to basic solutions ph = 7 refers to neutral solutions The following table details the H + concentration in water, its relationship with the OH - (hydroxide ion) concentration, and the resulting ph. Table 1. Relation Between Ion Concentration and ph Value. ph Hydrogen Ion Concentration (moles/l) [H + ] Hydroxide Ion Concentration (moles/l) [OH - ] 0 1 1 X 10-14 1 0.1 1 X 10-13 2 0.01 1 X 10-12 3 0.001 1 X 10-11 4 0.0001 1 X 10-10 5 0.00001 1 X 10-9 6 1 X 10-6 1 X 10-8 7 1 X 10-7 1 X 10-7 8 1 X 10-8 1 X 10-6 9 1 X 10-9 0.00001 10 1 X 10-10 0.0001 11 1 X 10-11 0.001 12 1 X 10-12 0.01 13 1 X 10-13 0.1 14 1 X 10-14 1 4

Precipitation - Precipitation is the process of producing solids within a solution. In metals removal, it is desirable to precipitate as much metal solid as possible so that it can be removed from the water. Precipitation Region - The region on a solubility diagram that indicates the appropriate concentration and ph value for a metal to form a solid precipitate. Solubility - Solubility defines a material s ability to go into solution (dissolve). Materials that are soluble readily dissolve in solution and do not precipitate. Substances that are insoluble do not easily dissolve in solution and stay in their solid form. The goal of metals removal in wastewater is to produce conditions so that metals are insoluble. Solubility Diagram - A graph that reveals the solubility of metals (through the formation of metal hydroxides) at specific ph values. Metal Treatment by Hydroxide Precipitation As metals enter the treatment process, they are in a stable, dissolved aqueous form and are unable to form solids. The goal of metals treatment by hydroxide precipitation is then to adjust the ph (hydroxide ion concentration) of the water so that the metals will form insoluble precipitates. Once the metals precipitate and form solids, they can then easily be removed, and the water, now with low metal concentrations, can be discharged. Metal precipitation is primarily dependent upon two factors: the concentration of the metal, and the ph of the water. Heavy metals are usually present in wastewaters in dilute quantities (1-100 mg/l) and at neutral or acidic ph values (< 7.0). Both of these factors are disadvantageous with regard to metals removal. However, when one adds caustic to water which contains dissolved metals, the metals react with hydroxide ions to form metal hydroxide solids: 5

Metal + Hydroxide (from caustic) Metal Hydroxide Precipitates Note from Table 1 that high ph corresponds to high hydroxide concentrations. Visual representations of the ph values that promote metal precipitation are displayed in the next seven figures. Each figure represents the solubility of an individual metal at various ph values. All of the figures illustrate how the solubility of a particular metal is directly controlled by ph. The y-axis displays the concentration of dissolved metal in the wastewater, in milligrams/liter (mg/l). Notice the wide variation in scale. The upper part of the scale shows a dissolved concentration of 100 mg/l. The lowest number on the scale is 0.001 mg/l. These solubility graphs display regions where the metals are soluble or insoluble. The region above the dark lines (the shaded areas) for each metal signifies that the metals should precipitate as metal hydroxides. This is referred to as the precipitation region. The region below or outside of the dark lines illustrates where the metals are dissolved in solution, no precipitation occurs, and no metal removal takes place. 6

Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Copper Hydroxide vs. ph 10 1 Copper 0.1 0.01 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 1 - Theoretical Solubility of Copper Hydroxide. 1 1 Plating Waste Treatment, Cherry, K., Ann Arbor Science, 1982, p. 46. 7

With the exception of silver, notice that all of the metals display a minimum concentration at a particular ph. For example, in Figure 1, the lowest possible dissolved concentration of copper is approximately 0.001 mg/l, which occurs at a ph value of 8.1. Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Silver Hydroxide vs. ph 10 1 Silver 0.1 0.01 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 2 - Theoretical Solubility of Silver Hydroxide. 8

Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Nickel Hydroxide vs. ph 10 1 Nickel 0.1 0.01 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 3 - Theoretical Solubility of Nickel Hydroxide. 9

Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Lead Hydroxide vs. ph 10 1 Lead 0.1 0.01 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 4 - Theoretical Solubility of Lead Hydroxide. 10

Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Cadmium Hydroxide vs. ph 10 1 0.1 Cadmium 0.01 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 5 - Theoretical Solubility of Cadmium Hydroxide. 11

Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Chromium Hydroxide vs. ph 10 1 0.1 0.01 Chromium 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 6 - Theoretical Solubility of Chromium Hydroxide. 12

Concentration Dissolved Metal 100 Theoretical Solubility of Zinc Hydroxide vs. ph 10 A B 1 0.3 0.1 0.01 Zinc Actual Concentration Zin 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ph Figure 7 - Theoretical Solubility of Zinc Hydroxide. Figure 7 can be used to determine how the concentration of zinc in water is affected by ph. Suppose a wastewater contains dissolved zinc at 4 mg/l and is at ph = 6.8. This is shown at point A in the diagram. Since this point is below the bold lines in the solubility graph, this indicates that zinc is only present as a dissolved metal. It is not in a solid form and under these conditions it will not precipitate. Since this is contrary to what we hope to achieve in zinc removal, we need to adjust the ph of the water by adding caustic. Point B reveals this ph adjustment from ph 6.8 to 8.6 (i.e., a horizontal line). Above the dark solubility lines, zinc forms zinc hydroxide solids, as is shown by the shaded area. At this new ph value, for example, most of the zinc forms zinc hydroxide and precipitates out of solution. The dissolved zinc concentration is obtained from the solubility line at this ph (i.e., 0.3 mg/l). This is the theoretical amount of zinc that would be in the discharged wastewater after this treatment. The difference of 3.7 mg/l has formed a solid - the metal hydroxide, which is the sludge. 13

Thus, simply adjusting the ph from 6.8 to 8.6 has effectively precipitated most of the dissolved metal from the water. Since all metals display similar effects, it is clear that the adjustment of ph is critical when the metal is to be removed from the wastewater. However, the metals now exist in another phase or state (i.e., as small solid particles). Metal removal is not complete until these metal solids are physically removed from the wastewater, typically by subsequent sedimentation and filtration processes, as explained in the next section. The metal solubilities presented in the previous figures are based on an ideal wastewater. Some variations in the exact values of the metal concentrations will occur due to the presence of other substances in the wastewater. Compounds such as cyanide or ammonia can inhibit precipitation of metals, and limit their removal to the point where discharge limits can be exceeded. Also, note that not all metals have the same minimum solubility. Therefore in a wastewater where multiple metals are present, as a general rule, ph should be adjusted to an average value, approximately 9. Unit Operations of Wastewater Treatment Metal removal occurs through the use of several unit operations, as displayed in Figure 8. Figure 8 also shows the points in the treatment process where the ph must be adjusted to insure adequate metals and metals solids removal. 14

Coagulant Addition: i.e., dddd polymer, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate Adjust ph to discharge value Adjustment to ph 9.0, using caustic Sedimentation Waste Water Source Rapid Mix Tank Solids Water Filter Dewatering Discharge Water Backwash Recycle - Water may have a reduced ph and contain metals Backwash from Filtration Sludge (disposal) 15

Figure 8 - The Processes of a Conventional Metals Precipitation Treatment Plant 1. Rapid Mix The goal of the rapid mix operation is to first raise the wastewater ph to form metal hydroxide particles, as discussed above. After the addition of caustic, the next step is to add aluminum or iron salts, or organic polymers (coagulants) directly to the wastewater. These polymers attach to the metal solids particles. The small metal hydroxide particles become entangled in these polymers, causing the particle size to increase (form flocs), which promotes settling. This effect is illustrated in Figure 9. + = Metal Hydroxide Polymer Metal Hydroxide Entrapped in Polymer (floc) Figure 9 - Aggregation of Metal Hydroxides. 16

2. Sedimentation Once particles become enmeshed in the polymer, they are allowed to settle so that they are removed from the wastewater. The particles settle since they are heavier than water. This settling occurs in the sedimentation tanks. Sedimentation tanks, in contrast to rapid mixing units, are designed to have no mixing, to produce a calm flow for settling. Figure 10 depicts a sedimentation basin with metal hydroxide particles settling. Influent Effluent Metal Hydroxide Particles Settled Metal Hydoxide Sludge Figure 10 - A Sedimentation Basin with Metal Hydroxide Sludge Formation. Optimized sedimentation basins have minimal baffling. As a result, there is no turbulence as the water flows through the unit. The ph during sedimentation must be maintained at approximately 9.0 to ensure that none of the metal hydroxides redissolve and become soluble in the water. A detention time of 1.5 to 3 hours is usually adequate to accomplish efficient settling. 3. Filtration Water emerging from the sedimentation basin is routed to the filtration unit. 17

The filtration unit is designed to trap those particles that did not settle in the sedimentation basin (because they were too small) or did not have sufficient time to settle and were carried out of the basin. Water entering the filtration unit is passed through silica sand, diatomaceous earth, carbon, or cloth to capture the remaining metal hydroxide particles. Metal particles stick to the filtering material and are removed from the water. Filtration completes the metal treatment process. Only now should the ph be reduced for discharge, if necessary, or ph can now be adjusted for water reuse. Figure 11 depicts a typical filtration unit. Inlet Trapped Solids Filter Media (Sand, Cloth, Diatomaceous Earth, etc.) Effluent Figure 11 - Filtration Unit for Metals Removal. As filtration progresses and more metal hydroxides and other solids clog the filter material, pressure drop through the filter rises and some solids may pass through the filter. When either of these two situations occurs, the filter must be backwashed by reversing the flow of water through the filter. This backwash water is sent back to the rapid mix tank for mixing with the incoming water since it contains a significant concentration of solids from the dislodging that has occurred. Furthermore, the ph of this water (since it will be diluted with incoming water) may drop significantly and pose the problem of redissolving all of the metal hydroxides solids. 18

4. Sludge Treatment The solids produced in the sedimentation stage (and possibly solids from filtration) are denoted as a sludge and periodically removed. In diatomaceous earth and fiber filters, the entire filter media (diatomaceous earth, filter cartridge) is dumped with the captured metal hydroxide solids. This sludge may be sent to a dewatering stage to remove excess water and leave only solids. The water from the dewatering stage may not be completely free of metals and should be piped to the rapid mix tank. The sludge now contains the precipitated metal hydroxide solids, made up of identifiable quantities of heavy metals, which are regulated according to state and federal guidelines. The solids produced from heavy metal wastewater treatment must then be disposed of as a hazardous waste. Additional Considerations for Plating Type Wastes: 1. Plating Waste Treatment - Cyanide Oxidation Cyanides are widely used in the electroplating industry. The cyanide wastewater flow is treated by an alkaline chlorination process for oxidation of cyanides to carbon dioxide and nitrogen. This treatment is prior to metals removal. Industries not using cyanide will not have this treatment stage. Cyanide treatment consists of two reaction tanks. In the first tank, conditions are adjusted to oxidize cyanides to cyanates by the introduction of chlorine and caustic to maintain a ph range of 9.5 to 10.0. Chlorine is typically added as chlorine gas or sodium hypochlorite. In the second reaction tank, conditions are maintained to oxidize cyanate to carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Additional chlorine is added and adequate caustic is mixed in to maintain a ph of 8.0. An additional tank may be added for holding and treatment to meet discharge limitations. Detention times of 45 minutes for each reaction tank is sufficient. A diagram of the cyanide oxidation process is shown in Figure 12. 19

Chlorine Caustic to ph - 9.5-10.0 Chlorine Caustic to ph - 8.0 Cyanides Cyanates Effluent to Metals Treatment Mix Tank 1 Mix Tank 2 Figure 12 - Cyanide Oxidation. 2. Plating Waste Treatment - Chromium Reduction Chromium is a common surface coating and its discharge into water poses a serious environmental hazard. Water containing hexavalent chromium is treated with a chemical reduction process. Sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite or ferrous sulfate is added to the wastewater and the ph is lowered to 3.0 or less using acid (typically sulfuric acid). A retention time of 45 minutes is usually maintained to ensure adequate mixing and reaction with the sulfur dioxide or other chemicals. This process converts chromium from the hexavalent form to the trivalent form. The trivalent form can be treated similar to other metals (Figure 6) and the effluent from this process is treated with the other metals wastewater. Figure 13 illustrates the chromium reduction process. 20

Sulfur Dioxide Acid: Adjust to ph - 3.0 Effluent to Metals Removal Hexavalent Chromium Trivalent Chromium Mix Tank Figure 13 - Chromium Reduction. 21