PCA Index Survey Responses Fourth Quarter 2013 Craig Everett, Ph.D., MBA Director, Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project

Similar documents
PCA Index Survey Responses First Three Quarters 2012, Trends

Pepperdine Private Capital Index Survey Responses Second Quarter 2014

Pepperdine Private Capital Index Survey Responses First Quarter 2014

Pepperdine Private Capital Index Survey Responses Third Quarter 2014

1FQQFSEJOF 1SJWBUF $BQJUBM *OEFY 4VSWFZ 3FTQPOTFT 4FDPOE 2VBSUFS

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS BROKERS ASSOCIATION M&A SOURCE PEPPERDINE PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS PROJECT MARKETPULSE

MARKETPULSE. PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS PROJECT bschool.pepperdine.edu/privatecapital Q U A R T E R L Y S U R V E Y R E P O R T SECOND QUARTER 2014

Q INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS BROKERS ASSOCIATION M&A SOURCE PEPPERDINE PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS PROJECT MARKETPULSE

2015 CAPITAL MARKETS REPORT

2Q15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS BROKERS ASSOCIATION M&A SOURCE PEPPERDINE PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS PROJECT MARKETPULSE

micro Businesses and Their Importance to Productivity

CHAPTER 2 LOAN DEMAND IN APPALACHIA

Small Business Credit

Small Business Credit Survey, Spring 2014 Federal Reserve Bank of New York KEY FINDINGS SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT SURVEY, SPRING 2014

FIS Mergent Online. Walsh College Library. Select one or more of the databases to search

Wages of Employed Texans Who Attended Texas Public Schools

Ohio Mid-Market Business Study Summer 2011

Frequently Asked Questions Q3 2006

FUNDMARKET INSIGHT REPORT

Quarterly Credit Conditions Survey Report Contents

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS BROKERS ASSOCIATION M&A SOURCE PEPPERDINE PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS PROJECT

Quarterly Credit Conditions Survey Report

2013 YEAR-END ECONOMIC REPORT

FRBNY May 2011 Small Business Finances Poll

Trends in 401(k) Plans and Retirement Rewards. research. A Report by WorldatWork and the American Benefits Institute March 2013

Small Business Survey Scotland 2012

Fort McPherson. Atlanta, GA MSA. Drivers of Economic Growth February Prepared By: chmuraecon.com

Information and Frequently Asked Questions for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Participants

NMI at 59.1% Business Activity Index at 63% New Orders Index at 62% Employment Index at 59.2%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS BROKERS ASSOCIATION M&A SOURCE PEPPERDINE PRIVATE CAPITAL MARKETS PROJECT QUARTERLY SURVEY REPORT Q

EMBARGOED UNTIL TUESDAY, 12 MARCH 2013 AT GMT

Quarterly Credit Conditions Survey Report

Developing Your Business Plan

EconoVue Snapshot Santa Cruz County

Taking Stock: Examining the Role of Corporate Stock Plan Benefits in the Workplace November 2009

Standard Chartered Hong Kong SME Leading Business Index

Ralph Lauren. Shelby Gray Group #2 BUS :30

Protective Reports First Quarter of 2011 Results and Announces Completion of Coinsurance Agreement

FUNDMARKET INSIGHT REPORT

Business Expectations Survey

FORACO INTERNATIONAL REPORTS Q3 2014

Measuring performance Update to Insurance Key Performance Indicators

Up to Five Years Prior to Retirement

INTERACTIVE DATA REPORTS FOURTH-QUARTER AND FULL- YEAR 2014 RESULTS

State & Local Tax Alert

KEY FINDINGS SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT SURVEY, Q4 2013

How To Answer A Survey On Finance In European Business

LYON RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING LOAN FUND APPLICATION. Name of Business: Address: City: Business contact person:

Professional and Business Services Employment Trends in the Richmond MSA

Jobs Demand Report. Chatham / Kent, Ontario Reporting Period of January 1 March 30, March 30, 2015

FRBNY Small Business Borrowers Poll Regional and Community Outreach

Calgary Small Businesses: Fact Sheet

Small-business owners who need

The History of NAICS

Department of Taxation

MBA Forecast Commentary Joel Kan,

2015 NEVADA TAX REFORMS. Commerce Tax, Modified Business Tax, Business License Fee

CBRE LENDERS SURVEY LOOKING AT 2015 LENDING TRENDS IN CANADA FINANCING DEBT COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BOND TERM DEBT YIELDS MORTGAGE ACQUISITION

êéëé~êåü=üáöüäáöüí House Prices, Borrowing Against Home Equity, and Consumer Expenditures lîéêîáéï eçìëé=éêáåéë=~åç=äçêêçïáåö ~Ö~áåëí=ÜçãÉ=Éèìáíó

The Bibby Barometer of Small business PAGE 1. Stress levels rise, but Australia s small business owners remain optimistic

Wealth Management and Securities Services

Apple Capital Group, Inc.

Charlene Hamrah (Investment Community) (212) Joe Norton (News Media) (212)

SBA Programs to Help You Start & Grow Your Small Business

Survey of Business Owners Veteran-Owned Firms

2014 Small BuSineSS HealtH Care Survey

Oct '12 (percent) 3. To what extent is your business having difficulty obtaining financing for desired long-term uses such as capital expenditures?

2014 Survey of Business Owners Proposed New Questions

Successful Accounting/Financing for Small Business Financing Overview

SBA 504 Expanded Refinancing Eligibility

The Nature, Elements and Importance of Working Capital

Performance Food Group Company Reports First-Quarter Fiscal 2016 Earnings

HOME EQUITY CREDIT ACCOUNT DISCLOSURES

MJS Business Finance Ltd 2nd Floor, 31 Waterloo Road, Wolverhampton WV1 4DJ

Tamara Underwood, Vice President

Introduction. 2 PriceMetrix Insights The State of Retail Wealth Management rd Annual Report

How to Get Business Credit Funding for your New Business

A Pi Primer in Entrepreneurship

2010 Industry Pulse: Business Travel Buyers Sentiment

Bethpage Business Banking Group Long Island Small Business Survey

Morgan Stanley Reports Full-Year and Fourth Quarter Results

Characteristics of Minnesota Business, All Firms Firms with Paid Employees Firms without Paid Employees. Number of Paid Employees

2009 Private Capital Markets Report

Bethpage Federal Credit Union. Long Island Small Business Survey

ATEL Growth Capital Fund 8, LLC. Financing Tomorrow s Technologies... Today

FUNDMARKET INSIGHT REPORT

Professionally Managed Portfolios of Exchange-Traded Funds

PRESS RELEASE February 4, 2016 SIMPSON MANUFACTURING CO., INC. ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS

NSBA SMALL BUSINESS HEALTH CARE SURVEY

Business Credit Builder Questionnaire

Quarterly Credit Conditions Survey Report

Valuing Real Property Going Concerns

E Smith Capital Partners provides capital-based strategy, services, and solutions for commercial real estate users and investors.

INTERMEDIATE SMALL BANK

Summary of Restructuring Issues At Non-Profit and For-Profit Colleges. Joe D Angelo

Regulation Crowdfunding

CONSULCO CAPITAL LONDON PROPERTY SECURED BONDS

FICOTM. Consumer Credit Risk North America Trends and Expectations FOURTH QUARTER 2013

Competitive Analysis Economic Vision for the City of Burlington

Monetary and Financial Trends First Quarter Table of Contents

Transcription:

PCA Index Survey Responses Fourth Quarter 2013 Craig Everett, Ph.D., MBA Director, Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project 2012 Pepperdine University. All rights reserved. Pepperdine Private Capital Access Index ( PCA Index ) is a trademark of Pepperdine University. PCA Index content is the intellectual property of Pepperdine University or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of PCA Index content, including but not limited to caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Pepperdine University. Pepperdine University shall not be liable for any errors, omissions or delays in PCA Index content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. 11

This research was made possible with the support of Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp., the leading provider of credit building and credibility solutions for businesses. DUN & BRADSTREET CREDIBILITY CORP. Jeffrey Stibel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Judy Hackett, Chief Marketing Officer Aaron Stibel, Senior Vice President, Technology Liz Gengl, Director, Marketing and Communications Brenda Gary, Vice President, Marketing Operations Lauren Simpson, Marketing and Communications Manager Bernice Brennan, Manager, Creative Services & Marketing Communications Trenice Taylor, Marketing Manager 22

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I d also like to thank the following people at The Graziadio School of Business and Management for their contributions: Dean Linda Livingstone Associate Dean David M. Smith Mike Sims, Executive Officer, CER John K. Paglia, Associate Professor of Finance Douglass Gore, Director of Public Relations Mark Chun, Director, Center for Applied Research Bill Bleuel, Professor of Decision Sciences Irina Shaykhutdinova, Research Analyst and consultant, Simon James, Ph.D. 33

Outline I. About the Private Capital Access (PCA) Index.... 5 II. Demand for external financing....14 III. Accessibility/success rate of raising new capital... 21 IV. Satisfaction rates for various capital sources....29 V. Expected demand for external financing....34 VI. Expected capital access (success) rates...39 VII. Hiring/growth outlooks and financing failure impacts 45 VIII.About the respondents.. 54 44

I. About the Private Capital Access (PCA) Index The Pepperdine Private Capital Access Index (PCA) is a quarterly indicator produced by the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University, and with the support of Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp. The index is designed to measure the demand for, activity, and health of the private capital markets. The purpose of the PCA Index is to gauge the demand of small and medium-sized businesses for financing needs, the level of accessibility of private capital, and the transparency and efficiency of private financing markets. 55

About the Q3 2013 Private Capital Access (PCA) Index Survey 30 questions Invite to participate distributed to sample from Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp. s business database 3,175 completed responses Where relevant, responses are segmented by revenues sizes (<$5 million; $5 million to $100 million) Responses collected from Oct 15 Nov 6 66

Private Capital Access (PCA) and Private Capital Demand (PCD) Index Results Whole Sample 77

Private Capital Access (PCA) and Private Capital Demand (PCD) Index Results Whole Sample 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012-Q2 2012-Q3 2012-Q4 2013-Q1 2013-Q2 2013-Q3 PCA Index 27.8 27.0 27.3 25.6 26.8 27.5 PCD Index 37.0 36.5 35.1 32.7 33.4 31.7 88

Small Business PCA and PCD Index Results (< $5M in Revenues) 99

Small Business PCA and PCD Index Results (< $5M in Revenues) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012-Q2 2012-Q3 2012-Q4 2013-Q1 2013-Q2 2013-Q3 PCA Index 26.6 26.0 26.3 24.6 26.3 26.8 PCD Index 38.8 38.0 36.5 33.2 34.3 32.3 10 10

Lower Middle Market PCA and PCD Index Results ($5M $100M in Revenues) 11 11

Lower Middle Market PCA and PCD Index Results ($5M $100M in Revenues) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2012-Q2 2012-Q3 2012-Q4 2013-Q1 2013-Q2 2013-Q3 PCA Index 34.7 33.5 32.7 31.9 34.3 34.7 PCD Index 32.3 33.1 31.5 30.6 28.7 27.6 12 12

Annual Revenue Change Expectations 10% by Revenue Size 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% Q3, 2012 Q4, 2012 Q1, 2013 Q2, 2013 Q3, 2013 Q4, 2013 Whole sample 7.3% 5.8% 6.4% 6.2% 5.4% 7.0% < $5 million 7.1% 5.7% 5.9% 6.3% 5.2% 7.0% $5 -$100 million 7.8% 6.7% 7.1% 5.3% 6.5% 8.1% 13 13

II. Demand for external financing 14 14

Demand for Financing by Purpose and Size 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% (% with any need reported) Planned growth or expansion, including acquisitions (not yet realized) Working capital fluctuations Growth due to increased demand (already realized) Finance worsening operating conditions Refinance existing loans or equity Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 52.3% 51.5% 45.1% 34.7% 29.4% 23.1% < $5 million 52.4% 52.4% 45.4% 36.2% 29.6% 23.0% $5 -$100 million 53.8% 45.6% 44.0% 25.5% 27.1% 23.8% 15 15

Strength of Demand for Financing (among those indicating demand) Scale 1-4: slight, moderate, high, extremely high need 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Planned growth or expansion, including acquisitions (not yet realized) Refinance existing loans or equity Working capital fluctuations Growth due to increased demand (already realized) Finance worsening operating conditions Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 < $5 million 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.0 $5 -$100 million 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 16 16

Respondents Indicating High and Extremely High Demand for Financing (among those indicating demand) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Planned growth or expansion, including acquisitions (not yet realized) Refinance existing loans or equity Working capital fluctuations Finance worsening operating conditions Growth due to increased demand (already realized) Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 43.9% 42.0% 36.9% 36.1% 35.3% 31.7% < $5 million 45.9% 42.6% 38.0% 36.6% 36.7% 32.0% $5 -$100 million 29.6% 35.1% 31.2% 27.3% 23.7% 26.7% 17 17

Percentage Indicating Yes to Is the current business financing environment restricting 100% 80% 58% 60% 60% 44% 48% 50% 33% 40% 20% 0% Growth opportunities for your business? Your ability to hire new employees? Whole sample < $5 million $5 -$100 million 18 18

Trade Accounts (Accounts Receivable) Payment Period Trends Over the Past Three Months 100% 80% 61.4% 60.6% 63.7% 60% 40% 30.3% 31.1% 27.0% 20% 8.3% 8.3% 9.3% 0% Accelerated (receiving payments from customers faster than three months ago) Slowed (receiving payments from customers slower than three months ago) Stayed the same Whole sample < $5 million $5 million -$100 million 19 19

Percentage of Respondents Who Attempted to Raise Outside Financing in the Last Three Months 100% 80% 60% 40% 28% 28% 32% 20% 0% Whole sample < $5 million $5 -$100 million 20 20

III. Accessibility/success rate 21 21

Is it Difficult or Easy to Raise New External Financing? Equity financing Debt financing 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Difficult Neither Easy difficult nor easy Whole sample 66.5% 15.8% 17.7% < $5 million 68.8% 16.1% 15.1% $5 -$100 million 53.2% 13.2% 33.6% 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Difficult Neither Easy difficult nor easy Whole sample 65.2% 15.5% 19.4% < $5 million 68.7% 15.3% 16.0% $5 -$100 million 45.3% 16.6% 38.1% 22 22

Financing Success Rates by Type and Business 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Size for Prior Three Months Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Whole sample 72% 31% 29% 14% 6% 63% 65% 53% 63% 57% 42% 17% 25% 40% 18% 15% 23% 12% 5% < $5 million 71% 30% 28% 13% 7% 61% 63% 52% 62% 51% 34% 15% 21% 40% 15% 8% 18% 7% 5% $5 -$100 million 76% 42% 25% 33% 0% 81% 85% 63% 75% 81% 75% 28% 50% 60% 44% 60% 60% 38% 0% Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 23 23

Percentage of Those Who Attempted to Raise Financing by Type of Financing for Prior Three Months 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Whole sample 41.2% 30.3% 15.8% 12.6% 12.4% 36.0% 41.8% 42.7% 49.9% 28.5% 57.1% 29.3% 32.7% 19.0% 16.1% 15.6% 15.8% 10.4% 9.4% < $5 million 43.1% 32.3% 17.2% 13.6% 13.6% 36.9% 46.1% 44.7% 53.6% 28.4% 55.1% 31.0% 33.2% 20.1% 17.1% 16.5% 16.5% 10.4% 10.4% $5 -$100 million 34.0% 14.2% 5.7% 7.5% 5.7% 34.0% 20.8% 32.1% 32.1% 28.3% 71.7% 19.8% 31.1% 13.2% 11.3% 11.3% 12.3% 9.4% 3.8% Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 24 24

Main Purpose for Raising or Attempting 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Growth or expansion (incl. acquis.) to Raise Financing Working capital fluctuations Replacing equipment or facilities unrelated to growth or expansion Refinancing existing loans or equity Finance worsening operations conditions Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 39.3% 29.5% 11.1% 9.6% 5.0% 0.8% 4.6% < $5 million 38.7% 31.1% 10.4% 9.2% 5.6% 0.3% 4.7% Other $5 -$100 million 43.4% 22.6% 11.3% 14.2% 2.8% 3.8% 1.9% 25 25

Reasons for Businesses Not Attempting to Raise External Financing (Multiple Selections) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Enough cash flow Sufficient financing in place Weak economy Business would be rejected Lack of expertise Not enough time Waiting for cheaper financing Loss of control / flexibility Cease operation / liquidate Whole sample 51% 25% 18% 17% 10% 9% 6% 4% 1% 8% < $5 million 49% 23% 18% 19% 11% 9% 6% 4% 2% 8% $5 -$100 million 66% 39% 12% 7% 3% 4% 6% 3% 0% 5% Other 26 26

Percentage of Owners Who Transferred Personal Assets to Business Over Prior Three Months 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 80.4% 61% 58.9% 37% 40.0% 19.3% 1% 1.1% Yes No Unsure Whole sample < $5 million $5 -$100 million 0.3% 27 27

Types of Personal Assets Transferred to Business 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% During Prior Three Months Personal savings / investments (Multiple Selections) Personal credit card purchases Personal loan Cash from the sale of personal assets Home equity loan Whole sample 74% 43% 18% 22% 9% 5% < $5 million 74% 44% 18% 22% 8% 5% $5 -$100 million 77% 33% 20% 23% 18% 5% Other 28 28

IV. Satisfaction rates 29 29

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Pricing and Contract Terms Satisfaction Rates Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) (for those with a successful raise) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Whole sample 89% 92% 81% 80% 33% 87% 48% 69% 66% 79% 85% 79% 71% 50% 79% 70% 71% 33% 50% Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 30 30

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% General Financing Process Satisfaction Rates Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit (by Outcome) Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Successful 74% 79% 84% 70% 0% 80% 58% 54% 69% 77% 75% 70% 60% 51% 60% 58% 67% 29% 33% Unsuccessful 26% 17% 13% 7% 5% 24% 17% 13% 18% 19% 9% 15% 10% 18% 11% 13% 14% 9% 9% Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 31 31

Percentage of Those Satisfied with Time Elapsed 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% from Point of First Contact until Funds Were Friends and family Received (for those successful raises) Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Whole sample 76% 63% 84% 80% 50% 80% 71% 60% 77% 79% 69% 67% 72% 55% 64% 64% 75% 33% Credit card - biz. Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender 32 32

Percentage of Those Unsuccessful Who Feel the 100% General Category of Financing is a Still a Good 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Fit for Their Business Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Whole sample 29% 63% 46% 45% 30% 58% 36% 47% 57% 51% 66% 62% 58% 44% 52% 49% 41% 41% 41% Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 33 33

V. Expected demand for external financing 34 34

Percentage of Businesses Planning to Raise Financing in the Next Six Months 100% 80% 64% 60% 54% 53% 40% 20% 28% 29% 24% 18% 19% 12% 0% Yes No Unsure Whole sample < $5 million $5 million -$100 million 35 35

Percentage of Respondents Indicating Demand for New Financing in the Next Six Months 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Planned future growth or expansion Expected working capital fluctuations Growth due to expected increased demand Expected worsening operating conditions Refinance existing loans or equity Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 54% 50% 47% 31% 29% 19% < $5 million 54% 51% 48% 32% 29% 20% $5 million -$100 million 51% 40% 40% 22% 23% 16% 36 36

Strength of Expected Demand for New External Financing in the Next Six Months (Scale 1-4: Slight, Moderate, High, Extremely High) 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Refinance existing loans or equity Planned future growth or expansion Expected working capital fluctuations Growth due to expected increased demand Expected worsening operating conditions Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 < $5 million 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.1 $5 million -$100 million 2.3 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 37 37

Respondents Indicating High or Extremely High Expected Demand for New External Financing in 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% the Next Six Months Planned future growth or expansion Refinance existing loans or equity Growth due to expected increased demand Expected working capital fluctuations Withdraw wealth for owners Expected worsening operating conditions Whole sample 43.5% 43.3% 37.7% 36.3% 33.8% 32.6% < $5 million 45.6% 44.3% 39.6% 38.0% 35.5% 33.6% $5 million -$100 million 26.1% 33.9% 22.4% 23.5% 27.0% 25.9% 38 38

VI. Expected access rates 39 39

Do You Expect It Would Be Easy or Difficult to Raise New Financing in the Next Six Months? Equity financing Debt financing 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Difficult Neither Easy difficult nor easy Whole sample 65.5% 14.3% 20.2% < $5 million 67.8% 13.9% 18.3% $5 -$100 million 50.4% 17.4% 32.2% 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Difficult Neither Easy difficult nor easy Whole sample 63.1% 13.9% 22.9% < $5 million 66.5% 13.6% 20.0% $5 -$100 million 42.6% 16.3% 41.1% 40 40

Likely Sources of Financing 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Whole sample 35% 38% 35% 19% 10% 8% 25% 33% 43% 33% 60% 36% 32% 17% 24% 22% 24% 13% 7% Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 41 41

Main Purpose for Raising Expected Financing 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Growth or expansion (incl. acquisition) Working capital fluctuations Replacing equipment or facilities unrelated to growth or expansion Refinancing existing loans or equity Finance worsening operations conditions Withdraw wealth for owners Whole sample 54.5% 21.2% 7.6% 8.6% 2.5% 1.0% 4.5% < $5 million 54.3% 22.0% 7.0% 8.8% 2.5% 0.9% 4.5% Other $5 -$100 million 56.3% 15.0% 13.8% 8.8% 3.8% 1.3% 1.3% 42 42

4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Level of Confidence for Successful Financing (Scale 0-4: none; some; moderately; very; completely) Friends and family Grants (SBIR, STTR, etc.) Crowd funding Presale/ Donate Crowd funding (Equity) Crowd funding (Debt) Trade credit Credit card - pers. Loan - pers. Credit card - biz. Whole sample 2.1 1.6 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0 2.1 1.6 1.9 2.2 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.9 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.3 < $5 million 2.1 1.6 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.1 2.1 1.6 1.9 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.9 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.2 $5 -$100 million 2.1 1.6 2.2 1.6 1.5 0.5 1.9 1.6 1.6 3.0 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.3 2.5 Lease Bank loan - biz. CDFI/ Credit union Asset based lender Factor Angel capital Vent. capital Private equity group Mezz. lender Hedge fund 43 43

Reasons for Not Planning on Raising Financing 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Enough cash flow Sufficient financing in place Weak economy Business would be rejected Lack of expertise Not enough time Waiting for cheaper financing Loss of control / flexibility Cease operation / liquidate Whole sample 51% 25% 18% 17% 10% 9% 6% 4% 1% 8% < $5 million 49% 23% 18% 19% 11% 9% 6% 4% 2% 8% $5 -$100 million 66% 39% 12% 7% 3% 4% 6% 3% 0% 5% Other 44 44

VII. Hiring / growth outlooks and financing failure impacts 45 45

Number of Employees Planned to Be Hired in the Next Six Months 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0 1-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 76-100 101-200 More than 200 Whole sample 45% 30% 14% 5% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% < $5 million 47% 31% 13% 5% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% $5 million -$100 million 27% 22% 22% 13% 6% 2% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 46 46

Impacts of Unsuccessful Financing Event in the Next Six Months for Those Planning to Raise 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Capital (Multiple selections) Slower business growth Hire fewer new employees than planned Reduce number of employees (layoffs) Sell business assets or shut down No expected impacts on growth, business size, or hiring plans Whole sample 67% 53% 20% 17% 16% < $5 million 67% 53% 20% 18% 16% $5 million -$100 million 63% 51% 18% 11% 19% 47 47

Annual Revenues Change for Last 12 Months: Whole Sample 26% 23% 21% 16% 11% 6% 1% -0.5% 6% 2% 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 8% 7% 8% 4% 4% 4% 3% 2% 5% -4% Decline Increase 48 48

Annual Revenues Change for Last 12 Months : Revenues Under $5M 26% 24% 21% 16% 11% 6% 1% -1.2% 7% 2% 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 8% 6% 7% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% -4% Decline Increase 49 49

21% Annual Revenues Change for Last 12 Months : Revenues from $5M to $100M 17% 16% 11% 10% 11% 6% 1% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 8% 7% 6% 7% 3% 1% 6% 4.2% -4% Decline Increase 50 50

26% Annual Revenue Change Expectations (Next 12 Months): Whole Sample 23% 21% 16% 14% 11% 6% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% 9% 10% 7% 6% 4% 2% 2% 7% 7.0% -4% Decline Increase 51 51

26% Annual Revenue Change Expectations (Next 12 Months): Revenues Under $5M 24% 21% 16% 14% 11% 6% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 9% 10% 7% 6% 4% 2% 2% 8% 7.0% -4% Decline Increase 52 52

Annual Revenue Change Expectations (Next 12 Months): Revenues $5M to $100M 21% 17% 16% 14% 11% 12% 11% 8% 8% 8.1% 6% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 4% 3% 4% 2% 5% -4% Decline Increase 53 53

VIII. About the Respondents 54 54

Details About the Respondents Geographic Location 55 55

Details About the Respondents Percentage of Respondents Who Feel Their State Supports Business Policies That Benefit Their Business 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Yes 51% 49% No 56 56

Details About the Respondents Percentage of Respondents Who Feel Their State Should Be More Involved in Making Capital More Accessible to Businesses 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Yes 68% No 32% 57 57

Details About the Respondents Percentage of Respondents Who Feel That They Have Access to Information about Available Capital Programs That Their Business Could Be Participating in Their State Today 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Yes 44% No 56% 58 58

Details About the Respondents Industry 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 1% 4% 5% 7% 7% 9% 9% 32% 10% Services Construction Retail trade Finance & real estate Manufacturing Information technology or services Health care Wholesale trade Unclassified establishments Educational services Arts, entertainment or recreation Transportation and warehousing Forestry, fishing, hunting or agriculture Utilities & mining 59 59

Details About the Respondents Annual Revenues 19% 2% 1% 3% 5% 4% 27% $1 - $100,000 $100,001 - $500,000 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 12% 27% $5,000,001 - $10,000,000 $10,000,001 - $25,000,000 $25,000,001 - $50,000,000 $50,000,001 - $100,000,000 $100,000,001 - $500,000,000 60 60

Details About the Respondents Annual Income 5% 6% 1% 7% Negative (net loss) $0 - $100,000 28% 53% $100,001 - $500,000 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 More than $5,000,000 61 61

Details About the Respondents Firm age Less than 1 year 37% 6% 6% 6% 8% At least 1 but less than 2 At least 2 but less than 3 22% 15% At least 3 but less than 5 At least 5 but less than 10 At least 10 but less than 20 20 or more 62 62

Details About the Respondents Number of Employees 3% 4% 4% 7% 2% 2% 1-2 3-5 3% 37% 6-10 11-15 15% 23% 16-20 21-30 31-50 51-100 101-200 More than 200 63 63

About Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project The Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project at the Graziadio School of Business and Management is the first simultaneous, comprehensive, and on-going investigation of the major private capital market segments. The research seeks to understand the true cost of private capital across market types and the investment expectations of privately-held business owners; providing lenders, investors and the businesses that depend on them with critical data to make optimal investment and financing decisions, and better determine where the opportunities to create lasting economic value may be realized. Download reports and find more information at http://bschool.pepperdine.edu/privatecapital. About Pepperdine University s Graziadio School of Business and Management Founded on the core values of integrity, stewardship, courage, and compassion, Pepperdine University s Graziadio (GRAT-ZEE-ah-DEE-oh) School of Business and Management has been developing values-centered leaders and advancing responsible business practice since 1969. Student-focused, experience-driven, and globally-oriented, the Graziadio School offers fully accredited top-ranked MBA, Masters of Science, and bachelor s completion business programs. More information found at http://bschool.pepperdine.edu/newsroom/. 64 64

THANK YOU! Craig Everett, Ph.D., MBA Director, Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project http://bschool.pepperdine.edu/privatecapital craig.everett@pepperdine.edu 310.506.8543 65 65