Performance Management Process



Similar documents
This grievance resolution procedure establishes guidelines for the prompt and equitable

The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System

SOUTH CAROLINA STATE FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY AUTHORITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers

Program Statement DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Number: B Date: February 3, 2011 Supersedes: A (5/30/01) Evaluations

Section-10 Training OP Page: 1 Effective Date: 01/30/2015

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Department of Management Services Division of Human Resource Management PROGRAM GUIDELINES

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

Performance Management

PART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

STATUS OF EMPLOYMENT:

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Introduction and Navigation

Fiscal Management Responsibilities

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Offender Living Will/Advance Directive for Health Care and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Consent

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL POLICY (Revised and Effective 11/1/09) MANDATORY BASELINE EPMS SYSTEM

Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff

The University of Texas at Brownsville Staff Performance Review FY 2014

Chapter 110, Florida Statutes; Chapter 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code; Executive Director

WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) - FAQs

Performance Management System

SUPERVISOR/MANAGER TRAINING PROGRAM

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY

NOAA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

5 CFR Ch. I ( Edition) SOURCE: 60 FR 43943, Aug. 23, 1995, unless otherwise noted. otherwise noted.

STATE OF MARYLAND JUDICIARY

SECTION 11 SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT VOLUNTARY SEPARATION Resignation Abandonment Retirement Voluntary Disability Separation

TITLE: Employee Performance Evaluations

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS)

ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System

Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised I. Introduction

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Budget & Finance Certificate Program - A Review

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

JOB AIDS AND RESOURCES FAQs Performance Evaluation System

1. ISSUING AGENCY: The Human Resources Department.

DEFINITIONS. Annual Appraisal the performance evaluation conducted once a year that goes in an employee s permanent record.

Department of Homeland Security Management Directives System MD Number: 3181 Issue Date: 3/23/2006 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

2014 Performance Management Frequently Asked Questions

of the Chancellor SUMMARY OF CHANGES

ACTIVITY REPORTING AND PROPOSAL FORM JUDICIAL COUNCIL DIRECTIVES AOC RESTRUCTURING

DIRECTOR OF GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING/AT-RISK A. QUALIFICATIONS:

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12

B. Probationary Evaluations

HANDBOOK PUBLIC SERVICE STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING PERFORMANCE REVIEW PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DECISION-MAKING

Employee Position Description & Performance Evaluation Manual

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

This policy applies to all City employees, except temporary seasonal and temporary oncall

Proposed Marin Community College District Policy BP 7250

PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors

Employee Performance Evaluation System

The information contained in this guideline is the processes typically recommended by Human Resource Services (HRS).

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR POLICE EMPLOYEES

Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Appraisal System

Sickness Management Policy

Employee Performance Management Program. Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30

Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G

MIB INTERNSHIP PROGRAM Handbook

3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Oklahoma Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board

National Guard Technician Performance Appraisal Program

Eligible Registers, Certification, and Appointment

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

Annual Performance Evaluation Form

Director of Administration and Management ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION

Subpart D Executive Development

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

1. The Library Management Systems Administrator shall have the general qualifications of a teacher as prescribed by the State Department of Education.

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:

PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF BILINGUAL/ESL ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA MCO MPO DEC 1998

A Leon County Employment Application is required in all cases. A separate application must be made for each position applied for.

Classification Appeal Decision Under section 5112 of title 5, United States Code

POLICY. Yes. A029 Version 1.0

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

CHAPTER 26. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

Human Resources Manual Instruction 330-2: Career Transition Assistance Plan Issue Date: 01/29/2009

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Transcription:

Performance Management Process... 1 I. Overview... 1 A. Performance Management Process... 1 B. Responsibilities for PMP... 2 II. Completing the PMP Form... 5 A. Time Frames... 5 B. Opening the Evaluation Period... 6 C. Mid-Year Review... 7 D. Closing Out the Evaluation Period... 7 E. Closing Out the Evaluation Period for Employees on Extended Leave... 9 F. Distribution... 9 III. Annual Report to HCM... 9 IV. References... 9 V. Action... 10 Referenced Forms... 11 Attachments... 11 Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 1 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 Performance Management Process ACA Standards: 2-CO-1C-01, 2-CO-1C-21, 4-4064, 4-ACRS-7B- 06, 4-APPFS-3D-17, 4-APPFS-3E-02 Robert Patton, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections Signature on File Performance Management Process The following procedure is established to ensure that the performance of each regular classified and unclassified employee is evaluated in accordance with the Performance Management Process (PMP) established under the provisions of 74 O.S. 840-4.17 and Merit Rule 260:25-17-31. (2-CO-1C-01, 4-4064, 4-ACRS-7B-06, 4-APPFS-3D-17) I. Overview A. Performance Management Process (2-CO-1C-21, 4-4064, 4-ACRS-7B-06, 4- APPFS-3D-17, 4-APPFS-3E-02) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Performance Management Process (PMP) is to evaluate the performance of each classified and unclassified employee. The process must provide: a. An objective evaluation by the immediate supervisor of the performance of the employee within the assigned duties of the job; [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(b)(1)]] b. The identification by the immediate supervisor of the accountabilities and behaviors upon which the employee will be evaluated; [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(b)(2)]] c. A mid-term interview with the immediate supervisor for the

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 2 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 purpose of discussing the progress of the employee in meeting the accountabilities and behaviors upon which the employee will be evaluated; [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(b)(3)]] d. The identification by the immediate supervisor of the performance strengths and areas for development; [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(b)(4)] e. A final interview with the employee by the immediate supervisor who will provide the employee with a copy of the performance evaluation; [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(b)(5)] and f. The opportunity for the employee to submit written comments regarding the performance evaluation. [Merit Rule 260:25-17- 31(b)(6)] 2. Evaluation Form The basic document to be used in conducting performance evaluations is the Performance Management Process (PMP) form (HCM-111) prescribed by the Human Capital Management (HCM) division of the Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES). [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(g)] 3. Minimum Requirement for Completing PMP Each employee will be rated at least 30 days prior to the end of the probationary period. After the end of the probationary period, each employee will be evaluated at least annually on a 12 month period. [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(c)] 4. Merit Rule Requirement for the Use of PMPs The agency must use employee evaluations of current or former state employees in decisions regarding promotions, appointments, demotions, performance pay increases, and discharges. [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(c)] B. Responsibilities for PMP The employee, the employee s supervisor and the reviewer share responsibility for ensuring that completed performance evaluations are an accurate and objective reflection of job performance. The facility/district/unit human resources management specialist (HRMS) is responsible for maintaining PMP records. 1. The employee is responsible for: a. Participating in discussions with the supervisor which will result

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 3 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 in a clear understanding of all accountability and behavior expectations; b. Taking responsibility for continuous performance improvement and development by requesting feedback and following-up on suggestions for improved performance and skill development; c. Meeting the accountability and behavior requirements listed; and d. Preparing for, and participating in, the review meeting; keeping documentation of performance and accomplishments; and making suggestions for improvement. 2. The immediate supervisor is responsible for: a. Meeting in person with the employee at least three times during a 12-month evaluation period. [Merit Rule 260:25-17- 31(d)] (1) One meeting will take place at the beginning of the evaluation period in order to communicate the accountabilities and behaviors upon which the employee will be evaluated. A copy will be provided to the employee. [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(d)(1)] (2) An additional meeting will take place during the rating period for the purpose of discussing the progress of the employee in meeting the accountabilities upon which the employee will be evaluated. [Merit Rule 260:25-17- 31 (d)(2)] This meeting is commonly referred to as the mid-year review. (3) A final meeting will take place at the end of the review period to provide the final evaluation. A copy of the evaluation will be provided to the employee, and the employee will have the opportunity to provide written comments. [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(d)(3)] b. Ensuring that employees have a clear definition of job tasks, performance standards, behaviors, and of expectations related to their work; and that assigned tasks are appropriate for the employee s classification; c. Discussing the PMP and reaching agreement with the reviewer prior to meeting with the employee;

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 4 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 d. Providing ongoing communication and feedback regarding performance, and identifying ways in which the employee can develop and improve; e. Providing the resources and information necessary for successful job performance and removing obstacles; f. Meeting with employees to initiate, review progress and close out evaluations in a timely manner and in accordance with these procedures; g. Documenting performance throughout the review period; h. When applicable, giving appropriate consideration to evaluations when making personnel decisions; and i. Providing the employee with the completed PMP following the close out of the evaluation. 3. The reviewer is responsible for: a. Reviewing the PMP form before and after supervisor/employee meetings to ensure that accountabilities and behaviors are appropriate, communicated clearly, and that ratings of employees by supervisors are consistent; b. Ensuring that, when applicable, performance appraisals are given appropriate consideration in decisions regarding personnel actions; and c. Ensuring that supervisors initiate and complete evaluations in accordance with established time frames. 4. The HRMS is responsible for: a. Reviewing all completed PMPs to ensure compliance with all statutory and procedural requirements, to include an end date which falls either within the one year period following the end date of the last completed PMP; when an employee is assigned a new supervisor more than 90 days into the current PMP (other than the supervisory change which occurs when a correctional officer changes shift); or is at least 30 days prior to the end of the probationary period; b. Entering data for all completed PMPs into the PeopleSoft system; and

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 5 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 c. Maintaining a copy of the PMP form in the employee s personnel file. [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(f)] II. Completing the PMP Form A. Time Frames 1. Initiating the PMP The PMP form (HCM-111) must be initiated by the immediate supervisor within 30 days after: a. The date a new employee enters on duty; b. An employee has a change in job family or supervisory status; c. An employee is assigned a new supervisor more than 90 days into the current PMP (other than the supervisory change which occurs when a correctional officer changes shift); and d. The close of any evaluation period including the annual evaluation period. 2. Mid-Year Review a. The supervisor will meet with the employee at least once during the review period being evaluated. b. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the progress of the employee in meeting the accountabilities upon which the employee will be evaluated. 3. Closing Out the PMP The PMP form must be finalized by the immediate supervisor: a. At least 30 days prior to the expiration of the probationary period for a classified employee; b. Within 30 days of the close of the annual evaluation period or a change in job duties for classified and unclassified employees; c. Prior to the date the supervisor ends responsibilities for supervising a classified or unclassified employee unless the current PMP has been opened for 90 days or less; and

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 6 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 d. When a classified or unclassified employee terminates employment with the agency and closing out the PMP is appropriate. B. Opening the Evaluation Period The supervisor will meet with the employee in order to communicate the accountabilities and behaviors upon which the employee will be evaluated. After receiving input from both the employee and the reviewer, the supervisor will complete the following sections of the PMP: 1. Section A - Employee Information This section will be completed in its entirety except for the Reason for PMP and the End Date which will be completed upon finalization of the PMP. 2. Section B - Accountabilities a. Job Tasks The supervisor, employee, and reviewer will come to agreement on five to eight tasks which accurately describe the employee s job and are consistent with the employee s job descriptor. If an agreement cannot be reached, the reviewer will determine the evaluated accountabilities. b. Performance Standards Each task must be accompanied by a performance standard which specifies what constitutes good work and how the quality of work will be determined. Performance standards should be specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-based. c. Performance Management Accountability All PMPs for supervisors will include a standard accountability for completing the PMP with all subordinates. d. Criticality of Accountability All accountabilities will be designated as important or critical depending on the percentage of time needed to complete the task, the impact of the task on attaining agency goals or objectives, the impact of the work on others, the consequences of making errors, or any legal requirements attached to the task.

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 7 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 3. Section D - Behaviors The supervisor will explain the following behavioral factors and the rating scale entitled Examples of Behaviors (Attachment A, attached) to be used to rate the employee: a. Customer Service Orientation; b. Teamwork; c. Problem-Solving Initiative; d. Leadership (if applicable); and e. Observing Work Hours/Using Leave. 4. Section G - Record of Meetings/Discussions C. Mid-Year Review The employee, supervisor, and reviewer will sign and date the Initial Planning meeting. For open PMPs less than 90 days old which are being continued under the direction of a new supervisor, the new supervisor and employee will date in Section G, Records of Meetings/Discussions, initial planning section, directly under the signatures of the previous supervisor and employee. The supervisor will retain the original form and provide a copy to the employee. The supervisor will meet with the employee during the rating period for the purpose of discussing the progress of the employee in meeting the accountabilities upon which the employee will be evaluated. D. Closing Out the Evaluation Period After the supervisor and reviewer agree on the results and ratings, the supervisor will complete the sections of the PMP as indicated below and schedule a meeting with the employee to provide the final evaluation. If during the review meeting with the employee, the supervisor is persuaded to change the results or ratings, the meeting may be postponed for consultation with the reviewer. Changes agreed to will be noted and the meeting with the employee subsequently resumed. 1. Section A - Employee Information The supervisor will note the Reason for the PMP (annual, probationary, change in supervisor, change in job duties) and the end date.

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 8 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 2. Section B - Accountabilities The supervisor will select a rating consistent with the performance standards and actual performance that occurred during the review period. The results will be recorded for any rating other than meets standards. 3. Section C - Overall Accountability Rating The supervisor will determine the overall accountability rating using the guidelines provided on the PMP form. 4. Section D - Behaviors a. The supervisor will select a rating consistent with the actual behaviors demonstrated during the review period. The supervisor may use Attachment A as a guide for selecting the appropriate rating. b. If the employee is not assigned any job duties or responsibilities that have a leadership component or require any leadership skills for successful completion the leadership behavior will be marked not applicable. 5. Section E - Overall Performance Rating The supervisor will select an overall performance rating in accordance with the guidelines provided on the PMP form. 6. Section F - Summary/Development Plan Prior to meeting with the employee, the supervisor will complete the Performance Strengths and Performance Areas for Development by describing the employee s demonstrated strengths and deficiencies. During the review meeting, the employee and supervisor will develop a plan to address any noted deficiencies and the supervisor will record the plan in the section entitled, Development Plan. 7. Section G - Record of Meetings/Discussion Prior to the review meeting with the employee, the reviewer will sign and date the PMP form. At the close of the review meeting, the supervisor and employee will sign and date the PMP form. 8. The employee will be provided a copy of the evaluation and provided

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 9 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 the opportunity to provide written comments. E. Closing Out the Evaluation Period for Employees on Extended Leave 1. Every effort must be made to ensure that a minimum of one PMP is completed (as defined by the end date) during every 12 month period following the close out of the last PMP. Employees will be evaluated for any consecutive period of more than 90 days. 2. Supervisors may meet with the employee for review and signature if the employee returns to work prior to the end of the original annual review period. In the event the employee is not expected to return (or the supervisor will no longer be available) within the annual review period, the PMP may be mailed to the employee for review and signature. 3. When employees are absent from work for more than nine months in the 12 month evaluation period, the supervisor must complete a PMP for the review period that contains the rating unable to rate. The supervisor s comments must indicate the inclusive dates of the employee s absence within the applicable 12 month period. The employee s signature will not be required on the PMP; however, a copy will be provided to the employee by mail or upon the employee s return to work. 4. An employee must sign, date and return any PMP that is received by mail under the above-described circumstances. F. Distribution The supervisor must provide one copy to the employee and the original to the HRMS. The HRMS will place the original in the employee s personnel file. III. Annual Report to HCM On or before March 31 of each year, the director will report compliance with statute to the administrator of HCM on a form prescribed by HCM. The report will include information from the most recent calendar year. [Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(h) and 74 O.S. 840-4.17(H)] IV. References Policy Statement No. P-110100 entitled Uniform Personnel Standards 74 O.S. 840-4.17 Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(b)(1) through (6)

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 10 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 V. Action Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(c) Merit Rule 260:25-17-31(f) The division head is responsible for compliance with this procedure. The chief administrator of Employee Services is responsible for the annual review and revisions. Any exceptions to this procedure will require prior written approval from the director. This procedure is effective as indicated. Replaced: Operations Memorandum No. OP-110225 entitled Performance Management Process dated July 10, 2014 Distribution: Policy and Operations Manual Agency Website

Section-11 Personnel OP-110225 Page: 11 Effective Date: 08/27/2015 Referenced Forms Title Location HCM-111 Performance Management Process www.hcm.ok.gov Attachments Title Location Attachment A Examples of Behaviors Attached