In ediscovery and Litigation Support Repositories MPeterson, June 2009



Similar documents
Long Term Record Retention and XAM

Best Practices for Long-Term Retention & Preservation. Michael Peterson, Strategic Research Corp. Gary Zasman, Network Appliance

Cloud Archiving. Paul Field Consultant

Information Migration

SNIA Cloud Storage: Standards and Beyond

How To Manage Cloud Data Safely

Storage Virtualisation in the Cloud

ILM et Archivage Les solutions IBM

2009 ikeep Ltd, Morgenstrasse 129, CH-3018 Bern, Switzerland (

TERRITORY RECORDS OFFICE BUSINESS SYSTEMS AND DIGITAL RECORDKEEPING FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL

Symantec Enterprise Vault.cloud Overview

Storage and Data Management in a post-filesystem

ILM: Tiered Services & The Need For Classification

Interoperable Cloud Storage with the CDMI Standard

Cloud Archive & Long Term Preservation Challenges and Best Practices

Moving Data and Distributing Data

Data Sheet: Archiving Symantec Enterprise Vault Discovery Accelerator Accelerate e-discovery and simplify review

How the Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) Complements ARMA International s Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles (GARP )

Functional Requirements for Digital Asset Management Project version /30/2006

Archiving A Dell Point of View

ILM, classification and the Information-Centric Enterprise. Per Sedihn, Vice Chair Nordics Comitte SNIA Europe CTO Proact IT Group

10 Steps to Establishing an Effective Retention Policy

Increase Agility and Reduce Costs with a Logical Data Warehouse. February 2014

How To Manage An Electronic Discovery Project

The biggest challenges of Life Sciences companies today. Comply or Perish: Maintaining 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

Information-centric Policy Management. Edgar StPierre, EMC

EMC SourceOne Management and ediscovery Overview

Information Governance in the Cloud

Records Management and SharePoint 2013

Managing Data Storage in the Public Cloud. October 2009

SNIA Cloud Storage PRESENTATION TITLE GOES HERE

WHITE PAPER Practical Information Governance: Balancing Cost, Risk, and Productivity

Storage Technology. Standards Trends

Realizing the ROI of Information Governance. Gregory P. Kosinski Director, Product Marketing EMC

Using EMC SourceOne Management in IBM Lotus Notes/Domino Environments

How to avoid building a data swamp

Global Headquarters: 5 Speen Street Framingham, MA USA P F

AccessData Corporation. No More Load Files. Integrating AD ediscovery and Summation to Eliminate Moving Data Between Litigation Support Products

Only 1% of that data has preservation requirements Only 5% has regulatory requirements Only 34% is active and useful

Considering Third Generation ediscovery? Two Approaches for Evaluating ediscovery Offerings

Lowering E-Discovery Costs Through Enterprise Records and Retention Management. An Oracle White Paper March 2007

Real World Strategies for Migrating and Decommissioning Legacy Applications

EMC PERSPECTIVE EMC SourceOne Management

FIVE TIPS FOR A SUCCESSFUL ARCHIVE MIGRATION TO MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 WHITEPAPER

Symantec Enterprise Vault.cloud Overview

SMART ARCHIVING. The need for a strategy around archiving. Peter Van Camp

Electronic Records Management

Data Portability Requirements for EHRs

IBM Unstructured Data Identification and Management

Proactive Data Management for ediscovery

<Insert Picture Here> Cloud Archive Trends and Challenges PASIG Winter 2012

Cloud Data Management Interface (CDMI) The Cloud Storage Standard. Mark Carlson, SNIA TC and Oracle Chair, SNIA Cloud Storage TWG

Archive and Preservation in the Cloud - Business Case, Challenges and Best Practices. Chad Thibodeau, Cleversafe, Inc. Sebastian Zangaro, HP

Information Archiving

Overview of Storage and Data Management Industry Trends in Long Term Information Retention and Preservation

in the Cloud - What To Do and What Not To Do Chad Thibodeau / Cleversafe Sebastian Zangaro / HP

and the world is built on information

COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR E-DISCOVERY AND PROTOTYPING OF SUIT-COPING SYSTEM

Amit Sheth & Ajith Ranabahu, Presented by Mohammad Hossein Danesh

Cloud Computing: Implications and Guidelines for Records Management in Kentucky State Government

Storage Clouds. Karthik Ramarao. Director of Strategy and Technology and CTO Asia Pacific, NetApp Board Director SNIA South Asia

A Practical Guide to Legacy Application Retirement

Queensland recordkeeping metadata standard and guideline

provide a log of who accessed and/or changed what and when, creating visibility and accountability.

W H I T E P A P E R E X E C U T I V E S U M M AR Y S I T U AT I O N O V E R V I E W. Sponsored by: EMC Corporation. Laura DuBois May 2010

ERA Challenges. Draft Discussion Document for ACERA: 10/7/30

Microsoft SharePoint and Records Management Compliance

The Recipe for Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance using Microsoft s SharePoint 2010 platform

IBM ediscovery Identification and Collection

Digital Asset Management Beyond CMIS

Solving the long term archiving challenges with IBM System Storage Archive Manager Solutions

Combining SAWSDL, OWL DL and UDDI for Semantically Enhanced Web Service Discovery

Donna G. Rose, CRM Global Records Manager Apache Corp May 6, 2010

CLOUD STORAGE SECURITY INTRODUCTION. Gordon Arnold, IBM

Record Retention and Digital Asset Management Tim Shinkle Perpetual Logic, LLC

<Insert Picture Here> Solution Direction for Long-Term Archive

IBM Infrastructure for Long Term Digital Archiving

Reduce Cost, Time, and Risk ediscovery and Records Management in SharePoint

# Is ediscovery eating a hole in your companies wallet?

Add the compliance and discovery benefits of records management to your business solutions. IBM Information Management software

Raytheon Oakley Systems

The Future of Information

Integrated archiving: streamlining compliance and discovery through content and business process management

RazorSafe Mail Archiving Appliances

IBM Enterprise Content Management Product Strategy

Flattening Enterprise Knowledge

Mitra Innovation Leverages WSO2's Open Source Middleware to Build BIM Exchange Platform

Tools and Services for the Long Term Preservation and Access of Digital Archives

NightOwlDiscovery. EnCase Enterprise/ ediscovery Strategic Consulting Services

THIS WEBCAST WILL BEGIN SHORTLY

Object Storage A Dell Point of View

The Webcast will begin at 1:00pm EST.

Top 5 reasons to choose HP Information Archiving

STORAGE SECURITY TUTORIAL With a focus on Cloud Storage. Gordon Arnold, IBM

Management: A Guide For Harvard Administrators

EMC arhiviranje. Lilijana Pelko Primož Golob. Sarajevo, Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved.

Structured Content: the Key to Agile. Web Experience Management. Introduction

COMPLIANCE PRACTICES:

How ArchiveOne can help with ediscovery (within the EDRM framework)

Cloud Storage Standards Overview and Research Ideas Brainstorm

Transcription:

XAM PRESENTATION (extensible TITLE Access GOES Method) HERE In ediscovery and Litigation Support Repositories MPeterson, June 2009

Contents XAM Introduction XAM Value Propositions XAM Use Cases Digital Libraries and Preservation Stores ediscovery Medical Records, Electronic Healthcare Records Cloud-services Reference Materials XAM Initiative 2

XAM Introduction The open XAM API specification Defines the programming interface and services that enable applications and information management services to define, store, retrieve, search, and manage XAM objects on XAMenabled storage systems XAM objects are: Exportable or importable as standard XML containers Provide for extensible metadata enabling ILMbased management, ediscovery, long-term retention and preservation Portable, location independent, compliant, secure XAM Initiative 3

XAM is a Data Storage Interface Data MetaData Data Storage Interface Resource Domains classify services into specific areas that each deal with a different aspect of the problem An information domain application creates data and associates metadata with it Certain Data Storage Interfaces can accommodate both Data and MetaData ( XAM, Filesystems with extended attributes) User MetaData User MetaData Data Data System MetaData Data Storage Interface System MetaData MetaData aware Data Services interpret Data System MetaData as the requirements for it s lifecycle and implement policies for retention, placement, lifecycle, etc. Other Data Storage interfaces (based on blocks or objects) provide virtualized Containers for the Data bits and the management of those containers Storage services are employed to meet those requirements at this point in the data s lifecycle, however the storage services are unaware of the data s requirements XAM Initiative 4

XAM Value Proposition XAM provides choice, flexibility, and makes information portable Choice between storage devices and applications, flexibility to change vendors or use storage devices from multiple vendors XAM reduces costs Reduces application porting, testing, and support costs, and improves utilization efficiencies & time to market XAM empowers ILM-based management practices Retention, disposition, security, and other requirements can be embedded in the metadata allowing application-based and external services to act on XAM objects automatically based on business rules Reduces cost and improves storage utilization efficiencies XAM Initiative 5

XAM Value Propositions XAM metadata is the foundation for extended e-discovery, analytics, and litigation support capabilities A standard container enabling centralized, shareable, and controlled medical and health care records Retention and Preservation systems utilizing XAM provide a standard preservation object format XAM provides cloud-based services with missing information management control capabilities XAM Initiative 6

ediscovery PRESENTATION and Litigation TITLE GOES HERE Support XAM Value Proposition May 2009

ediscovery and Litigation Support Top Challenges Identification and control of information and data assets and their locations Scaling to keep up with growth of capacity and number of cases Litigation hold policy control Avoid spoliating discovered information Including control of metadata Controlling discovered information for long-term periods of time while minimizing cost If you have a litigation that runs 7-10 years, you will have at least 3 migration events and will lose information and data XAM Initiative 8

ediscovery and Litigation Support Vision Discovery and litigation review practices are more scalable, cost effective, automated, and controllable across time XAM features, benefits, and attributes XAM objects are self-contained, portable, location independent preservation objects that can be searched and discovered All critical preservation and litigation control services are supported authenticity, integrity, availability, discoverability, portability, confidentiality, audit logs, ILM-base management, migration, Litigation hold controls can be embedded in each object Litigation review results can be embedded in each object Migration and management costs are greatly reduced XAM Initiative 9

How XAM Applies XAM defines an updateable preservation object it is the object container, the access method, and the application to storage interface Supports federated search including expanded metadata and controls Can control litigation holds During litigation review, review results can be placed in each object XAM objects are portable, storage and location independent reducing migration costs Vision: XAM objects provide preservation, litigation, and discovery controls supporting cost-effective retention, deletion, and litigation support practices in the datacenter. XAM Initiative 10

XAM and EDRM Federated Search of XAM objects including metadata, Litigation and deletion hold Ingest, Index, Litigation Review Repository: Create XAM objects Utilize XAM to preserve and protect from change, control authenticity, to record review/analysis results in the object metadata, etc. XAM Initiative 11

XAM Use Case A litigation support service runs ediscovery and ingests discovered content During ingestion, XAM objects are created with metadata based on policies Objects are hashed, audit logs started, indexed for discovery, and storage policies initiated based on classification rules Preservation services are now operating and in control ediscovery Process Rules Engine Typical Litigation Support Preservation Store Clients, sites, networks, etc. Remote Preservation Repository for Evidence Review and Control Federated Storage Resources: Tiered and Virtualized Distributed if needed for business continuity Multiple vendors Multiple architectures XAM Initiative 12

XAM Value Proposition XAM metadata and object containers create the foundation for extended e-discovery, analytics, and litigation support capabilities Rich XAM metadata can be searched and analyzed Extensible XAM container provides for security, integrity, authenticity, audit logs, chain of custody and litigation hold controls, and can hold litigation review metadata XAM provides the capability of preservation services that will mitigate the cost, complexity, and potential spoliation caused by logical and physical migrations XAM Initiative 13

SNIA and XAM For more information on XAM SNIA XAM Home http://www.snia.org/xam Contact information: Michael Peterson, SNIA Chief Strategy Advocate (805) 201-3178 or mpeterson@snia-dmf.org XAM Initiative 14

PRESENTATION XAM BRIEFING TITLE GOES HERE

MP1 Why XAM? The industry will benefit from a standardized access method to storage systems End Users want: Choices between Application Vendors Choices between Storage Vendors Easy migration between vendors/technology Compliance, Scalability, Performance, $/GB, TCO Application Vendors want: Annotate Data with associated Metadata Indicate basic Storage Management Policies Speak same language to all types of Devices Manipulate billions if not trillions or records XAM Storage Vendors want: Application Support for their Products Efficiently Store Application Data and Metadata Integrate Basic Storage Management Capabilities Manage billions if not trillions of records XAM Initiative 16

Slide 16 MP1 Needs updating with the new value props Michael Peterson, 5/13/2009

A New Storage API XAM Provides: Interoperability: Applications can work with any XAM conformant storage system; information can be migrated and shared Compliance: Integrated record retention and disposition metadata, ILM Practices: Framework for classification, policy, and implementation Migration: Ability to automate migration process to maintain long-term readability Discovery: Application-independent structured discovery avoids application obsolescence. XAM is a SNIA Architecture The XAM Architecture spec defines the normative semantics of the API for use by applications and implementation by storage systems XAM is an Application Programming Interface (API) The XAM Java and C API specs define bindings of the XAM Architecture to the Java and C Languages XAM is SNIA Software open source The XAM SDK provides a common library and reference implementation to promote widespread adoption of the standard XAM Initiative 17

XAM Interface First interface to standardize system metadata for retention of data Implements basic capability to Read and Write Data (through Xstreams) Locates any XSet with a query or by supplying the XUID Allows Metadata to be added to the data and keeps both in an XSet object Uses and produces system metadata for each Xset For example Access and Commit times (Storage System Metadata) But it also uniquely specifies Data System Metadata for Retention Data Services XAM User metadata is uninterpretable by the system, but stored with the other data and is available for use in queries Given this we can see that XAM is a data storage interface that is used by both Storage and Data Services (functions) XAM Initiative 18

XAM System Metadata XAM specifies property fields that are interpreted by an Xsystem as System Metadata It does this by using a reserved field namespace.xam.*,.xsystem.* and.xset.* are reserved Either the Content Application or a separate Information Management application provides preservation and/or ILM metadata to cause the underlying system to treat the data according to the specified requirements i.e. Retention XAM Initiative 19

Data Storage Interface Standards Other standard data storage APIs have the ability to deal with metadata as well (POSIX filesystems) POSIX specifies standard system metadata as part of the data storage interface: File times, Permission (including ACLs), owner, group, etc. This metadata is maintained and used (interpreted) by the storage services that implement the API Thus we call it storage system metadata The functions that are controlled by this metadata govern the storing and retrieval of the data through the interface These functions are described in the abstract as storage services XAM Initiative 20

Metadata Storage services may provide functions for metadata as part of the data storage interface. This is an important capability for managing Data Resources (as opposed to managing Storage Resources). The metadata may be managed by the storage service, managed by data services, or un-interpreted by either. System metadata that is managed by storage services are those properties of a data element that pertain to the primary functions of storing and retrieving the data. We call this storage system metadata, as it is used and managed by storage services. Other system and user metadata may be preserved on the basis of individual data elements, but is not interpreted by the storage services XAM Initiative 21

Metadata for Data Services Metadata available through the data storage interface may also be managed by data services This data service metadata can be used by data services to provide differentiated value to individual data elements The model or schema for data service metadata may be defined by each data service and may be standardized XAM Initiative 22

Metadata in Information Services The role of metadata in information services is as a communication mechanism with the underlying storage services and data services. Information services are primarily concerned with the data service system metadata as a means to convey the data s requirements to the underlying data services. An information service may also interpret user metadata for purposes of data classification. An information service can create its own user metadata that is uninterpreted by the underlying services for its own use. XAM Initiative 23

The Resource Domain Model This model shows the logical layering of the different domains and the role of policies for each domain. The services in each domain play a different role, but leverage common, standard interfaces XAM Initiative 24

Resource Domains Data MetaData Data Storage Interface Resource Domains are a way of classifying services into specific areas that each deal with a different aspect of the problem An information domain application creates data and associates MetaData with it Certain Data Storage Interfaces can accommodate both Data and MetaData ( XAM, Filesystems with extended attributes) User MetaData Data System MetaData Data Storage Interface MetaData aware Data Services interpret Data System MetaData as the requirements for it s lifecycle and implement policies for retention, placement, lifecycle, etc. Other Data Storage interfaces (based on blocks or objects) provide virtualized Containers for the Data bits and the management of those containers User MetaData Data System MetaData Storage services are employed to meet those requirements at this point in the data s lifecycle, however the storage services are unaware of the data s requirements XAM Initiative 25