BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HOWARD COUNTY MEETING AGENDA ITEM



Similar documents
Howard County Public Schools

Universal Design for Learning: Ensuring Curriculum Accessibility for All

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide

Hawaii Teacher Standards Board Teacher Leader Work Group Report

How To Teach Authentic Learning

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Kentucky Teaching Conditions Standards

WIDA ELD Standards Implementation in Boston Public Schools 2.0

Standards for Professional Development

The Leader in K 12 Professional Development

Professionals Responsible for Campus Turnaround Plan Development: Name:

Embedding Technology in Education for All Learners: CEC s Recommendations to the National Education Technology Plan

Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

MS Communication Arts Goals Building and District Update 2/26/2009

Arizona CTE Curriculum Consortium Strategic Plan

Engineering our Future New Jersey: Partnerships, the Critical Element

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

FY15 DANVERS PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT GOALS THEME I ACHIEVEMENT

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

POLICY 8030 GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS. I. Policy Statement

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Instructional Management Plan

Curriculum Management

100-Day Plan. A Report for the Boston School Committee By Dr. Tommy Chang, Superintendent of Schools. July 15

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Full Board ******************************************************************************

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

a. A brief description of the assessment, its use in the program, and how the assessment is aligned to standards

Overview of the Special Education Reform

The Faith Baptist Bible College Educator Preparation Program was. Accreditation Follow-up Review

Superintendent Effectiveness Rubric*

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

Covington Community Schools Innovative Technology Finalized Planning Grant Report

Requirements for Level 2 and Level 3 Teaching Certificates in 50 States and the District of Columbia

Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders

Educational Technology Plan. for Albemarle County Public Schools.

REVERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS District Improvement Plan: Technology K-12

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

SREB State College and Career Readiness Initiative

Appendix E. Role-Specific Indicators

The e-learning Planning Framework (English-medium)

GIFTED AND TALENTED STANDARDS

Moving Standards into Practice

The school principal practices effective cultural leadership when he or she

Universal Design for Learning: Opening the Doors to Academic Success for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

What School Principals Need to Know about Curriculum and Instruction by Gene Bottoms

QUALITY INDICATORS FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES RESEARCH-BASED REVISIONS, 2004

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Georgia Department of Education Report for Senate Bill 289

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

Field Experience and Student Teaching Competencies

A Blueprint for Student Success: Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, Professional Development & Assessment

Maryland State Department of Education Implementation of Personal Financial Literacy Education

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

How To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District

A Study of Best Practices in PLATO Learning Online Solutions

GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE COURSES OFFERED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL

STANDARDS FOR THE MASTER OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY/ COORDINATOR/ DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY LICENSE

PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION

Within the context of this policy, the following definitions apply:

C E. 21 st Century Model High Schools That Work. An Enhanced HSTW Design for Implementing the West Virginia Framework for High Performing High Schools

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Project-Based Learning for all students entering Kindergarten to Grade 12. Used by Missouri school districts since 2000! New STEM. Courses for 2016!

Supporting the Implementation of NGSS through Research: Curriculum Materials

Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders

DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS. EduStat Case Study. Denver Public Schools: Making Meaning of Data to Enable School Leaders to Make Human Capital Decisions

Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom

WIDA ELD Standards Implementation in Boston Public Schools

Holland Elementary School Local Stakeholder Group Recommendations to the Commissioner Submitted January 6, 2014

Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Additional Qualification Course Guideline. Primary Education Specialist

STANDARDS FOR THE MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE DEGREE/ SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA COORDINATOR LICENSE

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Introduction and Overview Formative Instructional Practices Professional Learning.

Walpole Public Schools Leadership Council Goals Date: 7/1/ Plan # 8

APPENDIX I.A. Alignment of ISTE National Educational Technology Standards with Proposed Programs

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

Virtual Learning Solutions

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

Public Education Leadership Project

Leadership for a Learning Support System in State Departments of Education: Example Job Descriptions

Purposes for the Culminating Experience: General Guidelines

MARYLAND S FOCUS SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

Standards: What does it mean to Community College Faculty? General Overview & Panel Discussion. OhioMATYC April 12, 2013

Monroe County Department of Education. Technology Plan

Labor, HHS and Education Appropriations Labor, HHS and Education Appropriations Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515

Universal design for learning A lens for better learning and instruction in higher education

EDTC Program Assessment Framework

Class of 2020: Action Plan for Education

Educational Technology

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Patience. In Washington State, technology integration relies on coaching and regional support, not equipment. Dennis Small

Transcription:

Report BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HOWARD COUNTY MEETING AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Universal Design for Learning DATE: April 24, 2014 Lisa Katz, Specialist, Instructional Technology Lauri Silver, Special Educator, Instructional PRESENTER(S): Access Team OVERVIEW: In March 2011, the Task Force to Explore the Incorporation of the Principles of Universal Design for Learning into the Education Systems in Maryland, submitted its report, A Route for Every Learner, to the Maryland State Board of Education. Subsequently COMAR modifications were passed and adopted that require every Maryland school system to incorporate the principles and practices of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) into curriculum, instructional materials, instruction, professional development, and assessments. The purpose of this report is to provide an update on how this effort is moving forward within the Howard County Public School System (HCPSS). RECOMMENDATION/FUTURE DIRECTION: Continue to embed principles and practices of UDL in HCPSS curriculum, instructional materials, instruction, professional development, and assessments. Submitted by: Approval/Concurrence: Clarissa B. Evans Executive Director School Improvement and Curricular Programs Renee A. Foose, Ed.D. Superintendent Linda T. Wise Deputy Superintendent

INTRODUCTION Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a research-based framework that addresses learner diversity at the beginning of the design or planning effort. Using UDL principles allows educators to embed flexibility into all aspects of instruction from the beginning. This report will: Provide background information on the UDL Principles and Guidelines. State the rationale for the incorporation of the principles of UDL into the HCPSS curriculum, instruction, the curriculum development process, and professional learning opportunities. Describe the COMAR requirements and how HCPSS is meeting those requirements. Describe the current approach for the implementation of UDL resources for staff and teachers. WHAT IS UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING? UDL helps meet the challenge of variability in learning by suggesting flexible instructional materials, techniques, and strategies that can empower educators to meet the varied needs of their students. The principles of UDL help educators refine how we approach who we teach, what we teach and how we teach. Through the use of the framework of UDL, educators can plan and deliver flexible and meaningful lessons that emphasize problem solving, project-based learning, and student choice. Exposing novice learners to innovative content acquisition and application supports their development as expert learners. Expert learners are individuals who know how to learn, who want to learn, and who, in their own highly individual ways, are well prepared for a lifetime of learning. Three primary principles guide UDL and provide structure for the instructional guidelines: Provide Multiple Means of Representation (the what of learning). Students differ in the ways that they perceive and comprehend information that is presented to them. Provide Multiple Means of Expression (the how of learning). Students differ in the ways that they can navigate a learning environment and express what they know. Provide Multiple Means of Engagement (the why of learning). Students differ markedly in the ways in which they can be engaged or motivated to learn. Some students are highly engaged by spontaneity and novelty while others are disengaged, even frightened, by those aspects, preferring strict routine.

The UDL Principles and Guidelines assist educators in designing flexible lessons and curricula that reduce barriers to learning and provide innovative and supportive learning to meet the needs of all learners. These principles and guidelines can also help educators evaluate existing curriculum goals, materials, methods, and assessments. The framework of Universal Design for Learning provides multiple ways of representing information to meet the needs of all learners. uses learner-centered proactive instructional design that includes both learning strategies and (low to high tech) tools. designs instruction that connects and supports the critical understanding of the big ideas. embeds reflective instructional practice that rapidly responds to learners through continuous feedback, progress monitoring, and databased decision-making. integrates multiple means of expression for students to demonstrate knowledge, understanding, critical thinking and synthesis of ideas. leverages the supports, engagement, and flexibility offered by technology. overcomes instructional, curriculum, and environmental barriers that impede learner success. leverages innovation that emerges from addressing the needs of diverse learners. COMAR REQUIREMENT On May 4, 2010, Governor O Malley signed the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) bill (HB 59/SB 467), establishing a Statewide Task Force to Explore the Incorporation of UDL Principles into Maryland's Education Systems. The Task force s report, A Route for Every Learner, was published in the spring of 2011. In July of 2011, the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) passed the COMAR regulation 13A.03.06.05 Universal Design for Learning. To date, Maryland is the only state with a regulation specifically requiring the implementation of UDL. There are currently nine (9) states that have initiatives underway to incorporate UDL into their school systems and schools. These states include Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota and New Jersey. Beginning in SY 2013-14, this COMAR regulation requires all school districts to develop or revise curricula incorporating UDL and certify they are using UDL principles and guidelines for ongoing curriculum development.

UDL IMPLEMENTATION IN HCPSS Beginning in November 2004, the Department of Special Education (DSE) began exploring UDL through full staff meetings with faculty and support staff. DSE continued work focusing on the UDL Principles in 2005-2006, through the Designing Quality Inclusive Education (DQIE) initiative. In the summer and fall of 2010, staff in the Division of Curriculum, Instruction, and Administration began to explore the principles of UDL. Staff participated in a variety of professional learning opportunities to learn about the principles of UDL and the application of these principles to their work. During workshops held in January, February, and March of 2011, curriculum specialists, coordinators and resource teachers began working toward incorporating the UDL Principles into curriculum writing resources and professional learning experiences offered in the summer of 2011. During this time, HCPSS also led the development of and launched the blended learning course, the interactive Educator Checklist wheel, and the UDLinks mobile application. The continued implementation of the UDL Principles into the instructional program directly supports translating the vision of the strategic plan into reality. This work supports the following strategies from the strategic plan: Strategy 1.1.2 Strategy 1.1.3 Strategy 1.2.3 Strategy 1.4.3 Strategy 1.4.4 Strategy 1.6.2 Strategy 2.1.5 Embed multiple opportunities for acceleration into the instructional program. Provide learning experiences that promote depth of knowledge. Incorporate inclusive practices and presumed competence of students with disabilities. Provide personalized education experiences. Provide authentic learning experiences to solve real-world problems. Implement assessments (formative and summative) that account for growth, and provide timely, meaningful information to help teachers adjust instruction. Provide professional learning to foster effective communication, respect, and collaboration in a diverse environment. The following actions are underway in HCPSS to address the implementation of UDL in curricula, instructional materials, instruction, professional development, and student assessment. 1. Establish a UDL workgroup to address challenges, align efforts, and develop strategies for system-wide implementation.

2. Provide the Universal Design for Learning and Next Generation Teaching and Learning course (#11-13-05) developed by and taught by HCPSS staff as a continuing Professional Development offering. This is a blended course that uses technology tools and resources and models best practice in UDL for participants. 3. Incorporate UDL principles into the unit plan template being used for new units of study aligned with Common Core. All curricular areas are required to include UDL principles and guidelines in their instructional materials beginning in 2012-13. 4. Support professional learning system wide by maintaining a website with resources, information, and videos related to UDL. (http://udlhcpss.weebly.com) 5. Develop resources, presentations, and materials to support curriculum writing and revision of curricular units. (http://udlhcpss.wordpress.com/curriculum-writing-training-materials/) 6. Set a systemic expectation that all educators will grow in their understanding and use of UDL principles and practices. Currently, several HCPSS staff members are members of the state-wide UDL Implementation Network and Workgroup. Meetings convene three times a year and the work centers on goal setting, best practices, research from the field and case studies of how educators across the country are implementing UDL. In future years it will be necessary to: FUTURE DIRECTION Continue development of a variety of learning opportunities for staff and administrators on the principles of UDL and their applications to the classroom. Provide more options for blended learning opportunities to learn about UDL and how to connect these ideas to existing county initiatives. Enhance criteria for the selection of instructional materials to strengthen the focus on UDL. Use UDL when choosing student assessment systems and technology systems for student and staff use.