CLASSROOM PERFORMANCE GENERAL EDUCATION A RESEARCH BRIEF



Similar documents
How To Improve The School District

A Comparison of Grades in the Traditional Versus the Online formats of CJ10100 and CJ20000

Retention and Success of Regular vs. Online and Hybrid Courses Fall 2001 through Spring 2003

E-COMMERCE & WEB DESIGN TECHNOLOGY Plan for Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

ACT National Curriculum Survey Policy Implications on Preparing for Higher Standards. improve yourself

Early Childhood Education

AVIATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT

PROGRESS REPORT: Ethnic Disparities in Higher Education in North County San Diego

IUPUC General Studies Degree Program Assessment Report for June 27, 2014

The Instructional (Academic Affairs) Program Review Narrative Report

Architectural/Construction Technology

Completion/Revision Date Approved by Board of Education on November 16, 2009

Meeting of the OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION May 25, 2012

T r i t o n C o l l e g e Assessment Planning and Reporting Tool ACADEMIC PROGRAMS

Human Resource Planning

How To Improve Your Knowledge Of Psychology

Policy on Accreditation of Baccalaureate Degrees (New, First Reading January 2016)

Assessment Report Applied Psychology Program

Neumann University Division of Education and Human Services: Graduate Masters Program

Dean: Erin Vines, Faculty Member: Mary Gumlia 12/14/2009

Appraisal: Evaluation instrument containing competencies, indicators, and descriptors.

Assessment Plans. for. Computer Engineering Programs

Course or Program Campus-Wide Tutoring (CWT) Form completed by Jason Berner

B. The educational competency descriptors are located in Appendix I.

Detailed Assessment Report Applied Welding Technologies (PSAV) (POS 5679)

The MetLife Survey of

Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate Curriculum Proposal Cover Sheet (Course, Program and Core)

Information Technology Security

Academic Program Review

Baker College - Master of Business Administration Program Assessment Report CGS Assessment Report: MBA Program

Succession Planning Process

MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE of The City University of New York GUIDELINES FOR THE FACULTY REGARDING REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION, AND TENURE

Strategic Planning at Lane Community College

New Program Proposal Bachelor of Arts Art Education USC Upstate

Program Outcomes and Assessment. Learning Outcomes

St. Petersburg College - A Review of the SPC Program

Technical Processes used to Develop Colorado School Grades for Alternative Education Campuses

Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall

U.S. Students in China: Meeting the Goals of the 100,000 Strong Initiative

Online : Implement in Spring

Basic Skills Initiative Academic Senate Center for Student Success

College of Nursing and Professional Disciplines Instructional Design Strategic Plan

Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering (BSCoE) Essential Ideas

BAKER COLLEGE Waiver Form - Office Copy. Computer Animation. Associate of Applied Science Degree

Indiana University Kokomo School of Business Undergraduate Program Assessment Report Academic Year

Criminal Justice Technology

Testing Accommodations For English Learners In New Jersey

Program Planning and Assessment (PPA) for Services, Offices & Non-Instructional Programs. Comprehensive Review, Annual Review & Action Plan

Appendix B: Accelerated Program Guidelines

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE AEROSPACE ENGINEERING DEGREE PROGRAM IN THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SECTION IN THE UNDERGRADUATE CATALOG

Major Map: Elementary Education

Math Content by Strand 1

Evaluation of Online Courses Fall 2000 to Fall 2001

SOBA. School of Business Administration Strategic Plan

Presentation to St. Petersburg College, Board of Trustees. Angie Beltz, Tech Data James Connelly, St. Petersburg College

Does the program qualify for supplemental Palmetto Fellows and LIFE Scholarship awards? Yes No

Thomas Edison State College W. Cary Edwards School of Nursing Guidelines for Synthesis Paper and MSN e-portfolio Nursing Administration

Policy Abstract. for the. Handbook for Program Review: Cleveland State University s Self-Study Process for Growth and Change Spring 2005

Oregon Institute of Technology Medical Imaging Technology Department Diagnostic Medical Sonography Degree Completion Program Assessment

Building Highly Skilled Teachers and Education Leaders

Saint Paul College Medical Office Careers Program Continuous Improvement of Teaching and Learning Assessment Report

Hospitality and Tourism Management

Problems and Measures Regarding Waste 1 Management and 3R Era of public health improvement Situation subsequent to the Meiji Restoration

Articulation Manual

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA REMEDIAL/DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVITIES REPORT The University of North Carolina General Administration

Bloomsburg University. Computer Science Assessment Report

Honorable John Kasich, Governor Honorable Keith Faber, President, Senate Honorable William G. Batchelder, Speaker, House of Representatives

UMD Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

Veterinary Technology

A Study of Career Patterns of the Presidents of Independent Colleges and Universities

State Board of Education Update

Fall Semester Year 1: 17 hours

Distance Learning Report

Diploma Programme. The unique benefits of the DP

CRITICAL THINKING ASSESSMENT

Service Plan Report 2005/06. Revised

Oh, that explains it. Michigan Merit Curriculum High School Graduation Requirements

UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA SOUTHEAST BACHELOR S OF SCIENCE IN GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES

Thomas Edison State College W. Cary Edwards School of Nursing Guidelines for Synthesis Paper and MSN e-portfolio Nursing Informatics

Guidance Counselor. To Apply: Please send resume and direct inquiries to the contact person below, is preferred:

THE SKILLS GAP IN ENTRY-LEVEL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE. The Problem, Its Consequences, and Promising Interventions

College of the North Atlantic and its accreditation with the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP)

THE CERTIFIED SIX SIGMA BLACK BELT HANDBOOK

E-COMMERCE & WEB DESIGN TECHNOLOGY Plan for Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

AC : SUCCESSFUL ABET ACCREDITATION OF A TWO-YEAR ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM: LESSONS LEARNED

PILOT ASSESSMENT PROJECT FOR April12, 2003

Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plan

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Academic and Student Affairs ******************************************************************************

Sorrell College of Business. Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)

COLLEGE FRESHMEN AND SENIORS PERCEPTIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SKILLS ACQUIRED IN HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE

DOÑA ANA BRANCH COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Strategic Plan Revision THIS DOCUMENT REFLECTS FINAL EDITING COMPLETED APRIL 10, 2003.

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 30-03: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING POLICY. Responsible Executive: Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs

The University of Southern Mississippi. Detailed Assessment Report As of: 10/02/ :30 AM EST Business Administration MBA**

Construction Management

Political Science Department Five Year Program Review/Planning Document March 17, Section 1. Mission and Goals

PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (PEOs): PEOs should be aligned with the Program Mission

ANNUAL REPORT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

E-Commerce and Web Design Selections for graduates in 2007

NOTE: The following report by the Benchmarking Task Force was reviewed with the Strategic Planning Steering Committee at its April 25, 2012 meeting.

Readiness Matters The Impact of College Readiness on College Persistence and Degree Completion

Transcription:

CLASSROOM PERFORMANCE GENERAL EDUCATION A RESEARCH BRIEF Research Briefs The dissemination of relevant information is a critical component of the performance improvement process. Research briefs are one mechanism used by St. Petersburg College (SPC) for this purpose. Research Briefs are short publications prepared by the Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness (IRE) that are intended to provide relevant important information regarding a variety of College-related topics. These topics include, but are not limited to, student achievement, state accountability measures, institutional survey results, student enrollment, and faculty/adjunct compensation. Introduction The purpose of this research brief is to evaluate the performance of students in general education courses. These courses focus on knowledge, skills, and abilities that are crucial to further study within the major, encourage the pursuit of life-long learning, and provide a foundation for becoming an informed independent thinker who can comprehend, evaluate, and address issues that occur in personal lives, careers, and in the community and public affairs. Major learning outcomes for the general education curriculum are listed in the St. Petersburg College Mission Statement (http://www.spcollege.edu/central/ie/mission.htm). Performance in this assessment is defined as the percent of students passing (earning a grade of A, B, and C). The information was compiled from the collegewide grade distribution report generated at the end of a session. Only lower division courses that were considered general education were examined. In addition, the number of enrollments is a duplicated headcount where students are counted for each class registered, however, only A, B, C, D, and F grades are included in the calculations. The general education categories were established using the specific courses listed in the general education requirements for an Associate of Arts degree (http://www.spcollege.edu/webcentral/acad/genedaa.htm). Results Visual 1 shows four years of Fall historical data by the general education category. It appears that the pass rates were showing a steady decline for several years with a slight increase in the most recent term for Communications, Ethics and Humanities; however the pass rates are still lower than the benchmark year. Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 1 of 7

10 Visual 1 General Education Pass Rates (A, B, C) Fall 4 2 1 Communications Computer Ethics Humanities Mathematics Natural Sciences Social & Behavioral Sciences 2003 87.8% 90.5% 91.3% 85.8% 84.5% 86.2% 85.3% 2004 84.6% 87.9% 89.3% 84.6% 80.5% 84.0% 86.0% 2005 80.9% 87.5% 88.2% 81.2% 77.0% 82.0% 83.7% 2006 83.0% 85.9% 89.3% 82.5% 76.5% 81.5% 81.7% Table 1 shows the differences in the pass rates shown in Visual 1 compared to the previous year by general education category. The last column shows a comparison between the most recent term (Fall 2006) and the benchmark year. Chi-squares were conducted on each comparison group which showed the difference in proportions (pass/fail) were statistically significant in several categories. Table 1 Distribution of Grades by General Education Category Difference between Percent Passing (Prior Year Comparison) 2004 vs.2003 2005 vs. 2004 2006 vs. 2005 2006 vs.2003 Difference Difference Difference Difference Communications -3.2% * -3.8% * 2.1% * -4.8% * Computer -2.6% * -0.4% -1.5% -4.6% * Ethics -2.0% * -1.1% 1.1% -2.0% * Humanities -1.1% -3.4% * 1.3% -3.3% * Mathematics -4.0% * -3.5% * -0.4% -8.0% * Natural Sciences -2.3% * -1.9% * -0.5% -4.7% * Social & Behavioral Sciences 0.7% * -2.3% * -2.0% * -3.6% * General Education Total -2.0% -2.6% 0.1% -4.5% *Statistically significant at Alpha.05 Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 2 of 7

The number of students enrolled in online classes has increased dramatically over the past four years. The following information provides a comparison between general education courses offered on-line versus all other methods. Visual 2 shows the overall pass rates for all general education classes and method of course delivery. The overall pass rates for both methods appear to have stabilized in the current year after declining for several years. Line pass rates appear to be lower than classes offered at the campuses. 10 Visual 2 General Education Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 85.6% 82.9% 78.7% 78.2% Other Methods 86.8% 85.0% 82.8% 83.2% Table 2 shows the pass rates for each general education category and the method of course delivery. Graphical representation of this information for each category is available in the Appendix. In general, students appear to pass at a higher rate in courses using more traditional instruction. Table 2 Distribution of Grades by General Education Category Line vs. Other Methods Other Line Other Line Other Line Other Line Communications 87.8% 87.6% 85.0% 79.8% 81.7% 73.9% 84.4% 73.5% Computer 90.6% 89.1% 88.0% 86.9% 88.7% 82.1% 88.2% 79.2% Ethics 91.0% 93.3% 89.3% 89.2% 88.0% 89.2% 89.4% 88.7% Humanities 85.7% 86.3% 84.8% 83.6% 81.4% 80.5% 82.4% 82.7% Mathematics 84.7% 82.8% 82.0% 69.2% 77.6% 72.5% 77.5% 71.3% Natural Sciences 87.0% 80.9% 84.3% 82.2% 83.1% 76.1% 82.8% 75.7% Social & Behavioral Sciences 84.8% 87.7% 85.4% 89.6% 84.0% 82.1% 82.6% 79.2% General Education Total 86.8% 85.6% 85.0% 82.9% 82.8% 78.7% 83.2% 78.2% Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 3 of 7

Table 3 shows the difference or gap between the pass rates (Line vs. Other Methods). For Fall 2006, Communications (-10.9%) had the largest gap between the pass rates for on-line and all other methods followed by Computers, Natural Science, Mathematics, and Social and Behavioral Sciences. In other words, students were less successful in taking on-line courses in these areas. Table 3 Distribution of Grades by General Education Category Difference between Percent Passing (Line vs. Other Methods) Communications -0.2% -5.2% -7.8% -10.9% Computer -1.5% -1.1% -6.6% -9.0% Ethics 2.3% -0.1% 1.2% -0.7% Humanities 0.6% -1.2% -0.9% 0.3% Mathematics -1.9% -12.8% -5.1% -6.2% Natural Sciences -6.1% -2.1% -7.0% -7.1% Social & Behavioral Sciences 2.9% 4.2% -1.9% -3.4% General Education Total -1.2% -2.1% -4.1% -5.0% Summary: Although the overall pass rates were showing a steady decline for several years, they appear to be stabilizing with a slight increase in 2006 for Communications, Ethics, and Humanities. When comparisons were made between methods (), it appears students were less successful in taking on-line courses in several areas. Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 4 of 7

APPENDIX 10 Visual 3 Communications Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 87.6% 79.8% 73.9% 73.5% Other Methods 87.8% 85.0% 81.7% 84.4% 10 Visual 4 Computer Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 89.1% 86.9% 82.1% 79.2% Other Methods 90.6% 88.0% 88.7% 88.2% Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 5 of 7

10 Visual 5 Ethics Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 93.3% 89.2% 89.2% 88.7% Other Methods 91.0% 89.3% 88.0% 89.4% 10 Visual 6 Humanities Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 86.3% 83.6% 80.5% 82.7% Other Methods 85.7% 84.8% 81.4% 82.4% Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 6 of 7

10 Visual 7 Mathematics Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 82.8% 69.2% 72.5% 71.3% Other Methods 84.7% 82.0% 77.6% 77.5% 10 Visual 9 Social and Behavioral Sciences Pass Rates (A, B, C) 4 2 1 Line 87.7% 89.6% 82.1% 79.2% Other Methods 84.8% 85.4% 84.0% 82.6% Department of Institutional Research and Effectiveness Page 7 of 7