Estate Forex Trading in Ohio, Not So Bad



Similar documents
Maryland s s Nutrient Trading Program. How Trading Works. John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture

Accounting for Uncertainty in Offset and Trading Programs

Maryland's Trading and Offset Programs Review Observations

The History and Status of Wetland Mitigation Banking and Water Quality Trading

Market-based Incentives to Improve Water Quality:

WATER QUALITY TRADING WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? Jim Shortle Penn State University STAC Workshop on Water Quality Trading May 14, 2013

Certification and Verification of Offset and Trading Credits in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Trading Nutrient Reductions from Nonpoint Source Best Management Practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Guidance for Agricultural Landowners and

Current Water Quality Trading Program Applications in the US:

Overview of Water Quality Trading Programs

WV Potomac Nutrient Credit Bank and Trade Program. NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant. Final Report

Draft. Maryland Department of Agriculture Annapolis, Maryland. April Not for Regulatory Purposes

Market-Based Programs for Water Quality Improvement: (Part of) the solution to diffuse pollution?

Further Details of the Four Successful Water Quality Trading Projects

Water Quality Trading and How to Implement a New Model

LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION

WRI POLICY NOTE. Because demand for funding in conservation programs

Transaction costs of nonpoint source water quality credits: Implications for trading programs in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

WORKING PAPER How Nutrient Trading Could Help Restore the Chesapeake Bay

Kevin DeBell, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gary Shenk, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA s Conditional Approval of Delaware s Revised Draft BMP Verification Program Plans January 26, 2016

Conservation Banking Incentives for Stewardship

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Wastewater Treatment Story: Three Decades and Counting

Comparison Tables of State Nutrient Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Using the Carbon Market to Provide Financial Support for Coastal Restoration and Protection. fact SHEET

Market Structures for Water Quality Trading in the Lower Fox River Watershed: Survey Results

Liquid Capital. Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia

Forest-Climate Working Group:

MATCHMAKERS, EVALUATORS, LIBRARIES, AND NETWORKS: ONLINE RESOURCES FOR LANDOWNERS AND PRACTITIONERS

~Pennsylvania Campaign for Clean Water~ Stormwater Workgroup

2008 Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Overview and Highlights. Jenny Thomas U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division July 2014

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

Payments for Ecosystem Services: Catalog of Online Tools and Resources

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Delaware's Trading and Offset Programs Review Observations. I. Summary of Program Characteristics and Regulatory Status

- POLICY - Disaster Recovery Assistance Program

Carbon Credits: An Opportunity for Forest Landowners. Hughes Simpson Texas Forest Service

Pollutant Monitoring of Effluent Credit Trading Programs For Agricultural Nonpoint Source Control

Lessons Learned from the Expert BMP Panel Process That May Apply to MTDs. Tom Schueler Chesapeake Stormwater Network

TMDL Data Center Webinar: Response to Comments and Questions

NC Environmental Restoration Association

Markets for Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Lands: Experience and Outlook in the United States

2016 Virginia Resource Management Plan Development Request for Applications ( RFA )

Excellence in Engineering Since 1946

TITLE: [Name of municipality] Storm Water Abatement Feasibility Study

Online Phosphorus Trading System

EPA Grants Supported Restoring the Chesapeake Bay

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Meeting Water Needs through Investing in Nature

Delivering biodiversity offsetting through an independent broker. Tom Tew Chief Executive

Leveraging Ohio s Clean Water SRF Program to Fund Stream and Wetland Restoration and Protection Projects

Baltimore City Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) July 2, 2012

Baltimore County Land Preservation: A Status Report and Call to Action

Colorado Habitat Exchange Exchange Manual

Investigating business demand for Watershed Service Markets: Case studies from Oregon

DORCHESTER COUNTY CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL PHASE II WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT)

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Water Quality Trading Internal Management Directive [Early DRAFT for policy forum discussion]

Klamath Tracking and Accounting Program Vision

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

The Role of the Entrepreneur. September

Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture Water Policy: The North American Experience

Riparian Forest Buffer Panel (Bay Area Regulatory Programs)

The International Stormwater BMP Database Part 1: Summary of Database

Forest Carbon for the Private Landowner (2): Protocols, Project Examples and Opportunities Andrea Tuttle*

TOOLS TO MONITOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Using the voluntary carbon market to provide funding for natural capital projects in the UK. 6 th October 2015

New Jersey Farm Bureau

Facilitating Adaptive Management in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed through the Use of Online Decision Support Tools

Report for 2003PA14B: Spruce Creek Watershed Keystone Project

Presented by Dani Wise Johnson Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Ecological Mitigation Strategies

Natural Resources Credit Trading Reference

Texas Riparian and Stream Ecosystem Education Program

Best Management Practices (BMPs) Verification - Communications Strategy

Nitrogen Management Project Protocol (NMPP) Special Topics Webinar & Project Developer Training

The 25 Year Saskatchewan Water Security Plan. February 2013

Please consider substituting the following short narrative on wetland regulatory issues:

Status of State PACE Programs

Chesapeake Conservation Corps Member Application Instructions

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

Chapter 4 FINANCIAL REWARDS: WHAT PROGRAMS COMPENSATE LANDOWNERS

Pennsylvania's Clean and Green Program

Water Quality Management

Overview of the Division of Water Restoration Assistance

Updated Best Management Practices (BMPs) Verification Communications Strategy

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

Executive Summary Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy

Wetlands in MN: Resource, Regulation, Restoration

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

CBP Efforts to Identify Priority Areas and Enhance Monitoring in the Bay Watershed

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

Towards Integrated Water/Watershed Management: Data Strategies. Clay Clifton EcoLayers, Inc.

E&SC Training & Certification

Use of Green Roofs to Meet New Development Runoff Requirements. Greg Davis Nov. 8, 2007

3.4 Watershed-Based Trading

Produced by: Conservation Trust for North Carolina on behalf of. with funding from WalMart

Transcription:

BENEFITS AND OBSTACLES IN WQT Indianapolis, IN August 27, 2009 CTIC Water Quality Trading Workshop George W. Kelly

Capital Financing provided for over 50 mitigation projects Structured to carry the long term liability associated with mitigation Invested in and sponsored mitigation banks throughout the US Funds available for large tract conservation acquisitions Experience Founded in 1997, EBX is one of the leading mitigation banking firms in the United States Over 50 miles of stream and over 13,000 acres of wetland, forest, buffer and habitat acres restored or under contract Long and successful track record working with rural land owners Expertise Broad proficiency with the legal, tax, easement and regulatory requirements of mitigation Stream, wetlands, and habitat restoration; water quality trading and carbon sequestration Build project-specific teams with top engineering i and ecological l firms

EBX Background Viewpoint of practitioner that has developed, financed and sold over $80 million in environmental credits Project sponsor that has participated in over 100 turnkey environmental credit projects resulting in the restoration and enhancement of over 50 miles of stream, 6,000 acres of restored wetlands, and the protection of 7,300 acres of critical species habitat, forest and buffer, including nutrient offset projects in the Mid Atlantic President of National Mitigation Banking Association Participant in Nutrient Trading Task Forces in Chesapeake Bay, including serving on the Advisory Committee of the Water Quality Fund for the Chesapeake Bay; Advisory Committee to Bay Bank; and Member of the Maryland Climate Change Commission (Mitigation Work Group) Early stage private sponsor of Ecosystem Marketplace - www.ecosystemmarketplace.com Working with landowners and project developers on the placement of investments Primarily focused on U.S. domestic market

Policy Background Chesapeake Bay Program Nutrient Trading Fundamental Principles and Guidelines, March 2001 EPA Office of Water: Water Quality Trading Policy, January 2003 Pennsylvania Policy and Guidelines, December 30, 2006 Virginia Guidance, February 5, 2008 Maryland Guidance slated for mid -2009 Ohio Water Quality Trading Rules, January 1, 2007

Regulatory Driversrs Baseline Permit timeline of Buyers Sale period Banking Currency Service Area BASIC FACTORS WATER QUALITY TRADING - 402/CWA/State delegated Programs / TMDL - WLA in TMDL, WQBEL 5-year permit Minimum period: 5 10 years typical Not typically authorized Pounds of nitrogen / phosphorus / sediment Watershed based, TMDL area or other areas designated by state agencies Certification process of NPS Qualified soil and water conservation professional or state agencies credits Liability for success Permittee responsible unless private contractual agreement Trading Ratios Options other than trade Credit release schedule Include uncertainty, delivery and retirement factors; (2:1 3:1 typical) Capital improvements to PS After certification? After implementation? Verification Approval of sale Credit generation Pricing Qualified soil and water conservation professional Water Quality Trading Management Plan approval Multiple BMPs (soil and water conservation professional) Needs further market discovery Registry State (with possible assistance from private sector )

Transactional Factors Market conditions i Eligibility determination Baseline Cost differential to support trade Market pricing discovery Credit generation Certification process approval of transaction Approval of transaction Types of practices Duration of trades Trading contracts Verification Registry Deed restrictions / covenants? Insurance Enforcement

Market Conditions Demand market analysis Preliminary analysis on expected cost of credits (could be a blended rate from one farm) Comparative analysis of credits with other BMP credits in the marketplace.

Buyer: - Permit authorizes Eligibility - Mass loading, cannot trade technology based effluent limits Seller: - Compliant with all laws - Meets baseline requirements - Federal or state / state funding for practices? 319? - Idling a substantial portion of farms?

Baseline Seller: - TMDL? -Can cost-share share programs be used to achieve baseline? Buyer: - Cannot buy NPS credits to achieve technology standards

Cost Differential to Trade NPS must be cheaper that capital improvements to PS Discovery of capital improvement cost to PS is hard to discern - it needs to include O&M costs; design; permit, etc. Trading ratios have an impact on costs to NPS buyer

Market Pricing Discovery Pricing reflects both BMP practice, land costs and market structure Trading ratios increase price of credit Function of demand and risk

When are Credits Generated? After certification and implementation? This may require capital investments before credits can be sold

Certification Process for Seller Proposal review process Consistent with rules No designated timeline Approved BMPs (qualified soil and water conservation professional)

Approval of Transaction Approve in permit to PS Certify NPS BMPs through water quality trading management plan Consistent with permit conditions NPS credits must be within the same designated watershed as PS

Types of Practices Both annual and structural practices BMPs with peer review

Duration of Trades Some states require 10 year minimum and up to 20 years Ohio appears to set no minimum i This presents problems for annual practices Needs to be blend of both annual and structural practices Economies of scale

Trading Contracts Negotiated between buyer and seller (bilateral) Not yet standardized Buyer will want seller to take liability for non- performance Penalties for non performance are a key issue

Verification Use NRCS standards Verify the practice, not on-the the-ground measurements Term of verification consistent with lifespan of BMP

Registry Credits should be registered Vintage years noted Provides market oversight Update to ledger and permits

Deed Restrictions / Covenants? Depends on practice as to whether some form of restrictive covenants is required Not likely require permanent easements

Insurance Self-insured? Reserve of credits or payment py to insurance pool likely required

Enforcement Penalty for exceeding effluent limitation on PS (ceiling on market) Requirement to authorize enforcement in any trading contract

Contact Information Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC 10055 Red Run Boulevard, Suite 130 Owings Mills, MD 21117 Phone: (410) 356-5159 Fax: (410) 356-5822 909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100 Raleigh, NC 27606 Phone: (919) 829-9909 Fax: (919) 829-9913 604 Greene Street Camden, SC 29020 Phone: (803) 432-48904890 Fax: (803) 236-5123 www.ebxusa.com George W. Kelly george@ebxusa.com